Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi

ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ, Nermin; YÜKSEL, Asuman

Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi

Nermin ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ, (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Asuman YÜKSEL (Uludağ Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Bursa, Türkiye)

Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri

23 0

Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 683 - 727 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi

Öz:

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ahlaki yargı yeteneği ile empatik beceri arasında ilişki olup olmadığını üniversite öğrencileri üzerinde incelemektir. Makalede iki farklı örneklem grubu üzerinde yürütülmüş olan iki araştırmanın bulguları sunulmaktadır. Birinci araştırmaya Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesinin farklı bölümlerinde okuyan, 20-29 yaşlarında (ortalama= 22,85) 68 bayan ve 61 erkek öğrenci katılmıştır. Veriler Davis’in Kişiler Arası Tepkisellik Ölçeği ve Lind’in Ahlaki Yargı Testi (MJT) ile toplanmıştır. İkinci araştırma ise Uludağ Üniversitesinin farklı fakültelerinde okuyan 18-30 yaşları arasındaki (ortalama= 22,30) 294 bayan ve 141 erkek öğrenci üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Veriler Dökmen’in Empatik Beceri Ölçeği ve Lind’in Ahlaki Yargı Testi (MJT) ile toplanmıştır. İki ayrı araştırmada da öğrencilerin Ahlaki Yargı Testi puanları ile Empatik Beceri testlerinden aldıkları genel empati puanları arasında anlamlı bir ilişki belirlenememiştir. Kişiler Arası Tepkisellik Ölçeği puanları alt ve üst % 27’lik dilimde yer alan öğrencilerin Ahlaki Yargı Testi puanları arasındaki ilişki incelendiğinde, öğrencilerin “kişisel sıkıntı” alt boyutundan aldıkları puanlar ile Ahlaki Yargı Testi’nin işçiler ikilemine ait puanları arasında negatif yönde .46 düzeyinde (p>0.01) anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Veriler ahlaki yargı ve empati ilişkisini inceleyen ilgili literatür doğrultusunda tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelime: uludağ üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi ahlaki yargı üniversite öğrencileri ahlaki gelişim empati becerileri ahlaki değerler ahlaki yargı testi kişiler arası tepkisellik ölçeği

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Davranış Bilimleri

Analysis of the relationship between moral judgment competences and empathic skills of university students

Öz:

The aim of this study is to analyse whether there is a significant relationship between moral judgment competence and empathic skills of the students studying at Uludağ University. In this article, the results of two researches carried out on two diff erent samples are presented. In the first research, data were collected using David’s Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and Lind’s Moral Judgment Test (MJT) and the participants were 68 female and 61 male students between the ages of 20 and 29 (average: 22.85) who are studying in diff erent departments in the Faculty of Education at Uludağ University. Th e second research was conducted on 294 female and 141 male students between the ages of 18 and 30 (average: 22.30) who are studying in diff erent faculties of Uludağ University. Data were gathered by using Dökmen’s Empathic Skill Scale (ESS) and Lind’s Moral Judgment Test (MJT). In the two separate studies there was no significant relationship between students’ moral test points and their general empathy points. Th e analysis of the relationship between the moral judgment test points of students whose Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) points are between the top and bottom 27 percent segments revealed a significant negative relationship (r=.45.6; p> 0.01) between the points students got from the ‘personal distress’ subscale and the ones they got from the ‘workers’ dilemma’ subscale of the moral judgment test. Data were discussed in accordance with the relevant literature that focuses on the relationship between moral judgment and empathy.

Anahtar Kelime: moral values moral judgment test interpersonel reactivity index uludag university faculty of education moral judgement university students moral development empathic skills

