Yıl: 2021 Cilt: Sayı: 24 Sayfa Aralığı: 153 - 181 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.47589/adalya.1036685 İndeks Tarihi: 23-11-2022

Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome

Öz:
It has been claimed that with Augustus, the Roman Empire and its capital underwent a transformation that divided them into welldefined and controllable spaces based on a rational use of information. Emperors like Domitian established a sort of symbolic and physical domination over their subjects by creating a medium of surveillance which is observable in architecture and sculpture as well as in literature. Yet the functions of early imperial public gardens and urban landscapes like the Campus Martius and the plot on which the Domus Aurea rose have not been fully explored in this respect. This article aims to demonstrate how viewing, gazing and surveilling operated symbolically in these spaces through architecture and sculpture by using Foucaultian concepts such as “heterotopia” and “surveillance” as well as “imperial gaze.” The gaze of the emperor was directed to the heterotopic microcosms created in public gardens and urban landscapes, and also to individuals - elite and commoners alike - within them. This is an “imperial gaze,” a subjective, epistemological, juridical mode of viewing that tends to categorize the landscape, its constituents and its activities within from an elevated point.
Anahtar Kelime:

-

Öz:
Augustus’la birlikte Roma İmparatorluğu ve Roma şehrinin rasyonel bilgiye dayalı, net şe- kilde tanımlanabilir ve kontrol edilebilir arazi parçalarına bölündüğü ileri sürülmüştür. Bu bağlamda şehir mimarisi ve uzamları gözet - lemeye imkân verecek şekilde düzenlenmiş ve görünüşe göre Domitianus gibi bazı impa - ratorlar “her şeyi gören ve bilen” hükümdar - lar olarak kitlelerin üzerinde sembolik ya da fiziksel tahakküm kurmuştur. Halka açık bah- çelerle Campus Martius gibi kentsel açık alan- lar ve Domus Aurea arazisinin benzer işlevleri ise pek tartışılmamıştır. Bu inceleme, Michel Foucault’nun “heterotopya” ile “gözetleme”, ayrıca “emperyal bakış” kavramlarını kullana- rak özellikle mimari ve heykeltıraşlık üzerinden böyle uzamlarda görme, bakma ve gözetle - menin sembolik olarak hangi yollarla gerçek - leştiğini göstermek amacındadır. İmparatorun “bakışı” ve “gözetlemesi”, şehrin ya da impara- torluğun söz konusu uzamlarda yaratılan hete- rotopik mikrokozmoslara ve bunların içindeki seçkin veya değil tüm bireylere yönelir. Bu aynı zamanda “emperyaldir”, yani belli bir yük- seklikten yönelen öznel, sınıflandırmaya eği - limli, epistemolojik ve hükmî bir bakıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • All ancient sources cited in the text are from the digital Loeb Classical Library (https://www.loebclassics. com) Albenda, P. 1974. “Grapevines in Ashurbanipal’s Garden.” BASOR 215.1:5-17.
  • Apostolidès, J.M. 1981. Le roi-machine: spectacle et politique au temps de Louis XIV. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
  • Badawy, A. 1956. “Maru-Aten: Pleasure Resort or Temple.” JEA 42.1:58-64.
  • Beck, R. 2006. The Religion of the Mithras Cult in the Roman Empire. Mysteries of the Unconquered Sun . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Benech, C., R. Boucharlat, and S. Gondet. 2012. “Organisation et Aménagement de l’espace à Pasargades: Reconnaissances Archéologiques de surface, 2003-2008.” ARTA 3:1-37.
  • Bhatt, S. 2017. “The Augustan Principate and the Emergence of Biopolitics: A Comparative Historical Perspective.” Foucault Studies 22:72-93.
  • Boëthius, A. 1960. The Golden House of Nero: Some Aspects of Roman Architecture . Jerome Lectures 5th Series. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Bowditch, L. 2009. “Palatine Apollo and the Imperial Gaze: Propertius 2.31 and 2.32.” AJP 130.3:401-38.
  • Bradley, M. 2009. Colour and Meaning in Ancient Rome . Cambridge Classical Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Canepa, M.P. 2017. The Two Eyes of the Earth: Art and Ritual of Kingship between Rome and Sasanian Iran, edited by P. Brown. Transformation of the Classical Heritage Series. California: University of California Press.
