Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders

GÜNDOGAN, MUSTAFA

Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders

Mustafa GÜNDOĞAN (Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Veteriner Fakültesi, Dölerme ve Sun'i Tohumlama Anabilim Dalı, Afyon, Türkiye)

Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi

5 2

Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 429 - 435 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders

Öz:

Sulandırılarak 4ºC’de saklanan koç spermasındaki günlük spermatozoa motilitesi, hypoosmotik rezistans test, ölü ve anormal spermatozoa oranlarındaki değişimleri araştırmak amacıyla yapılan bu çalışmada kullanılan 5 koçtan sun’i vagina yardımıyla toplam 25 ejakulat spermatolojik özellikleri değerlendirmek, 25 ejakulat da sulandırma işlemleri için toplandı. Ejakulatlar 5 farklı sulandırıcı, yumurta sarısı içeren Tris- (T), sodium citrate (SC), süt tozu (M) ve glucose phosphate (GP) ve yumurta sarısı içermeyen AndroMed® (A) ile sulandırıldı. Daha sonra 4ºC’de saklanarak spermatolojik özellikler motil spermatozoon görülmeyene kadar günlük olarak değerlendirildi. Koçların bazı spermatolojik özelliklerinin normal sınırlar içerisinde olduğu gözlendi. Sulandırma işlemi sonrasında ise bütün spermatolojikal parametrelerin saklama süresinden ve sulandırıcılardan etkilendiği (P<0.01) tespit edildi. Ancak sulandırıcıların sulandırma sırasındaki spermatolojik özelliklere etkisi gözlenmedi. Saklama süresince spermatozoa motilitesi ve hypoosmotic swelling test (HOST) değerleri kademeli olarak azalırken ölü ve anormal spermatozoa oranlarının yine kademeli olarak arttığı belirlendi. Ayrıca spermatozoa motilitesi ile HOST ve ölü ve anormal spermatozoa oranları arasında önemli ilişkiler bulundu (sırasıyla r: 0.8, r: -0.8, r: -0.9, P<0.01). Sonuç olarak, 4ºC’de sulandırılarak kısa dönem saklanan koç spermasının spermatolojik özelliklerinin T ve SC ile sulandırılanlarda M, A ve GP ile sulandırılanlardan belirgin olarak daha iyi ve daha uzun süre korunduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelime: sperm hareketliliği semen sulandırma koç semen koruma suni tohumlama semen sulandırıcısı anormallikler kısa süre saklama sperm kalitesi ölüm oranı semen sulandırıcı katkıları

Konular: Veterinerlik

Koç spermasının farklı sulandırıcılar ile kısa süre saklanması

Öz:

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the changes in daily spermatozoa motility, hypoosmotic resistance test, dead and abnormal spermatozoa rates of ram semen was diluted and stored at 4ºC. A total of 25 ejaculates were collected from five rams via an artificial vagina to evaluate the spermatological features of ram semen. Thereafter, an additional 25 ejaculates were collected for the dilution process. The ejaculates were pooled and diluted with five different extenders namely Tris (T), sodium citrate (SC), milk-powder (M), glucose phosphate (GP) extenders of which include egg-yolk, and AndroMed® (A) egg-yolk free diluent. Being preserved at 4ºC, the spermatological properties were daily evaluated until no motile spermatozoon was observed. It was observed that certain spermatological properties of ram semen were in optimal range. After dilution process, all spermatological parameters were influenced by the storage time and extenders (P<0.01). However the extenders had no effect on primary spermatological parameters of ram semen. Contrary to the gradual decrease in spermatozoa motility and hypoosmotic swelling test (HOST) value, the dead and abnormal spermatozoa rates increased gradually during the storage period. In addition, significant correlations were found between the spermatozoa motility and HOST and dead and abnormal spermatozoa rates (r: 0.8, r: -0.8, and r: -0.9, respectively, P<0.01). In conclusion, the spermatological features of ram semen diluted with T and SC and preserved at 4ºC for a short term was found to be better preserved in a longer period than that of diluted by M, A and GP.

Anahtar Kelime: abnormalities short term storage sperm quality mortality semen diluent additives sperm motility semen dilution rams semen preservation artificial insemination semen diluents