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Davranış Bilimleri

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

Adler, A. (1969). Th e science of living. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Akkoyun, F. (1987). Empatik eğilim ve ahlaki yargı. Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(21), 91-97.
Barnett, M. A. (1990). Empathy and related responses in children. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 146-163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Batson, C. D. & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Encouraging words concerning the evidence for altruism. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 159-168.
Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Shoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitative distinct vicarious emotions with diff erent motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 10-38.
Batson, C. D., O’Quin, K., Fultz, J., Vanderplas, M., & Isen, A. M. (1983). Infl uence of self-reported distress and empathy on egoistic versus altruistic motives to help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 706-718.
Behrmann, G. (2001). Moralische gefühle. Ethik und Unterricht, 12(1), 18-26.
Bernadett- Shapiro, S., Ehrensaft, D., & Shapiro, J. (1996). Father participation in child care and the development of empathy in sons: An emprical study. Journal of Family Therapy, 23(1), 77-93.
Blakeney, C. D. & Blakeney, R. A. (1991). Understanding and reforming moral misbehavior among behaviorally disordered adolescents. Behavioral Disorders, 16, 120- 125.
Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3, 178-210.
Borke, H. (1971). Interpersonal perception of young children: Ego-centrism or empathy? Developmental Psychology, 5, 263-269.
Bowman, J. T. & Reeves, T. G. (1987). Moral development and empathy in counseling. Counselor Education and Supervision, 26(4), 293-298.
Changeux, J. P. (2002/1993). Etiğin doğal temelleri (çev. N. Acar). İstanbul: Doruk Yay.
Çiftçi, N. (2001a). Almanya ve Türkiye’deki lise öğrencilerinin ahlakî yargı yeteneklerinin karşılaştırılması. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
Çiftçi, N. (2001b). Ahlaki Yargı Testi MUT’un teorisi ve Türkçe versiyonunun geçerliği. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2), 295-321.
Çiftçi, N. (2003a). Ahlaki yargı yeteneği ve ahlak eğitimi. H. Hökelekli (Ed.), Gençlik dönemi ve eğitimi-II içinde (s. 346-392). Istanbul: Ensar Neşriyat.
Çiftçi, N. (2003b). Kohlberg’in bilişsel ahlak gelişimi teorisi: Ahlak ve demokrasi eğitimi. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 1, 43-77.
Çiftçi, N. (2009). Ahlak gelişimi. A. Kaya (Ed.), Eğitim psikolojsi içinde (s. 169-215). Ankara: Pegem Yay.
Damon, W. (1999). Die moral entwicklung von kindern. Spektrum der Wissenschaft, 1, 62-70.
Davis, A. H. & Franzoi, S. L. (1991). Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(1), 70-87.
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual diff erences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(MS.2124), 85–100.
Davis, M. (1983). Measuring ındividual diff erences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
Davis, M. (1996). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dökmen. Ü. (1990). Yeni bir empati modeli ve empatik becerinin iki farklı yaklaşımla ölçülmesi. Psikoloji Dergisi, 7 (24), 42-50.
Durkheim, E. (1973). Erziehung, moral und gesellschaft. Neuwied und Darmstadt: Luchterhand.
Eisenberg, N. (1986). Altruistic Emotion, Cognition, and Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eisenberg, N. & Strayer, J. (1990). Introduction. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp.3-16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eisenberg, N. (1987). Self-attributions, social interaction, and moral development. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development through social interaction (pp. 22- 40). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665-697.
Eisenberg, N., Carlo, G., Murphy, B., & Van Court, P. (1995). Prosocial development in late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 66, 911-936.
Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Cumberland, A., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Zhou, Q. et al. (2002). Prosocial development in early adulthood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 993-1006.
Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Schaller, M., Fabes, R.A., Fultz, J., & Shell, R. (1989). Th e role of sympathy and alturistic personality traits in helping: A reexamination. Journal of Personality, 57, 41-67.
Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Shell, R., McNalley, S., & Shea, C. (1991). Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 27, 849-857.
Eisenberg-Berg, N. & Mussen, P. (1978). Empathy and moral development in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 14, 185-186.
Feshbach, N. D. & Roe, K. (1968). Empathy in six- and seven- year olds. Child Development, 39(1), 133-145.
Feshbach, N. D. (1997). Empathy: Th e formative years. Implications for clinical practice. In A. C. Bohart & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (pp.33-59). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Frimer, J. A. & Walker, L. J. (2008). Towards a new paradigm of moral personhood. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 333-356.
Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself: An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. Greenwich, Conn.: Fawcett Publications.
Garz, D. (1998). Moral, erziehung und gesellschaft. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
Gibbs, J. C. (1987). Social processes in delinquency: Th e need to facilitate empathy as well as sociomoral reasoning. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development through social interaction (pp.301-321). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Gibbs, J. C. (1991). Toward an integration of Kohlberg’s and Hoff man’s theories of morality. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1: theory, pp. 183-222). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibbs, J. C. (2003). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg and Hoff man. Th ousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Gielen, U. (1996). Kohlbergs theorie der moralischen entwicklung. In L. Kuhmerker, U.
