Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 198 - 203 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland

Öz:
Rangelands are the most important feed sources for animal husbandry in Turkey. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality obtained from the rangeland harvested at the grazing maturity stage. This study was conducted on a rangeland that cultivated 30 years ago and then abandoned in the Samsun region in Turkey between 2007 and 2008. Treatments were control, aeration, commercial fertilization; sheep manure application, over-seeding, aeration+fertilization, aeration+sheep manure, fertilization+over-seeding, and sheep manure+over-seeding. Harvest was realised when dominant grass+legume plants reached at grazing maturity. According to the results of two-year mean, the highest hay yield was obtained from the aeration+fertilizer treatment with 3720.5 kg $ha^ {-1}$ and from fertilization treatment with 3412.4 kg $ha^ {-1}$. In both years, the highest yields were generally obtained from each of the first cuts. Compared to control, all improvement methods generally increased the total yields in both years. In general, the first cut gave higher crude protein and RFV content and lower ADF and NDF content compared to the second or third cuts. According to quality standards of American Forage and Grassland Council, rangeland hay samples were generally classified in the first class. Rangeland improvement methods, especially aeration and its combinations, increased the hay yield and quality.
Anahtar Kelime: oversowing crop quality grazing sheep manure maturity crop yield crude protein pastures aeration rangelands fertilizers abandoned land botanical composition

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Altin, M., A. Gokkus, A. Koc, 2005. Pasture Rangeland Improwement. T. C. Ministry of Agriculture of Rural Affairs, General Directorate of Agricultural Production and Development, Ankara, 468 p.
  • Andic, C., B. Comakli, B., O. Mentese, 2001. Effects of fertilization, grazing starting time and grazing density on hay yield, crude protein yield, and crude protein ratio in a natural rangeland. Turkey 4th Field Crops Congress, September 17 – 21, pp. 7-12.
  • Anonymous, 2010. Relative Feed Value (RFV). Available at: http://www.prognutrition.com/PDF_Files/RELATIVE%20FEE D%20 VALUE.%202006doc.pdf (Accessed: 01November 2010).
  • Avcioglu, R., H. Soya, H. Kendir, 2010. Protection and use of rangelands in Turkey. Turkey Agricultural Engineering VII. Technical Congress, 11-15 January, pp. 199-213.
  • Ayan, I., Z. Acar, 2008. Methods for improving rangelands in the Blacksea Region of Turkey. J of Fac of Agric 23: 145-151.
  • Aydin, I., F. Uzun, 2000. Effect of different improvement methods on yield and botanical composition of natural pasture in Salur Village of Ladik Town. Turk J Agric For 21: 301-307.
  • Aydin, I., F. Uzun, 2005. Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization of rangelands affects yield, forage quality and the botanical composition. Europ J Agronomy 23: 8-14
  • Bakoglu, A., A. Koc, A. Gokkus, 1999. Some characteristics of the common plants of range and meadows in Erzurum in relation to life span, beginning of the flowering and forage quality. Turk J Agric For 23(4): 951-957.
  • Bayram, G., M. Turk, E. Budakli Carpici, N. Celik, 2009. The effect of aeration and application of manure and fertilizer on the hay yield, its quality and botanical composition of the abandoned range. AJAR 4: 498-504.
  • Brum, O. B., S. Lopez, R. Garcia, S. Andres, A. Calleja, 2009. Influence of harvest season, cutting frequency and nitrogen fertilization of mountain meadows on yield, floristic composition and protein content of herbage. R Bras Zootec 38: 596-604.
  • Caddel, J., E. Allen, 2010. Forage quality interpretations. Available at: http://virtual.chapingo.mx/dona/paginaCBasicos/f-2117.pdf (Accessed: 01November 2010).
  • Chang, C., T. G. Sommerfeldt, T. Entz, 1991. Soil chemistry after eleven annual applications of cattle feedlot manure. J Environ Qual 20: 475-480.
  • Cinar, S., M. Avci, R. Hatipoglu, K. Kokten, I. Atis, T. Tukel, S. Aydemir, H. Yucel, 2005. A research on effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on botanical composition, hay yield, and quality in slope part of Hanyeri Village rangeland (Tufanbeyli – Adana). Turkey VI. Field Crops Congress, September 5 – 9, pp. 873-877.
  • Comakli, B., M. Yanar, O. Mentese, L. Turgut, 2000. Effects of cultural practices on nutritional value of the roughage. International Animal Nutrition Congress, September 4-6, pp. 456-464.
  • Comakli, B., O. Mentese, A. Koc, 2005. Nitrogen fertilizing and pre-anthesis cutting stage improve dry matter production, protein content and botanical composition in meadows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Plant Soil Science 55: 125-130.
  • Eiswerth, M.E., J. S. Shonkwiler, 2006. Examining post-wildfire reseeding on arid rangeland: A multivariate tobit modelling approach. Ecological Modelling 192: 286-298.
  • Elliott, D.E., R. J. Abbott, 2003. Nitrogen fertilizer use on rainfed pasture in the Mt. Lofty Ranges. 1. Pasture mass, composition and nutritive characteristics. Aust J Exp Agric 43: 553-577.
  • Gokkus, A., A. Koc, 1995. Hay yield, botanical composition and useful hay content of meadows in relationto fertilizer and herbicide application. Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry, 19: 23- 29.
