Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 33 Sayfa Aralığı: 60 - 73 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi

Öz:
Modern bellek çalışmaları belleğimizde temsil edilen olayların, geçmişin birebir kopyası olmayıp, yeniden yapılan- dırıcı süreçlere dayandığı göstermektedir. Bu kapsamda, bireylerin hangi durumlarda bellek yanılsamalarına daha yatkın, hangi durumlarda ise daha dayanıklı oldukları ilgi görmüş bir araştırma konusudur. Loftus ve arkadaşları tarafından başlatılan araştırmalarda görgü tanıklığı durumlarında yanlış bilgiyle karşılaşma olasılığına dikkat çekil- miş ve olay sonrası bilginin bellek üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiştir. Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi etkisinde yanlış bilgiye maruz kaldıktan sonra orijinal bellek izine ne olduğunu açıklamak üzere bir takım kuramlar öne sürülmüştür. Bu hipotezlerden bazıları bellek bozukluğunu ima etmekte, bazıları erişilebilirlik, tahmin etme stratejileri, ya da kaynak karışıklığına yatkın olma gibi faktörlere odaklanmaktadır. Araştırmalar kaynak karışıklığının yanlış bilgi telkinine yatkınlık konusunda temel bir role sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu derlemede, olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradig- ması, yanlış bilgi etkisini açıklayan kuramlar ve bu etkiye katkıda bulunan stres ve yaşlanma faktörleri tartışılmıştır. Stresin insan belleği ve özellikle yaşlılar üzerindeki etkilerini daha detaylı incelemek, stresli durumların ortaya çıka- rabileceği olumsuzlukları engellemek ve bu durumlarla başa çıkmak için daha iyi yollar bulunmasını sağlayacaktır. Bu etkilerin doğasını, nasıl ve neden oluştuklarını anlamak, görgü tanıklığı ya da psikoterapi gibi alanlardaki hataları önleyecek stratejileri geliştirmeye katkıda bulunacağı için, sadece kuramsal olarak değil uygulamalı bir araştırma konusu olarak da önemlidir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Psikoloji

Suggestibility to the Misinformation Paradigm: Effects of Aging and Stress

Öz:
Modern research on memory has shown events that are represented in our memory are not exact copies of our past experiences, but are results of reconstructive processes. The subject of when individuals are more susceptible to memory illusions has been studied in this context. Studies that have been initiated by Loftus and colleagues have argued that memory illusions may be involved in eyewitness testimonies and have studied the effects of misinforma- tion on memory. Competing explanations have been put forward to explain what happens to the original memory trace when individuals receive misinformation. Some of these explanations suggest memory impairment, while others focus on factors such as accessibility problems, guessing strategies or source confusion. Recent research indi- cates source confusion to play an important role in suggestibility to misinformation. In this paper, the misinformation paradigm, competing explanations for the misinformation effect are reviewed with a particular focus on the effects of aging and stress. Studying the effects of stress on memory, especially in the aging population, is crucial for pre- venting and coping with its negative effects on memory. Understanding the nature of these effects is important from not only a theoretical but also an applied perspective, since they offer possible strategies to avoid errors in therapy settings or eyewitness situations.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Psikoloji
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Alpar, G., Er, N. ve Uçar Boyraz, F. (2007). Görgü tanıklığında bellek hataları: Olay sonrası bilginin ve tuzak soruların hatırlama ve kaynak izleme üzerindeki etkisi. Türk Psi- koloji Yazıları, 10(20), 1-17.
  • Ayers, M. S. ve Reder, L. M. (1998). A Theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation- based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 1-21.
  • Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Duchek, J. M., Adams, D., Roedi- ger, H. L., McDermott, K. B. ve Yerys, B. E. (1999). Ve- ridical and false memories in healthy older adults and in dementia of the Alzheimer’s Type. Cognitive Neuropsy- chology, 16, 361-384.
  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Uni- versity Press.
  • Baym, C. L. ve Gonsalves, B. D. (2010). Comparison of neural activity that leads to true memories, false memories, and forgetting: An fMRI study of the misinformation effect. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 339-348.
  • Bekerian, D. A. ve Bowers, J. M. (1983). Eyewitness testimony: Were we misled? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory ve Cognition, 9, 139-145.
  • Benjamin, A. S. ve Craik, F. I. M. (2001). Parallel effects of aging and time pressure on memory for source: Evidence from the spacing effect. Memory & Cognition, 29, 691- 697.
  • Boldini, A., Beato, M. S. ve Cadavid, S. (2013). Modality- match effect in false recognition: An event-related poten- tial study. NeuroReport, 24,108-113.
  • Bowers, J. M. ve Bekerian, D. A. (1984). When will post-event information distort eyewitness testimony? Journal of Ap- plied Psychology, 69, 466-472.
  • Bowman, L. L. ve Zaragoza, M. S. (1989). Similarity of en- coding context does not influence resistance to memory impairment following misinformation. American Journal of Psychology, 1989, 249-264.
  • Burke, D. M. ve Light, L. L. (1981). Memory and aging: The role of retrieval processes. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 513-554.
  • Cabeza, R., Rao, S. M., Wagner, A. D., Mayer, A. R. ve Schact- er, D. L. (2001). Can medial temporal lobe regions distin- guish true from false? An event-related fMRI study of ve- ridical and illusory recognition memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98, 4805-4810.
  • Cangöz, B. (2008). Yaşlılık: Sadece kayıp mı? Bir ayrıcalık mı? Turkish Journal of Geriatrics, 11(3), 143-150.
  • Ceci, S. J. ve Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of children’s recollections: An historical review and synthesis. Psycho- logical Bulletin, 113, 403-439.
  • Ceci, S. J., Bruck, M. ve Rosenthal, R. (1995). Children’s al- legations of sexual abuse: Forensic and scientific issues. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 494-520.
  • Chalfonte, B. L. ve Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403-416.
  • Chambers, K. L. ve Zaragoza, M. S. (2001). Intended and un- intended effects of explicit warnings on eyewitness sug- gestibility: Evidence from source identification tests. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1120-1129.
  • Chandler, C. C. (1991). How memory for an event is influenced by related events: Interference in modified recognition tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 115-125
  • Christiaansen, R. E. ve Ochalek, K. (1983). Editing misleading information from memory: Evidence for the co-existence of original and post-event information. Memory and Cog- nition, 11, 467-475.
  • Cohen, G. ve Faulkner, D. (1989). Age differences in source forgetting: Effects on reality monitoring and on eyewit- ness testimony. Psychology and Aging, 4, 10-17.
  • Coxon P. ve Valentine T. (1997). The effects of the age of eye- witnesses on the accuracy and suggestibility of their testi- mony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 415-430.
  • Davis, D. ve Loftus, E.F . (2005). Age and functioning in the le- gal system: Perception memory and judgment in victims, witnesses and jurors. I. Noy ve W. Karwowski, (Ed.), Handbook of forensic human factors in ligitation içinde. London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Dijkstra, K., Charness, N.,Yordon, R. ve Fox M. (2009). Chang- es in Physiological Stress and Self-Reported Mood in Younger and Older Adults After Exposure to a Stressful Task, Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition,16, 338- 356.
  • Dodson, C. S., Bawa, S ve Slotnick, S. D. (2007). Aging, Source Memory, and Misrecollections. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 33, 169- 181.
  • Dodson, C. S. ve Johnson, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194.
  • Dodson, C. S. ve Schacter, D. L. (2001). “If I had said it I would have remembered it”: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Re- view, 8, 155-161
  • Dodson, C. S. ve Schacter, D. L. (2002). Aging and strategic retrieval processes: Reducing false memories with a dis- tinctiveness heuristic. Psychology & Aging, 17, 405-415.
  • Echterhoff , G., Groll , S. ve Hirst , W. (2007). Tainted truth: Over-correction for misinformation influence on eyewit- ness memory. Social Cognition, 25, 367-409
  • Estes, W. K. (1997). Processes of memory loss, recovery, and distortion. Psychological Review, 104, 148-169.
  • Ferguson, S. A., Hashtroudi, S. ve Johnson, M. K. (1992). Age differences in using source relevant cues. Psychology & Aging, 7, 443-452.
  • Gabbert, F., Memon, A. ve Allan, K. (2003) Memory confor- mity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533-543.
  • Gallo, D. A., Roberts, M. J. ve Seamon, J. G. (1997). Remem- bering words not presented in lists: Can we avoid creat- ing false memories? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 271-276.
  • Gras, D., Tardieu, H., Piolino, P. ve Nicolas, S. (2011). Presen- tation modality effect on false memories in younger and older adults: the use of an inference paradigm. Memory 19(1), 92-102.
  • Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K. ve Chrosniak, L. D. (1989). Ag- ing and source monitoring. Psychology & Aging, 4, 106- 112.
  • Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K. ve Chrosniak, L. D. (1990). Aging and qualitative characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Psychology & Aging, 5, 119-126.
  • Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., Vnek, N. ve Ferguson, S. A. (1994). Aging and the effects of affective and factual fo- cus on source monitoring and recall. Psychology & Ag- ing, 9, 160-170.
  • Hay, J. F. ve Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Separating habit and recol- lection in young and older adults: Effects of elaborative processing and distinctiveness. Psychology & Aging, 14, 122-134.
  • Henkel, L. A., Jonhson, M. K. ve De Leonardis, D. M. (1998). Aging and source monitoring: Cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 127, 251-268.
  • Holliday, R. E. (2003). Reducing misinformation effects in chil- dren with cognitive interviews: Dissociating recollection and familiarity. Child Development, 74, 728-751.
  • Holliday, R. E., Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F. ve Humphries, J. E. (2009). The cognitive interview. R. Bull ve T. William- son, (Ed.). Handbook of the psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions içinde. Wiley.
  • Holliday, R. E., Humphries, J. E., Milne, R., Memon, A., Houl- der, L., Lyons, A. ve Bull, R. (2012). Reducing misinfor- mation effects in older adults with Cognitive Interview mnemonics. Psychology & Aging. 27(4),1191-1203.
  • Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Deceiving the elderly: Effects of acces- sibility bias in cued-recall performance. Cognitive Neu- ropsychology, 16, 417-436.
  • Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., Brown, J. ve Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Per- sonality and Social Psychology, 56, 326-338.
  • Jacoby, L. L. ve Rhodes, M. G. (2006). False remembering in the aged. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 49-53.
  • Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V. ve Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming fa- mous without being recognized: unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115-125.
  • Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A. ve Leach, K. (1988). The con- sequences for memory of imagining in another person’s voice. Memory & Cognition, 16, 337-342.
  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S. ve Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
  • Johnson, M. K. ve Multhaup, K. S. (1992). Emotion and MEM. S. A. Christianson, (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory: Current research and theory içinde (33-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  • Johnson, M. K., Nolde, S. F. ve De Leonardis, D. M. (1996). Emotional focus and source monitoring. Journal of Mem- ory and Language, 35, 135-156.
  • Johnson, M. K. ve Raye, C. L. (1998). False memories and con- fabulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 137-145.
  • Johnson, M. K. ve Raye, C. L. (2000). Cognitive and brain mechanisms of false memories and beliefs. D. L. Schact- er ve E. Scarry, (Ed.), Memory, brain, & belief içinde (35- 86). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Karpel, M. E., Hoyer, W. J., Toglia, M. P. (2001). Accuracy and qualities of real and suggested memories: Nonspecific age differences. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56,103-110.
  • Kausler, D. H. (1994). Learning and memory in normal aging. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M. ve Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The Trier Social Stress Test - A tool for investigating psycho- biological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuro- psychobiology, 28, 76-81.
  • Kukolja, J., Thiel, C. M., Wolf, O. T. ve Fink, G. R. (2008). Stress-induced cortisol release differentially impacts upon neural activity underlying spatial contextual mem- ory in young and older subjects. Psychopharmacology, 201(2), 293-304.
  • Lampinen, J. M., Faries, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S. ve Toglia, M. P. (2000). Recollections of things schematic: The influence of scripts on recollective experience. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 543-554.
  • Lee, K. (2004). Age, neuropsychological, and social cognitive measures as predictors of individual differences in sus- ceptibility to the misinformation effect. Applied Cogni- tive Psychology, 18, 997-1019.
  • Lindsay, D. S. (2008). Source monitoring. H. L. Roediger, (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory. Vol. 2 of Learn- ing and memory: A comprehensive reference, 4 vols. (J. Byrne, Editor) içinde (325-347). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Lindsay, D. S. ve Johnson, M. K. (1987). Reality monitoring and suggestibility: Children’s ability to discriminate among memories from different sources. S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia ve D. F. Ross, (Ed.), Children’s eyewitness memo- ry içinde (92-121). New York: Springer Verlag.
  • Lindsay, D. S. ve Johnson, M. K. (1989). The reversed eyewit- ness suggestibility effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 111-113.
  • Lindsay, D. S. ve Johnson, M. K. (2000). False memories and the source monitoring framework: Reply to Reyna and
  • Lloyd (1997). Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 145-161.
  • Lindsay, D. S., Johnson, M. K. ve Kwon, P. (1991). Develop- mental changes in memory source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52, 297-318.
  • Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness re- port. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-572.
  • Loftus, E. F. (1977). Shifting human color memory. Memory & Cognition, 5, 696-699.
  • Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Loftus, E. F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories. Ameri- can Psychologist, 48, 518-537.
  • Loftus, E. F. ve Hoffman, H. G. (1989). Misinformation and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 100-104.
  • Loftus, E. F. ve Loftus, G. R. (1980). On the permanence of stored information in the human brain. American Psy- chologist, 35, 409-420.
  • Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G. ve Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31.
  • Loftus, E. F. ve Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automo- bile destruction. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.
  • Loftus, E. F., Schooler, J. W. ve Wagenaar, W. A. (1985). The fate of memory: Comment on McCloskey and Zaragoza. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 375- 380.
  • Lupien, S. J., Fiocco, A., Wan, N., Maheu, F., Lord, C., Sch- ramek, T. ve Tu, M. T. (2005). Stress hormones and hu- man memory function across the lifespan. Psychoneouro- endocrinology, 20, 225-242.
  • Marche, T. A., Jordan, J. J. ve Owre, K. P. (2002). Younger adults can be more suggestible than older adults: The in- fluence of learning differences on misinformation report- ing. Canadian Journal on Aging, 21, 85-93.
  • Mather, M., Henkel, L. A. ve Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judg- ments and memory characteristics questionnaire com- pared. Memory & Cognition, 25, 826-837.
  • Mather, M., Johnson, M. K. ve De Leonardis, D. M. (1999). Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: Age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. Cognitive Neuro- psychology, 16, 437-458.
  • McCloskey, M. ve Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evi- dence against memory impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 1-16.
  • Misirlisoy, M. (2007). Suggestibility to false memories: contrib- uting and attenuating factors. Yayınlanmamış doktora te- zi, The Florida State University, ABD.
  • Mitchell, K. J. ve Johnson, M. K. (2000). Source monitoring: Attributing mental experiences. E. Tulving ve F. I. M. Craik, (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of memory içinde (179-185). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mitchell, K. J., Johnson, M. K. ve Mather, M. (2003). Source monitoring and suggestibility to misinformation: Adult age-related differences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 107-119.
  • Morgan III, C. A., Southwick, S., Steffian, G., Hazlett, G. A. ve Loftus, E. F. (2013). Misinformation can influence memory for recently experienced, highly stressful events. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36, 11-17.
  • Morton, J., Hammersley, R. H. ve Bekerian, D. A. (1985). Headed records: A model for memory and its failures. Cognition, 20, 1-23.
  • Multhaup, K. S. (1995). Aging, source, and decision criteria: When false fame errors do and do not occur. Psychology and Aging, 10, 492-497.
  • Multhaup, K. S. ve Conner, C. A. (2002). The effects of consid- ering non-list sources on the Deese-Roediger-McDermott memory illusion. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 214-228.
  • Multhaup, K. S., De Leonardis, D. M. ve Johnson, M. K. (1999). Source memory and eyewitness suggestibility in older adults. Journal of General Psychology, 126, 74-84.
  • Nicolas, S., Collins, T., Gounden, Y. ve Roediger, H. L. (2011). Natural suggestibility in children. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 394-398.
  • Norman, K. A. ve Schacter, D. L. (1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories. Memory & Cognition, 25, 838-848.
  • Okado, Y. ve Stark, C. E. L. (2005). Neural activity during en- coding predicts false memories createdby misinforma- tion. Learning & Memory, 12, 3-11.
  • Otgaar, H., Peters, M. ve Howe, M. L (2012). Dividing attention lowers children’s, but increases adults’ false memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 38, 204-210.
  • Payne, J. D., Nadel, L., Allen, J. J. B., Thomas, K. G. F. ve Ja- cobs, W. J. (2002). The effects of experimentally-induced stress on false recognition. Memory, 10, 1-6.
  • Porter, S., Spencer, L. ve Birt, A. R. (2003). Blinded by emo- tion? Effect of the emotionality of a scene on susceptibil- ity to false memories. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 35, 165-175.
  • Prull, M. W. ve Yockelson, M. B. (2013). Adult age-related dif- ferences in the misinformation effect for context-consis- tent and context-inconsistent objects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 384-395.
  • Raz, N. (2000). Aging of the brain and its impact on cognitive performance: Integration of structural and functional findings. F. I. M. Craik ve T. A. Salthouse, (Ed.), Hand- book of aging and cognition içinde (1-90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Roediger, H. L. III (1996). Memory illusions. Journal of Mem- ory and Language, 35, 76-100.