Gielen, & R. L. Hayes (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Seine bedeutung für die paedagogische und psychologische praxis (pp. 31-58). München: Kindt Verlag.
Greene, J. & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 517-523.
Grief, E. B. & Hogan, R. (1973). Th e theory and measurementof empathy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20, 280-284.
Haidt, J. (2001). Th e emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
Haidt, J. (2003). Th e emotional dog does learn new tricks: A reply to Pizarro and Bloom (2003). Psychological Review, 110, 197-198.
Hartshorne, H. & May, M. A. (1930). Studies in the nature of character (Vol. III: Studies in the organization of character). New York: Macmillan.
Haste, H. & Abrahams, S. (2008). Morality, culture and the dialogic self: Taking cultural pluralism seriously. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 337-394.
Heidbrink, H. (1991). Stufen der moral: Zur gültigkeit der kognitiven entwicklungstheorie Lawrence Kohlbergs. München: Quintessenz.
Hoffman, M. L. (1975). Developmental synthesis of aff ect and cognition and its implications for altruistic motivation. Developmental Psychology, 11, 607-622.
Hoffman, M. L. (1976). Empathy, role taking, guilt and development of alturuistic motives. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Th eory, research and social issues (pp. 124-143). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Hoffman, M. L. (1978). Empathy, its development and prosocial implications. In C. B. Keasey (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 169- 218). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Empathy, its limitations, and its role in a comprehensive moral theory. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp.283-330). New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Hoffman, M. L. (1987). Th e contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgement. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 47- 80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoffman, M. L. (1994). Discipline and internalization. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 26-28.
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hogan, R. & Emler, N. P. (1978). Moral development. In M. Lamb (Ed.), Social and personality development (pp. 200-223). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Horney, K. (1945). Our inner confl icts. New York: W. W. Norton.
Kalle, R. J. & Suls, J. (1978). Th e relationship between Kohlberg’s moral judgment stages and emotional empathy. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 11, 191-192.
Kalliopuska, M. (1983). Relationship between moral judgment and empathy. Psychological Reports, 53, 575-578.
Kalliopuska, M. (1992, March). Holistic empathy education among preschool and school children. Paper presented at the International Scientifi c Conference Comenius Heritage and Education of Man (pp.1-20), Praque. (unpublished manuscript)
Kohlberg, L. & Candee, D. (1996). Die beziehung zwischen moralischem Urteil und moralischem Handeln. In W. Althof (Ed.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Die psychologie der moralentwicklung (pp. 373-494). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. (Original work published in 1984)
Kohlberg, L. & Kramer, R. (1996/1969). Zusammenhaenge und Brüche zwischen der Moralentwicklung in der Kindheit und im Erwachsenenalter. In W. Althof (Ed.), (1995). Lawrence Kohlberg: Die Psychologie der Moralentwicklung. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, s. 41-80.
Kohlberg, L. (1974). Zur kognitiven Entwicklung des Kindes. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp. [Original: Stage and sequence: Th e cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. (1969). In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research, (pp. 347-480). Chicago, IL: by Rand MacNally & Company.]
Kohlberg, L. (1986). Der‚ ‘just community’-ansatz der moralerziehung in theorie und praxis. In. F. Oser, R. Fatke, & O. Höff e (Eds.), Transformation und entwicklung: Grundlagen der moralerziehung (pp. 21-55). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Kohlberg, L. (1995). Moralische entwicklung. In W. Althof (Ed.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Die psychologie der moralentwicklung (pp. 7-40). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. (Original work published in 1968)
Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1996). Zum gegenwaertigen stand der theorie der Moralstufen. In W. Althof (Ed.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Die psychologie der moralentwicklung (pp. 217-372). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. (Original work published in 1984)
Krebs, D. & Rosenwald, A. (1994). Moral reasoning and moral behavior in conventional adults. In B. Puka (Ed.), Fundamental research in moral development: A compendium (pp. 111-121). New York: Garland Publishing.
Krebs, D. L. & Denton, K. (1997). Th e forms and functions of real -life moral decisionmaking. Journal of Moral Education, 26, 131-146.
Kuhmerker, L., Gielen, U., & Hayes, R. L. (Eds.) (1996). Kohlbergs theorie der moralischen entwicklung. In L. Kuhmerker, U. Gielen & R. L. Hayes (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Seine bedeutung für die paedagogische und psychologische praxis (pp. 31-58). München: Kindt Verlag.
Lapsley, D. K. & Hill, P. L. (2008). On dual processing and heuristic approaches to moral cognition. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 313-332.
Lind, G. (1978). Wie mißt man moralisches Urteil? In G. Portele (Ed.), Sozialisation und moral (pp. 171-201). Weinheim: Beltz.
Lind, G. (1982). Experimental questionnaires - A new approach to personality research. In A. Kossakowski & K. Obuchowski (Eds.), Progress in psychology of personality (pp. 132- 144). Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Lind, G. (1984). Th eorie und Validität des ‘Moralischen-Urteil-Test. Zur Erfassung kognitiv-struktureller Effekte der Sozialisation. In G. Framhein & J. Langer (Eds.), Student und studium im interkulturellen vergleich (pp. 166-187). Klagenfurt: Kärntner Druck- und Verlangsanstalt.
