Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity

ERCOŞKUN, Muhammet Hanifi

Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity

Muhammet Hanifi ERCOŞKUN (Atatürk Üniversitesi, Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri

7 0

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1125 - 1145 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity

Öz:

The aim of this study is to adapt self-control and self-management scale (SCMS) developed by Mezo into Turkish and to test it considering gender and academic achievement variables. The scale was translated from English to Turkish for linguistic validity and then this scale was translated into English using back translation. The original and translated English version of the form was revised and edited by considering the opinions of three language experts of English. Considering the appropriateness of the scale into Turkish, the draft of the scale was evaluated by two Turkish language experts and two academicians from the Education Faculty evaluated the scale in terms of content. Necessary corrections were made and linguistic equivalence was obtained. In order to test the reliability of the scale, the original scale and a week later the Turkish form were implemented with 127 4th year students studying in English Language Teaching Department. Regarding the findings about linguistic equivalence, the correlation coefficients of self-control and self-management scale (SCMS) in both Turkish and English versions were found to be rSCMS = .91, rSR = .81, rSE = .79 and rSM = .84 Moreover, the Turkish scale was applied on the second sampling of the study which consisted of 159 students for the second time after a week via test-retest method. The reliability coefficients found revealed that the scale was reliable. The construct validity was carried out via exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with the intention of evaluating the structure of the draft scale in Turkish culture and 1006 students composed the third sampling of the study for validity. Moreover, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was administered. The total variance explained by the scale with three factor structure is 54.09%. In the second level of confirmatory factor analysis, it can be stated that the three-dimensional model has a good fit (RMSEA = .052, NFI = .97, CFI = .98, GFI = .96, AGFI = .94, RFI = .97). All these findings revealed that the scale was satisfactory considering reliability and validity (KMO = .91, Bartlett's test X2 = 5119.371). In terms of gender variable, a significant difference was found in favor of female pre-service teachers in the entire scale and in all its sub-scales. Moreover, it was found that there was a positive and meaningful relation between the scores earned from the scale in general and from its sub-scales and pre-service teachers' academic achievement scores.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

