‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?

Bayraktar, Fesih

‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?

Fesih BAYRAKTAR (Ardahan Üniversitesi, İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü, Ardahan, Türkiye)

Amme İdaresi Dergisi

74 0

Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 56 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 34 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 11-08-2023

‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?

Öz:

Bu makale özellikle son on yılda küresel Kuzey kentlerinde giderek artan bir görünürlük kazanan ‘kendin-yap’ kent aktivizmine odaklanmakta ve literatürde büyük bir coşkuyla karşılanan bu taban aktivizminin sosyal ve politik sınırlılıklarını göstermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Konuya ilişkin literatür, uzun bir tarihsel arka plana sahip bu ‘taban şehirciliğinin’, ‘yaratıcı şehir’ ve ‘soylulaştırma’ gibi güncel neoliberal kent politikaları doğrultusunda edindiği yeni işlevleri anlamaya yönelik daha ihtiyatlı çabaları gölgede bırakan çoğunlukla zorlama ‘radikallik’ ve ‘direniş’ anlatılarıyla maluldür. Çalışma, bu aceleci çıkarım ve beklentilerin söz konusu fenomeni anlamayı güçleştirdiğini ve daha analitik bir çabanın onun daha geniş bir tarihsel, sosyo-ekonomik ve politik bağlamda ve yalnızca toplumsal ‘dönüşümle’ ilgili potansiyellerini değil, toplumsal ve politik-ideolojik ‘yeniden üretimle’ ilgili boyutlarını da içerecek şekilde incelenmesiyle mümkün olduğunu iddia etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelime: Kendin-Yap Kent Aktivizmi Taban Şehirciliği Neoliberal Şehircilik Yaratıcı Şehir Soylulaştırma

‘Do-It-Yourself’ Urban Activism: Radical Grassroots Politics or Complicits of Neoliberal Urbanism?

Öz:

This paper focuses on 'do-it-yourself' urban activism that has gained increasing visibility in global North cities over the past decade and aims to demonstrate the social and political constraints of this grassroots activism that has been met with great enthusiasm in the literature on it. The literature on the subject is riddled with far-fetched 'radicalism' and 'resistance' narratives, which overshadow the more cautious efforts to understand the new functions that this ’grassroots urbanism‘, which has a long historical background, has recently acquired in line with neoliberal urban policies such as ’creative city' and 'gentrification’. This study argues that these hasty inferences and expectations make it difficult to understand this phenomenon and that a more analytical effort is possible by examining it in a broader historical, socio-economic and political context and in a way that includes not only its potentials related to social ‘transformation’, but also its dimensions related to social and political-ideological ‘reproduction’.

Anahtar Kelime: Do-It-Yourself Urban Activism Grassroots Urbanism Neoliberal Urbanism Creative City Gentrification

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

Adams, D. ve M. Hardman (2014). "Observing Guerrillas in the Wild: Reinterpreting Practices of Urban Guerrilla Gardening". Urban Studies, 51 (6), 1103-1119.
Arefi, M. ve C. Kickert (Ed.) (2018). The Palgrave Handbook of Bottom-Up Urbanism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bach, C. E. ve N. McClintock (2021). "Reclaiming the City One Plot at a Time? DIY Garden Projects, Radical Democracy, and the Politics of Spatial Appropriation". Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39 (5), 859-878.
Bela, J. (2014). User-Generated Urbanism and the Right to the City. Now Urbanism: The Future City is Here. (Ed. J. Hou, B. Spencer, T. Way ve K. Yocom). London: Routledge.
Bela, J. (2021). Pandemic-Era Street Spaces: Parklets, Patios, and the Future of the Public Realm, https://dirt.asla.org/2021/09/09/pandemic-era-street-spaces-parklets-patios-and-the-future-of-the-public-realm/ (19.02.2022).
Berglund, L. (2019). "Excluded by Design: Informality versus Tactical Urbanism in the Redevelopment of Detroit Neighborhoods". Journal of Cultural Geography, 36 (2), 144-181.
Bermann, K. ve I. C. Marinaro (2014). "“We Work It out”: Roma Settlements in Rome and the Limits of Do-It-Yourself". Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 7 (4), 399-413.
Bishop, P. ve L. Williams (2012). The Temporary City. London: Routledge.
Boltanski, L. ve È. Chiapello (2007). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.
Bradley, K. (2015). "Open-Source Urbanism: Creating, Multiplying and Managing Urban Commons". FOOTPRINT, 9 (16), 91-107.
Bragaglia, F. ve C. Rossignolo (2021). "Temporary urbanism as a new policy strategy: a contemporary panacea or a trojan horse?". International Planning Studies, 26 (4), 370-386.
Brenner, N. (2017). Is “Tactical Urbanism” An Alternative to Neoliberal Urbanism? Reflections on an Exhibition at the Moma, The Social (Re)Production of Architecture: Politics, Values and Actions in Contemporary Practice. (Ed. D. Petrescu ve K. Trogal). London:Routledge.
Bresnihan, P. ve M. Byrne (2015). "Escape into the City: Everyday Practices of Commoning and the Production of Urban Space in Dublin: Escape into the City". Antipode, 47 (1), 36-54.
Campo, D. (2016). "Tactical Urbanism: short-term action for long-term change (Book Review)", Journal of Urban Design, 21 (3), 388-390.
Certeau, M. (2008). Gündelik Hayatın Keşfi-1: Eylem, Uygulama, Üretim Sanatları. (Çev. L. A. Özcan). Ankara: Dost Kitabevi Yayınları.
Chase, J., J. Kaliski ve M. Crawford (1999). Everyday Urbanism. New York: The Monacelli Press.
Crossan, J., A. Cumbers, R. McMaster ve D. Shaw (2016). "Contesting Neoliberal Urbanism in Glasgow’s Community Gardens: The Practice of DIY Citizenship: Glasgow’s Community Gardens". Antipode, 48 (4), 937-955.
Davis, M. (2011). Fortress Los Angeles: The Militarization of Urban Space. Cultural Criminology: Theories of Crime. (Ed. J. Ferrell ve K. Hayward). London: Routledge.
Dawkins, N. (2011). "Do-It-Yourself: The Precarious Work and Postfeminist Politics of Handmaking (in) Detroit". Utopian Studies, 22 (2), 261-284.
De Angelis, M. ve S. Stavrides (2010). "On the Commons: A Public Interview with Massimo De Angelis and Stavros Stavrides". E-Flux Journal, (17). http://worker01.e-flux.com/pdf/article_8888150.pdf (24.02.2022).
Deslandes, A. (2013). "Exemplary Amateurism: Thoughts on DIY Urbanism". Cultural Studies Review, 19 (1), 216-227.
Devlin, R. T. (2018). "Asking “Third World Questions” of First World Informality: Using Southern Theory to Parse Needs from Desires in an Analysis of Informal Urbanism of the Global North". Planning Theory, 17 (4), 568-587.
Douglas, G. C. C. (2012). "Do-It-Yourself Urban Design in the Help-Yourself City". https://www.architectmagazine.com/Design/do-it-yourself-urban-design-in-the-help-yourself-city_o (18.03.2022).
Douglas, G. C. C. (2014). "Do–It–Yourself Urban Design: The Social Practice of Informal “Improvement” Through Unauthorized Alteration". City & Community, 13 (1), 5-25.
Douglas, G. C.C. (2018). The Help-Yourself City: Legitimacy and Inequality in DIY Urbanism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Elder, A. D. ve A. K. Gerlak (2019). "Interrogating Rainwater Harvesting as Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Urbanism". Geoforum, 104 (6-7), 46-54.
Eynaud, P., M. Juan ve D. Mourey (2018). "Participatory Art as a Social Practice of Commoning to Reinvent the Right to the City". VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29 (4), 621-636.
Fabian, L. ve K. Samson (2015). "Claiming Participation – a Comparative Analysis of DIY Urbanism in Denmark". Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9 (2), 166-184.
Finn, D. (2014). "DIY Urbanism: Implications for Cities". Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 7 (4), 381-398.
Foster, N. (2020). "Rethinking the Right to the City: DIY Urbanism and Postcapitalist Possibilities". Rethinking Marxism, 32 (3), 310-329.
Fredericks, J., L. Hespanhol, C. Parker, D. Zhou ve M. Tomitsch (2018). "Blending Pop-up Urbanism and Participatory Technologies: Challenges and Opportunities for Inclusive City Making". City, Culture and Society, 12, 44-53.
Gadringer, M. (2014). Urban Hacking as a Strategy for Urban (Re-)Planning/Designing. Urban Hacking as a Strategy for Urban (Re-)Planning/Designing. (Ed. G. Friesinger, J. Grenzfurthner ve T. Ballhausen). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Gamez, J. L.S. ve J. Sorensen (2014). "No More Waiting for Superman: Teaching DIY Urbanism and Reflexive Practice". Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 7 (4), 333-350.
Greco, J. (2012). "From Pop-Up to Permanent: Small, Nimble Projects Are Adding Value to Public Spaces". Planning, 78 (9): 4-8.
Groth, J. ve E. Corijn (2005). "Reclaiming Urbanity: Indeterminate Spaces, Informal Actors and Urban Agenda Setting". Urban Studies, 42 (3), 503-526.
Hardt, M. ve A. Negri (2011). Ortak Zenginlik. (Çev. E. B. Yıldırım). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Harvey, D. (2008). "The Right to the City". New Left Review, (53), 23-40.
Harvey, D. (2013). Asi Şehirler: Şehir Hakkından Kentsel Devrime Doğru. (Çev. A. D. Temiz). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
Heim LaFrombois, M. (2017). "Blind Spots and Pop-up Spots: A Feminist Exploration into the Discourses of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Urbanism". Urban Studies, 54 (2), 421-436.
Hollett, T. ve F. Vivoni (2020). "DIY Skateparks as Temporary Disruptions to Neoliberal Cities: Informal Learning through Micropolitical Making". Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 42 (6), 881-897.
Holston, J. (2013). Spaces of Insurgent Citizenship. The Urban Sociology Reader. (Ed. J. Lin ve C. Mele). London: Routledge.
Holtzman, B., C. Hughes ve K. V. Meter (2007). Do It Yourself... and the Movement Beyond Capitalism. Constituent Imagination: Militant Investigations. (Ed. S. Shukaitis, D. Graeber ve E. Biddle). Oakland, CA: AK Press.
Hou, J. (Ed.) (2010). Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. New York: Routledge.
Hou, J. (2020). "Guerrilla Urbanism: Urban Design and the Practices of Resistance". Urban Design International, 25 (2), 117-125.
Houghton, K., M. Foth ve E. Miller (2015). "Urban Acupuncture: Hybrid Social and Technological Practices for Hyperlocal Placemaking". Journal of Urban Technology, 22 (3), 3-19.
Howell, O. (2008). "Skatepark as Neoliberal Playground: Urban Governance, Recreation Space, and the Cultivation of Personal Responsibility". Space and Culture, 11 (4), 475-496.
Hurley, A. K. (2016). DIY urban planning is happening all over the country. Is it only for white people?, https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/10/27/diy-urban-planning-is-happening-all-over-the-country-is-it-only-for-white-people/ (18.03.2022).
Iveson, K. (2013). "Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City". International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37 (3), 941-956.
Jacobs, J. (2017). Büyük Amerikan Şehirlerinin Ölümü ve Yaşamı. (Çev. B. Doğan). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
Kimmelman, M. (2012). "Projects Without Architects Steal the Show". The New York Times, 11 Eylül, https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/12/arts/design/13th-venice-architecture-biennale-the-usual-hagiography.html (20.03.2022).
Kinder, K. (2016). DIY Detroit: Making Do in a City without Services. Minneapolis: Univ. Of Minnesota Press.
Krishnamurthy, S. (2018). Participation Caught In-Between Projects and Policies?. Neo-Liberalism and the Architecture of the Post Professional Era. (Ed. H. Sadri). New York, NY: Springer.
Krivý, M. ve T. Kaminer (2013). "Introduction: The Participatory Turn in Urbanism", FOOTPRINT, 7 (13), 1-6.
Kuran, H. (2019). Neoliberal Kentler ve Şehir Hakkı Mücadeleleri. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi S.B.E.
Lange, M. de ve M. de Waal (Ed.) (2018). The Hackable City: Digital Media and Collaborative City-Making in the Network Society. New York, NY: Springer.
Lefebvre, H. (2014). Mekânın Üretimi. (Çev. I. Ergüden). İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık.
Lefebvre, H. (2015). Kentsel Devrim. (Çev. S. Sezer). İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık.
Lefebvre, H. (2018). Şehir Hakkı. (Çev. I. Ergüden). İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık.
Liss-Marino, T. J. (2014). Sell (It) Yourself: Marketing Pleasure in Digital DIY. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania. http://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1347 (09.02.2022).
Love, R. (2013). "Aporia of Participatory Planning: Framing Local Action in the Entrepreneurial City". FOOTPRINT, 7 (13), 7-20.
Lydon, M. ve A. Garcia (2015). Tactical Urbanism: Short-Term Action for Long-Term Change. Washington, DC: Island Press).
Madanipour, A. (2017). Cities in Time: Temporary Urbanism and the Future of the City. London: Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing.
Marcuse, P. (2009). "From Critical Urban Theory to the Right to the City". City, 13 (2-3), 185-197.
Mayer, M. (2011). The “right to the city” in urban social movements. Cities for People, Not for Profit. (Ed. N. Brenner, P. Marcuse ve M. Mayer). London: Routledge.
Mayer, M. (2013). "First world urban activism". City, 17 (1), 5-19.
Mitchell, D. (2009). The End of Public Space? People’s Park, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy. Common Ground?: Readings and Reflections on Public Space. (Ed. A. M. Orum ve Z. Neal). London: Routledge.
Mould, O. (2014). "Tactical Urbanism: The New Vernacular of the Creative City: Tactical Urbanism". Geography Compass, 8 (8), 529-539.
Mukhija, V. ve A. Loukaitou-Sideris (Ed.) (2014). The Informal American City: Beyond Taco Trucks and Day Labor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Öner, R. V. ve F. Osmanoğulları (2017). "Kentli Haklarına Karşı Şehir Hakkı: Farklılıklar, Benzerlikler ve Eğilimler". Emek Araştırma Dergisi (GEAD), 8 (11), 75-98.
Pagano, C. (2013). "DIY Urbanism: Property and Process in Grassroots City Building". Marquette Law Review, 97 (2), 335-469.
Peck, J. (2005). "Struggling with the Creative Class". International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29 (4), 740-770.
Portes, A., M. Castells ve L. A. Benton (Ed.) (1989). The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
REBAR (2011). THE PARK(ing) DAY MANUAL. (Rebar Group, Inc.). https://www.asla.org/uploadedFiles/CMS/Events/Parking_Day_Manual_Consecutive.pdf. (18.02.2022).
Rodrigues, C. U. (2019). "Climate Change and DIY Urbanism in Luanda and Maputo: New Urban Strategies?". International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 11 (3), 319-331.
Rosol, M. (2012). "Community Volunteering as Neoliberal Strategy? Green Space Production in Berlin". Antipode, 44 (1), 239-257.
Sandler, D. (2020). "Grassroots Urbanism in Contemporary São Paulo". Urban Design International, 25 (1), 77-91.
Sawhney, N., C. de Klerk ve S. Malhotra (2015). "Civic Engagement through DIY Urbanism and Collective Networked Action". Planning Practice & Research, 30 (3), 337-354.
Sennett, R. (1996). Kamusal İnsanın Çöküşü. (Çev. S. Durak ve A. Yılmaz). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Silva, P. (2016). "Tactical Urbanism: Towards an Evolutionary Cities’ Approach?". Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43 (6), 1040-1051.
Simone, A. (2010). City Life from Jakarta to Dakar: Movements at the Crossroads. London: Routledge.
Sorkin, M. (Ed.) (1992). Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space. New York: Hill and Wang.
Spataro, D. (2016). "Against a De-Politicized DIY Urbanism: Food Not Bombs and the Struggle over Public Space". Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9 (2), 185-201.
Stavrides, S. (2016). Common Space: The City as Commons. London: Zed Books.
Stavrides, S. (2017). Brezilya Kent Hareketleri: Kenti Müşterek olarak “Yeniden-İcat Etmek”. Herkesin, Herkes için: Müşterekler Üzerine Eleştirel Bir Antoloji. (Ed. F. Adaman, B. Akbulut ve U. Kocagöz). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
Talen, E. (2015). "Do-It-Yourself Urbanism: A History". Journal of Planning History, 14 (2), 135-148.
Tardiveau, A. ve D. Mallo (2014). "Unpacking and Challenging Habitus: An Approach to Temporary Urbanism as a Socially Engaged Practice". Journal of Urban Design, 19 (4), 456-472.
Volont, L. (2019). "DIY Urbanism and the Lens of the Commons: Observations from Spain". City & Community, 18 (1), 257-279.
Wortham-Galvin, B. D. (2013). "An Anthropology of Urbanism: How People Make Places (and What Designers and Planners Might Learn from It)", FOOTPRINT, 7 (13), 21-40.