  • Carey, S. 2006. Pliny’s Catalogue of Culture: Art and Empire in the Natural History. Oxford Studies in Ancient Culture and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Champlin, E. 1998. “God and Man in the Golden House.” In Horti Romani: Atti del Convegno Internazionale, Roma, 4-6 maggio 1995 , edited by M. Cima and E. La Rocca, 333-44. Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma Suppl. 6. Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider.
  • Champlin, E. 2003. Nero. Cambridge, Mass. / London: The Belknap Press of Harvard Univesity Press.
  • Coarelli, F. 1983. “Architettura sacra e architettura privata nella tarda Repubblica .” In Architecture et société, de l’archaïsme grec à la fin de la r épublique romaine. Actes du Colloque internazionale organisé par le Centre National de la Recherche scientifique et l’École française de Rome, Rome 2-4 décembre 1980, 191-217. Rome: École Française de Rome.
  • Cooley, A.E. 2009. Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Text, Translation and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Downing, L. 2008. The Cambridge Introduction to Michel Foucault . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dumser, E.A. 2013. “The Urban Topography of Rome.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rome , edited by P. Erdkamp, 131-50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Elsner, J. 1998. Imperial Rome and Christian Triumph. The Art of the Roman Empire AD 100-450. Oxford History of Art. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ergin, G. 2011. “How to Transform an Isaurian into a Subject? The Roman Army as a Foucaultian Technology of Power.” Adalya 14:207-22.
  • Favro, D. 1996. The Urban Image of Augustan Rome . Cambridge / New York / Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fears, J.R. 1976. “The Solar Monarchy of Nero and the Imperial Panegyric of Q. Curtius Rufus.” Historia 25.4:494-96.
  • Ferrari, G.R.F. 2010. “The Meaninglessness of Gardens.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68.1:33-45.
  • Flaig, E. 2003. Ritualisierte Politik: Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft im Alten Rom. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
  • Foster, K.P. 2004. “The Hanging Gardens of Nineveh.” Iraq 66 (Nineveh. Papers of the 49th Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Part One):207-20.
  • Foucault, M. 1994. “Prisons et asiles dans le mécanisme du pouvoir.” In Dits et Ecrits 1954-1988. Vol. 2, 1970-1975, edited by D. Defert and F. Ewald, 521-25. Paris: Collection Quarto, Gallimard.
  • Foucault, M. 1995. Discipline & Punish. The Birth of the Prison . Translated by A. Sheridan. 2nd ed. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Foucault, M. 1997. “Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias.” In Rethinking Architecture. A Reader in Cultural Theory, edited by N. Leach, 330-57. London / New York: Routledge.
  • Fredrick, D. 2003. “Architecture and Surveillance in Flavian Rome.” In Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text, edited by A.J. Boyle and W.J. Dominik, 199-227. Leiden / Boston: Brill.
  • Frézouls, E. 1984. “La construction du theatrum lapideum et son contexte politique.” In Théâtre et spec- tacles dans l’antiquité : actes du colloque de Strasbourg, 5-7 novembre 1981, 193-214. Travaux du Centre de recherce sur le Proche-Orient et la Grèce antiques 7. Leiden: Brill.
  • Galinsky, K. 1996. Augustan Culture. An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Geiger, J. 2008. The First Hall of Fame. A Study of the Statues in the Forum Augustum , edited by S.E. Alcock, T. Harrison, W.M. Jongman, and H.S. Versnel. Mnemosyne Supplements, History and Archaeology of Classical Antiquity 295. Leiden / Boston: Brill.
  • Gleason, K.L. 1994. “Porticus Pompeiana: A New Perspective on the First Public Park of Ancient Rome.” JGH 14.1:13-27.
  • Gowers, E. 2010. “Augustus and ‘Syracuse’.” JRS 100:69-87.
  • Griffin, M.T. 2001. Nero. The End of a Dynasty. This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library.
  • Hartswick, K.J. 2004. The Gardens of Sallust: A Changing Landscape. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Hartswick, K.J. 2018. “The Roman Villa Garden.” In Gardens of the Roman Empire, edited by W.F. Jashemski, K.L. Gleason, K.J. Hartswick, and A.-A. Malek, 27-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hölscher, T. 2017. “Ubiquitär - Totalitär? Die Präsenz des Augustus im Stadtbild Roms.” In Augustus is tot - Lang lebe der Kaiser! Internationales Kolloquium anlässlich des 2000. Todesjahres des römischen Kaisers vom 20.-22. November 2014 in Tübingen , edited by M. Flecker, S. Krmnicek, J. Lipps, R. Posamentir, and Th. Schäfer, 15-37. Tübinger Archäologische Forschungen 24. Rahden / Westf.: Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH.
