Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey

Emrah ÖNDER, (İstanbul Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi, Sayısal Yöntemler Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Bahadır Fatih YILDIRIM (İstanbul Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi, Sayısal Yöntemler Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi
2 0
Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 23 Sayfa Aralığı: 293 - 314 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey

Öz:
Lojistik köyler birçok lojistik ile ilgili aktivitelerin gerçekleştirildiği özellikli alanlar olaraktanımlanabilir. Bu köylerin büyüklüğü, şehir merkezine olan uzaklığı, erişilebilirliği, karayollarına/havaalanlarına/ demir yollarına / limanlara olan mesafeleri, ofisler ve bilişim altyapısı vb. özellikleriönem arz etmektedir. Lojistik köylerin sıralama sı karar verme sürecinde birçok kriter ve amacındikkate alınması gerektiği için karmaşık bir işlemdir. Ayrıca birçok gerçek hayat vakasında lojistiksektör yöneticileri ve kamu karar vericilerine göre kriterler eşit öneme sahip değildir. Bu çalışmadaAnalitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) ve VIKOR (Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) yöntemleri birlikte kullanılarak lojistik köylerin sıralandırılmasına ilişkin modelönerilmektedir. AHP lojistik sektörü yöneticileri/uzmanlarına ait sübjektif ve/veya objektif fikirlerinnicel şekilde gösterilebilmesi için kullanılmıştır. VIKOR yöntemi ise lojistik köylerinsıralandırılmasında kullanılmıştır. Bu analizde amaç Türkiyedeki 11 lojistik köyün (İstanbul - Halkalı,Balıkesir - Gökköy, Eskişehir - Hasanbey, İzmit- Köseköy, Uşak, Denizli- Kaklık, Samsun- Gelemen,Mersin- Yenice, Kayseri- Boğazköprü, Konya - Kayacık ve Erzurum - Palandöken)sıralanmasıdır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih

Türkiye deki lojistik Köylerin vıkor yöntemi ile sıralandırılması

Öz:
Logistics villages are defined as a specific area of all the activities carried out by a variety oflogistics - related businesses. They have specific features including size, distance to city center,accessibility, proximity to road/ airport/ railway/ maritime, office and IT infrastructure etc. Rankinglogistic villages is a complicated task due to the fact that various criteria or objectives must beconsidered in the decision making process. Also in many real world cases the criteria are not equallyimportant for the logistic managers and government authorities. In this study, we proposed a logisticvillage ranking model considering both Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and VIKOR (ViseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) methods. Subjective and objective opinions oflogistic managers/experts turn into quantitative form with AHP. VIKOR technique is used forcalculating the logistic villages ranks. The aim of this paper is to rank the 11 logistic villages inTurkey including İstanbul (Halkalı), Balıkesir (Gökköy), Eskişehir (Hasanbey), İzmit (Köseköy), Uşak,Denizli (Kaklık), Samsun (Gelemen), Mersin (Yenice), Kayseri (Boğazköprü ), Konya (Kayacık) andErzurum (Palandöken).
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S. and Goyal, S.K., (2011). A multi -criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53, 98 –109
  • Ballis, A. and Mavrotas, G., (2007). Freight village design using the multicriteria method PROMETHEE.Operational Research. An International Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 213 - 232
  • Bamyaci, M., (2008). “Modern Lojistik Yönetimi: Organize Lojistik Bölgeleri İçin Bir Yer Seçimi Modeli” Istanbul Universitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, Doktora Tezi, In Turkish.
  • Cavallini, C., Giorgetti, A., Citti, P. and Nicolaie, F., (2013). Integral aided method for material selection based on quality function deployment and comprehensive VIKOR algorithm, Materials and Design 47, 27–34
  • Cerreno, A. L. C., Shin, H., S., Wieder, A.S. and Theofanis, S., (2008). Feasibility of Freight Villages in the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) Region, Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation Freight and Maritime Program, 1 - 23
  • Chen, L.Y. and Wang, T.C., (2009). Optimizing partners‟ choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR, Int. J. Production Economics 120, 233–242
  • Chiu, W. Y., Tzeng, G. H. and Li, H.L., (2013). A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business, Knowledge- Based Systems 37, 48–61
  • Cristobal, J.R.S., (2011). Multi- criteria decision- making in the selection of a renewable energy project in spain: The Vikor method, Renewable Energy 36, 498 -502
  • Dagdeviren, M., Yavuz, S. and Kilinc, N., (2009). Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 8143- 8151
  • Ertuğrul, İ and Karakaşoğlu, N., (2008). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol.39, no.7, pp.783- 795.
  • Girubha, R.J. and Vinodh, S., (2012). Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component, Materials and Design 37, 478 –486
  • Hsu C.H., Wang, F.K. and Tzeng, G.H., (2012). The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 66, 95–111.
  • http://ekonomi.haber7.com/ekonomi/haber/466883 -turkiyenin- arazisi- en-pahali -ili- hangisi- 27.08.2013
  • http://www.moment- expo.com/turkiyede- lojistik-koyler - kuruluyor - 21.08.2013
  • http://web.itu.edu.tr/oguts/Avrupada%20ve%20T%FCrkiyede%20lojistik%20k%F6yler.PDF Working Paper: Aydın G. T., Ögüt K. S “Freight villages in Europe and Turkey?” - 25.08.2013
  • https://maps.google.com/ -29.08.2013
  • Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Ismail, M.Y., Sapuan, S.M. and Bahraminasab, M., (2011). A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection, Materials and Design 32, 1215 –1221.
  • Janic, M. and Reggiani, A., (2002). An Application of the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Analysis to the Selection of a New Hub Airport, EJTIR, 2, no. 2, pp. 113 – 141
  • Jaržemskis, A., (2007). Research on Public Logistics Centre as Tool for Cooperation, Transport, Vol XXII, No 1, 50 –54
  • Kuo, M.S. and Liang, G.S., (2011). Combining VIKOR with GRA techniques to evaluate service quality of airports under fuzzy environment Expert Systems with Applications 38, 1304–1312
  • Lee, S., Kim, W., Kim, Y.M. and Oh, K.J., (2012). Using AHP to deter mine intangible priority factors for technology transfer adoption. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 6388 - 6395.
  • Li, Y., Liu, X. and Chen, Y., (2011). Selection of logistics center location using Axiomatic Fuzzy Set and TOPSIS methodology in logistics management, Expert Systems with Applications 38, 7901 –7908
  • Liberatore, M.J. and Nydick, R.L., (1997). Group Decision Making In Higher Education Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 38, No. 5
  • Lindholm, M. and Behrends, S., (2012). Challenges in urban freight transport planning – a review in the Baltic Sea Region, Journal of Transport Geography 22, 129 –136
  • Liu, C.H., Tzeng, G.H. and Lee, M.H., (2012). Improving tourism policy implementation: The use of hybrid MCDM models, Tourism Management 33, 413 -426
  • Liu, C.H., Tzeng, G.H., Lee, M.H. and Lee, P.Y., (2013). Improving metro –airport connection service for tourism development: Using hybrid MCDM models, Tourism Management Perspectives 6, 95–107