Konular: Veterinerlik

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Evans G: Current topics in artificial insemination of sheep. Aust J Biol Sci, 4, 103-116, 1988.
2. Foote RH, Chen Y, Brockett CC, Kaproth MT: Fertility of bull spermatozoa frozen in whole milk extender with trehalose, taurine, or blood serum. J Dairy Sci, 76, 1908-1913, 1993.
3. Holt WV: Alternative strategies for the long-term preservation of spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev, 9, 309-319, 1997.
4. Menchaca A, Pinezak A, Queirolo D: Storage of ram semen at 5ºC: effects of preservation period and timed artifical insemination on pregnancy rate in ewes. Anim Reprod, 2, 195- 198, 2005.
5. Tasseron F, Amir D, Schindler H: Acrosome damage of rams spermatozoa during dilution, cooling and freezing. J Reprod Fertil, 51, 461-462, 1977.
6. Aisen EG, Medina VH, Venturino A: Cryopreservation and post-thawed fertility of ram semen frozen in different trehalose concentrations. Theriogenology, 57, 1801-1808, 2002.
7. Fiser PS, Fairfull RW: The effect of glycerol concentration and cooling velocity on cryosurvival of ram spermatozoa frozen in straws. Cryobiology, 21, 542-551, 1984.
8. Gil J, Lundeheim N, Söderquist L, Rodriguez-Martinez H: Influence of extender, temperature, and addition of glycerol on post-thaw sperm parameters in ram semen. Theriogenology, 59, 1241-1255, 2003.
9. Watson PF, Martin ICA: The influence of some fractions of egg yolk on the survival of ram spermatozoa at 5ºC. Aust J Biol Sci, 28, 145-152, 1975.
10. Al-Hanak H, Spasova D: Preservation of ram seminal fluid in different diluents. Vet Med Nauki, 20, 74-82, 1983.
11. Chen Y, Foote RH, Tobback C, Zhang L, Hough S: Survival of bull spermatozoa seeded and frozen at different rates in egg yolk-tris and whole milk extenders. J Dairy Sci, 76, 1028-1034, 1993.
12. Maxwell WM, Salamon S: Liquid storage of ram semen: A review. Reprod Fertil Dev, 5, 613-638, 1993.
13. Lopez-Sáez A, Ortiz N, Gallego L, Garde JJ: Liquids storage (5ºC) of ram semen in different diluents. Arch Androl, 44, 155-164, 2000.
14. Paulenz H, Soderquist L, Pérez-Pé R, Berg KA: Effect of different extenders and storage temperatures on sperm viability of liquid ram semen. Theriogenology, 57, 823-836, 2002.
15. El-Alamy MA, Foote RH: Freezability of spermatozoa from Finn and Dorset rams in multiple semen extenders. Anim Reprod Sci, 65, 245-254, 2001.
16. Franceschini PH, Pinherio LEL, Leite FG, Oliveira-Filho EB, Esper CR: Effects of storage on sperm motility in refrigerated boar semen. Revista-Brasilera-de-Reproducao Animal, 8, 91- 95, 1984.
17. Galkin V, Sohraneri E: Semeni Borana Pri Ponizennyh Temperatrah. Zirotnovodstrvo, 12, 81-85, 1984.
18. Graham EF, Crabo BG, Pace MM: Current status of semen preservation in the ram, boar and stallion. J Anim Sci, 47, 80- 119, 1978.
19. Maxwell WM, Stojanov T: Liquid storage of ram semen in the absence or presence of some antioxidants. Reprod Fertil Dev, 8, 1013-1020, 1996.
20. Simpson AM, White JG: Effect of cold shock and cooling rate on calcium uptake on ram spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci, 12, 131-143, 1986.
21. Bozkurt T, Demirci E, Gundogan M: Daily motility of ram semen which stored at refrigerator (4ºC), diluted with yolk + milk powder, yolk + sodium citrat and yolk + sodium citrat + glycose. Firat Univ J of Health Sci (Vet), 13, 177-183, 1999.
22. Kosum N: An investigation about comparison of Triladyl® and Andromed® extender in German blackface sheep. Proc. 4rd Nat. of Reprod. and Art. Insem. Cong., Manavgat, Antalya, TR, 92-93, 2007.
23. Tiwari SB, Srivastava AK, Sahni KL: Some metabolic changes in ram semen stored in milk diluent. Indian Vet J, 54, 111-115, 1977.
24. Watson PF: The roles of lipid and protein in the protection of ram spermatozoa at 5ºC by egg-yolk lipoprotein. J Reprod Fertil, 62, 483-492, 1981.
25. Gundogan M, Tekerli M, Ucar M, Turkmenoglu I: Effect of diluents on motility of ram sperm during storage at 5ºC. Arch Androl, 49, 69-75, 2003.
26. Kasimanickam R, Kasimanickam V, Pelzer KD, Dascanio JJ: Effect of breed and sperm concentration on the changes in structural, functional and motility parameters of ram-lamb spermatozoa during storage at 4 degrees C. Anim Reprod Sci, 101, 60-73, 2007.
27. Pérez LJ, Valcárcel A, de Las Heras MA, Moses D, Baldassarre H: The storage of pure ram semen at room temperature results in capacitation of a subpopulation of spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 47, 549-558, 1997.
28. Yániz JL, Santolaria P, Marco-Aguado MA, López-Gatius F: Use of image analysis to assess the plasma membrane integrity of ram spermatozoa in different diluents. Theriogenology, 70, 192-198, 2008.
