Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 71 - 83 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 İndeks Tarihi: 01-11-2021
Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures
Öz: In this study, the effect of different types of slabs on dynamic characteristics of structures under the lateral loading was investigated. For this purpose, four different types of slabs namely, beamed slab, flat slab, one way ribbed (hollow core) slab andwaffle slab have been modeled in buildings having 3, 4 and 5 storeys with the same geometric dimensions, in accordance to design and construction requirements (TS 500) and Turkish building seismic codes (TBDY, 2018). Seismic analysis calculations of the modeled buildings were done using the equivalent seismic load method. The assumed local soil class was taken from the geotechnical report as ZD. As a result of the analysis, natural periods, base shear forces, maximum horizontal displacements and relative storey drifts of the buildings were compared. Seismic analysis and calculations of the buildings were completed using SAP2000 finite element software.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Afad (2019). T.C. İçişleri Bakanlığı Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı, Ankara, Turkey. https://tdth.afad.gov.tr/ Date of access: 12.05.2019.
- Ağcakoca E (2019). Yüksek katlı yapının sarsma tablası üzerinde deprem performansının incelenmesi. ALKÜ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(3), 132-143. (in Turkish)
- Ağcakoca E, Yaman Z, Yazıcı YE (2018). Kompozit ve kutu profilin darbe kuvveti altındaki davranışı. Journal of New Results in Engineering and Natural Sciences, 8, 75-83. (in Turkish)
- Alfeehan A, Abdulkareem HI, Mutashar SH (2017). Flexural behavior of sustainable reactive powder concrete bubbled slab flooring elements. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 3(2), 81-89.
- Al Munifi AA, Alameri IA (2019). The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 5(3), 85-95.
- Al-Safi S, Alameri IA, Badhib RA, Kuleib M (2020). Evaluation of performance-based earthquake engineering in Yemen. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 6(1), 10-22.
- Bansal A, Patidar A (2016). Pushover analysis of multistorey buildings having flat slab and grid slab. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention Research & Development, 2(7), 435-441.
- Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2016). Optimum design of reinforced concrete columns employing teaching learning based optimization. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 2(4), 216-219.
- Bhina MR, Banerjee A, Paul DK (2013). Assessment of different aspect of RC flat slab building over normal RC frame building. International Conference on Structural Engineering & Construction Management (ICSECM,), Kandy, Sri Lanka.
- Bilgin H, Uruçi R, (2018). Effects of structural irregularities on low and mid-rise RC building response. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 4(2), 33-44.
- Caglar N, Elmas M, Yaman ZD, Saribiyik M (2008). Neural networks in 3-dimensional dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete buildings, Construction and Building Materials, 22(5), 788-800.
- Çağlarım M (2002). Betonarme Çok Katlı Yapılarda Döşeme Türünün Taşıyıcı Sisteme Etkileri. Ph.D thesis, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
- Demirok A (2009). Perdeli Çerçeve Taşıyıcı Sisteme Sahip bir Betonarme Yapıda Farklı Döşeme Türlerinin Davranışa Etkisi. Ph,D thesis, İstanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
- Doğangün A (2018). Betonarme Yapıların Hesap ve Tasarımı. Birsen Yayınevi, İstanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
- El-Shaer MA (2013). Seismic load analysis of different RC slab systems for tall building. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 5(3), 65.
- ideCAD Static V10 (2021). Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design. ideYAPI, İstanbul, Turkey.
- Martinez A, Ventura CE (2016). Seismic response of a ten story concrete building subjected to different earthquakes. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 2(1), 60-68.
- Nasery MM, Ağacakoca E, Yaman Z (2020). Experimental and numerical analysis of impactor geometric shape effects on steel beams under impact loading. Structures, 27, 1118-1138.
- Özlü B (2015) Çok Katlı Betonarme Binalarda Taşıyıcı Sistem Türlerinin Davranışlarının Incelenmesi. Ph.D thesis, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
- Paripour MB, Budak A, Düzgün OA (2018). Numerical investigation of reinforced concrete frame behavior subjected to progressive collapse. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 4(3), 117-125.
- SAP2000 V20 (2021). IntegratedSoftware for Structural Analysis and Design. Computers & Structures, Inc., California, USA.
- Sümer Y, Aktaş M (2015). Defining parameters for concrete damage plasticity model. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 1(3), 149-155.
- TBDY (2018). Turkey Building Earthquake Code. Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Ankara, Turkey.
- Topçu A (2019). Betonarme-II. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü, Eskişehir, https://mmf2.ogu.edu.tr/atopcu. (in Turkish)
- TS498 (1997). Calculation Values of Loads to be taken in the Dimensioning of Structural Elements. Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
- TS500 (2000). Design and Construction Rules of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
- Uray E, Çarbaş S, Erkan İH, Tan Ö (2019). Parametric investigation for discrete optimal design of a cantilever retaining wall. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 5(3), 108-120.
- Uyar H, Ağcakoca E (2020a). Artic determination of dynamic characteristics the structure with ARX and ARMAX estimation methods. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 24(3), 460-471.
- Uyar H, Ağcakoca E (2020b). Sensör ve akıllı telefon kayıtları yardımı ile yapının dinamik karakteristiklerin belirlenmesi. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(2), 1053-1065. (in Turkish)
- Yaşoğlu FG (2015). Taşıyıcı sistemleri farklı olan betonarme yapılarda döşeme türlerinin davranışa etkisi. Ph.D thesis, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
- Yepes V, Alcala J, Perea C, González-Vidosa F (2008). A parametric study of optimum earth-retaining walls by simulated annealing. Engineering Structures, 30(3), 821-830.
- Yeşilyurt A (2016). Farklı döşeme ve taşıyıcı sistemlere sahip çok katlı betonarme binaların deprem davranışlarının incelenmesi. Ph.D thesis, Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
| APA | Keleş Y, Kasap H, yaman z (2021). Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures. , 71 - 83. 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| Chicago | Keleş Yılmaz,Kasap Hüseyin,yaman zeynep Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures. (2021): 71 - 83. 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| MLA | Keleş Yılmaz,Kasap Hüseyin,yaman zeynep Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures. , 2021, ss.71 - 83. 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| AMA | Keleş Y,Kasap H,yaman z Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures. . 2021; 71 - 83. 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| Vancouver | Keleş Y,Kasap H,yaman z Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures. . 2021; 71 - 83. 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| IEEE | Keleş Y,Kasap H,yaman z "Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures." , ss.71 - 83, 2021. 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| ISNAD | Keleş, Yılmaz vd. "Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures". (2021), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| APA | Keleş Y, Kasap H, yaman z (2021). Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 7(2), 71 - 83. 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| Chicago | Keleş Yılmaz,Kasap Hüseyin,yaman zeynep Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics 7, no.2 (2021): 71 - 83. 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| MLA | Keleş Yılmaz,Kasap Hüseyin,yaman zeynep Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, vol.7, no.2, 2021, ss.71 - 83. 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| AMA | Keleş Y,Kasap H,yaman z Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics. 2021; 7(2): 71 - 83. 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| Vancouver | Keleş Y,Kasap H,yaman z Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics. 2021; 7(2): 71 - 83. 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| IEEE | Keleş Y,Kasap H,yaman z "Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures." Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 7, ss.71 - 83, 2021. 10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
| ISNAD | Keleş, Yılmaz vd. "Evaluating the effects of different slab typeson static and dynamic characteristics of structures". Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics 7/2 (2021), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2021.02.003 |