Lind, G. (1985). Th e theory of moral-cognitive development: A socio-psychological assessment. In G. Lind, H. A. Hartmann, & R. Wakenhut (Eds.), Moral development and the social environment - Studies in the philosophy and psychology of moral judgment and education (pp. 21-53). Chicago, IL: Precedent Publ.
Lind, G. (1986). Parallelität von Aff ekt und Kognition in der moralischen Entwicklung. In F. Oser, W. Althof, & D. Garz (Eds.), Moralische Zugänge zum Menschen - Zugänge zum moralischen Menschen (pp. 158-179). München: Kindt.
Lind, G. (1993). Moral und bildung. Heidelberg: Roland Asanger Verlag.
Lind, G. (2000). Th e importance of role- taking opportunities for self- sustaining moral development. Journal of Research in Education, 10, 9-15.
Lind, G. (2002) Ist moral lehrbar? Ergebnisse der modernen moral-psychologischen Forschung [Can ethics be taught? Research Findings of modern moral psychology.]. Berlin: Logos-Verlag.
Lind, G. (2003). Moral ist lehrbar. München: Oldenbourg. Lind, G. (2008a). Th e meaning and measurement of moral judgment competence revisited -a dual- aspect model. In D. Fasko & W. Willis (Eds.), Contemporary philosophical and psychological perspectives on moral development and education (pp. 185-220). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Lind, G. (2008b). Teaching students to speak up and to listen to others: Fosterin moral_ democratic compentencies. In D. E. Lund & P. R. Carr (Eds.), Doing democracy and social justice in education: Political literacy for all students. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Matarazzo, O., Abbamonte, L., & Nigro, G. (2008). Moral reasoning and behaviour in adulthood. Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 30, 667-674.
McDaniel, B. L. (2007). Predicting moral judgment competence from developmental building blocks and moral emotions: A structural equation model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
McNeel, S. P. (1994). College teaching and student moral development. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 27-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mead, G. H. (1962/1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mehrabian, A. & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525-543.
Miller, P. A., Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., & Shell, R. (1996). Relations of moral reasoning and vicarious emotion to young children’s prosocial behavior toward peers and adults. Developmental Psychology, 32, 210-219.
Narvaez, D. & Vaydich, J. L. (2008). Moral development and behaviour under the spotlight of the neurobiological sciences. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 289-312.
Oser, F. & Althof, W. (2001). Moralische selbsbestimmung: Modelle der entwicklung und erziehung im wertebereich (4. Aufl age). Stuttgart: Verlag Klett-Cotta.
Özbay, Y. & Yıldırım, H. ( 2005, Eylül). Empati ile Beş Faktör Kişilik Modeli Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. 8. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışma Ve Rehberlik Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri, İstanbul, Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi.
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W.W. Norton.
Pizarro, D. (2000). Nothing more than fellings? Th e role of emotions in moral judgment. Journal for the Th eory of Social Behavior, 30, 354-375.
Pizarro, D., & Bloom, P. (2003). Th e intelligence of moral intuitions: Comment on Haidt (2001). Psychological Review, 110, 193-196.
Prehn, K., Wartenburger, I., Meriau, K., Scheibe, C., Goodneough, O. R., Villringer, A. et al., (2006). Infl uence of individual diff erences in moral judgment competence on neural correlates of normative judgments. NeuroImage, 31, Supplement 1, 84.
Preston, S. D. & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1-72.
Puka, B. (1986). Vom nutzen und nachteil der stufe 6. In W. Edelstein & G. Nunner- Winkler (Eds.), Zur bestimmung der moral (pp. 241-290). Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Reed, D. C. & Stoermer, R. M. (2008). Towards an integrated model of moral functioning: An overview of the special issue. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 417-428.
Reed, D. C. (2008). A model of moral stages. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 357-376.
Regenbogen, A. (1984). Überlegungen zur Rationalitaet von moralischen Urteilen. In A.
Regenbogen (Ed.), Moral und politik (pp. 113-127). Köln: Verlag Pahl-Rugenstein.
Rest, J. R. & Narvaez, D. (1991). Th e college experience and moral development. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development volume 2: Research (pp. 229-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rousseeau, J. J. (2004/1762). Toplum sözleşmesi (çev. T. Yalım). Ankara: Devin Yayınları.
Shelton, C. M. & McAdams, D. P. (1990). In search of an everyday morality: Th e development of a measure. Adolescence, 25, 923-943.
Swanson, H. L. & Hill, G. (1993). Metacognitive aspects of moral reasoning and behavior. Adolescence, 28, 111-136.
Tangney, J. P. (1991). Moral aff ect: Th e good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 598-607.
Thoma, S. J. (2000). Models of moral development. Th e Journal of Mind and Behavior, 21, 129-136.
Turiel, E. (1990). Moral judgment, action and development. New Directions for Child Development, 47, 31-49.
Turiel, E. (2008). Foreword. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 279-288.
Turiel, E., Smetana, J. G., & Killen, M. (1991). Social contexts in cognitive development. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development volume 2: Research (pp. 307-332). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Upright, R. L. (2002). To tell a tale: Th e use of moral dilemmas to increase empathy in the elementary school child. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30(1), 15-20.
Verducci, S. (2000). A moral method? Th oughts on cultivating empathy through method acting. Journal of Moral Education, 29(1), 87-99.
Walker, L. J. (2002). Th e model and measure: An appraisal of the Minnesota approach to moral development. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 353-367.
Yüksel, A. (2004). Empati Eğitim Programının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin empatik becerilerine etkisi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 341-554.

APA	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ N, YÜKSEL A (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. , 683 - 727.
Chicago	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ Nermin,YÜKSEL Asuman Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (2010): 683 - 727.
MLA	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ Nermin,YÜKSEL Asuman Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. , 2010, ss.683 - 727.
AMA	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ N,YÜKSEL A Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. . 2010; 683 - 727.
Vancouver	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ N,YÜKSEL A Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. . 2010; 683 - 727.
IEEE	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ N,YÜKSEL A "Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi." , ss.683 - 727, 2010.
ISNAD	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ, Nermin - YÜKSEL, Asuman. "Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi". (2010), 683-727.

APA	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ N, YÜKSEL A (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 10(2), 683 - 727.
Chicago	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ Nermin,YÜKSEL Asuman Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 10, no.2 (2010): 683 - 727.
MLA	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ Nermin,YÜKSEL Asuman Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, vol.10, no.2, 2010, ss.683 - 727.
AMA	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ N,YÜKSEL A Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2010; 10(2): 683 - 727.
Vancouver	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ N,YÜKSEL A Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2010; 10(2): 683 - 727.
IEEE	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ N,YÜKSEL A "Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi." Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 10, ss.683 - 727, 2010.
ISNAD	ARIDAĞ ÇİFTÇİ, Nermin - YÜKSEL, Asuman. "Üniversite öğrencilerinin ahlaki yargı yetenekleri ile empati becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi". Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 10/2 (2010), 683-727.