Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement

Nurcan KAHRAMAN (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Anafartalar Kampüsü, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Bölümü, Çanakkale, Türkiye)
Eğitim ve Bilim
3 1
Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 39 Sayı: 172 Sayfa Aralığı: 95 - 107 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement

Öz:
Bu çalışma ilkokul 4. Sınıf ve ortaokul 8. Sınıf öğrencilerinin fen bilgisi dersindeki katılım ve başarı ilişkisini ve bu ilişkinin 4. Sınıf ve 8. Sınıfta nasıl farklılık gösterdiğini incelemeyi hedeflemektedir. Bu çalışmanın örneklemini TIMSS 2011 Türkiye verileri oluşturmaktadır. Türkiye’den 7479 4. Sınıf ve 6928 8. Sınıf öğrencileri 2011 yılında TIMSS sınavına katılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre 4. Sınıf öğrencilerinin 8. Sınıf öğrencilerinden daha yüksek katılım göstermektedir. Ayrıca, her iki grup için davranışsal katılımın başarı üzerinde pozitif etkisi görülmüştür. Duyuşsal katılım açısından incelendiğinde, 4. Sınıflar için feni sevme akademik başarıya pozitif etki ederken, okul bağlılığının anlamlı bir etkisi olmamaktadır. 8. Sınıflarda ise her iki boyutun da pozitif etkisi gözlenmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Öğrenci katılımı ve TIMSS 2011 fen başarısı arasındaki ilişkinin sınıflara göre karşılaştırılması

Öz:
The present study aims to investigate the relationship between students’ engagement and achievement, and how this relationship changes across the 4th and 8th grade students in Turkey. TIMSS 2011 data were used for the purpose of the study. 7479 fourth grade elementary and 6928 eighth grade middle school students from Turkey participated in the study. According to the results, the 4th grade students display significantly higher engagement than the 8th graders do. Moreover, both student groups’ behavioral engagement has positive effect on science achievement. In terms of emotional engagement trajectories, while the 4th graders’ liking science has positive influence on students’ science achievement, school belonging has no significant influence. On the other side, the two dimensions of emotional engagement have positive influence on achievement of the 8th graders.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(3), 269-298.
  • Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). Influence of motivation, self-beliefs, and instructional practices on science achievement of adolescents in Canada. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 233-259.
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin, 117(3), 497.
  • Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47(5), 291-314.
  • Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African‐American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child development, 65(2), 493-506.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on Motivation, Lincoln, NE. 38, 237-288.
  • Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R. E. Ames &C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139-186). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
  • Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children's knowledge about the mind. Annual review of psychology, 50(1), 21-45.
  • Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59 – 109.
  • Fredericks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children's competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519−533.
  • Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142.
  • Foy, P., Brossman, B., & Galia, J. Scaling the TIMSS and PIRLS 2011 Achievement Data.
  • Goodenow, C. (1993a). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21-43.
  • Goodenow, C. (1993b). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 70-90.
  • Goodenow, C., & Grady, K. E. (1993). The relationship of school belonging and friends' values to academic motivation among urban adolescent students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 62(1), 60-71.
  • Haladyna, T., & Thomas, G. (1979). The attitudes of elementary school children toward school and subject matters. The Journal of Experimental Educational, 18-23.
  • Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 66(2), 99-136.
  • Hidi, S., Ainley, M., Berndroff, D. & Del Favero, L. (2006). The role of interest and self-efficacy in science-related expository writing. Studies in Writing, 19, 203-217.
  • IDB Analyzer (Version 3) [Computer software and manual]. (2013). Hamburg, Germany: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement
  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self‐competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child development, 73(2), 509-527.
  • Jarrett, O.S. (1999). Science interest and confidence among preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11, (1), 47-57.
  • Jimmerson, S., Campos, E. & Greif, J. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7- 27.
  • Joncas, M. (2007). TIMSS 2007 sample design. TIMSS, 77-92.
  • Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, A. (1992). Interest, learning and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.). The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119-137.
  • McMillan, D.W., & Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
  • Midgley, C., Anderman, E., & Hicks, L. (1995). Differences between elementary and middle school teachers and students: A goal theory approach. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(1), 90-113.
  • Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O'Sullivan, C. Y., & Preuschoff, C. (2009). TIMSS 2011 Assessment Frameworks. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
  • Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70, 323-367.
  • Özdamar K (1997). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yaynınları, Eskişehir, 512
  • Özdemir, S., Sezgin, F., Şirin, H., Karip, E. ve Erkan, S. (2010). İlköğretim okulu öğrencilerinin okul iklimine ilişkin algılarını yordayan değişkenlerin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38, 213-224.
  • Pandey, S., & Elliott, W. (2010). Suppressor variables in social work research: Ways to identify in multiple regression models. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1(1).
  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
  • Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer US.
  • Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427.
  • Sari, M. (2013). Sense of School Belonging Among High School Students. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 147-160.
  • Schiefele, U., Krapp, A. & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Shernoff, D. J., & Schmidt, J. A. (2008). Further evidence of an engagement–achievement paradox among US high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(5), 564-580.
  • Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: The role of perceived control in children's engagement and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22-32.
  • Veiga, F. H. (2009 b). Underachievers, overachievers and student’s self-concept. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Journal Psychology, 2, 299-306.
  • Villavicencio, F. T., & Bernardo, A. B. (2012). Positive academic emotions moderate the relationship between self‐regulation and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329- 340
  • Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31-39.
APA KAHRAMAN N (2014). Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement. , 95 - 107.
Chicago KAHRAMAN Nurcan Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement. (2014): 95 - 107.
MLA KAHRAMAN Nurcan Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement. , 2014, ss.95 - 107.
AMA KAHRAMAN N Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement. . 2014; 95 - 107.
Vancouver KAHRAMAN N Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement. . 2014; 95 - 107.
IEEE KAHRAMAN N "Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement." , ss.95 - 107, 2014.
ISNAD KAHRAMAN, Nurcan. "Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement". (2014), 95-107.
APA KAHRAMAN N (2014). Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(172), 95 - 107.
Chicago KAHRAMAN Nurcan Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement. Eğitim ve Bilim 39, no.172 (2014): 95 - 107.
MLA KAHRAMAN Nurcan Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.39, no.172, 2014, ss.95 - 107.
AMA KAHRAMAN N Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2014; 39(172): 95 - 107.
Vancouver KAHRAMAN N Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2014; 39(172): 95 - 107.
IEEE KAHRAMAN N "Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement." Eğitim ve Bilim, 39, ss.95 - 107, 2014.
ISNAD KAHRAMAN, Nurcan. "Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement". Eğitim ve Bilim 39/172 (2014), 95-107.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 19:39

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları