Yıl: 2009 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 28 Sayfa Aralığı: 57 - 92 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision

Öz:
Tüketiciler, interneti, satın alma kararı verme sürecinde bir bilgi kaynağı olarak giderek daha fazla kullanmaktadırlar. İnternet, tüketiciler arasında ağızdan ağıza iletişime olanak vermektedir. Bu çalışma, çevrim içi ağızdan ağıza iletişimin bir türü ve bir kişisel iletişim aracı olan çevrim içi müşteri yorumlarını konu edinmektedir. Müşteri yorumlarında verilen bilginin olumlu olup olmamasının etkisini cep telefonu satın alma kararının çeşitli aşamalarında değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Deneyin sonuçları, özellikle olumsuz çevrim içi ağızdan ağıza iletişime maruz kalmanın, satın almada dikkate alınan markaların sıralamasında ve satın alma niyetinde anlamlı farklılık yarattığını göstermektedir. Katılımcılar markayı çeşitli kriterlere göre değerlendirmişler ve kendilerine verilen bilginin olumlu olma düzeyine göre bu değerlendirmeler, belirli kriterlerde farklılık göstermiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, olumsuz yorumların etkisinin olumlu yorumların etkisinden daha fazla olduğuna işaret etmekte ve bulgular, karar vermede olumsuz çevrim içi ağızdan ağıza iletişimin gücünü desteklemektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: kullanıcı yorumları üniversite öğrencileri anket tüketici davranışı çevrimiçi müşteri yorumları alışveriş davranışı kredibilite çevrimiçi ağızdan ağıza bilgi satın alma kararı deneysel çalışma cep telefonu

Konular: İletişim

-

Öz:
Consumers’ usage of internet as an information source in the purchase decision is increasing day by day. Internet provides a consumer dominated word of mouth communication among consumers. This study aims to compare the effect of level of favorable information given in online customer reviews- a personal communication tool, which is a kind of online word-ofmouth (OWOM)- on various stages of purchasing decision of a mobile phone. The findings of the experiment demonstrate that especially exposure to unfavorable OWOM creates significant differences in the ranking of the brand in the consideration set and intention to purchase. Respondents’ evaluations of the brand differed on certain criteria based on the amount of favorability of the information. The results of the study indicate that unfavorable comments outweigh the effect of favorable comments hence the findings support the strength of negative OWOM on decision making.
Anahtar Kelime: online customer reviews shopping behaviour credibility online word of mouth information purchase decision experimental study mobile phone user comments university students questionnaire consumer behavior