29. Ax RL, Dally M, Didion BA, Lenz RW, Love CC, Varner DD, Hafez B, Bellin ME: Semen Evaluation. In, Hafez B, Hafez ESE (Eds): Reproduction in Farm Animals. 7th ed. 365-375, Williams & Wilkins, Lippincott, 2000.
30. Fiser PS, Marcus GJ: Continuous live-dead discrimination of ram sperm during freezing. Gamete Res, 22, 301-305, 1989.
31. Schäfer S, Holzmann A: The use of transmigration and $Spermac^{TM}$ stain to evaluate epididymal cat spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci, 59, 201-211, 2000.
32. Buckett WM, Luckas MJ, Aird IA, Farquharson RG, Kingsland CR, Lewis-Jones DI: The hypoosmotic swelling test in recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril, 68, 506-509, 1997.
33. Revell SG, Mrode RA: An osmotic resistance test for bovine semen. Anim Reprod Sci, 36, 77-86, 1994.
34. Jeyendran R, Van der Ven H, Pérez-Peláez M, Grabo B, Zanaveld L: Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil, 70, 219-228, 1984.
35. Zar JH: Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., Englwood, New Jersey, 1984.
36. Sramek C, Cechova D, Zelezna B, Kozumplik J, Petelikova J: Changes in proacrosin levels during preservation of ram semen. Vet Med (Praha), 30, 231-237, 1985.
37. Vishwanath R, Shannon P: Do sperm cell age? A review of the physiological changes in sperm during storage at ambient temperature. Reprod Fertil Dev, 9, 321-331, 1997.
38. Barroso G, Taylor S, Morshedi M, Manzur F, Gavino F, Oehninger S: Mitochondrial membrane potential integrity and plasma membrane translocation of phosphatidylserine as early apoptic markers: A comparison of two different sperm subpopulations. Fertil Steril, 85, 149-154, 2006.
39. Upreti GC, Jensen K, Oliver JE, Duganzich DM, Munday R, Smith JF: Motility of ram spermatozoa during storage in a chemically-defined diluent containing antioxidants. Anim Reprod Sci, 48, 269-278, 1997.
40. Holt WV, North RD: The role of membrane-active lipids in the protection of ram spermatozoa during cooling and storage. Gamete Res, 19 1, 77-89, 1988.
41. Jones R, Mann T: Lipid peroxidation in spermatozoa. Proc R Soc B, 184, 103-107, 1973.
42. Jones RC, Martin LCA: The effects of dilution egg yolk and cooling to 5ºC on the ultrastructure of ram spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil, 35, 311-320, 1973.
43. Dunnet CW: Pairwise multiple comparisons in the homogenous variance, unequal sample size case. J Am Assoc, 75, 789-795, 1980.
44. Lopez A, Söderquist L, Rodriguez-Martinez H: Sperm viability in ram semen diluted and stored in three different extenders. Acta Vet Scand, 40, 1-9, 1999.
45. Petruzzi V, Tarantini S, Roychovdhury PN: Effect of different semen dilutents on survival of ram spermatozoa at 5ºC. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A, 23, 556-561, 1976.
46. Deka BC, Rao AR: Preservation of ram semen. Ind J Anim Sci, 54, 813-815, 1984.
47. Salamon S, Maxwell WM: Storage of ram semen. Anim Reprod Sci, 18, 77-111, 2000.
48. Kommisrud E, Paulen H, Sehested F, Grevle IS: Influence of boar and semen parameters on motility and acrosome integrity in liquid boar semen stored for five days. Acta Vet Scand, 43, 49-55, 2002.
49. Pethov ZZ, Dokov VK, Georgiev GS: Investigating the biological sufficiency of bull and ram spermatozoa in the process of their storages. C R Acad Bulgaria Sci, 25, 837-839, 1972.

APA	GÜNDOGAN M (2009). Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders. , 429 - 435.
Chicago	GÜNDOGAN MUSTAFA Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders. (2009): 429 - 435.
MLA	GÜNDOGAN MUSTAFA Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders. , 2009, ss.429 - 435.
AMA	GÜNDOGAN M Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders. . 2009; 429 - 435.
Vancouver	GÜNDOGAN M Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders. . 2009; 429 - 435.
IEEE	GÜNDOGAN M "Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders." , ss.429 - 435, 2009.
ISNAD	GÜNDOGAN, MUSTAFA. "Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders". (2009), 429-435.

APA	GÜNDOGAN M (2009). Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(3), 429 - 435.
Chicago	GÜNDOGAN MUSTAFA Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 15, no.3 (2009): 429 - 435.
MLA	GÜNDOGAN MUSTAFA Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.15, no.3, 2009, ss.429 - 435.
AMA	GÜNDOGAN M Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009; 15(3): 429 - 435.
Vancouver	GÜNDOGAN M Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009; 15(3): 429 - 435.
IEEE	GÜNDOGAN M "Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders." Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, ss.429 - 435, 2009.
ISNAD	GÜNDOGAN, MUSTAFA. "Short term preservation of ram semen with different extenders". Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 15/3 (2009), 429-435.