Yıl: 2005 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 24 Sayfa Aralığı: 217 - 228 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level

Öz:
Özet: Beşeri sermaye, ekonomik büyümenin bir kaynağı olarak önemli bir role sahiptir. Daha eğitimli ve deneyimli çalışanların ekonomik verimliliği ve büyümeyi arttırdığı büyük ölçüde kabul edilmektedir. Bu yüzden becerileri, eğitim ve öğretim sistemini geliştirmeye yönelik çabalar mevcuttur. Beşeri sermaye bireylerin gelir dizeylerini yükselttiği için de bu alanda yatırımlar yapılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, büyümede böylesine önemli bir kaynağın eğitim düzeyi, istihdam oranı, işsizlik oranı ve kazanç verileri yardımıyla G-7 ülkelerindeki kullanımı incelenmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla, G-7 ülkelerinin işgücü piyasası ele alınarak eğitim düzeyine göre alınan ücret ve işsizlik oranı karşılaştırılmıştır. Bu çalışma sonucunda, bu ülkelerde işsizliğin olduğu ve yüksek eğitim düzeyinde işsizlik oranının düşük, ücretlerin ise yüksek olduğu görülmüştür.
Anahtar Kelime: gelişmiş ülkeler eğitim düzeyi istihdam oranı beşeri sermaye işsizlik ekonomik büyüme gelir düzeyi g-7 ülkeleri insan kaynakları işgücü planlaması

G-7 Ülkelerinde Beşeri Sermaye Kullanımının Eğitim Düzeyine Göre Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Abstract: The role of human capital is important as a source of economic growth in the present economic environment. There is widespread acceptance that better education and trained workers increase productivity and economic growth rate. In this process, there is a huge struggle to improve the education and training systems and to improve human skills. They usually raise income for everyone. Therefore, people invest in human capital. This paper represents a new view of the use of human capital in G-7 countries with data of level of population on education, employment, unemployment rates and earnings. The focus is a view on labour market to compare unemployment rate and wages according to educational level of G-7 countries. In the conclusion of this paper, it is seen that there is unemployment in these countries, and the rate of unemployment is low and the wages are high for high-skilled and highly educated workers.
Anahtar Kelime: income level g-7 countries human resources labor planning developed countries education level employment rate human capital unemployment economic growth

