İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme

Reyhan BİLGİÇ (ODTÜ Psikoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Türk Psikoloji Yazıları
38 4
Yıl: 2008 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 22 Sayfa Aralığı: 66 - 80 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme

Öz:
Bu yazıda, öncelikle İş Özellikleri Kuramı açıklanmış; kuramın gelişmesine yönelik çalışmalar incelenmiş ve ilgili literatür gözden geçirilerek kuramın gelişmesi kronolojik açıdan ele alınmıştır. Kuramın test edilmesine yönelik olarak öncelikle iş özelliklerinin faktör yapısı üstünde durulmuş ve iş özelliklerinin nesnel veya öznel olarak ölçülmesinin önemi tartışılmıştır. Daha sonra da, kuramda belirtilen ara değişkenlerin gerçekten de ara değişken rolü oynayıp oynamadığı incelenmiştir. Ayrıca Gelişme İhtiyacı Gücünün (GİG), iş özellikleri ile beklenen getiriler arasında gerçekten düzenleyici rol oynayıp oynamadığı dünya yazını göz önünde bulundurularak tartışılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, herhangi bir işte bazı önemli özellikler bulunmaktadır ve bu özellikler "İş Tanısı Ölçeği" ile rahatlıkla ölçülebilmektedir. Ara değişken olarak modelde yer alan "Önemli Psikolojik Durumların" gerçekten ara değişken olarak görev yapıp yapmadığı test edilse de uygun analizler kullanılarak yeni çalışmaların yapılmasına ihtiyaç duyulduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Modelde düzenleyici değişken olarak yer alan GİG'nün bu işlevi görüp görmediği konusunun yeterince test edilmediği ve yapılan bazı çalışmaların ise GİG'nün düzenleyici değişken rolünün olmadığı konusunda görüş bildirdikleri görülmüştür. İlave olarak, GİG'nin bu işleviyle ilgili olarak bazı soruların yazında tam olarak açıklanmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır. Ayrıca, iş özellikleri kuramı ile ilgili kişisel ve örgütsel olarak beklenen sonuçların gerçekten elde edilip edilmediği ile ilgili olarak yapılan araştırmaların genellikle olumlu sonuçlar bulduğu görülmüştür. İncelenen kuramla ilgili metodolojik sınırlılıklar belirtilerek kuramın geleceği ile ilgili saptamalar yapılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: iş tatmini faktör yapısı iş zenginleştirme önemli psikolojik durumlar motivasyon iş özellikleri kuramı iş tanısı ölçeği örgütsel psikoloji büyüme ihtiyacı gücü literatür incelemesi

Konular: Psikoloji

Jop characteristics theory : A comprehensive review

Öz:
In this paper, the Job Characteristics Theory was explained by reviewing the relevant literature from the start. In this review, the literature regarding testing of the theory was organized around a number of questions posed by the researchers who tested the theory. At first, the factorial structure of the job characteristics was explained and the subjective and objective aspects of the measurement of job characteristics were examined. Then, the literature related to the roles of Critical Psychological States and Growth Need Strength (GNS) was reviewed. The review of the studies showed that a number of factors exist in any job, but this number changes from three to five and the Job Diagnostic Survey may measure these factors easily. It was found that the subjective and objective measures of the job characteristics converge. The review also revealed mixed results related to the role of "Critical Psychological States" as a mediator variable, and there is a need to test these aspects of the theory utilizing structural equation modeling. As for the GNS as the moderator, the studies did not show strong support and there were few studies testing this aspect of the theory. The results regarding the positive personal and organizational outcomes showed that enriched jobs lead to the expected outcomes. Finally, the limitations of testing the theory were explained and some statements were made regarding the future of the theory.
Anahtar Kelime: organizational psychology growth need strength literature review job satisfaction factor structure job enrichment critical psychological states motivation job characteristics theory job diagnostic survey

