Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish
Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 158 Sayfa Aralığı: 143 - 157 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish
Öz: Bu araştırmanın amacı; Kouzes & Posner (2003) tarafından geliştirilen Leadership Practices Inventory’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, 2009-2010 eğitim öğretim yılında Konya/Türkiye’de görev yapan öğretmenler arasından tesadüfî örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen 436 öğretmen oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma grubunda yer alan öğretmenlerin 194’ü kadın ve 242’si erkektir. Öğretmenlerin mesleki kıdemi ortalama 15 yıldır. Ölçeğin uyarlama sürecinde öncelikle Türkçe’ye çevirisi yapılmıştır. Ardından ölçeğin geçerliğini sağlamak amacıyla, dilsel eşdeğerliği test edilmiş, açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ölçeğin güvenirliği ise, Cronbach α, Spearman Brown, Gutmann Split-Half teknikleri, Düzeltilmiş Madde-toplam Korelasyonları ve %27’lik Alt-üst Grup Farkına İlişkin t Değerleri hesaplanarak sağlanmıştır. Bu işlemlerden sonra ölçeğin Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Liderlik uygulamaları ölçeği'nin Türkçe'ye uyarlama çalışması
Öz: Aim of this research is determined as adapting the Leadership Practice Inventory developed by Kouzes & Posner (2003) to Turkish. Working group of the research consist of 436 teachers chosen by using the random sampling method among the teachers working in 2009-2010 educational years in Konya/Turkey. 194 of the teachers constituting the working group are female and 242 of them are male. Average working year of them are 15 years. During the adaptation of the scale, it was first translated into Turkish by English teaching experts; then the Turkish text was retranslated into English, compared with the original text and found to be identical with it. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted. Reliability of the scale was tested by using Cronbach a, Spearman Brown, Gutmann Split-Half techniques and corrected item-total correlations, the values related to differences of 27 percentage lower-higher groups. As a result of the validity and reliability analysis, it was thought that Turkish adaptation process of the scale was completed.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Arnold, J.A., Arad,S.,. Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: Tine construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior,; 21, 249-269.
- Barth, R. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Bakay, E. & Kalem, G. (2009). Türk Eğitim Sistemi ve Etkili Okul Göstergeleri Project Based School Management Project Number: 142320-LLP-1-2008-1-TR-COMENIUS-CMP.
- Bartell, C. (1990). Outstanding secondary principals reflect on instructional leadership. The High School Journal, 73(2), 118-128.
- Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (1995) The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ), Redwood City: Mind Garden.
- Blase, J., & Blase, J. R. (1994). Empowering teachers: What successful principals do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Bilgen, N. (1990). Örgiit İklimi. Ankara: TODAIE.
- Bycio, P., Hackett, R. D., & Allen, J. S. (1995). Further assessments of Bass' 1985 conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 468-478.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
- Büyiiköztürle, S., Akgün, Ö. E., Demirel, F., & Özkahveci, Ö. (2004). Güdülenme ve Öğrenme Stratejileri Ölçegı'nin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalısması. Kuram ve Uygulamada EgitimBilimleri, 4(2), 207-239.
- Car less, S. A., Wearing A.J. & Mann, L. (2000) A short measure of transformational leadership. Journal of B usiness and Psychology, 14 (3), 389-405.
- Cheng, E. W. L. (2001). SEM being more effective than multiple regression in parsimonious model testing for management devolopment research. Journal of Management Development, 20(7), 650-667
- Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R.N. (1994). Charismatic leadership iri organizations: perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15 (5),439-452.
- Deal, T., & Peterson, K. (1999). Shaping school culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Donaldson, G. A. (2006). Cultivation leadership in schools: Connecting people, purpose, & practice (Second ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Harris, A., & Lambert, L. (2003). Building leadership capacity for school improvement. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
- Johnson, J.F., Jr., & Asera, R„ (Eds.) (1999). Hope for urban education: A study of nine high-performing, high-poverty, urban elementary schools. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc., Washington DC. Austin, TX: Charles A Dana Center. Retrieved September 21, 2005 from www.ed.gov/PDFDocs/urbaned.pdf.
- Kelloway, E. K. (1.998) Using Lisrel for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide. London: Sage Publications.
- Kouzes, J. M.,& Posner, B. Z. (2001). Leadership practices inventory [LPI] Revised second edition online version participant's workbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
- Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2003). The Leadership Practices Inventonj: Observer (3rd e d.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Liden, R.C., Wayne, S .J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly; 19, 161-177.
- McKeever, B., & CSLA. (2003). Nine lessons of successful school leadership teams. San Francisco: West Ed.
- Mendez-Morse, S. (1991). The principal's role in Üre instructional process: Implications for at-risk students. Issues ... About Change, 2(3). Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, Austin, TX.
- Özdemir, S. (2000). Eğitimde Örgütsel Yenileşme. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
- Özgüven, İ.E. (1994). Psikolojik Testler. Ankara: Yeni Doğuş Matbaası.
- Pang, N. S. K. (1996). School values and teachers' feelings: A Lisrel model. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(2), 64-83.
- Rafferty, A.E. & Griffin, M.A. Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 25,329-354.
- Seifert, E. H., Vornberg, J. A. (2002). The new school leader for the 21st centunj: The principal. Maryland: Scarecrow Education.
- Scheurich, J. J. (1998). Highly successful and loving public elementary schools populated mainly by low ses children of color: Core beliefs and cultural characteristics. Urban Education, 33(4), 451-491.
- Sheppard, B., & Brown, J. (2000). Leadership and the transformation of secondary schools into learning organisations. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Understanding schools as intelligent systems (pp. 293-314). Stamford, Connecticut: JAI Press.
- Sheppard, B., & Brown, J., Dibbon, D. (2009). School district leadership matters (Vol. 6). Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
- Sizemore, B. (1985). Pitfalls and promises of effective schools research, journal ofNegiv Education, 54(3), 269-288.
- Steller, A. W. (1988). Effective schools research: Practice and Promise. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Foundation.
- Şimşek, Ö.F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş: Temel İlkeler ve Lisrel Uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayıncılık.
- Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3. Ed.). New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
- Tomlinson, H. (2004). Educational leadership: Personal growth for professional development. Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE Publications Inc.
- Valentine, J.W., & Bowman, M.L. (1988). Audit of principal effectiveness: A method for self-improvement. NASSP Bulletin, 72(508), 18-26.
- Wendel, F. C., Hoke, F. A., & Joekel, R. G. (1996). Outstanding school administrators: Their keys to success. Westport, CT: Praeger.
| APA | YAVUZ M (2010). Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish. , 143 - 157. |
| Chicago | YAVUZ MUSTAFA Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish. (2010): 143 - 157. |
| MLA | YAVUZ MUSTAFA Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish. , 2010, ss.143 - 157. |
| AMA | YAVUZ M Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish. . 2010; 143 - 157. |
| Vancouver | YAVUZ M Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish. . 2010; 143 - 157. |
| IEEE | YAVUZ M "Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish." , ss.143 - 157, 2010. |
| ISNAD | YAVUZ, MUSTAFA. "Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish". (2010), 143-157. |
| APA | YAVUZ M (2010). Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(158), 143 - 157. |
| Chicago | YAVUZ MUSTAFA Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish. Eğitim ve Bilim 35, no.158 (2010): 143 - 157. |
| MLA | YAVUZ MUSTAFA Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.35, no.158, 2010, ss.143 - 157. |
| AMA | YAVUZ M Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2010; 35(158): 143 - 157. |
| Vancouver | YAVUZ M Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2010; 35(158): 143 - 157. |
| IEEE | YAVUZ M "Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish." Eğitim ve Bilim, 35, ss.143 - 157, 2010. |
| ISNAD | YAVUZ, MUSTAFA. "Adaptation of the leadership practices inventory (LPI) to Turkish". Eğitim ve Bilim 35/158 (2010), 143-157. |
