Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey

OZBEYAZ, CEYHAN; KOPAR, Ahmet; ERDOĞAN, Metin; UGUZ, CEVDET

Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey

Metin ERDOĞAN, (Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Afyon, Türkiye)

Cevdet UĞUZ, (Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Afyon, Türkiye)

Ahmet KOPAR, (Etlik Merkez Veteriner Kontrol ve Araştırma Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Ceyhan ÖZBEYAZ (Ankara Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)

Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi

3 0

Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 267 - 272 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey

Öz:

Türkiye’de farklı haralarda ve halkelinde yetiştirilen toplam 4067 Arap atı arasındaki genetik farklılıklar ve genetik ilişkiler 16 lokus (5 kan grubu ve 11 protein lokusu) yardımıyla incelendi. FIT (0.019) ve FST (0.034) değerleri pozitif, FIS değeri ise negatif (-0.015) tahmin edilmiştir. Populasyonlar arasIndaki bu farklIlIklar önemli bulunmuştur (P<0.001). Tüm lokuslar üzerinden hesaplanan FST değerleri bölgesel farklılıklardan kaynaklanan toplam genetik varyasyonun %3.4, bireyler arasI farklılıkların ise %96.7 düzeyinde olduğunu yansıtmaktadır. Populasyonlar arasIndaki genetik farklılığı gösteren FST (0.034) önemli bulunmuştur (P<0.001). Her jenerasyon populasyonlar arasında meydana gelen gen akışı 4.48 (Karacabey-Özel çiftlikler) ile 16.72 (Çifteler-Sultansuyu) arasında değişmekte ve ortalama gen akışı ise 7.10 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Kümele analizine göre Çifteler ve Sultansuyu haraları bir küme oluşturmakta, daha sonra bu kümeye sırasıyla Karacabey ve özel çiftlikler katılmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, devlet haralarI, özellikle Çifteler ve Sultansuyu arasInda etkin bir gen akIşInIn olduğu görülmektedir. Özel çiftlikler ve üç devlet harasındaki at populasyonları arasIndaki genetik farklılığın nedeni haralar ile özel çiftlikler arasIndaki düşük genetik göçten kaynaklanabilir

Anahtar Kelime: kümeleme analizi gen akışı Arap atı heterozigotluk at ırkları istatistiksel analizler genetik uzaklık genetik farklılık genetik çeşitlilik

Konular: Veterinerlik

Türkiye'deki Arap atları arasındaki genetik farklılıklar

Öz:

The genetic variability within the Arabian horses and its relationship between three different national studs in Turkey was evaluated using 16 loci (five of blood groups and eleven protein polymorphisms) analyzed in 4055 Arabian horses. The FIT (0.019) and FST (0.034) values estimated for over all loci were positive, while FIS (-0.015) value was negative. The differences among population were found to be statistically significant (P<0.001). The estimated FST for all loci indicated that 3.4% of total genetic variation was originated from the differences among population, whereas 96.7% of genetic variation was originated from the differences among individuals. Genetic diversity computed as FST (0.034) is found to be statistically significant among populations (P<0.001). The gene flows occurred between populations within each generation was ranged from 4.47 for Karacabey and Private Farms and to 16.42 for Çifteler and Sultansuyu studs. The estimated mean gene flow was 7.1 for each generation among populations. According to dendogram, horses in Çifteler and Sultansuyu are forming a group and then Karacabey studs as well as national farms are joining into this group. In conclusion, there is indicated considerably high gene flow among national studs, especially between Çifteler and Sultansuyu. The reason for genetic diversity between horse population in private farms and three national studs may be due to the low genetic flow from these three national studs to private farms.

Anahtar Kelime: horse breeds statistical analysis genetic distance genetic diversity genetic variation cluster analysis gene flow Arab heterozygosity

Konular: Veterinerlik

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. ArpacLk R: At yetiştiriciliği. Şahin Matbaası, Ankara, 1-15, 1996.
2. Girgin ÖF: Türkiye Safkan Arap Atı soy kütüğü. Türkiye Jokey Klübü Yayınları, Vol. 1, İstanbul, Turkey, 1995.
3. Bowling AT: Population genetics of Great Basin feral horses. Anim Genet, 25, 67-74, 1994.
4. Wright S: The theory of gene frequencies. Evolution and the genetics of populations. University of Chicago Press, Vol. 4, 1978.
5. Jordana J, Alexandrino P, Beja-pereira A, Bessa I, Cañon J, Carretero Y, Dunner S, Laloe D, Moazami-Goudarzi K, Sanchez A, Ferrand N: Genetic structure of eighteen local south European beef cattle breeds by comparative F-statistics analysis. J Anim Breed Genet, 120, 1-15, 2003.
6. Ouragh L, Meriaux JC, Braun JP: Genetic blood markers in Arabian, Barb and Arab-Barb horses in Morocco. Anim Genet, 25, 45-47, 1994.
7. Kelly L, Postiglioni A, De Andres DF, Vega-Pla JL, Gagliardi R, Biagetti R, Franco J: Genetic characterization of the Uruguayan Creole horse and analysis of relationships among horse breeds. Res Vet Sci, 72, 69-73, 2002.
8. Nei M: Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, 1987.
9. Weir BS, Cockerham CC: Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-1370, 1984.
10. Nei M, Chesser RK: Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann Hum Genet, 47, 253-259, 1983.
11. Hartl DL, Clark AG: Principles of population genetics. Sinaur Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1989.
12. Nei M: Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89, 583-590, 1978.
13. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR: Numerical Taxonomy: The principle and practice of numerical classification. In, Kenedy D, Park RB (Eds): Taxonomy structure. 134-230, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973.
14. Miller MP: TFPGA (Tools for Population Genetic Analysis). Ver. 1.3., Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 1998.
15. Cañon J, Checa ML, Carleos C, Vega-Pla JL, Vallejo M, Dunner S: The genetic structure of Spanish Celtic horse breeds inferred from microsatellite data. Anim Genet, 31, 39- 48, 2000.
16. Diaz S, Dulout FN, Peral-Garcia P: Greater genetic variability in Argentine Creole than in Thoroughbred horses based on serum protein polymorphisms. Genet Mol Res, 3, 261-265, 2002.
17. Jiskrová I, Glasnák V, Misař D: The use of blood protein polymorphism for determining the genetic distance between the Moravian warm-blooded horse and the Czech warm-blooded and Trakehner horses. Czech J Anim Sci, 47, 98-105, 2002.
18. Shin JA, Yang YH, Kim HS, Yun YM, Lee KK: Genetic polymorphism of the serum proteins of horses in Jeju. J Vet Sci, 34, 255-263, 2002.
19. Erdoğan M, Özbeyaz C: Investigation of Blood Protein Polymorphism and Estimation of Genetic Distances in Some Dog Breeds in Turkey. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 28, 583-590, 2004.
20. Behara AMP, Collins DT, Cothran EG, Gibson JP: Genetic relationships between horse breeds based on microsatellite data: Applications for livestock conservation. http:// cgil.uoguelph.ca/PUB/6wcgalp/6wcBehara.pdf. Accessed: 08.06.2005.
21. Özbeyaz C, YLldLz MA, Çamdeviren H: Türkiye’de yetiştirilen farklW Esmer sWğWr sürüleri arasWndaki genetik ilişkiler. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 25, 453-461, 2001.
22. Nei M, Roychoudhury AK: Genetic relationship and evolution of human races. Evol Biol, 14, 1-59, 1982.
23. Jordana J, Piedrafita J, Sanchez A, Puig P: Comparative Fstatistics analysis of the genetic structure of ten Spanish dog breeds. J Hered, 83, 367-374, 1992.
24. Aberle KS: Untersuchung der Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse, Inzucht und genetischen Distanzen bei den deutschen Kaltblutpferderassen. Hannover, Deutschland, 2003.
25. Rodríguez-Gallardo PP, Aguilar Sánchez P, Vega Plá JL, de Andrés Cara DF: Blood group and protein polymorphism gene frequencies for the Andalusian horse breed. A comparison with four American horse breeds. Arch Zootec, 41, 433-442, 1992.
26. Saitbekova N, Gaillard C, Obexer-Ruff G, Dolf G: Genetic diversity in Swiss goat breeds based on microsatellite analysis. Anim Genet, 30, 36-41, 1999.
27. Trexler JC: Hierarchical organization of genetic variation in the Sailfin Molly, Poecilia latipinna (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution, 42, 995-1005, 1988.

APA	ERDOĞAN M, UGUZ C, KOPAR A, OZBEYAZ C (2009). Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey. , 267 - 272.
Chicago	ERDOĞAN Metin,UGUZ CEVDET,KOPAR Ahmet,OZBEYAZ CEYHAN Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey. (2009): 267 - 272.
MLA	ERDOĞAN Metin,UGUZ CEVDET,KOPAR Ahmet,OZBEYAZ CEYHAN Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey. , 2009, ss.267 - 272.
AMA	ERDOĞAN M,UGUZ C,KOPAR A,OZBEYAZ C Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey. . 2009; 267 - 272.
Vancouver	ERDOĞAN M,UGUZ C,KOPAR A,OZBEYAZ C Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey. . 2009; 267 - 272.
IEEE	ERDOĞAN M,UGUZ C,KOPAR A,OZBEYAZ C "Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey." , ss.267 - 272, 2009.
ISNAD	ERDOĞAN, Metin vd. "Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey". (2009), 267-272.

APA	ERDOĞAN M, UGUZ C, KOPAR A, OZBEYAZ C (2009). Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 267 - 272.
Chicago	ERDOĞAN Metin,UGUZ CEVDET,KOPAR Ahmet,OZBEYAZ CEYHAN Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 15, no.2 (2009): 267 - 272.
MLA	ERDOĞAN Metin,UGUZ CEVDET,KOPAR Ahmet,OZBEYAZ CEYHAN Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.15, no.2, 2009, ss.267 - 272.
AMA	ERDOĞAN M,UGUZ C,KOPAR A,OZBEYAZ C Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009; 15(2): 267 - 272.
Vancouver	ERDOĞAN M,UGUZ C,KOPAR A,OZBEYAZ C Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009; 15(2): 267 - 272.
IEEE	ERDOĞAN M,UGUZ C,KOPAR A,OZBEYAZ C "Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey." Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, ss.267 - 272, 2009.
ISNAD	ERDOĞAN, Metin vd. "Genetic variability among Arabian horses in Turkey". Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 15/2 (2009), 267-272.