  • Roediger, H. L. III ve Geraci, L. (2007). Aging and the misin- formation effect: A neuropsychological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cog- nition, 33, 321-334
  • Roediger, H. L. III ve McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
  • Ross, M., Spencer, S., Blatz, C. ve Restorick, E. (2008). Collab- oration reduces the frequency of false memories in older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 23(1), 85-92.
  • Saunders, J. ve Jess, A. (2010). The effects of age on remember- ing and knowing misinformation. Memory, 18, 1-11.
  • Schacter, D. L. (1995). Implicit memory: A new frontier for cognitive neuroscience. M. Gazzaniga, (Ed.), The cog- nitive neurosciences içinde (815-824). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Schacter, D. L., Buckner, R. L., Koutstaal, W., Dale, A. ve Rosen, B. (1997a). Late onset of anterior prefrontal ac- tivity during true and false recognition: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 6, 259-269.
  • Schacter, D. L., Kagan, J. ve Leichtman, M. D. (1995). True and false memories in children and adults: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 411-428.
  • Schacter, D. L., Norman, K. A. ve Koutstaal, W. (1998). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 289-318.
  • Schacter, D. L. ve Slotnick, S. D. (2004). The cognitive neuro- science of memory distortion. Neuron, 44, 149-160.
  • Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M. ve Pradere, D. (1996). The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 319-334.
  • Shing, Y. L., Werkle-Bergner, M., Li, S. C. ve Lindenberger, U. (2009). Committing memory errors with high confi- dence: Older adults do but children don’t. Memory, 17(2), 169-179.
  • Smeets T., Jelicic M. ve Merckelbach, H. (2006). Stress-in- duced cortisol responses, sex differences, and false recol- lections in a DRM-paradigm. Biological Psychology, 72, 164-172.
  • Smeets T., Otgaar H., Candel I. ve Wolf, O. T. (2008). True or false? Memory is differentially affected by stress-induced cortisol elevations and sympathetic activity at consolida- tion and retrieval. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33, 1378- 1386.
  • Spencer, W. D. ve Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of ag- ing on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 527-539.
  • Thomas, A. K., Bulevich, J. B. ve Chan, J. C. K. (2010) Reduc- ing retrieval enhanced suggestibility through warning. Journal of Memory & Language, 63, 149-157.
  • Thomas, A. K. ve Sommers, M. S. (2005). Attention to item- specific processing eliminates age effects in false memo- ries. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 71-86.
  • Wright, D. B. ve Loftus, E. F. (1998). How misinformation al- ters memories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychol- ogy, 71 , 155–164.
  • Zaragoza M.S. ve Lane, S.M. (1994). Source misattributions and suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Ex- perimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cogni- tion, 20, 934-945.
  • Zaragoza, M. S., McCloskey, M. ve Jamis, M. (1987). Mis- leading postevent information and recall of the original event: Further evidence against the memory impairment hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learn- ing, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 36-44.
APA Misirlisoy M, Ceylan-Batur S (2014). Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi. , 60 - 73.
Chicago Misirlisoy Mine,Ceylan-Batur Suzan Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi. (2014): 60 - 73.
MLA Misirlisoy Mine,Ceylan-Batur Suzan Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi. , 2014, ss.60 - 73.
AMA Misirlisoy M,Ceylan-Batur S Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi. . 2014; 60 - 73.
Vancouver Misirlisoy M,Ceylan-Batur S Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi. . 2014; 60 - 73.
IEEE Misirlisoy M,Ceylan-Batur S "Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi." , ss.60 - 73, 2014.
ISNAD Misirlisoy, Mine - Ceylan-Batur, Suzan. "Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi". (2014), 60-73.
APA Misirlisoy M, Ceylan-Batur S (2014). Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 17(33), 60 - 73.
Chicago Misirlisoy Mine,Ceylan-Batur Suzan Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 17, no.33 (2014): 60 - 73.
MLA Misirlisoy Mine,Ceylan-Batur Suzan Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, vol.17, no.33, 2014, ss.60 - 73.
AMA Misirlisoy M,Ceylan-Batur S Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2014; 17(33): 60 - 73.
Vancouver Misirlisoy M,Ceylan-Batur S Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2014; 17(33): 60 - 73.
IEEE Misirlisoy M,Ceylan-Batur S "Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi." Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 17, ss.60 - 73, 2014.
ISNAD Misirlisoy, Mine - Ceylan-Batur, Suzan. "Olay sonrası yanlış bilgi paradigması: Yaşlanma ve stresin etkisi". Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 17/33 (2014), 60-73.