  • Liu, H.C., Mao, L.X., Zhang, Z.Y. and Li, P., (2013). Induced aggregation operators in the VIKOR method and its application in material selection, Applied Mathematical Modelling 37, 6325 – 6338
  • Opricovic, S., (2011). Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 12983–12990
  • Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.H., (2002). Multicriteria planning of post- earthquake sustainable reconstruction.The Journal of Computer - Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 17 (3), 211 –220.
  • Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.H., (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKO R and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 445–455
  • Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.H., (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods, European Journal of Operational Research, 178, 514 –529
  • Saaty, T.L., (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw- Hill.
  • Saaty, T. L. and Vargas Luis L., (2001). Models, Methods, Concepts& Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Saaty, T. L., (2008). Decision Making With the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1 (1), 83.
  • Saaty, T.L., (1990). How To Make Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research,North_Holland, 48, 9- 26
  • Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S.F. and Yazdankhah, A, (2010). Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications 37, 24–30
  • Shemshadi, A., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M. and Tarokh, M.J., (2011). A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting, Expert Systems with Applications 38, 12160 –12167
  • Sirikijpanichkul, A. and Ferreira, L., ( 2006). Solving the Conflicts in Intermodal Freight Hub Location Decisions, BEE Postgraduate Infrastructure Theme Conference, 26th September 2006, Gardens Point Campus, Queensland University of Technology
  • Taniguchi, E., Noritake, M., Yamada, T. and Izumitani, T., (1999). Optimal size and location planning of public logistics terminals, Transportation Research Part E 35, 207 -222
  • Tsai, W.H, Chou, W.C. and Leu, J.D., (2011). An effectiveness evaluation model for the web - based marketing of the airline industry, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 15499 -15516
  • Tzeng, G.H., Lin, C.W. and Opricovic, S., (2005). Multi- criteria analysis of alternative- fuel buses for public transportation, Energy Policy, 33, 1373 –1383
  • Tzeng, GH, Teng, MH, Chen, JJ and Opricovic, S, (2 002). Multi- criteria selection for a restaurant location in Taipei, International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 21, no: 2, pp. 171 -187
  • Wang, Y.L. and Tzeng, G.H., (2012). Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DE MATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods, Expert Systems with Applications 39, 5600–5615
  • Yalçın, N., Bayrakdaroğlu A. and Kahraman, C., (2012). Application of fuzzy multi- criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries, Expert Systems with Applications 39, 350–364
  • Yanga, L., Jib, X.,Gaoa, Z. and Li, K., (2007). Logistics distribution centers location problem and algorithm under fuzzy environment, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 208, 303 – 315
  • Yoo, K.E. and Choi, Y.C., (2006). Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach For Identifying Relative Importance Of Factors To Improve Passenger Security Checks At Airports, Journal of Air Transport Management 12, 135–142
  • Yücenur, G.N. and Demirel, N.Ç., (2012). Group decision making process for insurance company selection problem with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications 39, 3702–3707
  • Zhang, N. and Wei, G., (2013). Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set. Applied Mathematical Modelling 37, 4938 –4947.
APA ONDER E, YILDIRIM B (2014). Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey. , 293 - 314.
Chicago ONDER Emrah,YILDIRIM Bahadır Fatih Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey. (2014): 293 - 314.
MLA ONDER Emrah,YILDIRIM Bahadır Fatih Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey. , 2014, ss.293 - 314.
AMA ONDER E,YILDIRIM B Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey. . 2014; 293 - 314.
Vancouver ONDER E,YILDIRIM B Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey. . 2014; 293 - 314.
IEEE ONDER E,YILDIRIM B "Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey." , ss.293 - 314, 2014.
ISNAD ONDER, Emrah - YILDIRIM, Bahadır Fatih. "Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey". (2014), 293-314.
APA ONDER E, YILDIRIM B (2014). Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 0(23), 293 - 314.
Chicago ONDER Emrah,YILDIRIM Bahadır Fatih Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 0, no.23 (2014): 293 - 314.
MLA ONDER Emrah,YILDIRIM Bahadır Fatih Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.0, no.23, 2014, ss.293 - 314.
AMA ONDER E,YILDIRIM B Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2014; 0(23): 293 - 314.
Vancouver ONDER E,YILDIRIM B Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2014; 0(23): 293 - 314.
IEEE ONDER E,YILDIRIM B "Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey." Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 0, ss.293 - 314, 2014.
ISNAD ONDER, Emrah - YILDIRIM, Bahadır Fatih. "Vikor method for ranking logistic Villages in Turkey". Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 23 (2014), 293-314.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 20:55

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları