Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment

Gizem ÇEVİK, (İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Deniz Ulaştırma ve İşletme Mühendisliği Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Özcan ARSLAN (İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Deniz Ulaştırma ve İşletme Mühendisliği Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Journal of Eta Maritime Science
5 1
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 185 - 194 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/jems.2022.41033 İndeks Tarihi: 27-10-2022

Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment

Öz:
To determine the market value of a ship management company, apart from its book value, it is necessary to also know its intellectual capital. The impact of this type of capital is evident, especially for ship management companies that are service-based. If these businesses follow the intellectual capital level and managers determine the necessary strategies based on this, these companies, which compete internationally beyond ensuring the continuity of their businesses, can stay one step ahead of their competitors. The purpose of this article is to provide an analytical perspective for ship management companies to evaluate their intellectual capital. In this context, the study adopts the analytical hierarchy process in the environment of fuzzy sets to increase sensitivity. Based on the analysis results, the most important intellectual capital elements for ship management companies are “human capital” as compared to “structural capital” and “relational capital” elements. As the key performance indicators applied for evaluation may differ according to enterprises, group performance indicators to be evaluated in the measurement of the elements were determined. The indicators related to human capital were more weighted than the others. This study guides not only the evaluation of the intellectual capital of ship management companies but also the determination of new strategies by managers for the development and valuation of companies.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] N. Bontis, “Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models.” Management Decision, vol. 36, pp. 63-76, March 1998,
  • [2] H. Itami, “Mobilizing Invisible Assets,” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
  • [3] L. Edvinsson and M. S. Malone, “Intellectual capital: realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower,” Harper Business, New York, 1997.
  • [4] T. A. Stewart, “Intellectual Capital,” Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London, 1997.
  • [5] G. Roos and J. Roos, “Measuring your company’s intellectual performance,” Long Range Planning, vol. 30, pp. 413-426, June 1997.
  • [6] H. Saint-Onge, “Tacit knowledge: the key to the strategic alignment of intellectual capital,” Strategy & Leadership, Routledge, 2009.
  • [7] J. Roos, G. Roos, N. Dragonetti, and L. Edvinsson, “Intellectual Capital: Navigating In The New Business Landscape,” New York University Press, New York. 1997.
  • [8] A. Pantouvakis, and A. Syntychaki, “Selecting the right partners to maximize value for shipping companies: An exploratory study,” Research in Transportation Business & Management, vol. 43, pp. 100697, 2021.
  • [9] D. Carlucci, B. Marr, and G. Schiuma, “The knowledge value chain: how intellectual capital impacts on business performance,” International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 27, pp. 575-590, 2004.
  • [10] S. Sumedrea, “Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance: A Dynamic Relationship in Crisis Time,” Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 6, pp. 137-144, 2013.
  • [11] V. Del Giudice, and P. De Paola, “The value of intellectual capital in shipping companies,” Book Series: Green Energy and Technology. pp. 231-239, 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-49676-4_17
  • [12] C. C. Sun, “A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, pp. 7745-7754, Dec 2010.
  • [13] A. Calabrese, R. Costa, and T. Menichini, “Using Fuzzy AHP to manage Intellectual Capital assets: An application to the ICT service industry,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, pp. 3747-3755, July 2013.
  • [14] F. T. Bozbura, and A. Beskese, “Prioritization of organizational capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 44, pp. 124-147, Feb 2007.
  • [15] M. A. Alsalem et al., “Systematic Review of an Automated Multiclass Detection and Classification System for Acute Leukaemia in Terms of Evaluation and Benchmarking, Open Challenges, Issues and Methodological Aspects,” Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 42, 2018.
  • [16] T. L. Saaty, “Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process,” RWS Publications, ISBN 0-9620317-9-8, p. 370, 1996, [Online]. Available: http://www. rwspublications.com/books/anp/decision-making-with- dependence-and-feedback/
  • [17] C. C. Yang, and B. S. Chen, “Key quality performance evaluation using fuzzy AHP,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, vol. 21, pp. 543-550, March 2004.
  • [18] J. J. Buckley, “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 17, pp. 233-247, Dec 1985.
  • [19] C.H. Cheng, and D.L. Mon, “Evaluating weapon system by analytical hierarchy process based on fuzzy scales,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 63 pp. 1-10, April 1994.
  • [20] R. Xu, “Fuzzy least-square priority method in the analytic hierarchy process,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 112 pp. 395-404, June 2000.
  • [21] M. Enea, and T. Piazza, “Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making , vol. 3 pp. 39-62, 2004.
  • [22] J. Krejˇcí, O. Pavlaˇcka, and J. Talašová, “A fuzzy extension of Analytic Hierarchy Process based on the constrained fuzzy arithmetic,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 16, pp. 89-110, 2016.
  • [23] T. Y. Hsieh, S. T. Lu, and G. H. Tzeng, “Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders’ selection in public office buildings,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 22, pp. 573-584, Oct 2004.
  • [24] M. Keleş, and S. Kum, “A comparison of third party and fulll in- house management based on shipping performance indexes in turkish coaster management,” Journal of ETA Maritime Science, vol. 7, pp. 65-77, March 2019.
APA ÇEVİK G, arslan o (2022). Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment. , 185 - 194. 10.4274/jems.2022.41033
Chicago ÇEVİK GİZEM,arslan ozcan Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment. (2022): 185 - 194. 10.4274/jems.2022.41033
MLA ÇEVİK GİZEM,arslan ozcan Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment. , 2022, ss.185 - 194. 10.4274/jems.2022.41033
AMA ÇEVİK G,arslan o Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment. . 2022; 185 - 194. 10.4274/jems.2022.41033
Vancouver ÇEVİK G,arslan o Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment. . 2022; 185 - 194. 10.4274/jems.2022.41033
IEEE ÇEVİK G,arslan o "Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment." , ss.185 - 194, 2022. 10.4274/jems.2022.41033
ISNAD ÇEVİK, GİZEM - arslan, ozcan. "Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment". (2022), 185-194. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2022.41033
APA ÇEVİK G, arslan o (2022). Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 10(3), 185 - 194. 10.4274/jems.2022.41033
Chicago ÇEVİK GİZEM,arslan ozcan Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 10, no.3 (2022): 185 - 194. 10.4274/jems.2022.41033
MLA ÇEVİK GİZEM,arslan ozcan Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.10, no.3, 2022, ss.185 - 194. 10.4274/jems.2022.41033
AMA ÇEVİK G,arslan o Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2022; 10(3): 185 - 194. 10.4274/jems.2022.41033
Vancouver ÇEVİK G,arslan o Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2022; 10(3): 185 - 194. 10.4274/jems.2022.41033
IEEE ÇEVİK G,arslan o "Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 10, ss.185 - 194, 2022. 10.4274/jems.2022.41033
ISNAD ÇEVİK, GİZEM - arslan, ozcan. "Analytic Evaluation of Intellectual Capital for Ship Management Companies Under a Fuzzy Environment". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 10/3 (2022), 185-194. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2022.41033
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 4:16

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları