Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities

Yıl: 2007 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 98 - 111 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities

Öz:
Bu çalışmaya, İran’da sosyal bilimler alanında eğitim gören lise son sınıf öğrencilerinin başarı ortalamasının diğer alanlardaki öğrencilere kıyasla düşük olduğu gözlemlendiği için başlanılmıştır. Çalışmada, sosyal bilimler öğrencilerinin özyeterlik inancını ve bu inancın İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenme sürecine olan etkilerini araştırmak amaçlanmıştır. Katılımcılar, 80 son sınıf öğrencisi ve lisede görev yapan 20 İngilizce öğretmenidir. Araştırma yöntemi (öğretmen görüşmeleri, sınıf içi gözlemler ve öğrenci günlükleri ile) hem nitel, hem de (yapılandırılmış anket uygulaması ve yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğreniminde başarı ölçümlemesi ile) nicel özelliklere sahiptir. Nicel veri analizinde açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı yaklaşım kullanılmış, nitel veri analizinde ise kikare testi ve korelasyon analizi tercih edilmiştir. Sonuçlar göstermiştir ki, sosyal bilimler öğrencilerinin İngilizce öğrenmede özyeterlikleri düşüktür ve yabancı dil öğrencisi olarak sahip oldukları akademik yeterliğe dair inançları oldukça olumsuzdur. İngilizce öğrenmedeki başarı ile özyeterlik arasında güçlü bir olumlu korelasyon olduğu belirlenmiştir. Nitel veriler, öğrencilerin özyeterliklerinin neden düşük olduğunu ve bunun ne gibi olumsuz sonuçlar doğurduğunu açıklayan önemli bulgular sağlamıştır. Bu çalışmadaki bulguların, öğrencilerin akademik beceri konusunda algılarını şekillendirmede önemli bir rolü bulunan öğretmenlere faydalı olacağı düşünülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Dil ve Dil Bilim

