Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 142 - 150 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study

Öz:
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the validity and the reliability of Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS) and to adapt it into the Turkish language. This scale is used for measuring maternal satisfaction with birth in order to evaluate women s birth perceptions. METHODS: In this study there were 150 women who attended to inpatient postpartum clinic. The participants filled in an information form and the BSS questionnaire forms. The properties of the scale were tested by conducting reliability and validation analyses. RESULTS: BSS entails 30 Likert-type questions. It was developed by Hollins Martin and Fleming. Total scale scores ranged between 30 150 points. Higher scores from the scale mean increases in birth satisfaction. Three overarching themes were identified in Scale: service provision (home assessment, birth environment, support, relationships with health care professionals); personal attributes (ability to cope during labour, feeling in control, childbirth preparation, relationship with baby); and stress experienced during labour (distress, obstetric injuries, receiving sufficient medical care, obstetric intervention, pain, prolonged labour and baby s health). Cronbach s alfa coefficient was 0.62. CONCLUSION: According to the present study, BSS entails 30 Likert-type questions and evaluates women s birth perceptions. The Turkish version of BSS has been proven to be a valid and a reliable scale.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Genel ve Dahili Tıp
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. González N, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Escobar A, Aizpuru F, Thompson A, et al. Development and validation of an in-patient satisfaction questionnaire. Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17:465– 72.
  • 2. Hodnett ED. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(5 Suppl Nature):160–72.
  • 3. Johnson M, Langdon R, Yong L, Stewart H, Kelly P. Comprehensive measurement of maternal satisfaction: the modified Mason Survey. Int J Nurs Pract 2002;8:127–36.
  • 4. Main EK, Bloomfield L, Hunt G; Sutter Health, First Pregnancy and Delivery Clinical Initiative Committee. Development of a large-scale obstetric quality-improvement program that focused on the nulliparous patient at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:1747–58.
  • 5. Janssen PA, Dennis CL, Reime B. Development and psychometric testing of The Care in Obstetrics: Measure for Testing Satisfaction (COMFORTS) scale. Res Nurs Health 2006;29:51–60.
  • 6. Peterson WE, Charles C, DiCenso A, Sword W. The Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scales: a valid measure of maternal satisfaction with inpatient postpartum nursing care. J Adv Nurs 2005;52:672–81.
  • 7. Turan JM, Ortaylı N, Nalbant H, Bulut A. İstanbul’da Üç Hastanede Gebelik ve Doğum Hizmetlerine Yakından Bakış. İstanbul: Aşama Matbaacılık; 2003.
  • 8. Uzun E, Güney M, Oral B, Özsoy M, Mungan T. Kadın Hastalıkları Ve Doğum Servisi: Verilen Hizmetlerle İlgili Hasta Memnuniyeti ve Etki Eden Faktörler. Uzmanlık Sonrası Eğitim ve Güncel Gelişmeler Dergisi 2006;3:167–71.
  • 9. Taşçı KD. Doğum Yapan Hastaların Aldıkları Bakımı Hasta Hakları Açısından Değerlendirmeleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2007;10;3:26–33.
  • 10. Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs 2004;46:212–9.
  • 11. Wilde-Larsson B, Sandin-Bojö AK, Starrin B, Larsson G. Birthgiving women’s feelings and perceptions of quality of intrapartal care: a nationwide Swedish cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs 2011;20:1168–77.
  • 12. Fair CD, Morrison TE. The relationship between prenatal control, expectations, experienced control, and birth satisfaction among primiparous women. Midwifery 2012;28:39–44.
  • 13. Leap N, Sandall J, Buckland S, Huber U. Journey to confidence: women’s experiences of pain in labour and relational continuity of care. J Midwifery Womens Health 2010;55:234–42.
  • 14. Eker A, Yurdakul M. Sezaryen Sonrası Verilen Bakımın Hasta Memnuniyetine Etkisi. Mersin Üniv. Sağlık Bilim Dergisi 2008;1:26–35.
  • 15. Mohammad KI, Alafi KK, Mohammad AI, Gamble J, Creedy D. Jordanian women’s dissatisfaction with childbirth care. Int Nurs Rev 2014;61:278–84.
  • 16. Güngör İ. Doğumda Anne Memnuniyetini Değerlendirme Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul, 2009. (Danışman: Prof. Dr. Nezihe Kızılkaya BEJİ).
  • 17. Öner N. Türkiye’de Kullanılan Psikolojik Testler. 2. Baskı. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi; 2006. s. 1–21.
  • 18. Şencan H. Faktör Analizi ve Geçerlilik. Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik. 1. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık; 2005. s. 355–414.
  • 19. Ercan İ, Kan İ. Ölçeklerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2004;30:211–6.
  • 20. Büyüköztürk Ş. Testlerin Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliğinde Kullanılan Bazı İstatistikler. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı.16. Baskı, Ankara: Pegem Akademi; 2012. s. 167–82.
  • 21. Bademci V. Türk Eğitim Ve Biliminde Bilimsel Devrim: Testler Ya Da Ölçme Araçları Güvenilir Ve Geçerli Değildir. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2011;16:116–32.
  • 22. Alpar R. Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik. Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlilik Güvenilirlik. 1. Baskı, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık; 2010. s. 316–66.
  • 23. Gözüm S, Aksayan S. A Guide For Transcultural Adaptation Of The Scale II: Psychometric Characteristics And Cross-Cultural Comparision. Turkish Journal of Research and Development in Nursing 2003;5:3–14.
  • 24. Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery 2014;30:610–9.
APA CETİN COSAR F, SEZER BALCI A, DOGAN MERİH Y (2015). The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study. , 142 - 150.
Chicago CETİN COSAR Fatma,SEZER BALCI AYŞE,DOGAN MERİH Yeliz The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study. (2015): 142 - 150.
MLA CETİN COSAR Fatma,SEZER BALCI AYŞE,DOGAN MERİH Yeliz The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study. , 2015, ss.142 - 150.
AMA CETİN COSAR F,SEZER BALCI A,DOGAN MERİH Y The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study. . 2015; 142 - 150.
Vancouver CETİN COSAR F,SEZER BALCI A,DOGAN MERİH Y The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study. . 2015; 142 - 150.
IEEE CETİN COSAR F,SEZER BALCI A,DOGAN MERİH Y "The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study." , ss.142 - 150, 2015.
ISNAD CETİN COSAR, Fatma vd. "The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study". (2015), 142-150.
APA CETİN COSAR F, SEZER BALCI A, DOGAN MERİH Y (2015). The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, 2(2), 142 - 150.
Chicago CETİN COSAR Fatma,SEZER BALCI AYŞE,DOGAN MERİH Yeliz The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri 2, no.2 (2015): 142 - 150.
MLA CETİN COSAR Fatma,SEZER BALCI AYŞE,DOGAN MERİH Yeliz The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, vol.2, no.2, 2015, ss.142 - 150.
AMA CETİN COSAR F,SEZER BALCI A,DOGAN MERİH Y The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri. 2015; 2(2): 142 - 150.
Vancouver CETİN COSAR F,SEZER BALCI A,DOGAN MERİH Y The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri. 2015; 2(2): 142 - 150.
IEEE CETİN COSAR F,SEZER BALCI A,DOGAN MERİH Y "The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study." İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, 2, ss.142 - 150, 2015.
ISNAD CETİN COSAR, Fatma vd. "The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study". İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri 2/2 (2015), 142-150.