  • Griffin, T., E. Giberson, M. Wiedenhoeft, 2002. Yield response of long-term mixed grassland swards and nutrient cycling under different nutrient sources and management regimes. Grass and Forage Science 57: 268-278.
  • Guevara, J.C., R. S. Carlos, R.E. Oscar, H. N. Le Houerou, 2000. N and P fertilization on rangeland production in Midwest Argentina. J Range Manage 53: 410-414.
  • Hatipoglu, R., M. Avci, S. Cinar, K. Kokten, I. Atis, T. Tukel, N. Kilicalp, C. Yucel, 2005. A research on effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on botanical composition, hay yield, and quality in humid part of Hanyeri Village rangeland (Tufanbeyli – Adana). Turkey VI. Field Crops Congress, September 5-9, pp. 867-872.
  • Horrocks, R.D., J. F. Vallentine, 1999. Harvested Forages. Academic Press, London, UK.
  • Knezevic, M., J. Leto, G. Perculija, K. Bosnjak, M. Vranic, 2007. Effects of liquid manure application on yield, quality and botanical composition of grassland. VI. Alps-Adria Scientific Workshop Obervellach, pp. 637-639.
  • Koc, A., 2000. Turkish Rangelands and Shrub Culture. Rangelands 22: 25-26.
  • Koc, A., B. Comakli, A. Gokkus, L. Tahtacioglu, 1994. The effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and ungrazed on plant density of Guzelyurt village in Erzurum. Proc. Turkey Field Crops Congress, Vol: Forage and Grassland, Izmir, pp: 78–82.
  • Koc, A., M. Guven, B. Comakli, O. Mentese, A. Bakoglu, 2003. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on hay yield and botanical composition in high altitude rangelands of Eastearn Anatolia. Turkey 5th Field Crops Congress, October 13-17, pp. 276-280.
  • Manske, L. L., 2002. Monitoring Grasslands Is Important. 2002 Annual Report, Grassland Section, Dickinson Research Extension Center.
  • McConnel, S.G., S. S. Waller, 1986. Subirrigated meadow response to application of nitrojen, phosphorus and atrazine. Agron J 78: 629-632.
  • Mut, H., 2009. Determination of effectiveness of different improvement methods on a plowed and abandoned pasture. PhD Thesis (in Turkish), Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey, p. 148.
  • Reece, P. E., J. T. Nichols, J. E. Brummer, R. K. Engel, K. M. Eskridge, 1994. Harvest date and fertilizer effect on native and interseeded wetland meadows. J Range Manage 47: 178-183.
  • Sharpley, A.N., R. W. Mcdowell, J. L. Weld, P. J. A. Kleinman, 2001. Assessing site vulnerability to phosphorus loss in an agricultural watershed. J Environ Qual 30: 206-236.
  • Stewart, B. A., C. A. Robinson, D. B. Parker, 1998. Manure production and utilization: challenges and opportunities. American Society of Agronomy annual meeting abstracts. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America. pp. 311.
APA Mut H, AYAN İ, ACAR Z, BAŞARAN U, ÖNAL AŞCI Ö (2010). The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland. , 198 - 203.
Chicago Mut Hanife,AYAN İlknur,ACAR Zeki,BAŞARAN UĞUR,ÖNAL AŞCI ÖZLEM The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland. (2010): 198 - 203.
MLA Mut Hanife,AYAN İlknur,ACAR Zeki,BAŞARAN UĞUR,ÖNAL AŞCI ÖZLEM The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland. , 2010, ss.198 - 203.
AMA Mut H,AYAN İ,ACAR Z,BAŞARAN U,ÖNAL AŞCI Ö The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland. . 2010; 198 - 203.
Vancouver Mut H,AYAN İ,ACAR Z,BAŞARAN U,ÖNAL AŞCI Ö The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland. . 2010; 198 - 203.
IEEE Mut H,AYAN İ,ACAR Z,BAŞARAN U,ÖNAL AŞCI Ö "The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland." , ss.198 - 203, 2010.
ISNAD Mut, Hanife vd. "The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland". (2010), 198-203.
APA Mut H, AYAN İ, ACAR Z, BAŞARAN U, ÖNAL AŞCI Ö (2010). The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 15(2), 198 - 203.
Chicago Mut Hanife,AYAN İlknur,ACAR Zeki,BAŞARAN UĞUR,ÖNAL AŞCI ÖZLEM The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 15, no.2 (2010): 198 - 203.
MLA Mut Hanife,AYAN İlknur,ACAR Zeki,BAŞARAN UĞUR,ÖNAL AŞCI ÖZLEM The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, vol.15, no.2, 2010, ss.198 - 203.
AMA Mut H,AYAN İ,ACAR Z,BAŞARAN U,ÖNAL AŞCI Ö The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2010; 15(2): 198 - 203.
Vancouver Mut H,AYAN İ,ACAR Z,BAŞARAN U,ÖNAL AŞCI Ö The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2010; 15(2): 198 - 203.
IEEE Mut H,AYAN İ,ACAR Z,BAŞARAN U,ÖNAL AŞCI Ö "The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland." Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 15, ss.198 - 203, 2010.
ISNAD Mut, Hanife vd. "The effect of different improvement methods on pasture yield and quality of hay obtained from the abandoned rangeland". Turkish Journal of Field Crops 15/2 (2010), 198-203.