Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1069 - 1080 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 İndeks Tarihi: 06-12-2022
Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming
Öz: Herein, a performance analysis of La-doped copper-based catalysts $(CuO/ZrO_2/La-Al_2O_3)$ in methanol steam reforming (MSR) was conducted and compared with a commercial low temperature water-gas shift catalyst (HiFUEL W220) to produce $H_2$ with low CO selectivity. The physicochemical properties of as-obtained catalysts were characterized by N2 adsorption, XRD, and ICP-OES. Effect of calcination temperature (750 °C and 1000 °C) on the properties of mixed oxide support $(La-Al_2O_3)$ were discussed based on catalytic activity. The optimum conditions of $H_2O/CH_3OH$ ratio (1.0–3.0), space-time ratio (WFA0) (40–120 kg s mol–1), and reaction temperature (180–310 °C) were evaluated by a parametric study using the commercial catalyst (HF220). Additionally, thermodynamic equilibrium calculations of experimentally identified components by using Aspen HYSYS process simulation software were also performed to analyze MSR process. The results were indicated that the calcination temperature significantly affected the structural properties and the activity with respect to CO selectivity. An increasing trend in CO selectivity for catalysts with supports calcined at 750 °C and a decreasing trend for catalysts with supports calcined at 1000 °C were observed. Hence, $CZ30LA_{750}$ and $CZ30LA_{1000}$ catalysts were selected to attain low CO selectivity and comparable activity when compared to other catalysts and the simulated thermodynamic calculation results.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1 Claudio-Piedras A, Ramírez-Zamora RM, Alcántar-Vázquez BC, Gutiérrez-Martínez A, Mondragón-Galicia G et al. One dimensional Pt/ $CeO_2-NR$ catalysts for hydrogen production by steam reforming of methanol: Effect of Pt precursor. Catalysis Today 2021; 360: 55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.08.013
- 2 Doğu T, Varişli D. Alcohols as alternatives to petroleum for environmentally clean fuels and petrochemicals. Turkish Journal of Chemistry 2007; 31 (5): 551–567.
- 3 Andersson J, Grönkvist S. Large-scale storage of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2019; 44: 11901–11919. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.063
- 4 Silva H, Mateos-Pedrero C, Ribeirinha P, Boaventura M, Mendes A. Low-temperature methanol steam reforming kinetics over a novel CuZrDyAl catalyst. Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms, and Catalysis 2015; 115: 321–339. doi: 10.1007/s11144-015-0846-z
- 5 Herdem MS, Sinaki MY, Farhad S, Hamdullahpur F. An overview of the methanol reforming process: Comparison of fuels, catalysts, reformers, and systems. International Journal of Energy Research 2019; 43: 5076–5105. doi: 10.1002/er.4440
- 6 Lima Da Silva A, Müller IL. Hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam reforming of oxygenated hydrocarbons (ethanol, glycerol, n-butanol and methanol): Thermodynamic modelling. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2011; 36: 2057–2075. doi: 10.1016/j. ijhydene.2010.11.051
- 7 Zhang J, Xiang Y, Lu S, Jiang SP. High Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells for Integrated Fuel Cell – Methanol Reformer Power Systems: A Critical Review. Advanced Sustainable Systems 2018; 2: 1–19. doi: 10.1002/adsu.201700184
- 8 Khzouz M, Wood J, Pollet B, Bujalski W. Characterization and activity test of commercial $Ni/Al_2O_3$, $Cu/ZnO/Al_2O_3$ and prepared $Ni-Cu/Al_2O_3$ catalysts for hydrogen production from methane and methanol fuels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2013; 38: 1664–1675. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.026
- 9 Ilsen Z. Catalytic Processes for Clean Hydrogen Production. Turkish Journal of Chemistry 2007; 31 (5): 531–550. 10 Chein R, Chen YC, Chung JN. Numerical study of methanol-steam reforming and methanol-air catalytic combustion in annulus reactors for hydrogen production. Applied Energy 2013; 102: 1022–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.010
