Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 16 - 27 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.29216/ueip.1181188 İndeks Tarihi: 16-05-2023

Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries

Öz:
Since the 1980s, income inequality has increased significantly in developed and developing countries. The literature has also seen studies that attempt to explain this rising trend in income inequality. Some studies explaining the increase in income inequality in various ways have focused on economic globalization. Questions on how the steps taken towards liberalization in international trade and finance and increasing market integration affect income inequality have been at the center of the discussions in these studies. Uncertainty about the direction and extent of the link between globalization and inequality persists primarily because of the conflicting empirical findings in the literature. This study aims to contribute to the literature by conducting an empirical analysis of MIST countries with data covering 1987-2019. The study's findings, which used panel data analysis to assess the data, showed that while trade and financial openness reduce income inequality for MIST countries over the analyzed period, foreign direct investments do the opposite. The results also showed that the effect of financial openness on income inequality is greater than the effect of trade openness. It is also discovered that the rate of per capita income increase has no statistically significant impact on income inequality.
Anahtar Kelime: Trade Openness Financial Openness Income Inequality MIST Countries Panel Data Analysis

Ticari Açıklık, Finansal Açıklık ve Gelir Eşitsizliği İlişkisi: MIST Ülkeleri için Ampirik Bulgular

Öz:
1980'lerden sonra hem gelişmiş hem de gelişmekte olan ülkelerde gelir eşitsizliği belirgin bir artış göstermiştir. Gelir eşitsizliğindeki bu artışı çeşitli şekillerde açıklayan çalışmalar da bunun üzerine literatürdeki yerini almıştır. Bu çalışma sorunun ekonomik küreselleşme yönü üzerinde durmakta, uluslararası ticaret ve finans alanlarında serbestleştirme yönünde atılan adımların gelir eşitsizliğini nasıl etkilediğini incelemektedir. Literatürde birbiriyle çelişen bulguların olması nedeniyle küreselleşme ve eşitsizlik arasındaki bağlantının yönü ve boyutu hakkında belirsizlik büyük ölçüde devam etmektedir. Bu çalışma, MIST ülkeleri üzerine 1987-2019 dönemini kapsayan verilerle ampirik analiz yaparak literatüre katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Panel veri analizi yönteminin uygulandığı çalışmanın sonuçları, incelenen dönem içerisinde MIST ülkeleri için ticari ve finansal açıklığın gelir eşitsizliğini azaltan, doğrudan yabancı yatırımların ise gelir eşitsizliğini artıran unsurlar olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuçlar ayrıca finansal açıklığın gelir eşitsizliği üzerindeki etkisinin ticari açıklığın etkisinden daha büyük olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca kişi başına düşen gelirdeki büyüme oranının gelir eşitsizliği üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı tespit edilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: Ticari Açıklık Gelir Eşitsizliği Finansal Açıklık Panel Veri Analizi Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Agusalim, L. and Pohan, F. S. (2018). Trade Openness Effect on Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 7(1), 1-14.
  • Ak, M. Z. ve Altıntaş, N. (2016). Kuznets’in Ters U Eğrisi Bağlamında Türkiye’de Gelir Eşitsizliği ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: 1986-2012. Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 93-102.
  • Akbakay, Z. ve Barak, D. (2020). Yükselen Piyasalarda Ekonomik Küreselleşme ve Gelir Eşitsizliği İlişkisi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 16(1), 17-34.
  • Aman, A., Ahmad, U. and Saleem, S. M. (2021). Investigating the Link Between Macroeconomic Factors and Income Inequality of Asian Countries. iRASD Journal of Economics, 3(3), 376- 387.
  • Bahadır, B. and Dereli, B. E. (2021). Globalization and Income Inequality: Evidence from BRICS-T Countries. Econder International Academic Journal, 5(2), 189-203.
  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Chang, T. and Lee, K. C. (2014). Purchasing Power Parity in the BRICS and the MIST Countries: Sequential Panel Selection Method. Review of Economics & Finance, 4, 1-12.
  • Baltagi, B.H. and Wu P.X. (1999). Unequally Spaced Panel Data Regressions with AR(1) Disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15(6), 814–823.
