Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 163 Sayfa Aralığı: 29 - 42 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index

Öz:
Araştırmanın amacı, Felder-Silverman öğrenme stilleri ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması,geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarının yapılması ve Mersin Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin tercih edilen öğrenme stilleri profillerinin belirlenmesidir. Bunun ötesinde bilim alanlarına göre öğrenme stilleri arasındaki farklar incelenmiştir. Bu araştırmada kullanılan Öğrenme Stilleri İndeksi (ÖBİ), Felder-Silverman modelinde dört boyutlu tercihlerle değerlendirilen 44 sorulu bir ölçme aracı olarak oluşturulmuştur. Katılımcılar Mersin Üniversitesi öğrencilerinden oluşan 526 kişidir. Örneklem, farklı akademik enstitüler arasından aşağıdaki gibi belirlenmiştir: Doğa Bilimleri: (n=320, 61%), Sağlık Bilimleri (n=149, 28%) Sosyal Bilimler (n=57, 11%). Bulgular,Mersin Üniversitesi öğrencilerinin tercih edilen öğrenme stillerinin Ardışık, Duyumsal ve Aktif öğrenenler olarak farklı olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuçlar, aynı zamanda, ÖBİ’nin Fen, Sağlık ve Sosyal bilimlerine göre Ardışık/Global öğrenme biçiminde manidar bir farklılık olduğunu göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: learning styles index of learning style(ils) Felder-Silverman Model individual learning styles

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Albaili, M. (1997). Differences among low, average, and high achieving college students in learning and strategies. Educational Psychology, 17(1), 171-176.
  • Alumran, J I.A. (2008). Learning styles in relation to gender, field of study, and academic for Bahraini university students. Individual Differences Research, 6(4), 303-316.
  • Anthony, F.G. & Yangarber-Hicks, N. (2000). Integrating teaching styles and learning styles with Instructional technology. College Teaching, 48(1), 2-9.
  • Ausubel, D.P. (1963). Cognitive structure and the facilitation of meaningful verbal learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 14, 217-222.
  • Baloğlu, M., Gadzelle, B.M., & Stephens, R. (2002). Prediction of educational psychology course grades by age and learning style scores. College Student Journal, 36, 618-623.
  • Boydak, A. (2008). Öğrenme Stilleri. (12. Baskı). İstanbul: Beyaz Yayınları.
  • Bruner, J.S. (1967). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  • Clump, M. A. & Skogsberg, K. (2003). Differences in learning styles of college students attending similar universities in different geographic locations. College Students Journal, 37(4), 501-515.
  • Coffield, F., Moselay, D., Hall, E. & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Should we be using learning style? What research has to say to practice. London: Learning and Skills Research Center.
  • Constant, K. P. (1997). Using multimedia techniques to address diverse learning styles in materials education. Journal of Materials Education, 19, 1-8.
  • De Vita, G. (2001). Learning styles, culture and inclusive instruction in multicultural classroom: A business and management perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International,38(2), 165-174.
  • DeBello, T.C. (1990). Comparison of eleven major learning styles models: Variables, appropriate populations, validity of instrumentation and the research behind them. Journal on Reading, Writing and Learning Disabilities. 6, 203-222.
  • Dee, K.C, Livesay, G.A &Nauman, E.A (2003). Learning styles of first-and second tear engineering students, Proc. 2003 ASEE/WFEO International Coll., ASEE,2003.
  • Dunn, R. (1984). Learning style: state of the science. Theory in to Practice, 23(1), 10-19.
  • Dunn, R. (2000). Learning styles: Theory, research and practice. national forum of applied educational research journal, 13(1), 3-22.
  • Dunn, R., Beaudry, J.S., & Klavas, A. (1990-91) Survey of research on learning styles, educational psychology 90/91. Annual Editions, 112-121.
  • Dunn, R., Griggs, S. A., Olson, J., Gormman, B., & Beasely, M. (1995). A meta-analytic validation of the dunn and dunn learning-styles model. Journal of Educational Research, 88(6), 353-361.
  • Felder, R.M. & Silverman, L.K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
  • Felder, R.M. & Solomon, B.A., (2001). Index of learning styles questionnaire, North Carolina State University, (2001). [Online] Retrieved on 12 May 2009, at URL: http://www2.ncsu.edu/ unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSdir/ILS-a.html.
  • Felder, R.M. (1996). Matters of style. American Society for Engineering Education Prism. 6(4), 18-23.
  • Felder, R.M. ve Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103-112.
  • Fer, S. (2003). Matematik, fizik ve kimya öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin öğrenme biçimlerine göre kolay öğrendikleri etkinlikleri. Çağdaş Eğitim, 28(304), 33-43.
  • Fleming, N.D. (1995). I’m different: Not dumb, modes of presentation (VARK) in tertiary Classroom. In A. Zelmer (Ed.) Research and Development in Higher Education, Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Conference of the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australia (HERDSA), 18, 308-313.
  • Gadzelle, B. & Masten, G. (1998). Critical thinking and learning processes for students in two major fields. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25, 256-261.
  • Graf, S., Viola, S.T ve Leo T. Ve Kinshuk (2007). In-depth analysis of the felder-silverman learning style dimensions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 79-93.
  • Hargrove, S.K., Wheatland, J.A., Ding, D & Brown, C.M. (2008). The effect of individual learning styles GPA in engineering education at Morgan State University. Journal of STEM Education. 9( 3)
  • Honey, P & Mumford, A. (1982). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead Honey Press, 1992.
  • İncik, E.Y. ( 2009). “Friedrich Vester’in bellek tipleri testinin güvenirlik çalışması.” Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Mersin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Mersin.
  • Kolb, A.Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2006). Learning styles and learning spaces: A review of the multidisciplinary application of experiential learning. Theory in Higher Education. 45-91.
  • Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice_hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Litzinger, T.A., Ha Lee, S., Wise J.C., & Felder, R. (2005). A study of reliability and validity of the Felder-Solomon index of learning styles. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education.
  • Livesay, G.A. Dee, K.C., Nauman, E.A Hites, L.S. Jr. (2002). Engineering student learning styles: a statistical analysis using Felder’s Index of Learning Styles, presented at the 2002 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Montreal, Quebec, June 2002.
  • Lopez, W. M.G. (2002 ). “IIS Inventario de aprendizagem de Felder-Solomon: Investigaçao du sua validade em estudentes Universitarios de Belo Horizante.” Unpublished master thesis.Universidade Federal de santa Catarina, Brazil.
  • Lumsdaine M. & Lumsdaine, E. (1995). Thinking preferences of engineering students: implications for curriculum restructuring. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 193-204.
  • Markova, D & Powell, A. (2002). Çocuklar nasıl öğrenir? (Çev: Hicran Güzelküçük). İstanbul: Kuraldışı Yayınları.
  • Mathews, D. (1994). An investigation of students’ learning styles in various disciplines in colleges and universities. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 33, 65-74.
  • Moser, C.A. (1952). Journal of the royal statistical society, Series A (General), 115(3): 411-423.
  • Myers, LB. (1962). Manual: The Myers-Briggs type indicator. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
  • Özer, B. (Ed). (1998). Öğrenmeyi öğretme eğitim bilimlerinde yenilikler. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Reid, J.M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87-111.
  • Riding, R. & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behavior. London: David Fulton Publishers.
  • Seery, N, Gaughran W.F. & Waldmann, T. (2003). Multi-modal learning in engineering education,Proc. 2003 Annual ASEE Conference, ASEE.
  • Sims, R. R. & Sims, S. J. (1995). The importance of learning styles: Understanding the implications for learning, course design, and education. London: Greenwood Press.
  • Tuckman, B.W. (1999). Conducting educational research (5th Ed.). Wadsworth Group.
  • Vester, F. (1991). Düşünmek, öğrenmek, unutmak. (Çev: Aydın Arıtan). İstanbul: Arıtan Yayınevi.
  • Weng, C-Y. (2001). The relationship between learning style preferences and teaching style preferences in college students. Unpublished EdD dissertation, University Of Northern Colorado, Colorado.
  • Zwanenberg, N.V., Wilkinson, L. J., & Anderson, A. (2000). Felder and silverman’s index of learning styles and honey and mumford’s learning styles questionnaire: How do they compare and do they predict academic performance? Educational Psychology, 20(3), 365-380.
  • Zywno, M.S. (2003). A contribution of validation of score meaning for Felder-Solomon’s Index of Learning Styles. Proceedings, 2003 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Washington D.C.:American Society for
APA ÜLTANIR E, TEMEL ÖREKECİ G (2012). The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index. , 29 - 42.
Chicago ÜLTANIR Emel,TEMEL ÖREKECİ Gülhan The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index. (2012): 29 - 42.
MLA ÜLTANIR Emel,TEMEL ÖREKECİ Gülhan The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index. , 2012, ss.29 - 42.
AMA ÜLTANIR E,TEMEL ÖREKECİ G The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index. . 2012; 29 - 42.
Vancouver ÜLTANIR E,TEMEL ÖREKECİ G The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index. . 2012; 29 - 42.
IEEE ÜLTANIR E,TEMEL ÖREKECİ G "The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index." , ss.29 - 42, 2012.
ISNAD ÜLTANIR, Emel - TEMEL ÖREKECİ, Gülhan. "The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index". (2012), 29-42.
APA ÜLTANIR E, TEMEL ÖREKECİ G (2012). The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(163), 29 - 42.
Chicago ÜLTANIR Emel,TEMEL ÖREKECİ Gülhan The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index. Eğitim ve Bilim 37, no.163 (2012): 29 - 42.
MLA ÜLTANIR Emel,TEMEL ÖREKECİ Gülhan The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.37, no.163, 2012, ss.29 - 42.
AMA ÜLTANIR E,TEMEL ÖREKECİ G The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2012; 37(163): 29 - 42.
Vancouver ÜLTANIR E,TEMEL ÖREKECİ G The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2012; 37(163): 29 - 42.
IEEE ÜLTANIR E,TEMEL ÖREKECİ G "The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index." Eğitim ve Bilim, 37, ss.29 - 42, 2012.
ISNAD ÜLTANIR, Emel - TEMEL ÖREKECİ, Gülhan. "The examination of university students’ learning styles by means of felder-silverman index". Eğitim ve Bilim 37/163 (2012), 29-42.