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1]Becker, G.S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. 3rd Ed. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • [2] Jones, F. Human Capital and Use of Time. Statistics Canada, 79,(http ://www.statcan.ca/english/research/ 11F0019MIE/1 lF0019MIE1995079.pdq [21.01.2003].
  • [3] Hornbeck, D.W. & Salamon, L.M. (1991). Human Capital and America's Future: An Economic Strategy for the '90s. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • [4] Mincer,J.(1989).Human Capital Reponses To Technological Change in the Labour Market. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 3207. (http://netec.mcc.ac.uk/HoPEc/geminiabout.htmn. [21.012003].
  • [5] OECD. (2001). The Well-Being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. (http://www.oecd.org/pdf /M00021000/M00021936.pdf). [30.01.2003].
  • [6] Kiker, B.F. (1966). The Historical Roots of Concept of Human Capital. Journal of Political Economy, 1A, 481 -499.
  • [7] Kiker, B.F. (1966). The Historical Roots of Concept of Human Capital. (Ed. Kiker, B.F.). (1971). Investment in Human Capital. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.
  • [8] Schultz, T.W. (1971). Investment in Human Capital: The Role of Education and Research. New York: The Free Press.
  • [9] Farr, W. (1853). Equitable Taxation of Property. Royal Stat is. Soc, XVI, March, 1-45.
  • [10] Dublin, L. & Lotka, A. (1930). The Money Value of Man. New York: Ronald Press Co.
  • [11]OECD.(1998).Human Capital Investment:An International Comparison. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
  • [12] Healy, T. (1998). Counting Human Capital. The OECD Observer, 212, June/July. (http://www.oecd.org/ publications/observer/212/Article8eng.htmn. [21.01.2003].
  • [13]Hartög, J. (1999). Behind the Veil of Human Capital. Columbia International Affairs Online. The OECD Observer, 215, January. (http://www.ciaonet.org/ pbeifimhtmn. [21.01.2003].
  • [14] IMF. (1993). World Economic Outlook. May. [15] IMF. (1997). World Economic Outlook. October.
  • [16] IMF. (2001). World Economic Outlook. October. [17] IMF. (2002). World Economic Outlook. September.
  • [18] Becker, G.S. Human Capital. The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. (http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/ HumanCapital.htmn. [24.01.2003].
  • [19] Ok, W. & Tergeist, P. (2002). Supporting Economic Growth Through continuous Education and Training -Some Preliminary Results. Meeting of National Economic Research Organisations, OECD Headquarters. Paris, 1st July. (http://oecd.org/doc/M00031000/M00031739.doc). [30.01.2003].
  • [20] Barro, R.J. (2003). Education and Economic Growth. (http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00008000/M00008442.pdf). [30.01.2003].
  • [21] OECD, (2002), Employment Outlook 2002 Statistical Annex., Vol. I 2002, no. 76 6. (http://iris.sourceoecd.org/ vl=3289868/cl=92/nw=l/rpsv/~6672/v2002n6/s9/p316). [30.01.2003].
  • [22] Melody, W.H. (2002). The Triumph and Tragedy of Human Capital: Foundation Resource for Building Network Knowledge Economies, (http://link.wits.ca.za/ papers/wm20020918.pdf). [21.01.2003].
  • [23] OECD. (2001). Trends in International Migration: Continuous Reporting System on Migration. Annual Report, (http://www.oecd.org1. [20.03.2003].
  • [24] Heckman, J.J. (2000). Policies to Foster Human Capital. The Harris School Working Paper Series, Supplement 14. (http://www.ounceofprevention.org/publications/pdf/Foster ing Human Capital.pdf). [30.01.2003].
  • [25] Hoquet, L. (1998). Vocational training as a Force of Equality? Training Opportunities and Outcomes in France and Britain. Document de travail Laboratoire de Microeconomie Appliquee.
  • [26] Acemoglu, D. & Pischke, J.S. (1998). Why Do Firms Train? Theory and Evidence. NBRE Working Paper Series, 5605. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113,79-119.
  • [27] Pischke, J.S. (2000). Continuous Training in Germany. CEPR Discussion Paper Series, 2428.
  • [28] Blundell, R.; Dearden, L. & Meghir, C. (1999). Work-related Training and Earning. DFEE mimeo.
  • [29] Booth, A.; Zoega, G. & Francesconi, M. (1999). Training, rent -sharing and Unions. CEPR Discussion Paper Series, 2200.
  • [30] Cosh, A.; Hughes, A. & Weeks, M. (2000). The Relationship between Training and Employment Growth in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. DFEE Research Report, RR245.
  • [31] Dearden, L.; Reed, H. & Van Reenen, J. (2000). Who Gain When Workers Train? The Institute for Fiscal Studies Working Papers, WP00/04.
  • [32] Green, F.; Ashton, D. & Felstead, A. (2001). Estimating the Determinants of Supply of Computing, Problem-solving, Communication, Social, and Teamworking Skills. Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 406-433.
  • [33] Black, S. & Lynch, L. (1996). Human Capital Investment and productivity. American Economic Review, 86(2), 263-267.
  • [34] Blöndal, S.; Field, S. & Girouard, N. (2002). Investment in Human Capital Through Upper Secondary And Tertiary Education.ÇECD Economic Studies,34, fhttp://ww.oecd.org/pdf/M00039000/M00039266pdf). [03.03.2003],
  • [35] OECD, (2002). Education at a Glance 2002- Tables. September 03, 2003. (http:www.oecd.Org/dataoecd/8/41/ 1962701.xls). [30.01.2003).
APA ERTEKİN M (2005). The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level. , 217 - 228.
Chicago ERTEKİN Meriç S. The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level. (2005): 217 - 228.
MLA ERTEKİN Meriç S. The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level. , 2005, ss.217 - 228.
AMA ERTEKİN M The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level. . 2005; 217 - 228.
Vancouver ERTEKİN M The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level. . 2005; 217 - 228.
IEEE ERTEKİN M "The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level." , ss.217 - 228, 2005.
ISNAD ERTEKİN, Meriç S.. "The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level". (2005), 217-228.
APA ERTEKİN M (2005). The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level. ÖNERİ, 6(24), 217 - 228.
Chicago ERTEKİN Meriç S. The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level. ÖNERİ 6, no.24 (2005): 217 - 228.
MLA ERTEKİN Meriç S. The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level. ÖNERİ, vol.6, no.24, 2005, ss.217 - 228.
AMA ERTEKİN M The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level. ÖNERİ. 2005; 6(24): 217 - 228.
Vancouver ERTEKİN M The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level. ÖNERİ. 2005; 6(24): 217 - 228.
IEEE ERTEKİN M "The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level." ÖNERİ, 6, ss.217 - 228, 2005.
ISNAD ERTEKİN, Meriç S.. "The Evaluation of Using of Human Capital in G-7 Countries: According to Educational Level". ÖNERİ 6/24 (2005), 217-228.