Konular: İletişim
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Alba, J., Lynch J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., Sawyer, A. & Wood, S. (1997) Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces, Journal of Marketing, 61, p.38-53.
  • Arndt, J. (1967) Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product, Journal of Marketing Research, 3, p.291-295.
  • Asch, S.E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Bakos, J.Y. (1997) Reducing buyer search costs: implications for electronic marketplaces, Management Science, 43, p.1676-1692.
  • Bellman, S., Johnson, E.J., Lohse, G.L. & Mandel, N. (2006) Designing marketplaces of the artificial with consumers in mind: Four approaches to understanding consumer behavior in electronic environments, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20, p.21-33.
  • Beatty, S.E. & Smith M.S. (1987) External search effort: an investigation across several product categories, Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (1): 83-95.
  • Bettman, J.R. (1973) Perceived risk and its components: a model and empirical test, Journal of Marketing Research, 10, p.184-190.
  • Bettman, J.R. & Park, C.W. (1980) Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision process: A protocol analysis, Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (3), p.234-248.
  • Bickart, B. & Schindler, R.M. (2001) Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15, p. 31-40.
  • Blackwell, R.D., Miniard, P.W. & Engel, J.F. (2001) Consumer behavior, Ohio: South-Western.
  • Brown, J., Broderick, A.J. & Lee, N. (2007) Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, p. 2-20.
  • Brucks, M. (1985) The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (1), p.1-16.
  • Claxton, J.D., Fry, J.N. & Portis, B. (1974) A taxonomy of prepurchase information gathering patterns, Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (3), p.35-42.
  • Coakes, S.J. & Steed, L.G. (2001) SPSS analysis without anguish, Singapore: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  • Crowley, A.E. & Hoyer, W.D. (1994) An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion, Journal of Consumer Research, 20, p.561-574.
  • Dowling, G.R. & Staelin, R. (1994) A model of perceived risk and intended riskhandling activity, Journal of Consumer Research, 21, p.119-134.
  • Etgar, M. & Goodwin, S.A. (1982) One-sided versus two-sided comparative message appeals for new brand introductions, Journal of Consumer Research, 9, p.460-465.
  • Fill, C. (2002) Marketing communications: Contexts, strategies and applications, Spain: Pearson Education.
  • Fong, J. & Burton, S. (2006) Online word-of-mouth: A comparison of American and Chinese discussion board, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 18, p.146-156.
  • Golden, L.L. & Alpert, M. (1987) Comparative analysis of the relative effectiveness of one-sided and two-sided communications for contrasting products, Journal of Advertising, 16 (1), p.18-28.
  • George, D. & Mallary, P. (2003) SPSS for Windows step by step, Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
  • Hammond, K., McWilliam, G. & Diaz, A.N. (1998) Fun and Work on the Web: Differences in Attitudes between Novices and Experienced Users, In: Alba, J.W. & Hutchinson, J.W. (eds). Advances in Consumer Research. (p.372- 378), Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
  • Hass, R. G. & Linder, D.E. (1972) Counterargument availability and the effect of message structure on persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, p.219-233.
  • Hastak, M. & Park, J. (1990) Mediators of Message Sidedness Effects on Cognitive Structure for Involved and Uninvolved Audiences, In: Goldberg, M.E. et al (eds). Advances in Consumer Research, (p.329-336). Provo, UT: Associations for Consumer Research.
  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K.P., Walsh, G. & Gremler, D.D. (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, p.38-52.
  • Herr, P.M., Kardes, F.R. & Kim, J. (1991) Effects of word-of-mouth and product attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective, Journal of Consumer Research, 17, p.454-462.
  • Hoffman, D.L. & Novak, T. (1996) Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations, Journal of Marketing, 60, p.50-68.
  • Hoque, A.Y. & Lohse, G.L. (1999) An information search cost perspective for designing interfaces for electronic commerce, Journal of Marketing Research, 36, p.387-394.
  • Huang, J. & Chen, Y. (2006) Herding in online product choice, Psychology and Marketing, 23, p.413-428.
  • Jepsen, A.L. (2007) Factors affecting consumer use of the internet for information search, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, p. 21-34.
  • Kamins, M.A. & Assael, H. (1987) Two-side versus one-sided appeals: A cognitive perspective on argumentation, source derogation, and the effect of disconfirming trial on belief change, Journal of Marketing Research, 24, p.29-39.
  • Kamins, M.A. & Marks, L.J. (1987) Advertising puffery: The impact of using twosided claims on product attitude and purchase intention, Journal of Advertising, 16 (4), p.6-15.
  • Kiel, G.C. & Layton, R.A. (1981) Dimensions of consumer information seeking behavior, Journal of Marketing Research, 28, p.233-239.
  • Klein, L.R. & Ford, G.T. (2003) Consumer search for information in the digital age: An empirical study of prepurchase search, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17, p.29-49.
  • Lee, E., Lee, J. & Schumann, D.W. (2002) The influence of communication source and mode on consumer adoption of technological innovations, The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36, p.1-27.
  • Malhotra, N.K. (1993) Marketing research: An applied orientation, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  • McGuire, W.J. (1985) Attitudes and Attitude Change In: Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology, (p. 233-346). MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Midley, D.F. (1983) Patterns of interpersonal information seeking for the purchase of a symbolic product, Journal of Marketing Research, 20, p.74-83.
