Yıl: 2008 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 247 - 265 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard

Öz:
Geleneksel muhasebe tabanlı performans ölçme yöntemleri sadece geçmişe yönelik bilgiler sunması, kısa döneme fazla odaklanması ve çok özet bilgiler içermesinden dolayı uzun zamandır eleştirilmekte ve yetersiz bulunmaktadır. Kaplan ve Norton, Balanced Scorecard yöntemini performans ölçme ve stratejik yönetim yazınında yeni ve sistemli bir yaklaşım olarak tanıtmaktadırlar. Balanced Scorecard yöneticilere işletme misyonunun, vizyonunun ve stratejisinin, finansal ve finansal olmayan performans ölçüleri setine dönüş¬türüldüğü bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Bu yöntemde geleneksel olarak kurumsal performans değerlendirmede kullanılan finansal ölçüler, müşteri boyutu, iç süreçler boyutu ile öğrenme ve gelişme boyutundaki finansal olmayan performans ölçülerinin kullanımı ile desteklenmektedir. Balanced Scorecard’ın en temel özelliği kurumsal stratejik amaçlar ile performans ölçüleri arasında bir bağ kurması ve bu bağı ön plana çıkarmasıdır. Buna ek olarak bu yöntem kurumların uzun dönemli kararları ile kısa dönemli kararları, iç ve dış çevresi arasında bir denge sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada Balanced Scorecard’ın kuramsal yapısı incelenerek, bu yöntemde kullanılabilecek boyutlar ve performans ölçüleri açıklanmakta, yöntemin kısıtları ve geleceğine ilişkin tartışmalara yer verilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat

The Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management Model

Öz:
Traditional accounting based performance measurement systems have been criticized for a long time as being too backward looking, too short term focusing, too aggregate and considered insufficient. Kaplan and Norton introduced the Balanced Scorecard as a new, systematic approach on performance measurement and strategic management literature. The balanced scorecard provides management with a comprehensive framework that translates a company’s mission, vision and strategy into a coherent set of financial and nonfinancial performance measures. The balanced scorecard supplements traditional financial measures with measures from three additional perspectives: those of customers, internal business processes, and learning and growth. A key feature of the balanced scorecard is its emphasis on linking the performance measures with organizational strategic objectives. In addition it provides the balance between short and long term decisions, internal and external environment of organizations. This paper analyzes theoretical background of balanced scorecard, explains perspectives and performance measures can be used in scorecards and debates limitations and future of the balanced scorecard.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • ACHTERBERGH, Jan; BEERES, Robert ve VRİENS, Dirk. (2003), “Does The Balanced Scorecard Organizational Viability?”, Emerald, Vol. 32, No. 9/10, pp. 1387-1404.
  • ADMIRAAL, R. J. ve VAN HELDEN J.G. (2003), “Benchmarking in the Dutch Waste - Water Treatment Sector”, Public Money & Management, April, pp. 113-118.
  • AMARATUNGA, D.; BALDRY, D. ve SARSHAR, M. (2001), “Process İmprovement Through Performance Measurement: The Balanced Scorecard Methodology”, Work Study, Vol. 50, No: 5, pp. 179-188.
  • ATKINSON, A.; WATERHOUSE, J. ve WELLS, R. (1997), “A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, No:3, pp. 25-40.
  • ALLEE, Verna (1999), “The art and practice of being a revolutionary”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 3 No: 2, pp. 121-131.
  • AUGER, N. ve ROY D. A. (2004), “The Balanced Scorecard: A Tool For Health Policy Decision-Making”, Canadian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 95 No:.3, pp. 233-234.
  • BARSKY, N.P. ve BREMSER, W.G. (1999), “Performance measurement, budgeting and strategic implementation in the multinational enterprise”, Managerial Finance, Vol. 25 No: 2, pp. 3-15.
  • BEAN, L. ve JARNAGIN, B.D. (2002), “New Cost Priorities: Using a Balanced Scorecard Approach in Financial Reports”, The Journal of Corporate Accounting, March-April, pp 55-62.
  • BOURGUIGNON, A.; MALLERT, V. ve NORREKLIT, H. (2004), “The American Balanced Scorecard Versus the French Tableau de Bord: The Ideological Dimension”, Management Accounting Research, Vol.15, pp. 107-134.
  • BRAAM, Geert J.M. ve NIJSSEN, Edwin J. (2004), “Performance Effects of Using the Balanced Scorecard: A Note on the Dutch Experience”, Long Range Planning, Vol.37, pp. 335-349.
  • BREMSER, Wayne G. ve BARSKY, Noah P. (2004), “Utilizing the Balanced Scorecard for R&D Performance measurement”, R&D Management, Vol. 34 No:3, pp. 229-238.
  • BREWER, P.C.; ALBRIGHT, T. ve DAVIS, S. (2004), “Security Regional Bank: Implementing A Balanced Scorecard Using the Business Modeling Approach”, The Journal of Corparate Accounting & Finance, July/August, pp. 73-83.
  • CALABRO, Lori. (2001), “On Balance”, The Magazine for Senior Financial Executives, February, pp. 73-76.
  • CHAN, Y.K.; GAFFNEY, P. ve NEAILEY, K. (2002), “Achieving Breakthrough Performance Improvement: Results of Implementing a Fit-Forpurposetotal Management System”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 14 No: 5, pp. 293-296.
  • CHAN, Yee-Ching Lilian. (2004), “Performance Measurement and Adoption of Balanced Scorecards”, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 17; No: 3, pp. 204-221.
  • CULLEN, John., JOYCE, John., HASSAL, Trevor ve BROADBENT, Mick. (2003), “Quality in Higher Education: From Monitoring to Management”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 11 No: 1, pp. 5-14.
  • DAVIS, Tim R.V. (1996), “Developing an Employee Balanced Scorecard: Linking Frontline Performance to Corporate Objectives, Management Decision, Vol. 34 No:4, pp. 14-18.
  • DAVIS, Stan ve ALBRIGHT, Tom. (2004), ”An Investigation of the Effect of Balanced Scorecard Implementation on Financial Performance”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 15, ,pp. 135-153.
  • DE WAAL, Andre A. (2003), “The future of the Balanced Scorecard; an interview with Prof. Dr. Robert S. Kaplan”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 7 No:1, pp. 30-35.
  • DEVLET PLANLAMA TEŞKİLATI, (2000), Küreselleşme, Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, DPT Yayını, Ankara.
  • EPSTEIN, Marc J. ve WISNER, Priscilla S. (2001), “Using a Balanced Scorecard to Implement Sustainability”, Environmental Quality Management, Wınter, pp.1-10.
  • ERENSAL, Yasemin C. (2004), “Eğitim Yatırımlarının Performansı: Eğitim Yatırımlarının Geri Dönüş Oranının Hesaplanmasında Yöntemsel Yeni Bir Yaklaşım” Yöneylem Araştırması/ Endüstri Mühendisliği XXIV. Kongresi, Haziran.
  • ERKAN, Hüsnü. (1998), Bilgi Toplumu ve Ekonomik Gelişme, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, Ankara.
  • ERKUŞ, Hakan. (2003), “Entelektüel Sermayenin Ölçütlmesi ve Raporlanması”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Malatya
  • GHALAYINI, A. M. ve NOBLE, J. S. (1996), “The changing basis of performance measurement”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol.16 No:8, pp. 63-80.
  • GOOIJER, J. (2000), “Designing a knowledge management performance framework”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 4 No:4, pp. 303-310.
  • GRIFFITHS, John. (2003), “Balanced Scorecard Use in New Zealand Goverment Departments and Crown Entities”, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 2 No:4, pp. 70-79.
  • HO, Shih-Jen Kathy ve MCKAY, Ruth B. (2000), “Balanced Scorecard Two Perspective”, The CPA Journal, March, pp. 21-25.
  • HOQUE, Z. ve JAMES, W. (2000), “Linking Balanced Scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, pp. 1-17.
  • HORNSBY, D.D. ve BAXENDALE, S. (2001), “Building a Balanced Scorecard for Entrepreneurs”, Journal of Cost Management, November-December, pp. 4-9.
  • HUMPHERY,Christopher. (2001), “Paper Prophets and The Continuing Case For Thinking Differently About Accounting Research”, British Accounting Review, No: 33, pp. 91-133.
  • ITTNER,C.D. ve LARCKER, D.F. (1998), “Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 205-238.
  • KAPLAN, Robert S. (1983), Measuring manufacturing performance: A new challenge for managerial accounting research. The Accounting Review, October, pp. 686-705.
  • KAPLAN, Robert S. (2001), “Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Nonprofit Organizations”, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, Spring, pp. 353-370.
  • KAPLAN, R.S. ve NORTON, D.P. (1992), “The Balanced Scorecard - measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70, No:1, pp. 71-79.
  • KAPLAN, R.S. ve NORTON, D.P. (1996), “Using the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic management system”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74 No: 1, pp. 75-85.
  • KAPLAN, R.S. ve NORTON, D.P. (1999), Balanced Scorecard, Şirket Stratejisini Eyleme Dönüştürmek, Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul
  • KAPLAN, R.S. ve NORTON, D.P. (2001), “Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management” Part 1, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 15, No: 1, pp. 87-104.
  • KAPLAN, R.S. ve NORTON, D.P. (2001), “Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management” Part 2, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 15, No: 2, pp. 106-125
  • KAPLAN, R.S. ve NORTON, D.P. (2001), The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment, Harvard Business School Pres
  • KAPLAN, R.S. ve NORTON, D.P. (2004), “The strategy map: guide to aligning intangible assets”, Strategy and Leadership, Vol. 32, No:5, pp. 10-17.
  • KERSHAW, Russ ve KERSHAW, Susan. (2001), “Developing a Balanced Scorecard to Implement Strategy at St. Elsewhere Hospital”, Management Accounting Quarterly, Winter, pp. 28-35.
  • KLOOT, Louise ve MARTIN, John (2000), “Strategic performance management: A balanced approach to performance management issues in local government”, Management Accounting Research, Vol: 11, pp. 231-251.
  • KOÇEL, Tamer (1993), İşletme Yöneticiliği: Yönetici Geliştirme, Organizasyonu ve Davranışı, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul
  • LETZA, Stephen R. (1996), “The design and implementation of the balanced business scorecard”, Business Process Re-engineering and Management Journal, Vol. 2, No: 3, pp. 54-76.
  • LOPES, J.L. Rangel. (1996), “Corporate Real Estate Management Features”, Facilities, Vol. 14, No: 7/8, pp. 6-11.
  • MALMI, Teemu (2001), “Balanced Scorecard in Finnish Companies: A Research Note”, Management Accounting Research, Vol.12, pp. 207-220.
  • MCADAM, R. ve WALKER, T. (2003), “An Inquiry into Balanced Scorecard Within Best Value Implemantation in UK Local Goverment”, Public Administration, Vol. 81, No: 4, pp. 873-892.
  • MEARNS, K. ve HAVOLD, J.I. (2003), “Occupational Health and Safety and the Balanced Scorecard”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 15, No:6, pp. 408-423.
  • NEELY, Andy (1999), “The Performance Measurement Revolution: Why Now and What Next?”, International Journal of Operations and production Management, Vol. 19, No:2, pp. 205-228.
  • NIVEN, Paul R. (2002), Balanced scorecard step by step, John Wiley and Sons Inc., London.
  • NIVEN, Paul R. (2004), Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step for Government and Nonprofit Agencies, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.London.
  • NORREKLIT, H. (2000), “The balance on the balanced scorecard a critical analysis of some of its assumptions”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11 No:1, pp. 65-88.
  • NORREKLIT, H. (2003), “The Balanced Scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the Balanced Scorecard”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28 (6), pp. 591-619
  • OTLEY, David. (1999), “Performance management: a framework for management control systems research”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, pp. 363-382.
  • ÖLÇER, Ferit (2005), “Dengeli Stratejik Performans Ölçüm ve Yönetim Sistemi’nin (Balanced Scorecard) Tasarımı ve Uygulanması”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt:38, Sayı:2 , ss. 89-134.
  • PINENO, Charles J. (2002), “The balanced scorecard: An incremental approach model to health care management”, Journal of Health Care Management, Summer, pp. 45-58.
  • RITTER, Michael. (2003), “The use of balanced scorecard in the strategic management of corporate communication”, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 8, No: 1, pp. 44-59.
  • SANGER, Mark. (1998), “Supporting the balanced scorecard”, Work Study, Vol. 47, No: 6, pp. 197-200.
  • SIM, Khim Ling ve KOH, Hian Chye. (2001), “Balanced Scorecard: A Rising Trend in Strategic Performance Measurement”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 5 No.2, pp. 18-26.
  • SPECKBACHER, Gerhard., BISCHOF, Juergen ve PFEIFFER, Thomas. (2003), “A Descriptive Analysis on the Implementation of Balanced Scorecards in German-Speaking Countries, Management Accounting Research, Vol.14, pp. 361-387.
  • STOREY, Anne (2002), “Performance Management in Schools: could the Balanced Scorecard help?” School Leadership and Management, Vol. 22 No: 3, pp. 321-338.
  • WALKER, Garret ve MACDONALD, Randall. (2001), “Designing and Implementing an HR Scorecard”, Human Resource Management, Vol. 40, No:4, pp. 365-377.
APA GÜNER M (2008). Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard. , 247 - 265.
Chicago GÜNER M. Fatih Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard. (2008): 247 - 265.
MLA GÜNER M. Fatih Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard. , 2008, ss.247 - 265.
AMA GÜNER M Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard. . 2008; 247 - 265.
Vancouver GÜNER M Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard. . 2008; 247 - 265.
IEEE GÜNER M "Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard." , ss.247 - 265, 2008.
ISNAD GÜNER, M. Fatih. "Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard". (2008), 247-265.
APA GÜNER M (2008). Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 247 - 265.
Chicago GÜNER M. Fatih Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 10, no.1 (2008): 247 - 265.
MLA GÜNER M. Fatih Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.10, no.1, 2008, ss.247 - 265.
AMA GÜNER M Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2008; 10(1): 247 - 265.
Vancouver GÜNER M Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2008; 10(1): 247 - 265.
IEEE GÜNER M "Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard." Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10, ss.247 - 265, 2008.
ISNAD GÜNER, M. Fatih. "Bir Stratejik Yönetim Modeli Olarak Balanced Scorecard". Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 10/1 (2008), 247-265.