Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life

YILMAZ, Bige; GOKTEPE, Ahmet Salim; SAFAZ, İsmail; YAZICIOĞLU, Kamil

Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life

İsmail SAFAZ, (GATA , Ankara, Türkiye)

Bige YILMAZ, (GATA , Ankara, Türkiye)

Ahmet Salim GOKTEPE, (GATA , Ankara, Türkiye)

Kamil YAZICIOĞLU (GATA , Ankara, Türkiye)

Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni

7 2

Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 79 - 83 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life

Öz:

Amaç: Alt ekstremite amputasyonu olan hastalarda orijinal ve revize edilmiş Ampute Vücut İmaj Anketi’nin Türkçe uyarlamasını yapmak, geçerlik ve güvenirliğini göstermek.Yöntem: Alt ekstremite amputasyonu olan ve protez kullanan 91 hastaya Ampute Vücut İmaj Anketi ( 20 madde, 1-5 arasında puanlama) uygulandı. Bir ay sonra medikal durumunda ve kullandığı protezde değişiklik yapılmayan 37 hastaya tekrar test ve yaşam kalitesi anketi (SF-36) uygulandı. Revize edilmiş Ampute Vücut İmaj Anketi (14 madde, 0–2 arasında puanlama) güvenirliği için ilgili çalışmaya göre yeniden puanlama yapıldı.Bulgular: Orijinal ve revize edilmiş Ampute Vücut İmaj Anketi’nin Türkçe versiyonu içsel olarak tutarlı ve güvenilir bulundu. Cronbach’s Alpha değeri orijinal versiyon için 0.88, revize edilmiş versiyon için 0.86 olarak bulundu. Madde toplam puan arasındaki korelasyon katsayısı orijinal versiyon için 0.25 (madde 3) ile 0.75 (madde 8 ve 14) arasında, revize edilmiş versiyon için 0.33 (madde 3) ile 0.76 (madde 6 ve 8) arasındaydı. Test- tekrar test korelasyon katsayısı orijinal versiyon için 0.78, revize edilmiş versiyon için 0.74 olarak hesaplandı. Yaşam kalitesi anketi (SF–36) alt bölümleri ile Ampute Vücut İmaj Anketi toplam puanları arasında 0.31 (mental sağlık) ile 0.60 (fiziksel fonksiyon) arasında değişen oranda negatif korelasyon saptandı.Sonuç: Ampute Vücut İmaj Anketi Türkçe versiyonu alt ekstremite amputasyonu olan hastaların vücut imaj algısında bozulmayı değerlendirmek için güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı olarak kullanılabilir

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Farmakoloji ve Eczacılık

Türkçe ampute vücut imaj anketi ve yaşam kalitesi ile ilişkisi

Öz:

Objective: To adapt the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS) into Turkish and to assess the reliability of the original and revised Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS-R) in lower limb amputees.Method: Turkish version of the ABIS (20 items; ratings of 1–5) was administered to 91 lower-limb amputee patients wearing prosthesis. One month later, retest was applied to 37 patients. SF–36 was also administered to 37 patients for validity. The scores have been reevaluated for the reliability of the ABIS-R (14 items; ratings of 0–2).Results: Turkish version of the ABIS and ABIS-R fitted the unidimensional construct that the scale was intended to measure and demonstrated good reliability. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.88 for the ABIS and 0.86 for the ABIS-R. Items-total correlation ranged from 0.25 (item 3) to 0.75 (items 8 and 14) for the ABIS. Items-total correlation ranged from 0.33 (item 3) to 0.76 (items 6 and 8) for the ABIS-R. Test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.78 for the ABIS and 0.74 for the ABIS-R. Negative correlations with SF-36 subscales ranged from 0.33 (mental health) to 0.60 (physical functioning) for the ABIS and ranged from 0.31 (mental health) to 0.60 (physical functioning) for the ABIS-R.Conclusions: We conclude that the Turkish versions of ABIS and ABIS-R demonstrate good reliability for measuring body image disturbances in individuals with lower-limb amputations. Moreover, the two scales displayed significant correlations with SF–36.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Farmakoloji ve Eczacılık