Konular: Psikoloji
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aldag, R. J. ve Brief, A. P. (1979). Examination of a measure of higher order need strength. Human Relations, 32,105- 718.
  • Alderfer, C. P. (1969). Job enlargement and the organizational context. Personnel Psychology, 22 (4), 418-426.
  • Algera, J. A. (1983). Objective and perceived task characteristics as a determinant of by task performers. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56,95-101.
  • Becherer, R. C, Morgan, F. W. ve Richard, L. M. (1982). The job characteristics of industrial salespersons: Relationship to motivation and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 46, 125-135.
  • Behson S. J., Eddy, E. R. ve Lorenzet, S. J. (2000). The importance of the critical psychological states in the job characteristics model: A meta-analytic and structural equations modeling examination. Current Research in Social Psychology, 5 (12), 170-189.
  • Bilgiç, R. (1999). A different way of testing the interaction between core job dimensions and growth need strength (GNS). Conference on TQM and Human Factors, 210- 215. CMTO, Linköping universitet.
  • Birnbaum, P. H., Fahr, J. ve Wong, G. Y. (1986). The job characteristics model in Hong Kong. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 (4), 598-605.
  • Bloom, A. J., Yorges, S. L. ve Ruhl, A. J. (2000). Enhancing student motivation: Extensions from job enrichment theory and practice. Teaching of Psychology, 27(2), 135- 137.
  • Boonzaier, B., Ficker, B. ve Rust, B. (2001). A review of research on the job characteristics model and the attendant job diagnostic survey. South African Journal of Business Management, 32 (1), 11-34.
  • Burke, B. G. (1999). Item reversals and response validity in the job diagnostic survey. Psychological Reports, 85, 213- 219.
  • Campion, M. A. ve McClelland, C. L. (1991). Interdisciplinary examination of the costs and benefits of enlarged jobs: A job design quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 186-198.
  • Campion, M. A. ve McClelland, C. L. (1993). Follow-up and extension of the interdisciplinary costs and benefits of enlarged jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (3), 339-351.
  • Cellar, D. R, Kernan, M. C. ve Barrett, G. V. (1985). Conventional wisdom and ratings of job characteristics: Can observers be objective? Journal of Management, 11 (3), 131-138.
  • Champpoux, J. E. (1991). Amultivariate test of job characteristics theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 431-446.
  • Chiu, S. ve Chen, H. (2005). Relationship between job characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediational role of job satisfaction. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 33 (6), 523-539.
  • Cordery, J. L. ve Sevastos, P. P. (1993). Responses to the original and revised job diagnostic survey: Is education a factor in responses to negatively worded items? Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 141-143.
  • De Cuyper, N. ve De Witte, H. (2006). Autonomy and workload among temporary workers: Their effects on job satisfaction, organizational commitment life satisfaction and self- rated performance. International Journal of Stress Management, 3 (4), 441-459.
  • Demerouti, E. (2006). Job characteristics, flow, and performance: The moderating role of conscientiousness. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(3), 266-280.
  • DeVaro, J., Li, R. ve Brookshire, D. (2007). Analaysing the job characteristics model: New support from a cross-section of establishments. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18 (6), 986-1003,
  • Dunham, R. B. (1976). The measurement and dimensionality of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61 (4), 404-409.
  • Dunham, R. B., Aldag, R. J. ve Brief, A. P. (1976). Dimensionality of task design as measured by the job diagnostic survey. Academy of Management Proceedings, 89-93.
  • Dunham, R. B., Aldag, R. I. ve Brief, A. P. (1977). Dimensionality of task design as measured by the job diagnostic survey. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 209-223.
  • Durant, R. R, Kramer, R., Perry, J. L., Mesch, D. ve Paarlberg, L. (2006). Motivating employees in a new governance era: The performance paradigm revisited. Public Administration Review, 66 (4), 505-514.
