Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri

Yıl: 2008 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 7 Sayfa Aralığı: 119 - 143 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri

Öz:
Bu araştırmada kurumsallaşmanın küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmelerin performansına etkileri incelenmektedir. Kurumsallaşma kavramının unsurları olarak formalleşme, otonomi, profesyonelleşme, kültürel güç, saydamlık, sosyal sorumluluk ve tutarlılık önerilmektedir. İşletme performansı olarak işlevsel performans, çıktı performansı ve yenilik ve uyum sağlama performansı incelenmektedir. Araştırmadaki kavramlar arasındaki ilişkiler hipotezlendirilmiş ve bunları test etmek için Türkiye’de farklı sektörlerdeki küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmelerden anket yöntemiyle veriler elde edilerek, regrasyon yöntemiyle çeşitli analizler yapılmıştır. Analizlerin sonuçlarından elde edilen bulgular, literatürdeki araştırmaları kısmen desteklemektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Effects of Institutionalization on the Performance of Small and Medium Size Firms

Öz:
In this research, effects of institutionalization on the performance of small and medium size firms are searched. The dimensions of institutionalization are proposed as formalization, autonomy, professionalization, cultural strength, transparency, social responsibility and consistency. Effectiveness, efficiency, and innovation and adaptability are examined as performance dimensions of firms. The relations between the concepts are hypothesized and tested using the data obtained from small and medium sized companies in different industries in Turkey with questionnaire forms and some regression analyses have been conducted to test the hypotheses. Some of the results of the analyses support the researches in the literature.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Apaydın, F. (2007), "Örgütlerde Kurumsallaşma ve Adaptif Yeteneklerin Pazarlama Eylemlerine ve Örgütsel Performansa Etkileri”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, 2007.
  • Begley, T. M. ve D. P. Boyd (1987), “Psychological Characteristics Associated with Performance in Entrepreneurial Firms and Smaller Businesses”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 2, pp. 79-93.
  • Cavuşgil, S. T. ve S. Zou (1994), “Marketing Strategy–Performance Relationship: An Investigation of the Empirical Link in Export Market Ventures”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 1-21.
  • Chakravarthy, B. S. (1986), “Measuring Strategic Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 437-458.
  • Cohen, A. ve Y. Kol (2004), “Professionalism and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: An Empirical Examination among Israeli Nurses”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 386-405.
  • Covin, J. G. ve T. Covin (1990), “Competitive Aggressiveness, Environmental Context, and Small Firm Performance”, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 35-50.
  • Dando, N. ve T. Swift (2003), “Transparency and Assurance: Minding the Credibility Gap”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 44, No. 2/3, pp. 195-200.
  • Davis, G. F. (1991), “Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, pp. 583-613.
  • Day, G. S. (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 37-52.
  • Dekimpe, M. G. ve D. M. Hanssens (1999), “Sustained Spending and Persistent Response: A New Look at Long-Term Marketing Profitability”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 397-412.
  • Denison, D. R. (1990), Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness, New York: Wiley.
  • Deshpande, R., J. U. Farley ve F. E. WEBSTER, JR. (1993), “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 23-37.
  • DiMaggio, P. J. ve W. W. Powell (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”, in W. W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (Ed.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis: 1991, pp. 63-82. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
  • Ergün, E., E. Eren, L. Alpkan, C. Yılmaz ve R. Kaynak (2003), “Moderating Effects of Market Dynamism on the Relationship between Basic Cultural Assumptions and Firm Performance”, The Global Business and Technology Association.
  • Frazier, G. L. (1999), “Organizing and Managing Channels of Distribution”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 226-240.
  • Gatignon, H. ve J. Xuereb (1997), “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 77-90.
  • Gottlieb, J. Z. ve J. Sanzgiri (1996), “Towards an Ethical Dimension of Decision Making in Organization”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 15, No. 12, pp. 1275-1285.
  • Greening, D. W. ve B. Gray (1994), “Testing a Model of Organizational Response to Social and Political Issues”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 467-498.
  • Hall, R. H. (1968), “Professionalization and Bureaucratization”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 92-104.
  • Hall, R. (1976), “A System Pathology of an Organization: The Rise and Fall of the Old Saturday Evening Post”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 185-211.
  • Hansen, G. S. ve B. Wernerfelt (1989), “Determinants of Firm Performance: The Relative Importance of Economic and Organizational Factors”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 399-411.
  • Hartline, M. D., J. G. Maxham III ve D. O. McKEE (2000), “Corridors of Influence in the Dissemination of Customer-Oriented Strategy to Customer Contact Service Employee”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 35-50.
  • Harts, S. L. (1992), “An Integrative Framework for Strategy-Making Process”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 17, pp. 327-351.
  • Homburg, C., W. D. Hoyer ve M. Fassnacht (2002), “Service Orientation of a Retailer’s Business Strategy: Dimensions, Antecedents, and Performance Outcomes”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 86-101.
  • Jaworski, B. J. ve K. A. Merchant (1988), “Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 23-39.
  • Kimberly J. R. (1978), “Hospital Adoption of Innovation: The Role of Integration into External Informational Environments”, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 361-373.
  • Kostova, T. (1999), “Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 308-324.
  • Kraatz, M. ve E. Zajac (1996), “Exploring the Limits of the New Institutionalism: The Causes and Consequences of Illegitimate Organizational Change”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, pp. 812-836.
  • Lumpkin, G. T. ve G. G. Dess (1996), “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 135-172.
  • Matsuno, K., J. T. Mentzer, ve A. Özsomer (2002), “The Effects of Entrepreneurial Proclivity and Market Orientation on Business Performance”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 18-32.