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

TRDizin Dışındaki Atıf Sayıları

OpenCitations: 0

OpenAlex: 0

Crossref: 0

1. Breakey JW. Body image: the lower-limb amputee. J Prosthet Orthot 1997; 9: 58-66.
2. Wetterhahn KA, Hanson C, Levy CE. Effect of participation in physical activity on body image of amputees. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 194-201.
3. Rybarczyk B, Nyenhuis DL, Nicholas JJ, Cash SM, Kaiser J. Body image, perceived social stigma, and the prediction of psychosocial adjustment to leg amputation. Rehabil Psychol 1995; 49: 95-110.
4. Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) and quality of life in people with a lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 730-736.
5. Gallagher P, Horgan O, Franchignoni F, Giordano A, MacLachlan M. Body image in people with lower-limb amputation: a Rasch analysis of the amputee body image scale. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 86: 205-215.
6. Pinar R. Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 259-264.
7. Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, Olmez N, Memis A. Validity and reliability of Turkish version of Short form 36: A study of patients with romatoid disorder. J Drug Ther 1999; 12: 102–106.
8. Demiral Y, Ergor G, Unal B, Semin S, Akvardar Y, Kivircik B, Alptekin K. Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36) in Turkish urban population. BMC Public Health 2006 9; 6: 247.
9. Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess 1995; 7: 309-319.
10. Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 2003
11. Fisher K, Hanspal R. Body image and patients with amputations: does the prosthesis maintain the balance? Int J Rehabil Res 1998; 21: 355-363.

APA	SAFAZ İ, YILMAZ B, GOKTEPE A, YAZICIOĞLU K (2010). Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life. , 79 - 83.
Chicago	SAFAZ İsmail,YILMAZ Bige,GOKTEPE Ahmet Salim,YAZICIOĞLU Kamil Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life. (2010): 79 - 83.
MLA	SAFAZ İsmail,YILMAZ Bige,GOKTEPE Ahmet Salim,YAZICIOĞLU Kamil Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life. , 2010, ss.79 - 83.
AMA	SAFAZ İ,YILMAZ B,GOKTEPE A,YAZICIOĞLU K Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life. . 2010; 79 - 83.
Vancouver	SAFAZ İ,YILMAZ B,GOKTEPE A,YAZICIOĞLU K Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life. . 2010; 79 - 83.
IEEE	SAFAZ İ,YILMAZ B,GOKTEPE A,YAZICIOĞLU K "Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life." , ss.79 - 83, 2010.
ISNAD	SAFAZ, İsmail vd. "Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life". (2010), 79-83.

APA	SAFAZ İ, YILMAZ B, GOKTEPE A, YAZICIOĞLU K (2010). Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, 20(1), 79 - 83.
Chicago	SAFAZ İsmail,YILMAZ Bige,GOKTEPE Ahmet Salim,YAZICIOĞLU Kamil Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni 20, no.1 (2010): 79 - 83.
MLA	SAFAZ İsmail,YILMAZ Bige,GOKTEPE Ahmet Salim,YAZICIOĞLU Kamil Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, vol.20, no.1, 2010, ss.79 - 83.
AMA	SAFAZ İ,YILMAZ B,GOKTEPE A,YAZICIOĞLU K Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni. 2010; 20(1): 79 - 83.
Vancouver	SAFAZ İ,YILMAZ B,GOKTEPE A,YAZICIOĞLU K Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni. 2010; 20(1): 79 - 83.
IEEE	SAFAZ İ,YILMAZ B,GOKTEPE A,YAZICIOĞLU K "Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life." Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, 20, ss.79 - 83, 2010.
ISNAD	SAFAZ, İsmail vd. "Turkish version of the amputee body image scale and relationship with quality of life". Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni 20/1 (2010), 79-83.