- 11 Ouzounidou M, Ipsakis D, Voutetakis S, Papadopoulou S, Seferlis P. A combined methanol autothermal steam reforming and PEM fuel cell pilot plant unit: Experimental and simulation studies. Energy 2009; 34: 1733–1743. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.031
- 12 Pojanavaraphan C, Luengnaruemitchai A, Gulari E. Effect of support composition and metal loading on Au catalyst activity in steam reforming of methanol. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2012; 37: 14072–14084. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.06.107
- 13 Suh JS, Lee MT, Greif R, Grigoropoulos CP. Transport phenomena in a steam-methanol reforming microreactor with internal heating. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2009; 34: 314–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.049
- 14 Lei Y, Luo Y, Li X, Lu J, Mei Z et al. The role of samarium on $Cu/Al_2O_3$ catalyst in the methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production. Catalysis Today 2018; 307: 162–168. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.072
- 15 Men Y, Kolb G, Zapf R, O’Connell M, Ziogas A. Methanol steam reforming over bimetallic $Pd-In/Al_2O_3$ catalysts in a microstructured reactor. Applied Catalysis A: General 2010; 380: 15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.03.004
- 16 Sá S, Silva H, Brandão L, Sousa JM, Mendes A. Catalysts for methanol steam reforming-A review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2010; 99: 43–57. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.06.015
- 17 Sanches SG, Flores JH, De Avillez RR, Pais Da Silva MI. Influence of preparation methods and Zr and y promoters on Cu/ZnO catalysts used for methanol steam reforming. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2012; 37: 6572–6579. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.033
- 18 Ahmadi F, Haghighi M, Ajamein H. Sonochemically coprecipitation synthesis of $CuO/ZnO/ZrO_2/Al_2O_3$ nanocatalyst for fuel cell grade hydrogen production via steam methanol reforming. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 2016; 421: 196–208. doi: 10.1016/j. molcata.2016.05.027
- 19 Byeon JH, Kim YW. Ultrasound-assisted copper deposition on a polymer membrane and application for methanol steam reforming. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2013; 20: 472–477. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.06.002
- 20 Fasanya OO, Al-Hajri R, Ahmed OU, Myint MTZ, Atta AY et al. Copper zinc oxide nanocatalysts grown on cordierite substrate for hydrogen production using methanol steam reforming. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2019; 44: 22936–22946. doi: 10.1016/j. ijhydene.2019.06.185
- 21 Matsumura Y. Durable Cu composite catalyst for hydrogen production by high temperature methanol steam reforming. Journal of Power Sources 2014; 272: 961–969. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.047
- 22 Pojanavaraphan C, Luengnaruemitchai A, Gulari E. Effect of steam content and $O_2$ pretreatment on the catalytic activities of Au/CeO2- Fe2O3 catalysts for steam reforming of methanol. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 2014; 20: 961–971. doi: 10.1016/j. jiec.2013.06.029
- 23 Frank B, Jentoft F, Soerijanto H, Krohnert J, Schlogl R et al. Steam reforming of methanol over copper-containing catalysts: Influence of support material on microkinetics. Journal of Catalysis 2007; 246: 177–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2006.11.031
- 24 Matsumura Y, Ishibe H. Effect of zirconium oxide added to Cu/ZnO catalyst for steam reforming of methanol to hydrogen. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 2011; 345: 44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2011.05.017
- 25 Alejo L, Lago R, Peña MA, Fierro JLG. Partial oxidation of methanol to produce hydrogen over Cu-Zn-based catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General 1997; 162: 281–297. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(97)00112-9
- 26 Behrens M, Armbrüster M. Methanol Steam Reforming. In: Guczi L, Erdóhelyi A (editors). Catalysis for Alternative Energy Generation. New York, USA: Springer, 2012, pp. 175–235.
- 27 Stekrova M, Rinta-Paavola A, Karinen R. Hydrogen production via aqueous-phase reforming of methanol over nickel modified Ce, Zr and La oxide supports. Catalysis Today 2018; 304: 143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.08.030
- 28 Khani Y, Tahay P, Bahadoran F, Safari N, Soltanali S et al. Synergic effect of heat and light on the catalytic reforming of methanol over Cu/x-TiO2(x=La, Zn, Sm, Ce) nanocatalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General 2020; 594: 117456. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117456
- 29 Papavasiliou J, Avgouropoulos G, Ioannides T. Effect of dopants on the performance of $CuO-CeO_2$ catalysts in methanol steam reforming. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2007; 69: 226–234. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.07.007
- 30 Lu J, Li X, He S, Han C, Wan G et al. Hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming over Ni-based catalysts: Influences of Lanthanum (La) addition and supports. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2017; 42: 3647–3657. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.165
- 31 Aspen Technology Inc.. Website https://www.aspentech.com/ [accessed 22 February 2022].
- 32 Gražulis S, Chateigner D, Downs RT, Yokochi AFT, Quirós M et al. Crystallography Open Database – an open-access collection of crystal structures. Journal of Applied Crystallograpghy 2009; 42: 726–729. doi: 10.1107/S0021889809016690
- 33 Özcan O, Akın AN. Thermodynamic analysis of methanol steam reforming to produce hydrogen for HT-PEMFC: An optimization study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2019; 44: 14117–14126. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.211
- 34 Özcan MD, Özcan O, Akın AN. Thermodynamic modelling and optimization of oxy-reforming and oxy-steam reforming of biogas by RSM. Environmental Technology 2020; 41: 14–28. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2019.1639828
- 35 Ribeirinha P, Mateos-Pedrero C, Boaventura M, Sousa J, Mendes A. $CuO/ZnO/Ga_2O_3$ catalyst for low temperature MSR reaction: Synthesis, characterization and kinetic model. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2018; 221: 371–379. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.040
- 36 Varmazyari M, Khani Y, Bahadoran F, Shariatinia Z, Soltanali S. Hydrogen production employing Cu(BDC) metal–organic framework support in methanol steam reforming process within monolithic micro-reactors. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2021; 46: 565–580. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.245
| APA | Özcan O, AKIN A (2022). Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming. , 1069 - 1080. 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| Chicago | Özcan Orhan,AKIN AYSE Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming. (2022): 1069 - 1080. 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| MLA | Özcan Orhan,AKIN AYSE Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming. , 2022, ss.1069 - 1080. 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| AMA | Özcan O,AKIN A Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming. . 2022; 1069 - 1080. 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| Vancouver | Özcan O,AKIN A Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming. . 2022; 1069 - 1080. 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| IEEE | Özcan O,AKIN A "Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming." , ss.1069 - 1080, 2022. 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| ISNAD | Özcan, Orhan - AKIN, AYSE. "Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming". (2022), 1069-1080. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| APA | Özcan O, AKIN A (2022). Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 46(4), 1069 - 1080. 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| Chicago | Özcan Orhan,AKIN AYSE Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming. Turkish Journal of Chemistry 46, no.4 (2022): 1069 - 1080. 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| MLA | Özcan Orhan,AKIN AYSE Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, vol.46, no.4, 2022, ss.1069 - 1080. 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| AMA | Özcan O,AKIN A Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming. Turkish Journal of Chemistry. 2022; 46(4): 1069 - 1080. 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| Vancouver | Özcan O,AKIN A Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming. Turkish Journal of Chemistry. 2022; 46(4): 1069 - 1080. 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| IEEE | Özcan O,AKIN A "Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming." Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 46, ss.1069 - 1080, 2022. 10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
| ISNAD | Özcan, Orhan - AKIN, AYSE. "Comparison of a commercial water-gas shift catalyst and La modified Cu-based catalysts prepared by deposition-precipitation in methanol steam reforming". Turkish Journal of Chemistry 46/4 (2022), 1069-1080. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0527.3415 |
