Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 54 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 281 - 284 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037 İndeks Tarihi: 06-05-2023

Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty

Öz:
Objective: Prominent ear deformity is one of the aesthetic problems that should be treated due to the psychosocial problems it causes. We aimed to present our results in which we used the combination of Mustarde suture to create an antihelix, conchal resection, and concomastoid suture combination to reduce conchal excess in the light of literature. Materials and Methods: A total of 28 cases in which the same otoplasty method was used in 2 separate centers between 2014 and 2020 were included in the study. Elliptic skin excision, antihelix reconstruction with Mustarde suture, and in cases with large conchal cartilage, cartilage excision and reconstruction with concomastoid suture were performed in all of our cases. After the skin was closed, a bandage was applied to the ear. Results: In the early postoperative period, hematoma developed in 4 cases. There was superficial erosion of the skin in 4 cases. In the late period, hypertrophic scar developed in both ears and resolved with medi- cal treatment. There was minimal asymmetry in 4 cases, but intervention was not required in cases with asymmetry. Skin necrosis, infection, and visible cartilage irregularity on the anterior side were not observed in any case. Conclusion: The aim of otoplasty is to create symmetrical ears with smooth contours, so combined tech- niques should be used instead of a single technique. In otoplasty, we used Mustarde suture to create antihelix, conchal resection, and concomastoid suture combination to reduce cavum. Our results were satisfactory.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Cincik H, et al. Iki Yillik Otoplasti Deneyimi ve Sonuclarimiz. KBB-Forum. 1995;6(1):1-5.
  • 2. Adamson PA, Strecker HD. Otoplasty tech- niques. Facial Plast Surg. 1995;11(4):284-300. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Adamson JE, Horton CE, Crawford HH. The growth pattern of the external ear. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;36(4):466-470. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Çelebi Ş, Çelik Ö, Karaca ÇT. Sadece Sütürleme Yöntemi ile Elde Ettiğimiz Otoplasti Sonuçlarımız. Kartal Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Derg. 2011;22(1):15-19.
  • 5. Schaverien MV, Al-Busaidi S, Stewart KJ. Long- term results of posterior suturing with postau- ricular fascial flap otoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aes- thet Surg. 2010;63(9):1447-1451. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Koçman AE. erişkin Hastalarda Kepçe Kulak Düzeltilmesinde Önden Yaygin Kikirdak Aşindirma Yöntemi ile Mustardé Dikişi, Sinirli Önden Kikirdak Aşindirma ve Postavriküler Fasyal Flep Birleşik Yöntemlerinin Karşilaştirilmasi. KBB-Forum. 2017;16(1):28-34.
  • 7. Mustardé JC. The treatment of prominent ears by buried mattress sutures: a ten-year survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;39(4):382-386. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Converse JM, Wood-Smith D. Technical details in the surgical correction of the lop ear deform- ity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963;31(2):118-128. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Yugueros P, Friedland JA. Otoplasty: the experi- ence of 100 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(4):1045-1051. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Salgarello M, et al. Otoplasty for prominent ears: a versatile combined technique to master the shape of the ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(2):224-227. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Battista RA, Giordano L, Giordano Resti A, et al. Combination of Mustarde cheek advancement flap and paramedian forehead flap as a recon- structive option in orbital exenteration. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(3):1463-1468. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Hassanpour SE, Moosavizadeh SM. Posterior scoring of the scapha as a refinement in aesthetic otoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(1):78-86. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Gülşen S, Ulutaş S. Heliks-Antiheliks Ayırma Tekniği ile Otoplasti Sonuçlarımız. Dicle Tıp Derg. 2019;46(3):435-441. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Songu M. Kombine Mustardé ve Furnas Tipi Otoplastisi: 85 Hastalık Deneyim. J Med Updates. 2013;3(3):129-134. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Rubino C, Farace F, Figus A, Masia DR. Anterior scoring of the upper helical cartilage as a refine- ment in aesthetic otoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2005;29(2):88-93. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Stucker FJ, Vora NM, Lian TS. Otoplasty: an analysis of technique Over a 33-year period. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(6):952-956. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Alzayadneh I, Glikson E, Shapiro J, Rival E, Solo- mon Z, Solomon P. Utilization of free soft-tissue grafts in otoplasty: a simple yet effective way to avoid suture extrusion. Aesthet Surg J. 2022. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Boroditsky ML, Van Slyke AC, Arneja JS. Out- comes and complications of the Mustarde oto- plasty: a “good-fast-cheap” technique for the prominent ear deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(9):e3103. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Chongchet V. A method of antihelix reconstruc- tion. Br J Plast Surg. 1963;16:268-272. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Stenstroem SJ. A “natural” technique for correc- tion of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Recon- str Surg. 1963;32(5):509-518. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Schneider AL, Sidle DM. Cosmetic otoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2018;26(1):19-29. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Ahmed M, Alkhalaf H, Ibrahim E. Helix free oto- plasty for correction of prominent ear. Asian J Surg. 2019;42(5):621-627. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Calder JC, Naasan A. Morbidity of otoplasty: a review of 562 consecutive cases. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47(3):170-174. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Weerda H, Siegert R. Complications in otoplastic surgery and their treatment. Facial Plast Surg. 1994;10(3):287-297. [CrossRef]
APA OLGUN A, Dilber M (2022). Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty. , 281 - 284. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
Chicago OLGUN ABDULKERIM,Dilber Muhammet Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty. (2022): 281 - 284. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
MLA OLGUN ABDULKERIM,Dilber Muhammet Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty. , 2022, ss.281 - 284. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
AMA OLGUN A,Dilber M Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty. . 2022; 281 - 284. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
Vancouver OLGUN A,Dilber M Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty. . 2022; 281 - 284. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
IEEE OLGUN A,Dilber M "Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty." , ss.281 - 284, 2022. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
ISNAD OLGUN, ABDULKERIM - Dilber, Muhammet. "Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty". (2022), 281-284. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
APA OLGUN A, Dilber M (2022). Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 54(3), 281 - 284. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
Chicago OLGUN ABDULKERIM,Dilber Muhammet Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty. Eurasian Journal of Medicine 54, no.3 (2022): 281 - 284. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
MLA OLGUN ABDULKERIM,Dilber Muhammet Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, vol.54, no.3, 2022, ss.281 - 284. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
AMA OLGUN A,Dilber M Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2022; 54(3): 281 - 284. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
Vancouver OLGUN A,Dilber M Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2022; 54(3): 281 - 284. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
IEEE OLGUN A,Dilber M "Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty." Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 54, ss.281 - 284, 2022. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037
ISNAD OLGUN, ABDULKERIM - Dilber, Muhammet. "Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty". Eurasian Journal of Medicine 54/3 (2022), 281-284. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037