Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması
Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 22 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması
Öz: İşletme çevre ilişkisini açıklayan kurumsal teori ile ilgili yapılan çok araştırma olmasına rağmen işletmelerin nasıl kurumsallaşacağı somut olarak ortaya konmamıştır. Keşifsel bir araştırma olan bu makale ile bu boşluğun doldurulması hedeflenmektedir. Kurumsallaşma işletmelerin çevresel aktörlerle etkileşimi ile birlikte bilinçsel, düzenleyici ve normatif baskılar sonucunda kararlarını, eylemlerini, süreçlerini ve yapılarını bu baskılara cevap vermek amacıyla yapılandırmaları ve geliştirmeleridir. Bunu yaparak işletmeler kaynaklarını artırmayı, dengeye ulaşmayı ve korumayı, çevreye uyum sağlamayı ve meşrulaşmayı amaçlamaktadırlar. İşletmeler formalleşmeyi sağlayarak, işletme eylem ve kararlarında tutarlılık oluşturarak, güçlü bir örgüt kültürü geliştirerek, hesap verebilir olarak ve profesyonelleşerek kurumsallaşmaktadır. Böylece yaşamlarını sürdürebilmekte ve rekabet avantajı elde edebilmektedirler.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Institutional Theory and Institutionalization of Organizations
Öz: Institutional theory, one of the main theories that examine the interactions between an organization and its environment, explains the reasons why organizations are institutionalizing. Researchers have done many surveys related to this theory. However, they haven’t put forward any abstract propositions on how organizations might institutionalize. This literature survey aims to fill this void. Due to the interactions with their environments, organizations are exposed to three main pressures: cognitive, regulative, and normative. In order to respond to these pressures, managers are making decisions to adapt their behaviors and restructuring and improve their processes and structures. In doing so, managers desire to increase their resources, reach stability, adapt to their environment and achieve legitimacy. To reach these goals which are extremely important to survive and gain a competitive advantage, organizations institutionalize by formalization, professionalization, consistency, accountability, and strong organizational culture.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- ADLER, Paul S. ve Bryan BORYS (1996), “Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (March), 1, 61-89.
- ALFRED, Kieser (1989), “Organizational, Institutional, and Societal Evolution: Medieval Craft Guilds and the Genesis of Formal Organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34 (December), 4, 540-564.
- BOONS, Frank ve Lars STRANNEGARD (2000), “Organizations Coping with Their Natural Environment”, International Studies of Management & Organization, 30 (Fall), 3, 7-17.
- BOYNTON, Andrew C. ve Bart VICTOR (1991), “Beyond Flexibility: Building and Managing the Dynamically Stable Organization”, California Management Review, 34 (Fall), 1, 53-66.
- BURNS, Lawton R. ve Douglas R. WHOLEY (1993), “Adoption and Abandonment of Matrix Management Programs: Effects of Organizational Characteristics and Inter-organizational Networks”, Academy of Management Journal, 36 (February), 1, 106-138.
- COHEN, Aaron ve Yardena KOL (2004), “Professionalism and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: An Empirical Examination among Israeli Nurses”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 4, 386-405.
- D’AUNNO, Thomas, Melissa SUCCI ve Jeffrey A. ALEXANDER (2000), “The Role of Institutional and Market Forces in Divergent Organizational Change”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (December), 4, 679-703.
- FELDMAN, Daniel C. (1984), “The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms”, The Academy of Management Review, 9 (January), 1, 47-53.
- FERRELL, O. C. ve Steven J. SKINNER (1988), “Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations”, Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (February), 1, 103-109.
- FORD, Jeffrey D. ve Deborah A. SCHELLENBERG (1982), “Conceptual Issues of Linkage in the Assessment of Organizational Performance”, The Academy of Management Review, 7 (January), 49-58.
- FOX-WOLFGRAMM, Susan J., Kimberly B. BOAL ve James G. HUNT (1998), “Organizational Adaptation to Institutional Change: A Comparative Study of First-order Change in Prospector and Defender Banks”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (March), 1, 87-126.
- GOTTLIEB, Jonathan Z. ve Jyotsna SANZGIRI (1996), “Towards an Ethical Dimension of Decision Making in Organizations”, Journal of Business Ethics, 15 (December), 12, 1275-1285.
- GREWAL, Rajdeep ve Ravi DHARWADKAR (2002), “The Role of the Institutional Environment in Marketing Channels”, Journal of Marketing, 66 (July), 3, 82-97.