-

Öz:
Observing the low English achievements of Iranian senior high school students majoring in humanities as compared with those of the other majors motivated the researcher to set out this study. The reseracher investigated the humanities students’ English self-efficacy beliefs, and examined the contributions they make to their EFL achievements. A total of 80 senior high school students and 20 high school English teachers participated in the study. The methodology underlying the study was both qualitative (teacher interviews, classroom observations, and student diaries) and quantitative (through the implementation of a structured questionnaire and a measure of EFL achievement). The approach was both exploratory and confirmatory in design for the qualitative data, while the quantitative data were analyzed using a chi-square test and a set of correlational analysis. The results revealed that the students majoring in humanities had a very weak English self-efficacy and held certain negative beliefs about their academic ability as foreign language learners. A strong positive correlation was found between their EFL achievements and self-efficacy. The qualtitative data provided very rich and invaluable information regarding the sources of their low self-efficacy and its negative consequences. The implications suggested in the study seem to be helpful to teachers, who proved to have a great role in shaping the students’ self-perceptions of their academic abilitiy.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Dil ve Dil Bilim
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Arnold, J. & Brown, H. D. (1999). A map of the terrain. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 1-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • Barnhardt, S. (1997). Self-effiacy and second language learing. The NCLRC Language Resources, 1(5). Retrieved 17th July, 2007 from http://www.Cal.org/nclrc/caidlr15.htm#BMY
  • Baron, A. R. (2004). Social Psychology. (10th ed.). Retrieved 23rd August, 2007 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-efficacy.
  • Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. (4th ed.). Addison Welsey Longman.
  • Chamot, A. U. (1993). Changing instruction for language minority students to achieve national goals. Proceedings of the Third National Resewarch Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student Issues: Focus on Middle and High school Issues. Retrieved 1st June, 2007from http:www. Ncbe.gwu.eduncbepubs/symposium/third/chamot.htm.
  • Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second language skills: Theory to practice. (3rd ed.). USA: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Cheng, Y. (2001). The relationships among language learning self-efficacy, belief in giftedness for language learning, and language anxiety. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 27(2), 75-90.
  • Cotterall, S. (1999). Key variables in language learning: What do learners believe about them? System, 27(4), 493-513.
  • Crozier, W. R. (1997). Individual learners: Personality differences in education. Oxford: OUP.
  • Dornyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign languag classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3) , 273-284.
  • Edmond, R. (2005). Student-Centered Learning Versus Teacher-Centered Learning: Developing a School-Wide Self-Efficacy Plan. Retrieved 13th July, 2007 from http://info.gcsu.edu/intranet/schooled/Research sofDrSmoothstudents.
  • Ergul, H. (2004). Relationship between student characteristics and academic achievement in distance education and application on students of Anadolu university. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 5(2). Retrieved 13th July, 2007 from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde14/articles/ergul.htm
  • Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
  • Graham, S. & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63-84). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
  • Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. The Modern Language Journal, 72(3), 283-294.
  • Kondo, K. (1990). Motivating bilingual and sembiilingual university students of Japanese: An analysis of language learning persistence and intensity among students from immigrant back grounds. Foreign Language Annual, 32(1), 77-89.
  • Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., Noels, K. A., & Clement, R. (1997). Biases in self-ratings of second language proficiency: The role of language anxiety. Language Learning, 47(2), 265-287.
  • Mills, N. (2004). Self-Efficacy of College Intermediate French Students: Relation to Motivation, Achievement, and Proficiency. Retrieved 22nd April, 2007 from http:// www.sas.upenn .edu /~nmills /Dissertation
  • Moskowitz, G. (1981). Effects of humanistic techniques on attitudes, cohesiveness, and selfconcept of foreign language students. The Modern Language Journal, 65(2), 149-157.
  • Nezami, E., Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1996). Persian Adaptation (Farsi) of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Retrieved 29th July, 2007 from userpage.fuberlin. de/~health/persean.htm.
  • Pajares (2002). Overview of Social Cognitive Theory and of Self-Efficacy. Retrieved 19th February, 2007 from http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html
  • Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
  • Pintrich, P. & Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research & applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Siegle, D. (2000). An Introduction to Self-efficacy. Retrieved 18th February, 2006 from http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/self-efficacy/section1.htm1.
  • Tremblay, P. F. & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 505-520.
  • Wen, Q. & Johnson, R. K. (1997). L2 learner variables and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level English majors in China. Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 24-48.
  • Wenden, A. L. (1999). An introduction to metacognitive knowledge and beliefs in language learning: beyond the basics. System, 24(4), 435-441.
APA RAHEMI J (2007). Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities. , 98 - 111.
Chicago RAHEMI Jamileh Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities. (2007): 98 - 111.
MLA RAHEMI Jamileh Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities. , 2007, ss.98 - 111.
AMA RAHEMI J Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities. . 2007; 98 - 111.
Vancouver RAHEMI J Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities. . 2007; 98 - 111.
IEEE RAHEMI J "Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities." , ss.98 - 111, 2007.
ISNAD RAHEMI, Jamileh. "Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities". (2007), 98-111.
APA RAHEMI J (2007). Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities. Novitas-Royal, 1(2), 98 - 111.
Chicago RAHEMI Jamileh Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities. Novitas-Royal 1, no.2 (2007): 98 - 111.
MLA RAHEMI Jamileh Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities. Novitas-Royal, vol.1, no.2, 2007, ss.98 - 111.
AMA RAHEMI J Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities. Novitas-Royal. 2007; 1(2): 98 - 111.
Vancouver RAHEMI J Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities. Novitas-Royal. 2007; 1(2): 98 - 111.
IEEE RAHEMI J "Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities." Novitas-Royal, 1, ss.98 - 111, 2007.
ISNAD RAHEMI, Jamileh. "Self Efficacy in English and Iranian Senior High School Students Majoring in Humanities". Novitas-Royal 1/2 (2007), 98-111.