Induction is known as a problem, a logic method, or a way of reasoning that attracts the attention of philosophers and scientists. It means making inferences from the facts, which we have experienced; for the facts, which we have not experienced yet. Induction is mostly accepted as inferences that do not include any skepticism by philosophers and scientists; and its epistemological position is controversial. In this study, induction will be examined in the scope of David Hume's philosophy because of its epistemological position, not in the scope of the principles of logic. Hume has been thought as a radical skeptic about induction in the history of philosophy. In the background of this idea, there is an argument that we have no reason in justification of inductive inferences and of beliefs with regard to them, or inductive inferences have no foundation. This argument of Hume reveals that induction has no epistemic value. This result is a skeptic result, and it shows that Hume deals with induction in a skeptical and epistemological way. In this study, after the epistemological objection of Hume about induction is examined, it will be claimed that this objection is in fact a skeptical objection. This claim will be supported with the ideas of Hume on inductive inferences and the nature of these beliefs.