- HALL, Richard H. (1968), “Professionalization and Bureaucratization”, American Sociological Review, 33 (February.), 1, 92-104.
- HOFFMAN, Andrew J. (1999), “Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry”, Academy of Management Journal, 42 (August.), 4, 351-371.
- KIMBERLY, John R. (1979), “Issues in the Creation of Organizations: Initiation, Innovation, Institutionalization,” Academy of Management Journal, 19/9 (September), 437-457.
- LANGAN-FOX, JanIce ve Philomena TAN (1997), “Images of a Culture in Transition; Personal Constructs of Organizational Stability and Change”, Journal Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70 (September), 3, 273-293.
- LAWRENCE, Thomas B., Monika I. WINN ve P. Devereaux JENNINGS (2001), “The Temporal Dynamics of Institutionalization”, The Academy of Management Review, 26 (October), 4, 624-644.
- MCNALLY, Regina (2002), “The Institutionalization of Relationship Marketing”, American Marketing Association, Conference Proceedings, 13, 179-184.
- NORBURN, David, Sue BIRLEY, Mark DUNN ve Adrian PAYNE (1990), “A Four Nation Study of the Relationship Between Marketing Effectiveness, Corporate Culture, Corporate Values, and Market Orientation”, Journal of International Business Studies, 21,3, 451-468.
- PRUZAN, Peter (1998), “From Control to Values-Based Management and Accountability”, Journal of Business Ethics, 17 (October), 13, 1379-1394.
- RUERKERT, Robert W., Orville C. Walker, Jr., ve Kenneth J. ROERING (1985), “The Organization of Marketing Activities: A Contingency Theory of Structure and Performance”, Journal of Marketing, 49 (Winter), 13-25.
- SCOTT, W. Richard (1987), “The Adolescence of Institutional Theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32 (December), 4, 493-511.
- SELZNICK, Philip (1996), “Institutionalism Old and New”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (June), 2, 270-277.
- SLATER, Stanley F. ve John C. NARVER (1995), “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization”, Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63-74.
- STAGGENBORG, Suzanne (1988), “The Consequences of Professionalization and Formalization in the Pro-choice Movement”, American Sociological Review, 53 (August), 4, 585-606.
- SWAIT, Joffre ve Tülin ERDEM (2002), “The Effects of Temporal Consistency of Sales Promotions and Availability on Consumer Choice Behavior”, Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (August), 3, 304-320.
- WALLACE, Jean E. (1995), “Organizational and Professional Commitment in Professional and Nonprofessional Organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40 (June), 2, 228-255.
- YILMAZ, Cengiz, Lütfihak ALPKAN ve Ercan ERGÜN (2005), “Cultural Determinants of Customer- and Learning-Oriented Value Systems and Their Joint Effects on Firm performance”, Journal of Business Research, 58, 1340- 1352.
- ZAJAC, Edward J. ve James D. WESTPHAL (2004), “The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions”, American Sociological Review, 69 (June), 3, 433-457.
- ZUCKER, Lynne G. (1977), “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence,” American Sociological Review, 42 (October), 5, 726-743.
| APA | APAYDIN F (2009). Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması. , 1 - 22. |
| Chicago | APAYDIN Fahri Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması. (2009): 1 - 22. |
| MLA | APAYDIN Fahri Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması. , 2009, ss.1 - 22. |
| AMA | APAYDIN F Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması. . 2009; 1 - 22. |
| Vancouver | APAYDIN F Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması. . 2009; 1 - 22. |
| IEEE | APAYDIN F "Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması." , ss.1 - 22, 2009. |
| ISNAD | APAYDIN, Fahri. "Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması". (2009), 1-22. |
| APA | APAYDIN F (2009). Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 1 - 22. |
| Chicago | APAYDIN Fahri Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 10, no.1 (2009): 1 - 22. |
| MLA | APAYDIN Fahri Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol.10, no.1, 2009, ss.1 - 22. |
| AMA | APAYDIN F Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2009; 10(1): 1 - 22. |
| Vancouver | APAYDIN F Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2009; 10(1): 1 - 22. |
| IEEE | APAYDIN F "Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması." Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 10, ss.1 - 22, 2009. |
| ISNAD | APAYDIN, Fahri. "Kurumsal Teori ve İşletmelerin Kurumsallaşması". Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 10/1 (2009), 1-22. |
