Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 37 Sayfa Aralığı: 120 - 134 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies

Öz:
Bu çalısmanın amacı Eğitim Fakültesi’nde öğrenim gören lisans düzeyindeki öğrencilerin çevrimiçi teknolojilere yönelik öz-yeterlik algılarının demografik özellikleri (cinsiyet, çalısma alanı), bilgisayar ve internet tecrübelerine göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğini incelemektir. Analizlerde Türkiye’nin Batı Karadeniz Bölgesi’nde bulunan bir Eğitim Fakültesi’nde farklı çalısma alanlarındaki 268 öğrenciden (189 kız, 79 erkek) elde edilen veriler kullanılmıstır. Đnternet yeterlikleri alt ölçeğinden elde edilen puanlardaki farklılık erkeklerin lehine anlamlılık düzeyine çok yakın olmasına rağmen öğrencilerin ölçeğin bütün alt boyutlarındaki öz-yeterlik ortalama puanlarında cinsiyet farkı bulunmamıstır. Fakat, daha fazla bilgisayar ve internet tecrübesine sahip öğrenciler çevrimiçi teknolojiler öz-yeterlik ölçeğinin bütün alt boyutlarında (Internet öz-yeterlikleri, eszamanlı etkilesim, eszamansız etkilesim I, eszamansız etkilesim II) anlamlı derecede daha yüksek puan almıslardır. Bu çalısmanın bulguları ve ilgili alan yazın öğrencilerin çevrimiçi teknolojilere yönelik öz-yeterlik algılarının onların önceki bilgisayar ve Internet tecrübeleriyle oldukça iliskili olduğunu isaret etmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Eğitim Fakültesi öğrencilerinin çevrimiçi teknolojilere yönelik öz-yeterlik algıları

Öz:
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether self-efficacy perceptions of undergraduate students at the Faculty of Education toward online technologies differ based on demographics (i.e., gender, area of study), computer and Internet experiences. The data obtained from 268 students (189 females, 79 males) in different area of studies in the Faculty of Education, at a university in the Western Blacksea Region of Turkey, were used in the analyses. There were no gender differences in the self efficacy mean scores of the students although the difference on the Internet competencies subscale was notably close to significant level in favor of the male students. However, the students with higher computer and Internet experiences indicated significantly higher scores on all subscales (i.e., Internet competencies, synchronous interaction, asynchronous I, asynchronous II) of the online technologies self-efficacy scale. The findings of this study and the related literature suggest that the students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward the online technologies are highly related to their prior computer and Internet experiences.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Askar, P. & Davenport, D. (2009). An Investigation of factors related to self-efficacy for Java programming among engineering students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 8(1), 26-32. http://www.tojet.net/volumes/v8i1.pdf [viewed 10 November 2009].
  • Bandura, A. (1982).Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologist, 37 (2), 122- 147.
  • Bandura, A. (1999). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), The self in social psychology: Key readings in social psychology (pp. 285–298). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Compeau, D. & Higgins, C. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19 (2), 189–211.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-340.
  • Doll, W. J. & Torkzadeh, G. (1989). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction, MIS Quarterly, 12 (2), 259-274.
  • Durndell , A. & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample, Computers in Human Behavior, 18 (5), 521–535
  • Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html [viewed 26 October 2009].
  • Gist, M. E. & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability. The Academy of Management Review, 17, (2), 183-211
  • Green, K. C. (1998). Campus computing 1998: The ninth annual survey of desktop computing and information technology in higher education. Encino, CA: The Campus Computing Project.
  • Horzum, M. & Çakır, Ö. (2009). Çevrim içi Teknolojilere Yönelik Öz Yeterlik Algısı Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalısması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 9 (3), 1327-1356
  • Johnson, D. M. & Wardlow, G. W. (2004). Computer experiences, self-efficacy, and knowledge of undergraduate students entering a land-grant college of agriculture by year and gender. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45 (3), 53-64, http://pubs.aged.tamu.edu/jae/pdf/Vol45/45-03-053.pdf [viewed 20 October 2009].
  • Liaw, S. S. (2002). An Internet survey for perceptions of computers and the World Wide Web: Relationship, prediction, and difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(1), 17–35.
  • Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research. Information Systems Research, 9 (2), 126-163
  • Miltiadou, M. & Yu, C. H. (2000). Validation of the online technologies self-efficacy scale (OTSES), (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 445 672).
  • Nahl, D. (1997). User-centered assessment of two Web browsers: Errors, perceived self-efficacy, and success. Journal of American Society for Information Sciences, 34, 89-97.
  • NITA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration) (2002). A nation on-line: How Americans are expanded their use of the Internet. Washington DC: US Department of Commerce.
  • Potosky, D. (2002). A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: the role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training. Computers in Human Behavior, 18 (3), 241-255.
  • Ren, W. (1999). Self-efficacy and the search for government information: A study of small-business executives. Reference & User Service Quarterly, 38 (3), 283-291.
  • Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A. & Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the Internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (4), 205-219.
  • Shaw, F. S. & Giacquinta, J. B. (2000). A survey of graduate students as end users of computer technology: New roles for the faculty. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 18 (1), 21-39.
  • Taylor, S. & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A Test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6 (2), 144-176.
  • Tekinarslan, E. (2008).Computer Anxiety: A Cross-cultural Comparative Study of Dutch and Turkish University students. Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (4), 1572–1584
  • Teo, T. (2008). Assessing the computer attitudes of students: An Asian perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1634 -642
  • Thompson, B. & Daniel, L.G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56 (2), 197-208.
  • Whitty, M. T. & McLaughlin, D. (2007). Online recreation: The relationship between loneliness, Internet self-efficacy and the use of the Internet for entertainment purposes. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1435–1446
  • Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407- 415.
APA Tekinarslan E (2011). Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies. , 120 - 134.
Chicago Tekinarslan Erkan Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies. (2011): 120 - 134.
MLA Tekinarslan Erkan Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies. , 2011, ss.120 - 134.
AMA Tekinarslan E Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies. . 2011; 120 - 134.
Vancouver Tekinarslan E Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies. . 2011; 120 - 134.
IEEE Tekinarslan E "Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies." , ss.120 - 134, 2011.
ISNAD Tekinarslan, Erkan. "Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies". (2011), 120-134.
APA Tekinarslan E (2011). Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik), 10(37), 120 - 134.
Chicago Tekinarslan Erkan Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik) 10, no.37 (2011): 120 - 134.
MLA Tekinarslan Erkan Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik), vol.10, no.37, 2011, ss.120 - 134.
AMA Tekinarslan E Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik). 2011; 10(37): 120 - 134.
Vancouver Tekinarslan E Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik). 2011; 10(37): 120 - 134.
IEEE Tekinarslan E "Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies." Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik), 10, ss.120 - 134, 2011.
ISNAD Tekinarslan, Erkan. "Faculty of education students’ self-efficacy perceptions toward online technologies". Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (elektronik) 10/37 (2011), 120-134.