APA	Bayraktar F (2023). ‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?. , 1 - 34.
Chicago	Bayraktar Fesih ‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?. (2023): 1 - 34.
MLA	Bayraktar Fesih ‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?. , 2023, ss.1 - 34.
AMA	Bayraktar F ‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?. . 2023; 1 - 34.
Vancouver	Bayraktar F ‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?. . 2023; 1 - 34.
IEEE	Bayraktar F "‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?." , ss.1 - 34, 2023.
ISNAD	Bayraktar, Fesih. "‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?". (2023), 1-34.

APA	Bayraktar F (2023). ‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 56(2), 1 - 34.
Chicago	Bayraktar Fesih ‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?. Amme İdaresi Dergisi 56, no.2 (2023): 1 - 34.
MLA	Bayraktar Fesih ‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, vol.56, no.2, 2023, ss.1 - 34.
AMA	Bayraktar F ‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?. Amme İdaresi Dergisi. 2023; 56(2): 1 - 34.
Vancouver	Bayraktar F ‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?. Amme İdaresi Dergisi. 2023; 56(2): 1 - 34.
IEEE	Bayraktar F "‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?." Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 56, ss.1 - 34, 2023.
ISNAD	Bayraktar, Fesih. "‘Kendin-Yap’ Kent Aktivizmi: Tabana Dayalı Radikal Siyaset mi, Neoliberal Şehirciliğin Suç Ortakları mı?". Amme İdaresi Dergisi 56/2 (2023), 1-34.