BİREYCİLİK VE TOPLULUKÇULUK DEĞERLERİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ: BENLİK KURGUSU VE INDCOL ÖLÇEKLERİNİN TÜRKÇE GEÇERLEMESİ

Yıl: 2007 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1-2 Sayfa Aralığı: 39 - 66 Metin Dili: Türkçe

BİREYCİLİK VE TOPLULUKÇULUK DEĞERLERİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ: BENLİK KURGUSU VE INDCOL ÖLÇEKLERİNİN TÜRKÇE GEÇERLEMESİ

Öz:
Bu çalışma ile bireycilik ve toplulukçuluk değerlerini bireysel düzeyde ölçmek üzere sıklıkla kullanılan, Benlik Kurgusu Ölçeği (Self Construal Scale; SCS) (Singelis, 1994) ile INDCOL ölçeğinin (Singelis ve diğerleri, 1995) Türkçedeki psikometrik özellikleri değerlendirilmiştir. Üç farklı çalışan örnekleminden elde edilen veriler üzerinde yapılan analizler neticesinde SCS’nin geçerliği desteklenmemiş ve ölçeğin yapısının kuramsal olarak da gözden geçirilmesi gerektiği sonucuna varılmıştır. INDCOL ölçeğinin ise gerek faktör analizleri gerek korelasyon analizleri ile geçerlemesi sonucunda daha güvenilir bir ölçek olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Ancak Türkiye ortamında daha anlamlı olabilecek maddelerle geliştirilmesi önerilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Arbuckle, J. ve Wothke, W. 1999. AMOS 4 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corporation.
  • Brewer, M. ve Chen, Y. 2007. Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114 (1): 133-151.
  • Brislin, R. 1980. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. H.C. Triandis ve J. W. Berry (Der.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Chiou, J. S. 2001. Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism among college students in the United States, Taiwan and Argentina. Journal of Social Psychology, 141 (5): 667-678.
  • Chirkov, V. I., Lynch, M., Niwa, S. 2005. Application of the scenario questionnaire of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism to the assessment of cultural distance and cultural fit. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29 (4): 469-490.
  • Clancy, S. M. ve Dollinger, S. J. 1993. Photographic depictions of the self: Gender and age differences in social connectedness. Sex Roles, 29: 477-495.
  • Clugston, M., Howell, P. J. ve Dorfman, P. W. 2000. Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment? Journal of Management, 26 (1): 5-30.
  • Coon, H. M. ve Kemmelmeier, M. 2001. Cultural orientations in the United States –(Re)examining differences among ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32 (3): 348-364.
  • Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L. ve Morris, M. L. 2000. The relational interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78: 191-208.
  • Çukur, C. S., Guzman, M. R. ve Carlo, G. 2004. Religiosity, values, and horizontal and vertical individualism-collectivism: A study of Turkey, the United States, and the Philippines. Journal of Social Psychology, 144 (6): 613-634.
  • Earley, C. P. ve Gibson C. 1998. Taking stock in our progress on individualism–collectivism: 100 Years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24 (3): 1998: 265-304.
  • Farh, J., Hackett, R. D. ve Liang, J. 2007. Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (3): 715-729.
  • Gelfand, M. J. ve Dyer, N. 2000. A cultural perspective on negotiation: Progress, pitfalls and prospects. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49 (1): 62-99.
  • Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L. H., Godfrey, E., Raver, J., Cheng, S., Floriano, L., Okumura, T. ve Wasti, S. A. 2003. Culture, metaphor and negotiation, Konferans sunumu, Academy of Management, Seattle.
  • Gouveia, V. V., Clemente, M. ve Espinosa, P. 2003. The horizontal and vertical attributes of individualism and collectivism in a Spanish population. Journal of Social Psychology, 143 (1): 43-63.
  • Göregenli, M. 1995. Kültürümüz açısından bireycilik – toplulukçuluk eğilimleri: Bir başlangıç çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 10 (35): 1-14.
  • Grace, S. L. ve Cramer, K. L. 2003. The elusive nature of self-measurement: The self-construal scale versus the twenty statement test. Journal of Social Psychology, 143 (5): 649-668.
  • Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T. Kim, K. S. ve Heyman, S. 1996. The influence of cultural individualism – collectivism, self construals and individual values on communication styles across cultures. HumanCommunication Research, 22: 510-543.
  • Gudykunst, W. B. ve Lee, C. M. 2003. Assessing the validity of self-construal scales – A response to Levine et al. Human Communication Research, 29 (2): 253-274.
  • Hair, J. E., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. ve Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. NJ: Prentice Hall
  • Hanisch, K. A. ve Hulin, C. H. 1990. Job attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An examination of retirement and other voluntary withdrawal behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37: 60-78.
  • Hanisch, K. A. ve Hulin, C. H. 1991. General attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An Evaluation of a causal model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39 (1): 110-128.
  • Hardin, E. E., Leong, F. T. L, ve Bhagwat, A. A. 2004. Factor structure of the self-construal scale revisited – Implications for the dimensionality of self-construal. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35 (3): 327-345.
  • Hardin, E. E. 2006. Convergent evidence for the multidimensionality of self-construal. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37 (5): 516.
  • Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • House, R., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. ve Gupta, V. 2004. Culture, leadership and organizations: The Globe Study of 62 Societies: Sage Publications.
  • Hui, C. 1988. Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22: 17-36.
  • Hui, C. ve Yee, C. 1994. The shortened individualism – collectivism scale: Its relationship to demographic and work related variables. Journal of Research in Personality, 28: 409-424.
  • İmamoğlu, E. O. ve Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. 2004. Self-construals and values in different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 130 (4): 277-306.
  • Josephs, R. A., Markus, H. R. ve Tafarodi, R. W. 1992. Gender and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63: 391-402.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. 1997. Individualism and collectivism. J. W. Berry; M. H. Segall; Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı (Der.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Kemmelmeier, M. ve Oyserman, D. 2001. The ups and downs of thinking about a successful other: Self construal and the consequences of social comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(3): 311-320.
  • Kumru, A., Carlo, G. ve Edwards, C. P. 2006. Olumlu sosyal davranışların ilişkisel, kültürel, bilişsel ve duyuşsal bazı değişkenlerle ilişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19 (54): 109.
  • Kwan, V. S. Y, Bond, M. H. ve Singelis, T. M. 1997. Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (5): 1038-1051.
  • Lam, B. T. 2005. Factor structure of the self-construal scale in a Vietnamese-American adolescent sample. Psychological Reports, 96 (1): 152-158.
  • Levine, T., Bresnahan, M. J., Park, H. S., Lapinski, M. K., Wittenbaum, G. M., Shearman, S. M., Lee, S. Y., Chung, D. ve Ohashi, R. 2003. Self-construal scales lack validity. Human Communication Research, 29 (2): 210-252.
  • Li, F. ve Aksoy, L. 2007. Dimensionality of individualism-collectivism and measurement equivalence of Triandis and Gelfand scales. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21 (3): 313-329.
  • Markus, H. R. ve Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and self: implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98 (2): 224-253.
  • Maslach, C., Stapp, J. ve Santee, R. 1985. Individuation: Conceptual analysis and assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 729-738.
  • McAllister, D. J. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 24-59.
  • Meade, A.W. ve Kroustalis, C.M. 2006. Problems with item parcelling for confirmatory factor analytic test of measurement invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 9: 369-403.
  • Meyer, J. P., Barak, I. ve Vandenberghe, C. 1996. Revised measures of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to organizations, Yayınlanmamış çalışma, Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario002E
  • Moorman, R. H. ve Blakely, G. L. 1995. Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16 (2): 127-142.
  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. ve Kemmelmeier, M. 2002. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128 (1): 3-72.
  • Peng, K., Nisbett, R. ve Wong, N. Y. C. 1997. Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions. Psychological Methods, 2 (4): 329-344.
  • Pohlman, C. ve Hannover, B. 2006. Who shapes the self of independent and interdependents? Explicit and implicit measures of the self’s relatedness to family, friends and partner. European Journal of Personality, 20 (7): 525-547.