  • Mitra, K., Reiss, M.C. & Capella, L.M. (1999) An examination of perceived risk, information search and behavioral intentions in search, experience and credence services, The Journal of Services Marketing, 13, p. 208-228.
  • Moore, W.L. & Lehmann, D.R. (1980) Individual differences in search behavior for a nondurable, Journal of Consumer Research, 7, p.296-307.
  • Mourali, M., Laroche, M. & Pons, F. (2005) Antecedents of consumer relative preference for interpersonal information sources in pre-purchase search, Journal of Consumer Behavior, 4, p.307-318.
  • Nakip, M. (2003) Pazarlama araştırmaları, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Newbold, P. (1995) Statistics for business and economics, New Jersey: Prentice- Hall.
  • Özcan, Y.Z. & Koçak, A. (2007) Research note: A need or a status symbol?: Use of cellular telephones in Turkey, European Journal of Communication, 18, p.241-254.
  • Pechmann, C. (1992) Predicting when two-sided ads will be more effective than onesided ads: The role of correlational and correspondent inferences, Journal of Marketing Research, 29, p. 441-453.
  • Peterson, R.A. & Merino, M.C. (2003) Consumer information search behavior and the internet, Psychology and Marketing, 20, p.99-121.
  • Phelps, J. E., Lewis, R., Mobilio, L., Perry, D. & Raman, N. (2004) Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email, Journal of Advertising Research, 45, p.333– 348.
  • Punj, G.N. & Staelin, R. (1983) A model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles, Journal of Consumer Research, 9, p.366-380.
  • Punj, G. & Brookes, R. (2001) Decision constraints and consideration-set formation in consumer durables, Psychology and Marketing, 18, p.843-863.
  • Ratchford, B.T., Lee, M.S. & Talukdar, D. (2001) A model of consumer choice of the internet as an information source, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5, p.7-21.
  • Roberts, J.H. & Lattin, J.M. (1991) Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition, Journal of Marketing Research, 28, p.429-440.
  • Sawyer, A.G. (1973) The effects of repetition of refutational and supportive advertising appeals, Journal of Marketing Research, 10, p.23-33.
  • Schiffman, L. & Kanuk, L.L. (2007) Consumer behavior, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
  • Schmidt, J.B. & Spreng, R.A. (1996) A proposed model of external consumer information search, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24 (3), p.246-256.
  • Settle, R.B. & Golden, L.L. (1974) Attribution theory and advertiser credibility, Journal of Marketing Research, 11, p.181-185.
  • Siegel, S. & Castellan, Jr., N.J. (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, Singapore: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  • Smith, D., Menon, S. & Sivakumar, K. (2005) Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust, and choice in virtual markets, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19, p.15-37.
  • Smith, R.E. & Hunt, S.D. (1978) Attributional processes and effects in promotional situations, Journal of Consumer Research, 5, p.149-158.
  • Smith, R.E. & Vogt, C.A. (1995) The effects of integrating advertising and negative word-of-mouth communications on message processing and response, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4, p.133-151.
  • Solomon, M.R. (2004) Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Solomon, M.R. (2007) Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Srinivasan, N. (1990) Prepurchase external search for information, In: Zeithaml. V.E. (ed.). Review of Marketing (p.153-189). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
  • Srinivasan, N. & Ratchford, B. (1991) An empirical test of a model of external search for automobiles, Journal of Consumer Research, 18, p.233-242.
  • Stigler, G.J. (1961) The economics of information, Journal of Political Economics, 29, p.213-225.
  • Sun, T., Youn, S., Wu, G. & Kuntaraporn, M. (2006) Online word-of-mouth (or mouse): An exploration of its antecedents and consequences, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, p.1104-1127.
  • Wolfinbarger, M. & Gilly, M. (2001) Shopping online for freedom, control and fun, California Management Review, 43, p.34-53.
  • Ying, H.L.& Chung, C.M.Y. (2007). The effects of single-message single-source mixed word-of-mouth on product attitude and purchase intention, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 19, p.75-86.
APA BAYRAKTAROĞLU G, AYKOL B (2009). The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision. , 57 - 92.
Chicago BAYRAKTAROĞLU Gül,AYKOL BİLGE The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision. (2009): 57 - 92.
MLA BAYRAKTAROĞLU Gül,AYKOL BİLGE The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision. , 2009, ss.57 - 92.
AMA BAYRAKTAROĞLU G,AYKOL B The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision. . 2009; 57 - 92.
Vancouver BAYRAKTAROĞLU G,AYKOL B The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision. . 2009; 57 - 92.
IEEE BAYRAKTAROĞLU G,AYKOL B "The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision." , ss.57 - 92, 2009.
ISNAD BAYRAKTAROĞLU, Gül - AYKOL, BİLGE. "The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision". (2009), 57-92.
APA BAYRAKTAROĞLU G, AYKOL B (2009). The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 0(28), 57 - 92.
Chicago BAYRAKTAROĞLU Gül,AYKOL BİLGE The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi 0, no.28 (2009): 57 - 92.
MLA BAYRAKTAROĞLU Gül,AYKOL BİLGE The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, vol.0, no.28, 2009, ss.57 - 92.
AMA BAYRAKTAROĞLU G,AYKOL B The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi. 2009; 0(28): 57 - 92.
Vancouver BAYRAKTAROĞLU G,AYKOL B The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi. 2009; 0(28): 57 - 92.
IEEE BAYRAKTAROĞLU G,AYKOL B "The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision." İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 0, ss.57 - 92, 2009.
ISNAD BAYRAKTAROĞLU, Gül - AYKOL, BİLGE. "The effect of favorability of online word-of mouth information on consumer purchase decision". İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi 28 (2009), 57-92.