Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 69 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 297 - 302 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.33988/auvfd.796785 İndeks Tarihi: 25-08-2022

Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey

Öz:
The main object of the study is to demonstrate that Bruce-ladder multiplex PCR, which is capable of identify all Brucella species including vaccinal strains, is a safe and practical method that is alternative to bacteriological culture methods. Brucellosis is a zoonosis of great socio-economic importance which is endemic in Turkey. In three-year period from 2009 to 2011, a total of 281 Brucella spp. isolates from cattle, sheep and goats were identified and characterized by both conventional biotyping procedures and the PCR based method called Bruce-ladder. Species identification from both phenotypic testing and Bruce-ladder was concordant for all isolates tested. The results showed preferred host pattern in B.abortus isolates. In terms of species identity, it was found that 94% of the isolations derived from cattle were B.abortus and were exclusively biotype 3. B.melitensis biotype 3 and biotype 1 were the prevelant biotypes in sheep and goats. Two isolates from sheep were identified as B.melitensis Rev.1 vaccine strain. Surprisingly, one of the goat isolates was identified as B.abortus S19 vaccine strain. Other interesting observations were the isolation of penicilin-sensitive non vaccine strains of B.abortus and B.melitensis as well as an isolation of an atypical B.abortus biotype 3 strain on the basis of growth inhibition in the presence of basic fuchsin dye. At the end of this study, it was concluded that monitoring Brucella isolates and identify them are indispensable epidemiological tool for brucellosis control
Anahtar Kelime:

Türkiyede çiftlik hayvanlarından izole edilen Brusella izolatlarının konvansiyonel ve moleküler identifikasyonu

Öz:
Çalışmanın başlıca amacı, izole edilen Brusella suşlarının identifikasyonunda, aşı suşları dahil tüm türleri saptayan Bruceladder multipleks PCR’nin bakteriyolojik kültür yöntemlerine güvenli ve kolay uygulanabilir bir alternatif sunduğunu göstermektir. Bruselloz, Türkiye’de yaygın olarak görülen ve büyük sosyo-ekonomik etkiye sahip bir zoonozdur. 2009 yılından 2011’e, 3 yıllık bir dönemde, sığır, koyun ve keçilerden izole edilen toplam 281 Brucella spp. izolatı, konvansiyonel biyotiplendirme ve PCR temelli Bruce-Ladder metodları birlikte kullanılarak tanımlandı ve karakterize edildi. Fenotipik test ve Bruce-ladder metodlarıyla tür identifikasyonu sonuçları, tüm izolatlar için birbirleriyle uyumluydu. Sonuçlar B.abortus izolatları için, tercih edilen konakları belirledi. Tür düzeyinde identifikasyona göre sığırlardan elde edilen izolatların %94’ü B.abortus ve çoğunlukla biyotip 3’tü. B.melitensis biyotip 3 ve biyotip 1, koyun ve keçilerdeki yaygın biyotiplerdi. Koyunlardan iki izolat, B.melitensis Rev.1 aşı suşu olarak identifiye edildi. Keçi izolatlarından biri, beklenmedik şekilde B.abortus S19 aşı suşu olarak tanımlandı. Diğer ilginç gözlemler, penisiline duyarlı olan ancak aşı suşu olmayan B.abortus ve B.melitensis suşları ile 3 adet Bazik fuksin boyasına duyarlı B.abortus biyotip 3 suşunun izolasyonlarıydı. Çalışmanın sonunda, Brucella izolatlarını izlemek ve onları tanımlamanın brusellozun kontrolünde vazgeçilmez bir epidemiyolojik araç olduğu kanısına varıldı.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Aldomy FMM, Jahans KL, Altarzi YH (1992): Isolation of Brucella melitensis from aborting ruminants in Jordan. J Comp Path, 107, 239-242.
  • 2. Alton GG, Jones LM, Angus RD, et al (1988): Techniques for the Brucellosis Laboratory. INRA, Paris, France.
  • 3. Banai M, Mayer I, Cohen A (1990): Isolation, identification, and characterization in Israel of Brucella melitensis biovar 1 atypical strains susceptible to dyes and penicillin, indicating the evolution of a new variant. J Clin Microbiol, 28, 1057-1059.
  • 4. Blasco JM (1997): A review of the use of B.melitensis Rev 1 vaccine in adult sheep and goats. Prev Vet Med, 31, 275- 283.
  • 5. Bricker BJ, Halling SM (1994): Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1,2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR. J Clin Microbiol, 32, 2660- 2666.
  • 6. Büyükçangaz E, Şen A, Kahya S (2009): Isolation and biotyping of Brucella melitensis from aborted sheep and goat fetuses. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 33, 311-316.
  • 7. Corbel MJ (1989): Brucellosis: epidemiology and prevalence worldwide. 25-40. In: Young EJ, Corbel MJ (Ed), Brucellosis: Clinical and Laboratory Aspects. CRC Press 1 st ed., Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  • 8. Corbel MJ (1989): Microbiology of the genus Brucella. 54- 67. In: Young EJ, Corbel MJ (Ed), Brucellosis: Clinical and Laboratory Aspects. CRC Press 1st ed., Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  • 9. Corbel MJ (1991): Identification of dye-sensitive strains of Brucella melitensis. J Clin Microbiol, 29, 1066-1068.
  • 10. Corbel MJ (1997): Brucellosis:an overwiev. Emerg Infect Dis, 3, 213-221.
  • 11. Erdenlig S, Şen A (2000): Koyun atıklarından izole edilen Brucella cinsi mikroorganizmaların izolasyonu ve biyotiplendirilmesi. Pendik Vet Mikrobiol Derg, 31, 31-42.
  • 12. Erdenlig S, Iyisan AS, Baklan EA, et al (2007): Biovar distrubution of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey, 1999 to 2006. 27-28. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Mediterrenean Federation for Health and Production of Ruminants. Kuşadası, Turkey.
  • 13. Ewalt DR, Forbes LB (1987): Atypical isolates of Brucella abortus from Canada and the United States characterized as dye sensitive with M antigen dominant. J Clin Microbiol, 25, 698-701.
  • 14. Foster G, Osterman BS, Godfroid J, et al (2007): Brucella ceti sp. nov. Brucella pinnipedialis sp. nov. for Brucella strains with cetaceans and seals as their preferred hosts. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 57, 2688–2693.
  • 15. Garcia-Yoldi D, Marin CM, De Miguel MJ, et al (2006): Multiplex PCR assay for the identification and differentiation of all Brucella species and the vaccine strains Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 and Brucella melitensis Rev1. Clin Chem, 52, 779–781.
  • 16. Güler L, Gündüz K, Ok U (2003): Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and bacteriological culture for the diagnosis of sheep brucellosis using aborted fetus samples. Vet Microbiol, 93, 53-61.
  • 17. Hemashettar BM, Patil CS, Jayakumar K, et al (1987): Isolation of Brucella melitensis biotype 1 from a cow and two of its attenders. Indian Vet J, 64, 822-825.
  • 18. Ica T, Aydın F, Erdenliğ S, et al (2008): Characterisation of Brucella abortus biovar 3 isolates from Turkey as biovar 3b. The Vet Rec, 29, 660-662.
  • 19. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (2019): Chapter 3.1.4. Brucellosis (Brucella abortus, B. melitensis and B. suis) (infection with B. abortus, B. melitensis and B. suis) (NB: Version adopted in May2016), Available at https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/ Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/3.01.04_BRUCELLOSI S.pdf; [Accessed August 19, 2020].
  • 20. Mayer-Scholl A, Draeger A, Göllner C, et al (2010): Advancement of a multiplex PCR for the differentiation of all currently described Brucella species. J Microbiol Method, 80, 112-114.
  • 21. Ocholi RA, Kwaga JKP, Ajogi I, et al (2005): Abortion due to Brucella abortus in sheep in Nigeria. Rev Sci Tech Int Epiz, 24, 973-979.
  • 22. Saytekin AM, Ak S (2018): Direct diagnosis of Brucella species through multiplex PCR formed by a new method. J Microbiol Method, 154, 86-94.
  • 23. Scholz HC, Hubalek Z, Sedlacek I, et al (2008): Brucella microti sp. nov., isolated from the commonvole Microtus arvalis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 58, 375–382.
  • 24. Shaw WB (1976): Brucella abortus infection in sheep. I. Field case. Br Vet J, 132, 18-26.
  • 25. Stinebring WR, Kunkel JR (1982): In vitro susceptibility of selected isolates of Brucella abortus to penicilin. Am J Vet Res, 43, 545-547.
  • 26. Şahin M, Genç O, Ünver A, et al (2008): Investigation of bovine brucellosis in the Northeastern Turkey. Trop Anim Health Product, 40, 281-286.
APA erdenlig s, Baklan E, Sağlam G, Karagul M, Saytekin A (2022). Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey. , 297 - 302. 10.33988/auvfd.796785
Chicago erdenlig sevil,Baklan Emin Ayhan,Sağlam Gülnur,Karagul Mustafa Sencer,Saytekin Ahmet Murat Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey. (2022): 297 - 302. 10.33988/auvfd.796785
MLA erdenlig sevil,Baklan Emin Ayhan,Sağlam Gülnur,Karagul Mustafa Sencer,Saytekin Ahmet Murat Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey. , 2022, ss.297 - 302. 10.33988/auvfd.796785
AMA erdenlig s,Baklan E,Sağlam G,Karagul M,Saytekin A Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey. . 2022; 297 - 302. 10.33988/auvfd.796785
Vancouver erdenlig s,Baklan E,Sağlam G,Karagul M,Saytekin A Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey. . 2022; 297 - 302. 10.33988/auvfd.796785
IEEE erdenlig s,Baklan E,Sağlam G,Karagul M,Saytekin A "Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey." , ss.297 - 302, 2022. 10.33988/auvfd.796785
ISNAD erdenlig, sevil vd. "Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey". (2022), 297-302. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.796785
APA erdenlig s, Baklan E, Sağlam G, Karagul M, Saytekin A (2022). Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 69(3), 297 - 302. 10.33988/auvfd.796785
Chicago erdenlig sevil,Baklan Emin Ayhan,Sağlam Gülnur,Karagul Mustafa Sencer,Saytekin Ahmet Murat Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 69, no.3 (2022): 297 - 302. 10.33988/auvfd.796785
MLA erdenlig sevil,Baklan Emin Ayhan,Sağlam Gülnur,Karagul Mustafa Sencer,Saytekin Ahmet Murat Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.69, no.3, 2022, ss.297 - 302. 10.33988/auvfd.796785
AMA erdenlig s,Baklan E,Sağlam G,Karagul M,Saytekin A Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 69(3): 297 - 302. 10.33988/auvfd.796785
Vancouver erdenlig s,Baklan E,Sağlam G,Karagul M,Saytekin A Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 69(3): 297 - 302. 10.33988/auvfd.796785
IEEE erdenlig s,Baklan E,Sağlam G,Karagul M,Saytekin A "Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey." Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 69, ss.297 - 302, 2022. 10.33988/auvfd.796785
ISNAD erdenlig, sevil vd. "Conventional and molecular identification of Brucella isolates from livestock in Turkey". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 69/3 (2022), 297-302. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.796785