Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 2023 Sayı: 34 Sayfa Aralığı: 239 - 265 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14689/enad.34.1662 İndeks Tarihi: 05-07-2023

A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19

Öz:
This study aimed to explore the similarities and differences between face-to-face and online education based on the opinions of two groups of students using the qualitative method and a comparative case study design. Of the 38 tertiary-level participants, 19 had finished the program before COVID-19, while the other 19 completed it online during quarantine. A structured interview form was used for collecting the participants’ opinions online, and content analysis was utilized for data analysis. The analysis resulted in three main themes were expectations, learning processes and outcomes. The first theme, expectations, yielded two shared categories for both groups: four language skills and academic/departmental expectations. Also, one separate category appeared for the face-to-face group: daily use of language. The second theme, the learning process, produced a shared category that was related to educational opportunities. The different categories were classroom atmosphere for the online group and physical opportunities/facilities for the face-to-face group. The last theme, which was about the outcomes of the program, provided two shared categories: faculty use and faculty-level challenges. The findings showed that participants’ opinions about online and face-to-face language programs were mostly similar. More comparative studies should be conducted to further explore the differences between online and face-to-face education in the long term.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abu Talib, M., Bettayeb, A.M., & Omer, R.I. Analytical study on the impact of technology in higher education during the age of COVID-19: Systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6719–6746 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10507-1
  • Ali, A., &Ahmad, I. (2011). Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in Distance Learning Courses: A Study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2), 118-134.
  • Ali, A., Ramay M., & Shahzad M. (2011). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University (AUOU) Islamabad, Pakistan, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(2), 114-127.
  • Aly, I. (2013). Performance in an online introductory course in a hybrid classroom setting. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43(2), 85-99.
  • Arbaugh, J.B. (2000a). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with Internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24, 32-54.
  • Ayebi-Arthur K. (2017) E-learning, resilience and change in higher education: Helping a university cope after a natural disaster. E-Learning and Digital Media. 14(5), 259-274. doi:10.1177/2042753017751712
  • Bakioğlu, B., & Çevik, M. (2020). COVID-19 pandemisi sürecinde fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin uzaktan eğitime ilişkin görüşleri. Turkish Studies, 15(4), 109-129.
  • Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2004). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26, 87–122. doi: 10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
  • Brownson, K,. & Harriman R. L. (2000). Distance education in the twenty-first century. Hospital Materiel Management Quarterly 22(2), 64-72.
  • Cabi, E., & Kalelioglu, F. (2019). A fully online course experience from students' perspective: readiness, attitudes and thoughts. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(3), 165-180.
  • Chen, C. C., & Jones, K. T. (2007). Blended learning vs. traditional classroom settings: Assessing effectiveness and student perceptions in an MBA accounting course. Journal of Educators Online, 4(1), 1–15.
  • Chen, D., & Guo, W. Y. (2005). Distance learning in China. Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 3(4), 1-5.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualiative inquiry and research design (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • De La Varre, C., Keane, J., & Irvin, M. J. (2010). Enhancing online distance education in small rural US schools: A hybrid, learner-centred model. ALT-J Association for Learning Technology, 18, 193–205. doi: 10.1080/09687769.2010.529109
  • Dendir, S. (2019). Performance differences between face-to-face and online students in economics. Journal of Education for Business, 94(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2018.1503586
  • Dhawan S. (2020) Online Learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  • Evişen, N., Akyılmaz, Ö., & Torun, Y. (2020). A Case Study of University EFL Preparatory Class Students’ Attitudes towards Online Learning during COVID-19 in Turkey. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4 (2), 73-93. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/guebd/issue/59201/803017
  • Ferri, F., Grifoni, G., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10(4), 1-18. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/4/86/htm
  • Flick, O., (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research: Sage Publications.
  • Herman, T., & Banister, S. (2007). Face-to face versus online coursework: A comparison of costs and learning outcomes. Contemporary Issues in Technology Education, 7(4), 318-326.
  • Hong, K.S., Lai, K.W., & Holton, D. (2003). Students' satisfaction and perceived learning with a Web based course. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 6(1), 116-124.
  • Hurd, S. (2006). Individual learner differences and distance language learning: An overview. RTVU ELT Express, 12(4), 1-26.
  • Irani, T. (1998). Communication potential, information richness and attitude: A study of computer mediated communication in the ALN classroom. ALN Magazine, 2(1) [Online].
  • Jeffcoat, B., S., & Golek, J. H. (2004). Evaluating the cost effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. Journal of Educational Technology and Society 7, 167–175.
  • Karakuş, N., Ucuzsatar, N., Karacaoğlu, M. Ö., Esendemir, N., & Bayraktar, D. (2020). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının uzaktan eğitime yönelik görüşleri. Rumelide Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (19), 220-241.
  • Koory, M. A. (2003). Differences in learning outcomes for the online and F2F versions of "An Introduction to Shakespeare". Journal for Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2), 18-39.
  • Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry: Sage Publications.
  • Marshall, M.N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family practice, 13(6), 522-5.
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.
  • Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Michailidou, A., & Economides, A. (2003). E-learn: Towards a collaborative educational virtual environment. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2, 131-152.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. New York: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Moore, M. G. (1993). Three types of interaction. In K. Harry, M. Hohn, and D. Keegan (Ed.), Distance education: New perspectives (pp. 12-24). London: Routledge.
  • Northrup, P. T. (2002). Online learners' preferences for interaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 32, 219–226.
  • Onyema E.M., Eucheria N.C., Obafemi F.A., Sen S., Atonye F.G., Sharma A., & Alsayed A.O. (2020) Impact of Coronavirus pandemic on education. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(13), 108-121.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40.
  • Queiros, D. R., & de Villiers, M. R. (2016). Online learning in a South African higher education institution: Determining the right connections for the student. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 165-185.
  • Rahim, A., Ali, S., Ali, S., & Fayyaz, H. (2020). Riphah Medical, Dental and Physiotherapy Faculty Experience with Online Education – COVID-19 Pandemic. PAFMJ, 70(2), 506-12. https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/5240
  • Sahin, I. (2007). Predicting student satisfaction in distance education and learning environments. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 1302–6488.
  • Sargeant, J., Curran, V., Allen, M., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Ho, K. (2006). Facilitating interpersonal interaction and learning online: Linking theory and practice. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26, 128-136.
  • Selim, H. M. (2005). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers and Education, 49, 396-413.
  • Stake, R.E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68, 523–540.
  • Stake, R. E. (2008). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed., pp. 119–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Strauss, A. (1998). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306-316.
  • Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz,W., & Maher, G. (2000). Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 234, 359–383.
  • Şentürk, S., Duran, V. & Yilmaz, A. (2020). The secondary school students’ opinions on distance education. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(4), 360-367.
  • Taş, M. (2022). Yüz yüze ve çevrimiçi derslerin karşılaştırılması: Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri (Publication No: 711598) [Unpublished master’s thesis, Agri İbrahim Cecen University], Agri. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  • Thurmond, V. A., Wambach, K., Connors, H. R., & Frey, B. B. (2002). Evaluation of student satisfaction: Determining the impact of a web-based environment by controlling for student characteristics. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 169-189.
  • Turkish Council of Higher Education, (2020). CoHE President’s press release. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2020/universitelerde-uygulanacak-uzaktan-egitime-iliskin-aciklama.aspx
  • UNESCO (2020a, March 29). Global monitoring of school closures. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://en.unesco.org/COVID19/educationresponse#durationschoolclosures
  • UNESCO (2020b). Distance learning strategies in response to COVID-19 school closures. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373305
  • Unger, S., & Meiran, W. R. (2020). Student attitudes towards online education during the COVID-19 viral outbreak of 2020: Distance learning in a time of social distance. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 4(4), 256-266.
  • Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216-223.
  • Warren, L. L., & Holloman, H. L. (2005). On-line instruction: Are the outcomes the same? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(2), 148-150.
  • Weber, J. M., & Lennon, R. (2007). Multi-course comparison of traditional versus web-based course delivery systems. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1-19. https://www.thejeo.com/archive/archive/2007_42/weber_finalpdf
  • Webster, J., & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282–1309.
  • WHO (2020, March 11). WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-COVID-19---11-march-2020
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9th Ed.). Seckin.
  • Young, A., & Norgard, C. (2006). Assessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 107–115.
APA AYAZ M, Yağcı E (2023). A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19. , 239 - 265. 10.14689/enad.34.1662
Chicago AYAZ Mehmet Ali,Yağcı Esed A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19. (2023): 239 - 265. 10.14689/enad.34.1662
MLA AYAZ Mehmet Ali,Yağcı Esed A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19. , 2023, ss.239 - 265. 10.14689/enad.34.1662
AMA AYAZ M,Yağcı E A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19. . 2023; 239 - 265. 10.14689/enad.34.1662
Vancouver AYAZ M,Yağcı E A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19. . 2023; 239 - 265. 10.14689/enad.34.1662
IEEE AYAZ M,Yağcı E "A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19." , ss.239 - 265, 2023. 10.14689/enad.34.1662
ISNAD AYAZ, Mehmet Ali - Yağcı, Esed. "A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19". (2023), 239-265. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.34.1662
APA AYAZ M, Yağcı E (2023). A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2023(34), 239 - 265. 10.14689/enad.34.1662
Chicago AYAZ Mehmet Ali,Yağcı Esed A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi 2023, no.34 (2023): 239 - 265. 10.14689/enad.34.1662
MLA AYAZ Mehmet Ali,Yağcı Esed A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, vol.2023, no.34, 2023, ss.239 - 265. 10.14689/enad.34.1662
AMA AYAZ M,Yağcı E A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2023; 2023(34): 239 - 265. 10.14689/enad.34.1662
Vancouver AYAZ M,Yağcı E A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2023; 2023(34): 239 - 265. 10.14689/enad.34.1662
IEEE AYAZ M,Yağcı E "A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19." Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2023, ss.239 - 265, 2023. 10.14689/enad.34.1662
ISNAD AYAZ, Mehmet Ali - Yağcı, Esed. "A Lost Year? Perspectives of foreign language students before and after the COVID-19". Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi 2023/34 (2023), 239-265. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.34.1662