Arlı, Ö. (2011). Bazı öncül ve ardıllarıyla öz liderlik: İlköğretim öğretmenleri üzerine bir araştırma [Antecedent and consequences of self-leadership: A study on primary school teachers] (Master's thesis, Turkish Military Academy Defense Sciences Institute Department of Defense Management, Ankara, Turkey).
Department of Defense Management, Ankara, Turkey). Bayram, N. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS ile veri analizi [Data analysis with SPSS in social sciences]. Bursa, Turkey: Ezgi Kitabevi.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis handbook for social sciences] (12nd ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Yayıncılık.
Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS]. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership skills and work innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75-90.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Covarrubias, R., & Stone, J. (2015). Self-monitoring strategies as a unique predictor of Latino male student achievement. Journal of Latinos and Education, 14, 55-70.
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics for the social sciences SPSS and LISREL applications] (2nd ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Yayıncılık.
Deniz, K. Z. (2007). Psikolojik ölçme aracı uyarlama [The adaptation of psychological scales]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 40(1), 1-16. Retrieved from http://dergiler. ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/40/152/1100.pdf
Frayne, C. A., & Geringer, J. M. (2000). Self-management training for improving job performance: A field experiment involving salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 361-372.
Godwin, J. L., Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (1999). The impact of thought self-leadership on individual goal performance: A cognitive perspective. The Journal of Management Development, 18(2), 153-169. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/ pdfplus/10.1108/02621719910257738
Graham, J. M., Guthrie, A. C., & Thompson, B. (2003). Consequences of not interpreting structure coefficients in published CFA research: A reminder. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(1), 142-153. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/ S15328007SEM1001_7
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided an guidelines for improving test adaptation practices [online]. Retrieved from http://www. testpublishers.org/assets/documents/volume%201%20issue%201Increasing%20validity.pdf
Houghton, J. D., Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (2003). We think we can, we think we can, we think we can: The impact of thinking patterns and work team sustainability. The Performance Management: An International Journal, 9(1/2), 31-41.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist. London, England: Sage.
Kalaycı, Ş. (Ed.). (2006). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri [SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques]. Ankara, Turkey: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
Kanfer, F. H. (1970). Self-regulation: Research, issues, and speculations. In C. Neuringer & J. L. Michael (Eds.), Behavior modification in clinical psychology (pp. 178-220). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Kazan, A. L. (1999), Exploring the concept of self-leadership: Factor impacting self leadership of Ohio AmeriCorps members (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Ohio).
Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equations modeling (3th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Köklü, N. (2002). Açıklamalı istatistik terimleri sözlüğü [Annotated statistics terms glossary]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Kurman, J. (2001). Self-regulation strategies in achievement setting: culture and gender differences. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(4), 491-503.
Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed.). New Jersey, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mahoney, M. J., & Thoresen, C. E. (1972). Behavioral self-control: Power to the person. Educational Researcher, 1(10), 5-7.
Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585-600.
Manz, C. C. (1992). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 5(3), 361-367.
Marshall, G., Kiffin-Petersen, S., & Soutar, G. (2012). the influence personality and leader behaviours have on teacher self-leadership in vocational colleges. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(6), 707-723.
Martin, C. R., & Newell, R. J. (2004). Factor structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in individuals with facial disfigurement. Psychology Health and Medicine, 9(3), 327- 336.
Meydan, C. H., & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları [Structural equation modeling AMOS applications]. Ankara, Turkey: Detay Yayıncılık.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. California, CA: Sage.
Mezo, P. G. (2009). The self-control and self-management scale (SCMS): Development of an adaptive self-regulatory coping skills instrument. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31(2), 83-93.
Mezo, P. G., & Heiby, E. M. (2011). Proposed cut-off scores for self-management questionnaires. Clinical Psychologist, 15(2), 78-84.
Mezo, P. G., & Short, M. M. (2012). Construct validity and confirmatory factor analysis of the self-control and self-management scale. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 44(1), 1-8.
Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 270-295.
Özsoy, İ. (2012). Örgüt iklimi, öz liderlik ve iş tatmininin Ar-Ge performansına etkisi: Savunma sanayiinde bir araştırma [The effect of organizational climate, self leadership and job satisfaction on R&D performance: A study on Turkish defense industry] (Doctoral dissertation, Turkish Military Academy Defense Sciences Institute Department of Defense Management, Ankara, Turkey).
Razieh, A., Reza, H., & Saeid, R. (2013). The analysis of relationship between self-leadership strategies and components of quantum organization at universities. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2(5), 192-203.
Schriesheim, C. A., & Eisenbach, R. J. (1995). An exploratory and confirmatory factoranalytic investigation of item wording effects on the obtained factor structures of survey questionnaire measures. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1177-1193.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A Beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Seçer, İ. (2013). SPSS ve LISREL ile pratik veri analizi: Analiz ve raporlaştırma [Practical data analysis with SPSS and LISREL: Analysis and reporting]. Ankara, Turkey: Anı Yayıncılık.
Shevlin, M. E., & Lewis, C. A. (1999). The revised social anxiety scale: exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(2), 250-252.
Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar [Structural equation models: Basic concepts and sample applications]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74.
Şeker, H., & Gençdoğan, B. (2006). Psikolojide ve eğitimde ölçme aracı geliştirme [Development of measurement tool in psychology and education]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlik [Reliability and validity in the social and behavioral measurements]. Ankara, Turkey: Seçkin Yayınları.
Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş - Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları [Intruduction of structural equation modeling - Basic principles and LISREL applications]. Ankara: Ekinoks Eğitim Danışmanlık Hiz. ve Basım.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Tavşancıl, E. (2006). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS] (3. ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Tekindal, S. (2009). Duyuşsal özelliklerin ölçülmesi için araç oluşturma [Tool formation for measurement of affective characteristic] (2nd ed.). Ankara, Turkey: PegemA Yayıncılık.
Todd, A. W., Horner, R. H., & Sugai, G. (1999). Self-monitoring and self-recruited praise: Effects on problem behavior, academic engagement, and work completion in a typical classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1(2), 66-76.
Türköz, T. (2010). Çalışanların öz liderlik algısının izlenim yönetimi taktiklerini kullanımlarına olan etkileri: Savunma sanayinde uygulamalı bir araştırma [The effects of employees' selfleadership perceptions on impression management tactics: An applied research in Turkish defense industry] (Master's thesis, Turkish Military Academy Defense Sciences Institute Department of Defense Management, Ankara, Turkey).
Uğurluoğlu, Ö. (2010). Kendi kendine liderlik stratejileri üzerine bir araştırma [A study on selfleadership strategies]. Ankara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(1), 175-191.
Ural, A., & Kılıç, İ. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Scientific research process and data analysis with SPSS] (3th ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Detay Yayıncılık. Watkins, D. (1989). The role of confirmatory factor analysis in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 685-701.
Xue, G., & Sun, X. (2011). Construction and validation of self-management scale for undergraduate students, Creative Education, 2(2), 142-147.
Yaka, A. İ. (2011). Bağlanma, erken döneme yönelik şemalar, öz-yönetim ve psikolojik belirtiler arasındaki ilişkiler [The relationship between adult attachment styles, early maladaptive schemas, self regulatory and psychological symptoms] (Master's thesis, Ankara University Social Sciences Institute, Ankara, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez. yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

APA	ERCOŞKUN M (2016). Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity. , 1125 - 1145.
Chicago	ERCOŞKUN Muhammet Hanifi Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity. (2016): 1125 - 1145.
MLA	ERCOŞKUN Muhammet Hanifi Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity. , 2016, ss.1125 - 1145.
AMA	ERCOŞKUN M Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity. . 2016; 1125 - 1145.
Vancouver	ERCOŞKUN M Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity. . 2016; 1125 - 1145.
IEEE	ERCOŞKUN M "Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity." , ss.1125 - 1145, 2016.
ISNAD	ERCOŞKUN, Muhammet Hanifi. "Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity". (2016), 1125-1145.

APA	ERCOŞKUN M (2016). Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16(4), 1125 - 1145.
Chicago	ERCOŞKUN Muhammet Hanifi Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 16, no.4 (2016): 1125 - 1145.
MLA	ERCOŞKUN Muhammet Hanifi Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, vol.16, no.4, 2016, ss.1125 - 1145.
AMA	ERCOŞKUN M Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2016; 16(4): 1125 - 1145.
Vancouver	ERCOŞKUN M Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2016; 16(4): 1125 - 1145.
IEEE	ERCOŞKUN M "Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity." Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 16, ss.1125 - 1145, 2016.
ISNAD	ERCOŞKUN, Muhammet Hanifi. "Adaptation of Self-Control and Self-Management Scale (SCMS) into Turkish Culture: A Study on Reliability and Validity". Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 16/4 (2016), 1125-1145.