The main purpose of this research, labor market employment policy implemented by governments in OECD member countries of the logic of efficiency as an alternative to traditional methods of Game proposed cross effectiveness models and the advantages of alternative models based on the comparison with the results of the comparison in the field type has to offer. Thirty-six OECD member states were selected as the decision-making unit (DMU) within the scope of the proposed cross effectiveness model of the study. Four input and two output variables were used for the model. The input variables used in the model are part-time (partial) employment rate, labor force participation rate, foreign direct investments, exports, and the output variables are employment rate and GDP. Annual data of all countries were used in the study. Therefore, changes have been observed over time and it has been evaluated how/in what direction the labor activity values of DMUs have changed over the years. The alternative game cross-activity method proposed in the study can be preferred as an alternative method to determine the effectiveness of DMUs according to the traditional/classic CCR-DEA and BCC-DEA models and to create their own rankings. The alternative method proposed in this study has not been used in the Turkish labor markets activity field article before, so it will be able to give researchers a different perspective. According to the model results, the most inefficient countries are Mexico, New Zealand, Turkey and the Netherlands. The three countries with the best employment policy effectiveness were Luxembourg, Iceland and Hungary.