Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 81 Sayfa Aralığı: 8 - 14 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species

Öz:
Orman ağaçlarının toprak üzerine etkisi uzun zamandır çalışılmaktadır. Son yıllarda ise orman topraklarında karbon rezervleri ve sera gazı etkileri daha fazla dikkat çekmektedir. Bu çalışmada İstanbul Belgrad Ormanında 6 farklı orman ağacı altında; sapsız meşe (Quercuspetraea), doğu ladini (Picea orientalis), karaçam (Pinus nigra), Uludağ göknarı (Abies bormulleriana), sarıçam (Pinus sylvestris) ve Toros sediri (Cedrus libani) ölü örtü ile ilk 30 cm lik mineral topraktaki karbon rezervleri araştırılmıştır. Ölü örtü karbon rezervi en az 11 Mg $ha^{-1}$ doğu ladininde, en fazla ise 20 Mg $ha^{-1}$ olarak sarıçam altında bulunmuştur. Türler arasında ölü örtü karbon rezervleri bakımından önemli istatistiksel farklar bulunmamaktadır. Türler bu bakımından birbirine oldukça benzer özellik göstermektedir. İlk 30 cm lik mineral toprakta Toros sediri önemli derecede daha yüksek karbon değerlerine sahiptir. Bununla birlikte doğal sapsız meşe ormanı en düşük mineral toprak karbonuna sahiptir. Toplam karbon miktarı (ölü örtü + 30 cm mineral toprak) Quercus petraea < Abies bornmulleriana < Picea orientalis < Pinus sylvestris < Pinus nigra < Cedrus libani sırasında artmakta ve 77 ile 126 Mg $ha^{-1}$ arasında değişmektedir. Sonuçlar göstermektedir ki, ağaç türleri altındaki ölü örtü ve topraklar farklı karbon bağlanması değerlerine sahiptir. Fakat ölü örtü ve toprak karbon miktarlarının değişimi üzerinde önemli farklar bulunmamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime: kimyasal özellikler doğa koruma Belgrad Ormanları ölü örtü karbon ormanlar İstanbul orman ölü toprağı orman toprakları ağaçlandırma

Konular: Çevre Mühendisliği

Altı farklı orman ağacı ölü örtü ve mineral toprak karbon rezervleri

Öz:
The influence of tree species on forest soil properties has been studied for a long time. Recently, the role of soil carbon (C) pools for mitigation of greenhouse gases has highlighted the need for more knowledge on the tree species effects on soil organic C. In Turkey, the effects of six different tree species; Sessile oak (Quercus petraea), Oriental spruce (Picea orientalis), Austrian pine (Pinus nigra), Turkish fir (Abies bormulleriana), Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris), and Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani) on the carbon pools of the top mineral soil (0-30 cm) and the forest floor were investigated in adjacent stands. Carbon pools of the forest floor varied from 11 Mg $ha^{-1}$ beneath the Oriental spruce to 20 Mg $ha^{-1}$ beneath the Scots pine. The C contents of the forest floor were similar among species and there was no significant difference in C mass of forest floors among species. In the 0-30 cm mineral soil layer, the highest soil organic C pool was beneath the Taurus cedar and the lowest was found in the native Sessile oak forest. Total C pools (forest floor + 30 cm mineral soil) increased in the order Quercus petraea < Abies bornmulleriana < Picea orientalis < Pinus sylvestris < Pinus nigra and Cedrus libani from 77 to 126 Mg $ha^{-1}$. The results suggest that tree species differ in C sequestration rates within the forest floor and mineral soil, respectively, but there is little evidence of major differences in the combined forest floor and mineral soil after five decades.
Anahtar Kelime: Istanbul forest litter forest soils afforestation chemical properties nature conservation Belgrad Forests litter (plant) carbon forests

Konular: Çevre Mühendisliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Banfield GE, BhattiJS, Jiang H, Apps MJ (2002) Variability in regional scale estimates of carbon stocks in boreal forest ecosystems: result from west-Central Alberta. Forest Ecology and Management 169: 15-27.
  • Binkley D, Giardina C (1998) Why do tree species affect soils? The Warp and Woof of tree-soil interactions. Biogeochemistry 42: 89-106.
  • Brown S (2002) Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. Environmental Pollution 116: 363-372.
  • Brüggemann N, Rosenkranz P, Papen H, Pilegaard K, Butterbach-Bahl K (2005). Pure stands of temperate forest tree species modify soil respiration and N turnover. Biogeosciences Discussions 2: SOS-SSI.
  • Finzi AC, Van Breemen N, Canham CD (1998a) Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecological Applications 8(2): 440-446.
  • Finzi AC, Canham CD, Van Breemen N (1998b) Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on pH and cations. Ecological Applications 8(2): 447-454.
  • Guo LB Gifford RM (2002) Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global Change Biology 8: 345-360.
  • Hedde M, Aubert M, Decaens T, Bureau F (2008) Dynamics of soil carbon in a beechwood chronosequence forest. Forest Ecology and Management 255(1): 193-202.
  • Johnson DW, Knoepp JD, Swank WT, Shan J, Morris LA, Van Lear DH, Kapeluck PR (2002) Effects of forest management on soil carbon: results of some long-term resampling studies. Environmental Pollution 116: 201-208.
  • Kaipainen T, Liski J, Pussinen A, Karjalainen T (2004) Managing carbon sinks by changing rotation length in European forests. Environmental Science and Policy 7: 205-219.
  • Kara O, Bolat I (2008) Microbial biomass C (Cmic) and N (Nmic) content of forest and agricultural soils in Bartin province, Turkey. Ekoloji 18 (69): 32-40.
  • Karaoz O (1989a) Laboratory analyze methods of some physical soil properties related to water holding capacity, (in Turkish). Review of the Faculty of Forestry University of Istanbul 39 (B2): 133-144.
  • Karaoz O (1989b) Analyze methods of some chemical soil properties (pH, carbonates, salinity, organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus) (in Turkish). Review of the Faculty of Forestry University of Istanbul 39 (B3>: 64-82.
  • Karaoz O (1992) Analyze methods of leaves/needles and litter (in Turkish). Review of the Faculty of Forestry University of Istanbul 42 (Bl-2): 57-71.
  • Lal R (2005) Forest soils and carbon sequestration. Forest Ecology and Management 220: 242-258.
  • Larsen JB, Nielsen AB, (2007) Nature-based forest management-where are we going? Elaborating forest development types in and with practice. Forest Ecology and Management 238: 107-117.
  • LiY,Xu M, ZouX, Shis P, Zhang Y (2005) Comparing soil organic carbon dynamics in plantation and secondary forest in wet tropics in Puerto Rico. Global Change Biology 11: 239-248.
  • Liski J, Perruchoud D, Karjalainen T (2002) Increasing carbon stocks in the forest soils of western Europe. Forest Ecology and Management 169: 159-175.
  • Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63: 621-626.
  • Melillo JM, Aber JD, Linkins AE, Ricca A, Fry B, Nadelhoffer KJ (1989) Carbon and nitrogen dynamics along the decay continuum: plant litter to soil organic matter. Plant and Soil 115: 189-198.
  • Post WM, Kwon KC (2000) Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes and potential. Global Change Biology 6: 317-327.
  • Prescott CE, Taylor BR, Parsons WFJ, Durall DM, Parkinson D (1993) Nutrient release from decomposing litter in Stoney Mountain coniferous forests: influence of nutrient availability. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 1576-1586.
  • Schulp CJE, Nabuurs G, Verburg PH, de Waal RW (2008). Effect of tree species on carbon stocks in forest floor and mineral soil and implications for soil carbon inventories. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 482-490.
  • Smethurst PJ, Nambiar EKS (1990) Distribution of carbon and nutrients and fluxes of mineral nitrogen after clear-felling a Pinus radiata plantation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 1490-1497.
  • Stump LM, Binkley D (1993) Relationships between litter quality and nitrogen availability in Stoney Mountain forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 492-502.
  • Turner J, Lambert M (2000) Change in organic carbon in forest plantation soils in eastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 133: 231-247.
  • Turner J, Lambert MJ, Johnson DW (2005) Experience with patterns of change in soil carbon resulting from forest plantation establishment in eastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 22Q: 259-269.
  • Vesterdal L, Schmidt IK, Callesen I, Nilsson LO, Gundersen P, (2008) Carbon and nitrogen in forest floor and mineral soil under six common European tree species. Forest Ecology and Management 255 (1): 35-48.
  • Yanai RD, CurrieWS, Goodale CL (2003) Soil carbon dynamics after forest harvest: an ecosystem paradigm reconsidered. Ecosystems 6: 197-212.
  • Yang YS, Guo J, Chen G, Xie J, Gao R, Li Z, Jin Z (2005) Carbon and nitrogen pools in Chinese fir and evergreen broadleaved forests and changes associated with felling and burning in mid-subtropical China. Forest Ecology and Management 216: 216-226.
  • Zengin E, Sagliker HA, Darici C (2008) Carbon mineralization of Acacia cyanophylla soils under the different temperature and humidity conditions. Ekoloji 18 (69): 1-6.
APA SEVGİ O, Makineci E, KARAÖZ M (2011). The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species. , 8 - 14.
Chicago SEVGİ Orhan,Makineci Ender,KARAÖZ MUSTAFA ÖMER The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species. (2011): 8 - 14.
MLA SEVGİ Orhan,Makineci Ender,KARAÖZ MUSTAFA ÖMER The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species. , 2011, ss.8 - 14.
AMA SEVGİ O,Makineci E,KARAÖZ M The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species. . 2011; 8 - 14.
Vancouver SEVGİ O,Makineci E,KARAÖZ M The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species. . 2011; 8 - 14.
IEEE SEVGİ O,Makineci E,KARAÖZ M "The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species." , ss.8 - 14, 2011.
ISNAD SEVGİ, Orhan vd. "The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species". (2011), 8-14.
APA SEVGİ O, Makineci E, KARAÖZ M (2011). The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species. Ekoloji, 20(81), 8 - 14.
Chicago SEVGİ Orhan,Makineci Ender,KARAÖZ MUSTAFA ÖMER The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species. Ekoloji 20, no.81 (2011): 8 - 14.
MLA SEVGİ Orhan,Makineci Ender,KARAÖZ MUSTAFA ÖMER The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species. Ekoloji, vol.20, no.81, 2011, ss.8 - 14.
AMA SEVGİ O,Makineci E,KARAÖZ M The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species. Ekoloji. 2011; 20(81): 8 - 14.
Vancouver SEVGİ O,Makineci E,KARAÖZ M The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species. Ekoloji. 2011; 20(81): 8 - 14.
IEEE SEVGİ O,Makineci E,KARAÖZ M "The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species." Ekoloji, 20, ss.8 - 14, 2011.
ISNAD SEVGİ, Orhan vd. "The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different tree species". Ekoloji 20/81 (2011), 8-14.