Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 141 - 160 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160 İndeks Tarihi: 29-12-2023

Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects

Öz:
Briefing is the process of determining requirements through communication between an architect and a client for project success. Essentially briefing utilizes knowledge management tools and techniques. This study aims to explore the issues and problems of briefing with a focus on requirement elicitation and validation by investigating the attitudes and approaches of industry practitioners. A literature review was conducted to design the questionnaire survey and interviews. A survey in three themes: organizational information, knowledge capturing in briefing, process for requirement elicitation and validation has been applied to 24 respondents, and 11 interviews were held with openended questions. The survey was conducted among the members of the Turkish, İstanbul, and İzmir Association of Architects in Private Practice. Interviews were held with architects (founder/partner) from Ankara. Issues, problems, methodologies for requirement management, and knowledge processes were explored. The involvement of the user in briefing and the experience of stakeholders are important for project success. Furthermore, the knowledge processes: of capturing, indexing, recording, and archiving are used for requirement elicitations. Using comprehensive frameworks for briefing and technology like Building Information Modelling may increase the benefits; however, the awareness of architects in this field is low. Discussions about the issues, problems, and success of briefing processes were held to state the requirement management approaches of architects. The study implicated the importance of requirement validation before and during the design process, the difficulty of capturing knowledge from the client, and assuring the user’s involvement with proper experience level in the briefing. These may be used to improve practical studies on requirement management. Furthermore, the study is an actual record of vocational practices, so with the implementation of other research, it contributes as a comparison and evaluation point.
Anahtar Kelime: Architects in private practice Client briefing Knowledge processes Requirement capturing Utilization of requirements

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Olatokun E, Pathirage C. Importance of Knowledge Capturing (KC) in the Design Briefing Process in the Construction Industry. 2015.
  • 2. Olatokun EO. Requirement Elicitation Using Knowledge Capturing (Kc) Techniques During the Client Briefing Process for Improved Client Satisfaction in The UK Construction Industry. The University of Salford; 2017.
  • 3. Mertens A, Hamarat Y, Elsen C. Interactions between architects and end-users during housing design processes: a systematic literature review. International Jouranl of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR. 2022;
  • 4. Caglayan S, Ozorhon B, Ilicali E. Investigating the building commissioning practices in Turkey. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation. 2022;5(2):77–94.
  • 5. Kayaçetin NC, Tanyer AM. Exploring Knowledge Management In The Practice Of Architecture: A Pilot Study In The Turkish Capital. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture. 2009;26(2):279–308.
  • 6. Pekeriçli MK, Sarı R, Tanyer AM. An Investigation of Building Information Modeling Maturity in Turkish Small-Medium Size Enterprises Architectural and Engineering Firms. In: MSTAS 2017. 2017. p. 214–27.
  • 7. Blyth A, Worthigton J. Managing the Brief for Better Design, 2nd Ed. ROUTLEDGE. 2010.
  • 8. CIB. Briefing the Team: A Guide to Better Briefing for Clients. Thomas Telford; 1997.
  • 9. Ryd N. The design brief as carrier of client information during the construction process. Design Studies. 2004 May 1;25(3):231–49.
  • 10. Çalışkan BE, Pekeriçli MK. Knowledge Capturing in Design Briefing Process for Requirement Elicitation and Validation. In: Damcı A, Cenk B, Serdar U, editors. 6th international Project and Construction Management Conference (e-IPCMC2020). İstanbul: ITÜ; 2020. p. 215–24.
  • 11. Bray I. An introduction to requirements engineering. Addison-Wesley; 2002. 408 p.
  • 12. Pegoraroa C, Carísio I de P. Requirements processing for building design: A systematic review. Producao. 2017;27:1–18.
  • 13. Kamara JM, Augenbroe G, Anumba CJ, Carrillo PM. Knowledge management in the architecture, engineering and construction industry. Construction Innovation. 2002;2(1):53–67.
  • 14. Tan HC, Carrillo PM, Anumba CJ, Bouchlaghem N, Kamara JM, Udeaja CE. Development of a methodology for live capture and reuse of project knowledge in construction. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2007;23(1):18–26.
  • 15. Webb SP. Knowledge management: Linchpin of change. Routledge; 2017.
  • 16. Quintas P, Lefrere P, Jones G. Knowledge management : A strategic agenda. Long Range Planning. 1997;30(3).
  • 17. Chimay J. Anumba, Charles O. Egbu PMC. Knowledge management in construction. 2005. 91–179 p.
  • 18. Kamara JM, Anumba CJ, Evbuomwan NFO. Capturing Client Requirements in Construction Projects. Capturing Client Requirements in Construction Projects. 2002.
  • 19. Azhar S. Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry. Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry. 2011;11(3):241–52.
  • 20. Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K. BIM Handbook. 2008.
  • 21. Li X, Wu P, Shen GQ, Wang X, Teng Y. Mapping the knowledge domains of Building Information Modeling (BIM): A bibliometric approach. Automation in Construction. 2017;84(July):195–206.
  • 22. Ergen F, Bettemir ÖH. Development of BIM software with quantity take-off and visualization capabilities. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation. 2022;5(1):01–14.
  • 23. Tessema YA. BIM for improved building design communication between architects and clients in the schematic design phase. Texas Tech University; 2008.
  • 24. O’Reilly JJN. Better briefing means better buildings. Building Research Establishment; 1987. 32 p.
  • 25. Zeisel J. Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behaviour Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
  • 26. Shen Q, Li H, Chung J, Hui PY. A framework for identification and representation of client requirements in the briefing process. Construction Management and Economics. 2004;22(2):213–21.
  • 27. Shahrin F, Johansen E, Lockley S, Udeaja C. Effective Capture, Translating and Delivering Client Requirements Using Building Information Modelling (Bim) Technology. 2010;(February):38–45.
  • 28. Bowen PA, Pearl RG, Edwards PJ. Client briefing processes and procurement method selection: A South African study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 1999 Feb;6(2):91–104.
  • 29. Othman AAE, Hassan TM, Pasquire CL. Dynamic Brief Development For Better Constcution. In: 5th International Postgraduate Research Conference. 2005.
  • 30. den Otter A, Emmitt S. Design team communication and design task complexity: The preference for dialogues. Architectural Engineering and Design Management. 2008;4(2):121–9.
  • 31. Taleb H, Ismail S, Wahab MH, Rani WNMWM. Communication management between architects and clients. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2017;1891(November).
  • 32. Norouzi N, Shabak M, Embi MR Bin, Khan TH. The Architect, the Client and Effective Communication in Architectural Design Practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015 Jan 27;172:635–42.
  • 33. Bogers T, Van Meel JJ, Van Der Voordt TJ m. Architects about briefing: Recommendations to improve communication between clients and architects. Facilities. 2008;26(3–4):109–16.
  • 34. Baccarini D. The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success. Project Management Journal. 1999;30(4):25–32.
  • 35. RIBA Plan Of Work: [Internet]. RIBA; 2013 [cited 2020 Dec 17]. Available from: www.ribaplanofwork.com
  • 36. Marczyk G, DeMatteo D, Festinger D. Essential of Research Design and Methodology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2005.
  • 37. Bechhofer F, Paterson L. Principles of Research in the Social Sciences. Social Reseach Today. Routledge; 2000.
  • 38. Metu Survey [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://anket.metu.edu.tr/
  • 39. Fellow R, Liu A. Research Methods for Constuctions. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
APA çalışkan e, Pekeriçli M (2023). Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects. , 141 - 160. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
Chicago çalışkan ekrem bahadır,Pekeriçli Mehmet Koray Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects. (2023): 141 - 160. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
MLA çalışkan ekrem bahadır,Pekeriçli Mehmet Koray Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects. , 2023, ss.141 - 160. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
AMA çalışkan e,Pekeriçli M Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects. . 2023; 141 - 160. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
Vancouver çalışkan e,Pekeriçli M Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects. . 2023; 141 - 160. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
IEEE çalışkan e,Pekeriçli M "Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects." , ss.141 - 160, 2023. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
ISNAD çalışkan, ekrem bahadır - Pekeriçli, Mehmet Koray. "Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects". (2023), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
APA çalışkan e, Pekeriçli M (2023). Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 6(3), 141 - 160. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
Chicago çalışkan ekrem bahadır,Pekeriçli Mehmet Koray Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 6, no.3 (2023): 141 - 160. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
MLA çalışkan ekrem bahadır,Pekeriçli Mehmet Koray Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), vol.6, no.3, 2023, ss.141 - 160. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
AMA çalışkan e,Pekeriçli M Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2023; 6(3): 141 - 160. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
Vancouver çalışkan e,Pekeriçli M Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2023; 6(3): 141 - 160. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
IEEE çalışkan e,Pekeriçli M "Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects." Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 6, ss.141 - 160, 2023. 10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160
ISNAD çalışkan, ekrem bahadır - Pekeriçli, Mehmet Koray. "Client briefing issues and problems for requirement elicitation and validation: A survey among architects". Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 6/3 (2023), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2023.03141160