  • Beck, T., Kunt, A. D. and Levine, R. (2007). Finance Inequality and the Poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 27-49.
  • Beji, S. (2019). Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Do Institutions Matter for Africa?. Economics Bulletin, 39(1), 104-114.
  • Bhandari, B. (2007). Effect of Inward Foreign Direct Investment on Income Inequality in Transition Countries. Journal of Economic Integration, 22(4), 888-928.
  • Brady, D., Beckfield, J. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2005). Economic Globalization and the Welfare State in Affluent Democracies 1975-2001. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 921-948.
  • Breusch, T. S. and Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Application to Model Specifications in Econometrics. Review of Economic Studies. 47(1), 239–253.
  • Bumann, S. and Lensink, R. (2016). Capital Account Liberalization and Income Inequality. Journal of International Money and Finance, 61, 143-162.
  • Chinn, M.D. and Ito, H. (2006). What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions, and Interactions. Journal of Development Economics, 81(1), 163-192.
  • Dabla-Norris, E., Kochhar, K., Suphaphiphat, N., Ricka, F. and Tsounta, E. (2015). Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global Perspective. IMF Staff Discussion Note, No: 15/13.
  • De Haan, J. and Sturm, J. (2017). Finance and Income Inequality: A Review and New Evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 50, 171-195.
  • Delis, M.D., Hasan, I. and Kazakis, P. (2014). Bank Regulations and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence. Review of Finance, 18(5), 1811-1846.
  • Dinler, Z. (2016). İktisada Giriş. Bursa: Ekin Yayınları.
  • Dişbudak, C. ve Süslü B. (2009). Kalkınma ve Bireysel Gelir Dağılımı: Kuznets Hipotezi Türkiye için Geçerli mi?. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 18, 146-166.
  • Dollar, D. and Kraay, A. (2004). Trade Growth and Poverty. The Economic Journal, 114(493), 22-49.
  • Driscoll, J.C. and Kraay, A.C. (1998). Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560.
  • Faustino, H.C. and Vali, C. (2013). The Effects of Globalization and Economic Growth of Income Inequality: Evidence for 24 OECD Countries. Argumenta Oeconomica, 1(30), 13-31.
  • Friedman M. (1937). The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32(200), 675-701.
  • Gourdon, J., Maystre, N. and De Melo, J. (2008). Openness Inequality and Poverty: Endowments Matter. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 17(3), 343-378.
  • Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N. and Sturm, J. (2019). The KOF Globalisation Index revisited. The Review of International Organisations, 14, 543-574.
  • Heimberger, P. (2019). Beinflusst die Ökonomische Globalisierung die Einkommensungleichheit? Eine Meta-Analyse. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 45(4), 497-529.
  • Hymer, S. (1976). The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • ILO. (2008). World of Work Report 2008: Income Inequalities in the Age of Financial Globalization, Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
  • Jaumotte, F., Lall, S. and Papageorgiou, C. (2013). Rising Income Inequality: Technology, or Trade and Financial Globalization?. IMF Economic Review, 61(2), 271-309.
  • Jensen, N. M. and Rosas, G. (2007). Foreign Direct Investment and Income Inequality in Mexico, 1990-2000. International Organization, 61(3), 467-487.
  • Le, Q. H., Do, Q. A., Pham, H. C. and Nguyen, T. D. (2021). The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Income Inequality in Vietnam. Economies, 9(27), 1-15.
  • Letsoalo, T. E. and Ncanywa, T. (2021). Effects of External Financial Flows On Income Inequality in Selected Southern African Development Community Member States. Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review, 9(1), a476.
  • Levine, R. (2005). Finance and Growth: Theory and Evidence. P. Aghion and S.N. Durlauf (Ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Volume 1 A (s.865-934) içinde. North Holland.
  • Li, X. and Su, D. (2021). Does Capital Account Liberalization Affect Income Inequality?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 377-410.
  • Manu, C. (2021). Effect of Globalization on Income Inequality in Ghana. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 13(2), 15-24.
  • Meschi, E. and Vivarelli, M. (2009). Trade and Income Inequality in Developing Countries. World Development, 7(2), 287-302.
  • Mihaylova, S. (2015). Foreign Direct Investment and Income Inequality in Central and Eastern Europe. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 22(603), 23-42.