  • McKee, D. O., P. R. Varadarajan ve W. M. Pride (1989), “Strategic Adaptability and Firm Performance: A Market-Contingent Perspective”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 21-35.
  • McWilliams, A. ve D. Siegel (2001), “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 117-127.
  • Meyer, J. W. ve B. Rowan (1977), “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structures as Myth and Ceremony”, in W. W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (Ed.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis: 1991, pp. 41- 62. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
  • Miller, R. L., W. F. Lewis ve J. P. Merenski (1985), “A Value Exchange Model for the Channel of Distribution: Implications for Management and Research”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1-17.
  • Milne, M. J. ve D. M. Patten (2002), “Securing Organizational Legitimacy: An Experimental Decision Case Examining the Impact of Environmental Disclosures”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 372-397.
  • Morgan, R. M. ve S. D. Hunt (1994), “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No.3, pp. 20-38.
  • Noble, C. H., R. K. Sinha, ve A. Kumar (2002), “Market Orientation and Alternative Strategic Orientations: A Longitudinal Assessment of Performance Implications”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 25-39.
  • Pelham, A. M. ve D. T. Wilson (1996), “A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Market Structure, Firm Structure, Strategy, and Market Orientation Culture on Dimensions of Small-Firm Performance”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 27-43.
  • Quinn, R. ve K. Cameron (1983), “Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence”, Management Science, Vol. 29, pp. 33-51.
  • Ruekert, R. W., O. C. Walker, Jr. ve K. J. Roering (1985), “The Organization of Marketing Activities: A Contingency Theory of Structure and Performance”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 13-25.
  • Rust, R. T., C. Moorman ve P. R. Dickson (2002), “Getting Return on Quality: Revenue Expansion, Cost Reduction, or Both?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 7-24.
  • Scott, W. R. (1987), “The Adolescence of Institutional Theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 493-511.
  • Selznick, P. (1996), “Institutionalism “Old” and “New” ”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 270-277.
  • Shrivastava, P. ve J. H. Grant (1985), “Empirically Derived Models of Strategic Decision-Making Processes”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 97-113.
  • Staggenborg, S. (1988), “The Consequences of Professionalization and Formalization in the Pro-choice Movement”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 585-606.
  • Straw, B., L. Sandelands, ve J. Dutton, (1981), “Threat-rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel and Reorientation”, In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7, pp. 171-232. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
  • Swait, J. ve T. Erdem (2002), “The Effects of Temporal Consistency of Sales Promotions and Availability on Consumer Choice Behavior”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 304-320.
  • Szymanski, D. M., S. G. Bharadwaj ve P. R. Varadarajan (1993), “An Analysis of the Market Share-Profitability Relationship”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 1-18.
  • Venkatraman, N. (1989), “Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises: The Construct, Dimensionality, and Measurement”, Management Science, Vol. 35, pp. 942-962.
  • Waddock, S. (2004), “Creating Corporate Accountability: Foundational Principles to Make Corporate Citizenship Real”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 313-327.
  • Walker, O. C. Jr. ve R. W. Ruekert (1987), “Marketing’s Role in the Implementation of Business Strategies: A Critical Review and Conceptual Framework”,Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 15-33.
  • Walker, O. C. Jr. (1997), “The Adaptability of Network Organizations: Some Unexplored Questions”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 75-82.
  • Wallace, J. E. (1995), “Organizational and Professional Commitment in Professional and Nonprofessional Organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly,Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 228-255.
  • Westphal, J. D., R. Gulati ve S. M. Shortell (1997), “Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, No.2, pp.366-394.
  • Yılmaz, C., L. Alpkan ve E. Ergün (2005), “Cultural Determinants of Customer- and Learning-Oriented Value Systems and Their Joint Effects on Firm Performance”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, pp. 1340-1352.
  • Zahra, S. A. ve J. G. Covin (1995), “Contextual Influences on the Corporate Entrepreneurship-Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 10, pp. 43-58.
  • Zajac, E. J. ve J. D. Westphal (2004), “The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 433-457.
  • Zucker, L. G. (1977), “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence”, in W. W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (Ed.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis: 1991, pp. 63-82. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
APA APAYDIN F (2008). Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri. , 119 - 143.
Chicago APAYDIN Fahri Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri. (2008): 119 - 143.
MLA APAYDIN Fahri Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri. , 2008, ss.119 - 143.
AMA APAYDIN F Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri. . 2008; 119 - 143.
Vancouver APAYDIN F Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri. . 2008; 119 - 143.
IEEE APAYDIN F "Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri." , ss.119 - 143, 2008.
ISNAD APAYDIN, Fahri. "Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri". (2008), 119-143.
APA APAYDIN F (2008). Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(7), 119 - 143.
Chicago APAYDIN Fahri Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 4, no.7 (2008): 119 - 143.
MLA APAYDIN Fahri Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.4, no.7, 2008, ss.119 - 143.
AMA APAYDIN F Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2008; 4(7): 119 - 143.
Vancouver APAYDIN F Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2008; 4(7): 119 - 143.
IEEE APAYDIN F "Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri." Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4, ss.119 - 143, 2008.
ISNAD APAYDIN, Fahri. "Kurumsallaşmanın Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerin Performansına Etkileri". Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 4/7 (2008), 119-143.