  • Fok, L. Y., Hartman, S. J., Patti, A. L. ve Razek, J. R. (2000). The relationships between equity sensitivity, growth need strength, organizational citizenship behavior, and perceived outcomes in the quality environment: A Study of accounting professionals. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15 (1), 99-120.
  • Fried, Y. (1991). Meta-analytic comparisons of the job diagnostic survey and job characteristics inventory as correlates of work satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 690-697.
  • Fried, Y. ve Ferris, G. R. (1986). The dimensionality of job characteristics: Some neglected issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 (3), 419-426.
  • Fried, Y. ve Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-anâlysis. Personnel Psychology, 40,287-322.
  • Graen, G. B., Scandura, T. A. ve Graen, M. R. (1986). A field experimental test of the moderating effects of growth need strength on productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 (3), 484-491.
  • Hackman, J. R. ve Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 55, 259-286.
  • Hackman, J. R. ve Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (2), 159-170.
  • Hackman, J. R. ve Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16 (2), 250-279.
  • Hackman, J. R., Oldham, G. R., Janson, R. ve Purdy, K. (1975). A new strategy for job enrichment. California Management Review, 57-71.
  • Harvey, R. J., Billings, R. S. veNilan, K. J. (1985). Confirmatory factor analysis of the job diagnostic survey: Good news and bad news. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 461- 468.
  • Helpistine, S. R., Head, T. C. ve Sorensen, R Jr. (1981). Job characteristics, job satisfaction, motivation and satisfaction with growth: A study of industrial engineers. Psychological Reports, 49, 381-382.
  • Herzberg, R (2003). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Business Review, 81 (1), 86-86.
  • Hulin C. L. ve Blood, M. R. (1968). Job enlargement, individual differences, and worker responses. Psychological Bulletin, 41-55.
  • Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D. ve Morgeson, R P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (5), 1332-1356.
  • Hunt, M., Head, T. C. ve Sorensen, R Jr. (1982): Job characteristics, job satisfaction, motivation, and the role of context variables: A study of hospital pharmacists. Psychological Reports, 51,39A.
  • Idaszak, J. R. ve Drasgow, F. (1987). A revision of the job diagnostic survey: Elimination of a measurement artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 69-1 A.
  • Johns, G., Xie, J. L. ve Fang, Y (1992). Mediating and moderating effects in job design. Journal of Management, 18, 657-676.
  • Judge, T. A., Parker, S. K. ve Colbert, A. E. (2002). Job satisfaction: A cross-cultural review. N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. D. Sinangil ve C. Viswesvaran, (Ed.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology içinde (25-52). London: Sage Publications.
  • Kernan, M. C.(2007). The positive side of reorganization: Interactive effects of job changes and role perceptions. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1-6.
  • Katz, R. (1978). The influence of job longevity on employee reactions to task characteristics. Human Relations, 31 (8), 703-725.
  • Kulik, C. T, Oldham, G. R. ve Hackman, J. R. (1987). Work design as an approach to person-environment fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 278-296.
  • Kulik, C. T., Oldham, G. R. ve Lagner, P. H. (1988). Measurement of job characteristics: Comparison of the original and the revised job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (3), 462-466.
  • Lawler, E. E. (1969). Job design and employee motivation. Personnel Psychology, 22 (4), 426-435.
  • Lee, R. ve Klein, A. R. (1982). Structure of the job diagnostic survey for public sector occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67,515-519.
  • Loher, B. T., Noe, R. A., Moeller, N. L. ve Fitzgerald, M. P. (1985). A meta-analysis of the relation of job characteristics to job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70 (2), 280-289.
  • Mann, F. C. ve Hoffman, R. L. (1956). Individual and organizational correlates of automation. Journal of Social Issues, 12 (2), 7-23.
  • Medcof, J. W. (1991). Atest of arevision of the job characteristics model. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 40 (4), 381-393.
  • Morgeson, F. P. ve Humphrey, E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (6), 1321-1339:
  • Morgeson, F. P., Delaney-Klinger, K. ve Hemingway, M.A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (2), 399-406.
  • Morrison, D., Cordery, J., Girardi, A. ve Payne, R. (2005). Job design, opportunities for skill utilization, and intrinsic job satisfaction. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 14 (1), 59-79.
  • Muchinsky, P. M. (2006). Psychology applied to work: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology (6. baskı). Australia.
  • Oldham, G. R., Hackman, J. R. ve Pearce, J. L. (1976). Conditions under which employees respond positively to enriched work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61 (4), 395-403.
  • Piccolo, R. F. ve Colquit, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (2), 327-340.
  • Saavedra, R. ve Kwun, S. K. (2000). Affective states in job characteristic theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 131-46
  • Spector, P. E. ve Jex, S. M. (1991). Relations of job characteristics from multiple data sources with employee affect, absence, turnover intentions and health. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 46-53.
  • Stone, E. F. ve Porter, L. W. (1978). On the use of incumbent - supplied job characteristics data. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46,751-758.
  • Susman, G. I. (1973). Job enlargement: Effects of culture on worker responses. Industrial Relations, 12(1),
  • 1-15 Taber, T. D. ve Taylor, E. (1990). A review and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the job diagnostic survey. Personnel Psychology, 43, 467-500.
  • Taylor, F. (1947). Scienfic management. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.
  • Thomas, A., Bubolt, W. C. ve Winkelspecht, C. S. (2004). Job characteristics and personality as predictors of job satisfaction. Organizational Analysis, 12 (2), 205-219.
  • Todd, S. Y. ve Kent, A. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of task characteristics on organizational citizenship behavior. North American Journal of Psychology, 8 (2), 253-268.
  • Turner, A. N. ve Lawrence, P. R. (1965). Industrial jobs and the worker. Boston: Harvard University Press.
  • Ünüvar, G. T. (2006). An integrative model of job characteristics, job satisfaction organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior. Unpublished dissertation. Middle East Technical University, Ankara-Turkey.
  • Varoglu, D. (1986). Relationship of job characteristics to satisfaction and motivation: A study on academicians. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, ODTÜ, Ankara - Türkiye.
  • Walker, C. R. ve Guest, R. H. (1952). The man on the assembly line. Business Review, 30 (3), 71-83.
  • Wall, T. D., Clegg, C. W. ve Jackson, P. R. (1978). An evaluation of the job characteristics model. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 5, 183-196.
  • Zaccaro, S. J. ve Stone. E. F. (1988). incremental validity of an empirically based measure of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (2), 245-252.
APA BİLGİÇ R (2008). İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme. , 66 - 80.
Chicago BİLGİÇ Reyhan İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme. (2008): 66 - 80.
MLA BİLGİÇ Reyhan İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme. , 2008, ss.66 - 80.
AMA BİLGİÇ R İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme. . 2008; 66 - 80.
Vancouver BİLGİÇ R İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme. . 2008; 66 - 80.
IEEE BİLGİÇ R "İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme." , ss.66 - 80, 2008.
ISNAD BİLGİÇ, Reyhan. "İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme". (2008), 66-80.
APA BİLGİÇ R (2008). İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 11(22), 66 - 80.
Chicago BİLGİÇ Reyhan İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 11, no.22 (2008): 66 - 80.
MLA BİLGİÇ Reyhan İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, vol.11, no.22, 2008, ss.66 - 80.
AMA BİLGİÇ R İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2008; 11(22): 66 - 80.
Vancouver BİLGİÇ R İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2008; 11(22): 66 - 80.
IEEE BİLGİÇ R "İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme." Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 11, ss.66 - 80, 2008.
ISNAD BİLGİÇ, Reyhan. "İş özellikleri kuramı : Geniş kapsamlı gözden geçirme". Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 11/22 (2008), 66-80.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 14:40

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları