Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 8 Sayfa Aralığı: 1142 - 1147 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668 İndeks Tarihi: 03-11-2022

Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures

Öz:
BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of fifth metacarpal fractures, especially using Kirschner (K) wire techniques, has recently become popular because it provides for early hand movement. Successful anatomical reduction of the fracture is often achieved with surgery; however, an anatomical reduction cannot always be achieved and, according to 30° oblique radiography, the fracture is fixed with an apex dorsal angulation below 40°. The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of such fractures postoperatively and compare the two different angulation options that provide early movement of the hand and wrist. METHODS: Thirty consecutive cases of neck fractures of the fifth metacarpal were treated intramedullarly with one K wire. Cases were divided into two groups: One fixed with anatomical reduction (Group 1) and the other (Group 2) fixed in apex dorsal angulation below 40°, according to 30° oblique radiography. Angulation, shortening, and functional outcome as Quick DASH scores and grip strengths were evaluated at 6 months. RESULTS: The mean correction angle was 56.6° (between 30° and 110°) for Group 1 and the residual angle was 0°. The mean cor- rection angle was 42.4° (between 20° and 75°) for group 2 (Figs. 4 and 5) and the residual angle was 23.6° (between 10° and 45°). The mean Quick DASH scores were 1.9 (SD: 1.7) for Group 1 and 5.67 (SD: 2.93) for Group 2 (p<0.05). Grip strength values were similar for both groups. All the patients returned to their previous occupations without any limitations in an average of 4 weeks (SD: 1.4) (range 2–6 weeks). No complications such as correction loosening or shortening were detected. Rotation was not detected during physical examination. CONCLUSION: Our investigation revealed no risk of shortening or rotation of the fracture; the patients were able to return quickly to their everyday activities.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Memon FW, Patankar H, Nagori AM.“Bouquet technique” for displaced boxers fracture: Surgical technique and outcomes in 143 consecutive cases. Int J Biomed Res 2018;9:202–7.
  • 2. Cepni SK, Aykut S, Bekmezci T, Kilic A. A minimally invasive fixation technique for selected patients with fifth metacarpal neck fracture. Injury 2016;47:1270–5.
  • 3. Boeckstyns ME. Challenging the dogma: severely angulated neck frac- tures of the fifth metacarpal must be treated surgically. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2021;46:30–6.
  • 4. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopae- dic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:S1–133.
  • 5. Sokolove PE, Barnes DK. Extensor and flexor tendon injuries in the hand, wrist, and foot. In: Clinical procedures in emergency medicine. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004.
  • 6. Kim JK, Kim DJ. Antegrade intramedullary pinning versus retrograde intramedullary pinning for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:1747–54.
  • 7. Hall RF Jr. Treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures in noncom- pliant patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;214:31–6.
  • 8. Assi C, Mansour J, Samaha C, Ajjoub S, Yammine K. A single antegrade intramedullary K-wire for fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020;46:389–95.
  • 9. Pogliacomi F, Mijno E, Pedrazzini A, Tocco S, Tonani M, Ceccarelli F, et al. Fifth metacarpal neck fractures: Fixation with antegrade locked flexi- ble intramedullary nailing. Acta Biomed 2017;88:57–64.
  • 10. Zeng L, Zeng L, Miao X, Chen Y, Liang W, Jiang Y. Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Sci Rep 2021;11:1778.
  • 11. Boussakri H, Elidrissi M, Azarkane M, Bensaad S, Bachiri M, Shimi M, et al. Fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal bone, treated by percutaneous intramedullary nailing: Surgical technique, radiological and clinical results study (28 cases). Pan Afr Med J 2014;18:187.
  • 12. Heo YM, Kim SB, Yi JW, Kim TG, Lim BG. Radiologic changes by early motion in neck fractures of the fifth metacarpal treated with antegrade intramedullary fixation. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol 2016;21:30–6.
  • 13. Khan A, Giddins G. The outcome of conservative treatment of spiral metacarpal fractures and the role of the deep transverse metacarpal liga- ments in stabilizing these injuries. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015;40:59–62.
  • 14. Mirza A, Mirza J, Healy C, Mathew V, Lee B. Radiographic and clinical assessment of intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of unstable metacarpal fractures. Hand (N Y) 2018;13:184–9.
  • 15. Aykut S, Öztürk K, Özcan Ç, Demiroğlu M, Gürün AU, Özden E. Re- sults of surgical treatment in metacarpal shaft fractures using low profile mini plates. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2015;21:279–84.
  • 16. Facca S, Ramdhian R, Pelissier A, Diaconu M, Liverneaux P. Fifth meta- carpal neck fracture fixation: Locking plate versus K-wire? Orthop Trau- matol Surg Res 2010;96:506–12.
  • 17. She Y, Xu Y. Treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fractures with ante- grade single elastic intramedullary nailing. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18:238.
  • 18. Kadlub N, Danino A, Trost O, Robe N, Malka G. Evaluation of the cost of fifth metacarpal neck fractures: orthopedic and surgical treatment. Chir Main 2006;25:152–5.
  • 19. Lundin M, Woo E, Hardaway J, Pratt CK, Clarkson JH. The cost of qual- ity: Open reduction and internal fixation techniques versus percutaneous K-wire fixation in the management of extra-articular hand fractures. J Orthop Surg Rehabil 2017;1:19–24.
  • 20. Mercan S, Uzun M, Ertugrul A, Ozturk I, Demir B, Sulun T. Psycho- pathology and personality features in orthopedic patients with boxer’s fractures. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2005;27:13–7.
APA uzun m, Tetik C (2022). Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures. , 1142 - 1147. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
Chicago uzun metin,Tetik Cihangir Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures. (2022): 1142 - 1147. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
MLA uzun metin,Tetik Cihangir Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures. , 2022, ss.1142 - 1147. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
AMA uzun m,Tetik C Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures. . 2022; 1142 - 1147. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
Vancouver uzun m,Tetik C Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures. . 2022; 1142 - 1147. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
IEEE uzun m,Tetik C "Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures." , ss.1142 - 1147, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
ISNAD uzun, metin - Tetik, Cihangir. "Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures". (2022), 1142-1147. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
APA uzun m, Tetik C (2022). Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28(8), 1142 - 1147. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
Chicago uzun metin,Tetik Cihangir Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28, no.8 (2022): 1142 - 1147. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
MLA uzun metin,Tetik Cihangir Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.28, no.8, 2022, ss.1142 - 1147. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
AMA uzun m,Tetik C Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(8): 1142 - 1147. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
Vancouver uzun m,Tetik C Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(8): 1142 - 1147. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
IEEE uzun m,Tetik C "Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28, ss.1142 - 1147, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668
ISNAD uzun, metin - Tetik, Cihangir. "Early movement does not cause loss of reduction in surgically treated boxer fractures". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28/8 (2022), 1142-1147. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.24668