  • Jacobs II, P.W., and D.A. Conlin. 2014. Campus Martius. The Field of Mars in the Life of Ancient Rome . New York / Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kuttner, A.L. 1999. “Culture and History at Pompey’s Museum.” TAPA 129:343-73.
  • L’Orange, H.P. 1942. “Domus Aurea. Der Sonnenpalast”. In Symbolae Osloenses (Serta Eitremiana) Suppl. 11:68-100.
  • Lincoln, B. 2007. Religion, Empire, and Torture. The Case of Achaemenian Persia, with a Postscript on Abu Ghraib. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ling, R. 2009. Roman Painting. 7th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lowe, D. 2010. “The Symbolic Value of Grafting in Ancient Rome.” TAPA 140.2:461-88.
  • Marzano, A. 2014. “Roman Gardens, Military Conquests and Elite Self-Representation.” In Le Jardin dans l’Antiquité, edited by K. Coleman and P. Derron, 195-238. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 60. Vandoeuvres: Fondation Hardt.
  • McCullough, A. 2008-2009. “Heard but Not Seen: Domitian and the Gaze in Statius’ ‘Silvae’.” CJ 104.2:145-62.
  • McIntosh, C. 2005. Gardens of the Gods: Myth, Magic and Meaning. London: I.B. Tauris & Co.
  • Miano, D. 2018. Fortuna. Deity & Concept in Archaic & Republican Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Netzer, E. 2009. “Palaces and the Planning of Complexes in Herod’s Realm.” In Herod and Augustus, Papers presented at the IJS Conference, 21st-23rd June 2005, edited by D.M. Jacobson and N. Kokkinos, 171-80. IJS Studies in Judaica 6. Leiden / Boston: Brill.
  • Östenberg, I. 2009. Staging the World: Spoils, Captives, and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession. Oxford Studies in Ancient Culture & Representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pagán, V.E. 2013. Rome and the Literature of Gardens. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Panagiotopoulos, D. 2006. “Foreigners in Egypt in the Time of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III.” In Thutmose III. A New Biography , edited by E.H. Cline and D. O’Connor, 370-412. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Parisinou, E. 2017. “Brightness Personified: Light and Divine Image in Ancient Greece.” In Personification in the Greek World from Antiquity to Byzantium , edited by E. Stafford and J. Herrin, 29-43. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
  • Patrich, J. 2009. “Herodian Entertainment Structures.” In Herod and Augustus, Papers presented at the IJS Conference, 21st-23rd June 2005 , edited by D.M. Jacobson and N. Kokkinos, 181-214. IJS Studies in Judaica 6. Leiden / Boston: Brill.
  • Pollard, E.A. 2009. “Pliny’s Natural History and the Flavian Templum Pacis: Botanical Imperialism in First- Century C.E. Rome.” Journal of World History 20.3:309-38.
  • Provencal, V.L. 2015. Sophist Kings. Persians as Other in Herodotus . Bloomsbury Classical Studies Monographs. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Qingxi, L. 2010. Chinese Gardens: In Search of Landscape Paradise . Translated by Z. Lei and Y. Hong. Cultural China Series. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press.
  • Ramage, N.H., and A. Ramage. 2005. Roman Art: Romulus to Constantine. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Rehak, P. 2009. Imperium and Cosmos: Augustus and the Northern Campus Martius , edited by J.G. Younger. Madisoni WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Richardson Jr., L. 1992. A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome. Baltimore / London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Royo, M. 2007. “Bis uidimus urbem totam (Pline, NH 36, 111) Les résidences de Caligula et de Néron, entre topos rhétorique et réalité topographique.” In Neronia VII : Rome, l’Italie et la Grèce : hellén- isme et philhellénisme au premier siècle après J.-C. : actes du VIIe Colloque international de la SIEN (Athènes, 21-23 octobre 2004) , edited by Y. Perrin, 378-405. Collection Latomus 305. Bruxelles: Éditions Latomus.
  • Ruggles, D.F. 1992. “The Gardens of Alhambra and the Concept of the Garden in Islamic Spain.” In Al- Andalus. The Art of Islamic Spain , edited by J.D. Dodds, 163-71. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
  • Ruggles, D.F. 2008. Islamic Gardens and Landscapes. Pen Studies in Landscape Architecture. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Russell, A. 2016. The Politics of Public Space in Republican Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sauron, G. 1987. “Le complexe pompéien du Champ de Mars : nouveauté urbanistique à finalité idéologique.” In L’Urbs. Espace urbain et histoire. Ier siècle av. J.-C. - IIIe siècle ap. J.-C. Actes du colloque international organisé par le CNRS et l’EFR: Rome, 8-12 mai 1985, 457-73. CÉFR 98. Rome: Publications de l’École française de Rome.
  • Spencer, D. 2010. Roman Landscape: Culture and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Spencer, D. 2018. “Written Rome: Ancient Literary Responses.” In A Companion to the City of Rome , ed- ited by C. Holleran and A. Claridge, 619-41. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. London: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Stronach, D. 1990. “The Garden as a Political Statement: Some Case Studies from the Near East in the First Millennium BC.” Bulletin of the Asia Institute, New Series. In honor of Richard Nelson Frye: Aspects of Iranian Culture 4:171-80.
  • Taraporewalla, R. 2010. “The Templum Pacis: Construction of Memory under Vespasian.” Acta Classica 53:145-63.
  • Taylor, L.R. 2013. The Voting Districts of the Roman Republic. Thirty-five Urban and Rural Tribes . 4th ed. PAAR 34. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Taylor, R. 2014. “Movement, Vision and Quotation in the Gardens of Herod the Great.” In Le Jardin dans l’Antiquité, edited by K. Coleman and P. Derron, 145-85. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 60. Vandoeuvres: Fondation Hardt.
  • Totelin, L. 2012. “Botanizing Rulers and Their Herbal Subjects: Plants and Political Power in Greek and Roman Literature.” Phoenix 66.1.2:122-44.
  • Toynbee, J.M.C. 1947. “Ruler-Apotheosis in Ancient Rome.” NC 7.3.4:126-49.
  • Tuplin, C. 1996. Achaemenid Studies. Historia Einzelschriften 99. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
  • von Stackelberg, K.T. 2009a. “Performative Space and Garden Transgressions in Tacitus’ Death of Messalina.” AJP 130.4:595-624.
  • von Stackelberg, K.T. 2009b. The Roman Garden: Space, Sense, and Society. Routledge Monographs in Classical Studies. London: Routledge.
  • Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2005. “Mutatas Formas: the Augustan Transformation of Roman Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus , edited by K. Galinsky, 55-84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilkinson, A. 1998. The Garden in Ancient Egypt. London: Rubicon Press.
  • Wylie, J. 2007. Landscape. London: Routledge.
  • Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus . Translated by A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Ziolkowski, A. 2013. “Civic Rituals and Political Spaces in Republican and Imperial Rome.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rome , edited by P. Erdkamp, 389-409. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
APA ERGIN Y (2021). Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome. , 153 - 181. 10.47589/adalya.1036685
Chicago ERGIN YUSUF GÜRKAN Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome. (2021): 153 - 181. 10.47589/adalya.1036685
MLA ERGIN YUSUF GÜRKAN Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome. , 2021, ss.153 - 181. 10.47589/adalya.1036685
AMA ERGIN Y Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome. . 2021; 153 - 181. 10.47589/adalya.1036685
Vancouver ERGIN Y Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome. . 2021; 153 - 181. 10.47589/adalya.1036685
IEEE ERGIN Y "Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome." , ss.153 - 181, 2021. 10.47589/adalya.1036685
ISNAD ERGIN, YUSUF GÜRKAN. "Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome". (2021), 153-181. https://doi.org/10.47589/adalya.1036685
APA ERGIN Y (2021). Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome. Adalya, (24), 153 - 181. 10.47589/adalya.1036685
Chicago ERGIN YUSUF GÜRKAN Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome. Adalya , no.24 (2021): 153 - 181. 10.47589/adalya.1036685
MLA ERGIN YUSUF GÜRKAN Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome. Adalya, vol., no.24, 2021, ss.153 - 181. 10.47589/adalya.1036685
AMA ERGIN Y Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome. Adalya. 2021; (24): 153 - 181. 10.47589/adalya.1036685
Vancouver ERGIN Y Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome. Adalya. 2021; (24): 153 - 181. 10.47589/adalya.1036685
IEEE ERGIN Y "Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome." Adalya, , ss.153 - 181, 2021. 10.47589/adalya.1036685
ISNAD ERGIN, YUSUF GÜRKAN. "Modes of Viewing the Urban Landscapes and Public Gardens of Early Imperial Rome". Adalya 24 (2021), 153-181. https://doi.org/10.47589/adalya.1036685