  • Realo, A., Allik, J. ve Vadi, M. 1997. The hierarchical structure of collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(3): 93-116.
  • Robert, C., Lee, W. C. ve Chan, K. 2006. An empirical analysis of measurement equivalence with the INDCOL measure of individualism and collectivism: Implications for valid cross-cultural inference. Personnel Psychology, 59 (1): 65-100.
  • Roth, P. L. 1994. Missing data: a conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 47(3): 537–561.
  • Schaffer, B. S. ve Riordan, C. M. 2003. A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational Research Methods, 6: 169-216.
  • Schimmack, U., Oishi, S. ve Diener, E. 2005. Individualism: A valid and important dimension of cultural differences between nations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9 (1): 17-31.
  • Schwartz, S. H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25: 1-65.
  • Singelis, T. M. 1994. The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20: 580-591.
  • Singelis, T. M, Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. S., ve Gelfand, M. J. 1995. Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29 (3): 240-275.
  • Triandis, H. C. 1989. The self and behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96: 506- 520.
  • Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism and collectivism, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Triandis, H. C. ve Gelfand, M. J. 1998. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (1): 118-128.
  • Üskül, A.K., Hynie, M. ve Lalonde, R. N. (2004). Interdependence as a mediator between culture and interpersonal closeness for Euro–Canadians and Turks. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35: 174.
  • Wasti, S. A. 2003. The influence of cultural values on antecedents of organizational commitment: An individual level analysis. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52 (4): 533-554.
  • Xie, J. L., Roy, J. P. ve Chen, Z. G. 2006. Cultural and individual differences in self-rating behavior: An extension and refinement of the cultural relativity hypothesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (3): 341-364.
  • Yamaguchi, S. 1994. Collectivism among the Japanese: A perspective from the self. U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kağıtçıbaşı, S. C. Choi ve G. Yoon (Der.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications, (sayfa: 175-188) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
APA WASTI A, ERDİL S (2007). BİREYCİLİK VE TOPLULUKÇULUK DEĞERLERİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ: BENLİK KURGUSU VE INDCOL ÖLÇEKLERİNİN TÜRKÇE GEÇERLEMESİ. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1-2), 39 - 66.
Chicago WASTI Arzu,ERDİL Selin Eser BİREYCİLİK VE TOPLULUKÇULUK DEĞERLERİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ: BENLİK KURGUSU VE INDCOL ÖLÇEKLERİNİN TÜRKÇE GEÇERLEMESİ. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi 7, no.1-2 (2007): 39 - 66.
MLA WASTI Arzu,ERDİL Selin Eser BİREYCİLİK VE TOPLULUKÇULUK DEĞERLERİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ: BENLİK KURGUSU VE INDCOL ÖLÇEKLERİNİN TÜRKÇE GEÇERLEMESİ. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.7, no.1-2, 2007, ss.39 - 66.
AMA WASTI A,ERDİL S BİREYCİLİK VE TOPLULUKÇULUK DEĞERLERİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ: BENLİK KURGUSU VE INDCOL ÖLÇEKLERİNİN TÜRKÇE GEÇERLEMESİ. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2007; 7(1-2): 39 - 66.
Vancouver WASTI A,ERDİL S BİREYCİLİK VE TOPLULUKÇULUK DEĞERLERİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ: BENLİK KURGUSU VE INDCOL ÖLÇEKLERİNİN TÜRKÇE GEÇERLEMESİ. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2007; 7(1-2): 39 - 66.
IEEE WASTI A,ERDİL S "BİREYCİLİK VE TOPLULUKÇULUK DEĞERLERİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ: BENLİK KURGUSU VE INDCOL ÖLÇEKLERİNİN TÜRKÇE GEÇERLEMESİ." Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7, ss.39 - 66, 2007.
ISNAD WASTI, Arzu - ERDİL, Selin Eser. "BİREYCİLİK VE TOPLULUKÇULUK DEĞERLERİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ: BENLİK KURGUSU VE INDCOL ÖLÇEKLERİNİN TÜRKÇE GEÇERLEMESİ". Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi 7/1-2 (2007), 39-66.