Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 270 - 277 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297 İndeks Tarihi: 27-09-2022

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form

Öz:
Objective: : Despite the excessive healthcare needs, persons with Intellectual Disability (ID) experience an inade quate access to healthcare services. Evaluating the attitudes of health personnel and community toward ID is important in terms of determining the factors affecting the social inclusion of persons with ID and the effective ness of the services provided to these persons. The aim of this study was to adapt the Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID)-Short Form to Turkish, which consists of cognitive, emotional and behavioural dimensions of attitude, and to evaluate its validity and reliability. Method: This study is a methodological type of research conducted on 1-6th grade medical faculty students studying in 2019. Exploratory factor analysis, simultaneously applied scale correlation analysis, Cronbach's alpha and test-retest correlation analysis were carried out in data analyses. Results: In this study, as a result of the exploratory factor analysis, five factors were determined whose items were compatible with the original items of the questionnaire. The factor loads of the items in the five factors were between 0.33-0.80, and five factors explained 52.49% of the total variance. As a result of the reliability analysis, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient in the factors of the Turkish version of the ATTID-Short Form varied between 0.76-0.87, and it was 0.88 in the whole questionnaire. Discussion: Analyses conducted to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the ATTID-Short Form demonstrated that the questionnaire was accepted as a valid and reliable measurement tool.
Anahtar Kelime:

Zihinsel Yetersizliğe Yönelik Tutumlar Anketi (ZYYTA)-Kısa Form Türkçe uyarlamasının geçerlik ve güvenirliği