  • Özdemir, M. Ç. (2017). Gelir Eşitsizliği Ölçüm Yöntemleri. E. İslamoğlu and M. Ç. Özdemir(Ed.), Gelir Dağılımı ve Yoksulluk (s. 78-110) içinde. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Öztürk, N. (2009). İktisatta Bölüşüm. Ankara: Palme Yayıncılık.
  • Perera, S., Siriwardana, M. and Mounter, S. (2014). Reducing Poverty And Income Inequality In Sri Lanka: Does Trade Liberalization Help?. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 19(4), 629-655.
  • Şengür, M. (2020). Gelir Eşitsizliği ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Geçiş Ekonomileri Üzerine Panel Veri Analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 331- 346.
  • Solt, F. (2020). Measuring Income Inequality Across Countries and Over Time: The Standardized World Income Inequality Database. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1183-1199.
  • Stolper, W.F. and Samuelson, P.A. (1941). Protection and Real Wages. The Review of Economic Studies, 9(1), 58-73.
  • Sylwester, K. (2005). Foreign Direct Investment, Growth and Income Inequality in Less Developed Countries. International Review of Applied Economics, 19(3), 289-300.
  • Tatoğlu F Y. 2012. Panel Veri Ekonometrisi. İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
  • Topuz, S. G. and Dağdemir, Ö. (2016). Ekonomik Büyüme ve Gelir Eşitsizliği İlişkisi: Kuznets Ters- U Hipotezi’nin Geçerliliği. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 115-130.
  • Ullah, I., Tunio, F.H. Ulllah, Z. and Nabi, A.A. (2022). The Impact of Capital Account Openness on Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Asia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(2), 49-59.
  • UNDP (2013). Humanity Divided: Confronting Inequality in Developing Countries. United Nations Development Programme. Access address: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/ zskgke326/files/publications/HumanityDivided_Full-Report.pdf.
  • Villaverde, J. and Maza, A. (2011). Globalisation Growth and Convergence. The World Economy, 34(6), 952-971.
  • World Bank (2022). World Development Indicators/ Data Bank. Access address: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
  • Zakaria, M. and Fida, B.A. (2016). Trade Openness and Income Inequality in China and the SAARC Region. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 30(2), 33-44.
APA CENGİZ V, DEMIR S (2023). Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries. , 16 - 27. 10.29216/ueip.1181188
Chicago CENGİZ VEDAT,DEMIR SEDANUR Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries. (2023): 16 - 27. 10.29216/ueip.1181188
MLA CENGİZ VEDAT,DEMIR SEDANUR Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries. , 2023, ss.16 - 27. 10.29216/ueip.1181188
AMA CENGİZ V,DEMIR S Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries. . 2023; 16 - 27. 10.29216/ueip.1181188
Vancouver CENGİZ V,DEMIR S Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries. . 2023; 16 - 27. 10.29216/ueip.1181188
IEEE CENGİZ V,DEMIR S "Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries." , ss.16 - 27, 2023. 10.29216/ueip.1181188
ISNAD CENGİZ, VEDAT - DEMIR, SEDANUR. "Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries". (2023), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.1181188
APA CENGİZ V, DEMIR S (2023). Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 7(1), 16 - 27. 10.29216/ueip.1181188
Chicago CENGİZ VEDAT,DEMIR SEDANUR Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi 7, no.1 (2023): 16 - 27. 10.29216/ueip.1181188
MLA CENGİZ VEDAT,DEMIR SEDANUR Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, vol.7, no.1, 2023, ss.16 - 27. 10.29216/ueip.1181188
AMA CENGİZ V,DEMIR S Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi. 2023; 7(1): 16 - 27. 10.29216/ueip.1181188
Vancouver CENGİZ V,DEMIR S Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi. 2023; 7(1): 16 - 27. 10.29216/ueip.1181188
IEEE CENGİZ V,DEMIR S "Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries." Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 7, ss.16 - 27, 2023. 10.29216/ueip.1181188
ISNAD CENGİZ, VEDAT - DEMIR, SEDANUR. "Trade Openness, Financial Openness and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence for MIST Countries". Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi 7/1 (2023), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.1181188