Öz:
Amaç: Sağlık hizmeti ihtiyaçlarının fazlalığına karşılık Zihinsel Yetersizlik (ZY)’i olan bireyler sağlık hizmetlerine erişimde yetersizlikler yaşamaktadır. Toplumun ve sağlık personelinin ZY’e yönelik tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi, ZY’i olan bireylerin topluma dahil olmasını etkileyen faktörlerin ve bu bireylere verilen hizmetlerin etkinliğinin belirlenmesi açısından önemlidir. Çalışmanın amacı tutumun bilişsel, duygusal, davranışsal boyutlarından oluşan Zihinsel Yetersizliğe Yönelik Tutumlar Anketi (ZYYTA)-Kısa Form’un Türkçeye uyarlanarak geçerlik güvenirliğinin değerlendirilmesiydi. Yöntem: Çalışma 2019 yılında öğrenim gören 1-6. Sınıf tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinde yapılan metodolojik tipte bir araştırmadır. Verilerin analizinde açımlayıcı faktör analizi, eş zamanlı uygulanan ölçek korelasyon analizi, Cronbach alfa ve test-tekrar test korelasyon analizi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmada açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda maddeleri anketin orijinal maddeleriyle uyumlu olan beş faktör belirlenmiştir. Beş faktörde maddelerin faktör yükleri 0.33-0.80 arasında olup, beş alt alan toplam varyansın % 52.49’ini açıklamaktaydı. Yapılan güvenirlik analizi sonu cunda ZYYTA-Kısa Form’un alt alanlarında Cronbach alfa katsayısı 0.76-0.87 arasında değişmekte olup anketin tamamında 0.88 idi. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, ZYYTA-Kısa Form’un geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin belirlenmesine yönelik yapılan analizlerde, anketin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu kabul edildi.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Definition: Intellectual Disability. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicablediseases/mental-health/news/news/2010/15/childrens-right-to-family-life/definitionintellectual-disability. Access date: August 26, 2021.
  • American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Definition of Intellectual Disability. https://aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition. Access date: August 26, 2021.
  • Schalock RL, Luckasson RA, Shogren KA. The renaming of mental retardation: Understanding the change to the term intellectual disability. Intellect Dev Disabil 2007; 45:116-24.
  • United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol. http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/ convoptprot-e.pdf. Access date: August 26, 2021.
  • Abbott S, Mcconkey R. The barriers to social inclusion as perceived by people with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil 2006; 10:275-87.
  • Lau J T-F, Cheung C-K. Discriminatory attitudes to people with intellectual disability or mental health difficulty. Int Soc Work 1999; 42:431-44.
  • Cummins RA, Lau AL. Community integration or community exposure? A review and discussion in relation to people with an intellectual disability. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2003; 16:145-57.
  • Wieczorek M, Sadziak A, Matczak D. Attitudes towards persons with intellectual disabilities in adolescents. Journal of Education, Health and Sport 2019; 9:106-23.
  • Hall E. Spaces of social inclusion and belonging for people with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2010; 54:48- 57.
  • Morin D, Rivard M, Crocker AG, Boursier CP, Caron J. Public attitudes towards intellectual disability: a multidimensional perspective. J Intellect Disabil Res 2013; 57:279-92.
  • Ryan TA, Scior K. Medical students' attitudes towards people with intellectual disabilities: a literature review. Res Dev Disabil 2014; 35:2316-28.
  • Mencap. Treat me right: Better healthcare for people with a learning disability. https://www.mencap.org.uk/sites/default/files/2016- 08/treat_me_right.pdf. Access date: 26 August 26, 2021.
  • Emerson E, Baines S, Allerton L, Welch V. Health inequalities & people with learning disabilities in the UK 2011. Improving Health and Lives: Learning Disabilities Observatory.
  • Morin D, Crocker AG, Beaulieu-Bergeron R, Caron J. Validation of the attitudes toward intellectual disability: ATTID questionnaire. J Intellect Disabil Res 2013; 57:268-78.
  • Antonak RF, Harth R. Psychometric analysis and revision of the Mental Retardation Attitude Inventory. Ment Retard 1994; 32:272-80.
  • Henry D, Keys C, Jopp D, Balcazar F. The Community Living Attitudes Scale, Mental Retardation Form: development and psychometric properties. Ment Retard 1996; 34:149-58.
  • Scior K. & Furnham A. Development and validation of the Intellectual Disability Literacy Scale for assessment of knowledge, beliefs and attitudes to intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil 2011; 32:1530-41.
  • Hampton NZ, Xiao F. Psychometric properties of the Mental Retardation Attitude Inventory-Revised in Chinese college students. J Intellect Disabil Res 2008; 52:299-308.
  • Findler L, Vilchinsky N, Werner S. The Multidimensional Attitudes Scale Toward Persons With Disabilities (MAS): Construction and Validation. Rehabil Couns Bull 2007; 50:166- 76.
  • Antonak RF, Livneh H. Measurement of attitudes towards persons with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22:211-24.
  • Morin D, Valois P, Crocker AG, Robitaille C. Development and psychometric properties of the Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire–Short Form. J Intellect Disabil Res 2019; 63:539-47.
  • Hall I, Hollins S. Changing medical students' attitudes to learning disability. Psychiatr Bull 1996; 20:429-30.
  • Sinai A, Strydom A, Hassiotis A. Evaluation of medical students' attitudes towards people with intellectual disabilities: a naturalistic study in one medical school. Adv Ment Health Intellect Disabil 2013; 7:18-26.
  • Ouellette-Kuntz H, Burge P, Cleaver S, Isaacs B, Lunsky Y, Jones J, Hastie R. Attitudes of medical clerks toward persons with intellectual disabilities. Can Fam Physician 2012; 58:e282-8.
  • Karl R, McGuigan D, Withiam-Leitch ML, Akl EA, Symons AB. Reflective impressions of a precepted clinical experience caring for people with disabilities. Intellect Dev Disabil 2013; 51:237-45.
  • Kaya A, Yöntem MK. Zihin yetersizliği olan yetişkin bireylere yönelik tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi 2020; 10:61-73.
  • Dindar N. Çocuk doktorları ile zihinsel yetersizliği olan çocuğa sahip anne babaların zihinsel yetersizlikten etkilenmiş bireylere yönelik tutumlarının karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Eğitimde Psikolojik Hizmetler Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 1995.
  • Bentler PM, Chou C-P. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol Methods Res 1987; 16:78-117. 29. Worthington RL,Whittaker TA. Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices. The Counseling Psychologist 2006; 34:806-38.
  • Hirai M, Clum GA. Development, reliability, and validity of the beliefs toward Mental Illness Scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2000; 22:221-36.
  • Bilge A, Cam O. Validity and reliability of Beliefs towards Mental Illness Scale. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2008; 9:91- 6.
  • Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 1975; 28:563-75.
  • Alpar R. Spor, sağlık ve eğitim bilimlerinden örneklerle uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik-güvenirlik. 4. Baskı, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık Ltd. Sti., 2016, 557-619.
  • Howard MC. A Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis Decisions and Overview of Current Practices: What We Are Doing and How Can We Improve? Int J Hum Comput Interact 2016; 32:51-62.
  • Beavers AS, Lounsbury JW, Richards JK, Huck SW, Skolits GJ, Esquivel SL. Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in education research. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 2013; 18:1–13.
  • Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 2005; 10:1–9.
  • Sharma B. A focus on reliability in developmental research through Cronbach’s alpha among medical, dental and paramedical professionals. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences 2016; 3:271-8.
  • Kim Y, Park S. A Validation of the Korean Version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (KATTID). Korean Journal of Special Education 2018; 53:1-34.
APA Akbulut Zencirci S, Metintas S, Kosger F, MELEKOGLU M (2022). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form. , 270 - 277. 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
Chicago Akbulut Zencirci Sevil,Metintas Selma,Kosger Ferdi,MELEKOGLU MERAL The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form. (2022): 270 - 277. 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
MLA Akbulut Zencirci Sevil,Metintas Selma,Kosger Ferdi,MELEKOGLU MERAL The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form. , 2022, ss.270 - 277. 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
AMA Akbulut Zencirci S,Metintas S,Kosger F,MELEKOGLU M The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form. . 2022; 270 - 277. 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
Vancouver Akbulut Zencirci S,Metintas S,Kosger F,MELEKOGLU M The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form. . 2022; 270 - 277. 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
IEEE Akbulut Zencirci S,Metintas S,Kosger F,MELEKOGLU M "The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form." , ss.270 - 277, 2022. 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
ISNAD Akbulut Zencirci, Sevil vd. "The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form". (2022), 270-277. https://doi.org/10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
APA Akbulut Zencirci S, Metintas S, Kosger F, MELEKOGLU M (2022). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, 25(3), 270 - 277. 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
Chicago Akbulut Zencirci Sevil,Metintas Selma,Kosger Ferdi,MELEKOGLU MERAL The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi 25, no.3 (2022): 270 - 277. 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
MLA Akbulut Zencirci Sevil,Metintas Selma,Kosger Ferdi,MELEKOGLU MERAL The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, vol.25, no.3, 2022, ss.270 - 277. 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
AMA Akbulut Zencirci S,Metintas S,Kosger F,MELEKOGLU M The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2022; 25(3): 270 - 277. 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
Vancouver Akbulut Zencirci S,Metintas S,Kosger F,MELEKOGLU M The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2022; 25(3): 270 - 277. 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
IEEE Akbulut Zencirci S,Metintas S,Kosger F,MELEKOGLU M "The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form." Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, 25, ss.270 - 277, 2022. 10.5505/kpd.2022.39297
ISNAD Akbulut Zencirci, Sevil vd. "The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire (ATTID) – Short Form". Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi 25/3 (2022), 270-277. https://doi.org/10.5505/kpd.2022.39297