The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course

DEMİRTAŞLI, Nükhet; ayan, cansu; yalçın, seher

The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course

Nükhet DEMİRTAŞLI, (Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)

Seher YALÇIN, (Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)

Cansu AYAN (Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)

Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi

3 1

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 133 - 144 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course

Öz:

Bu araştırmada, ölçme ve değerlendirme dersine yönelik tutumu ölçmek üzere geliştirilen Likert tipi, Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dersine Yönelik Tutum (ÖDET) ölçeğinin (Demirtaşlı, 2002) madde tepki kuramına dayalı (MTK) çok kategorili puanlanan modeller çerçevesinde yeniden ölçeklenerek psikometrik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. MTK'ya dayalı modeller verilerle uyum gösterdiğinde, değişmez birey ve madde parametreleri kestirilebilir amaca uygun ölçek geliştirmede daha güvenilir ve geçerli sonuçlara ulaşılabilir. Ölçeğin ilk versiyonu, dörtlü Likert tipi, dereceli toplamlı tepki vermeye uygun 41 maddeden oluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin bu formu, Türkiye'deki farklı illerden üç devlet üniversitesinin öğretmen yetiştiren fakülte ve programlarına devam eden 519 üniversite öğrencisine uygulanmıştır. Maddeler çok kategorili puanlanan maddeler için geliştirilen MTK modellerinden Samejima (S) kademeli tepki modeli (S-Graded Response model), kısmi puan modeli (partial credit model) ve sınıflandırmalı tepki modeline (nominal response model) göre ölçeklenmiştir. Ki-kare veri-model uyum testi sonucunda, S-kademeli tepki modeline göre ölçeklenen ölçeğin 33 maddelik yeni versiyonunun veriyle daha uyumlu olduğu görülmüştür. İç tutarlık anlamındaki klasik güvenilirlik katsayısının da 0.97 olduğu bulunmuştur. S-kademeli tepki modeline göre psikometrik özellikleri MTK'ya göre kestirilen ÖDET'in geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih

Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dersine Yönelik Tutum Ölçeğinin Madde Tepki Kuramına Dayalı Olarak Geliştirilmesi

Öz:

In this study, the Scale of Attitude towards Educational Measurement and Evaluation (SAEM) developed by Demirtaşlı (2002) is reconstructed based on polytomous Item Response Theory (IRT) models and its psychometric features are identified. In this context, the best polythomous IRT model was investigated which is fitted SAEM data. IRT models gives invariant person and item parameters, when data-model fit. A version of SAEM has 41 Likert type items with four points was administered to 519 teacher candidates attending teacher education programs at several universities in Turkey. The data were analyzed according to polythomous IRT models: Samejima's graded response model (S-GRM), the partial credit model (PCM) and a nominal response model (NRM). The results of the analysis showed that a new version of SAEM, which is based on S-GRM, consists of 33 items, has lower chi-square value than the other models and the classic internal reliability was found to be 0.97. The findings of the study indicate that the validity and reliability features of the scale are fairly good.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Aktaş, M., & Alıcı, D. (2012). Development of likert type attitude scale towards measurement and evaluation in education course. Journal of Qafqaz University, 33, 66-73.
Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Milton-Keynes, England: Open University Press/ McGraw- Hill.
Baker, F. B. (2001). The basis of item response theory. USA: ERIC Clearing house on Assessment and Evaluation.
Baker, J. G., Rounds, J. B. & Zevon, M. A. (2000). A comparison of graded response and rasch partial credit models with subjective well-being. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 253-70.
Brady, P. & Bowd, A. (2005). Mathematics anxiety, prior experience and confidence to teach mathematics among pre-service education students. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 37-46.
Clauser, B. E.,& Mazor, K. M. (1998). Using statistical procedure to identify differential item functioning test items. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17, 31-44.
de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Demirtaşlı, Ç. N. (2002). Developing a scale for attitudes toward the measurement and evaluation course. Education and Science, 27, 125, 44-48.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. LEA publishers: NJ.
Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Greer T. G. (2004). Detection of differential item functioning (DIF) on the SATV: A comparison of four methods: Mantel-Haenszel, logistic regression, simultaneous item bias and likelihood ratio test (Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, Texas). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/305196900/EE5E5B40D7A34E5DPQ/1?accountid=8319
Gresham, G. (2010). A study exploring exceptional education pre-service teachers' mathematics anxiety. IUMPST: The Journal, 4, 1-14.
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Jaggernauth, J. S. (2010). Mathematics anxiety and the primary school teacher: An exploratory study of the relationship between mathematics anxiety, mathematics teacher efficacy, and mathematics avoidance. EDRS6900: Project Report. The University of the West Indies.
Kaptan, S. (1995). Bilimsel araştırma ve istatistik teknikleri (10. Baskı). Ankara: Rehber Yayınevi.
Kılınç, M. (2011). A perceptual scale for measurement and evaluation of prospective teachers self-efficacy in education. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 12, 4, 81-93.
Kilmen, S., & Çıkrıkçı-Demirtaşlı, N. (2009). The Perceptions of primary school teachers about their application levels of measurement and evaluation principles. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 42(2), 027-054.
Kottke, J. L. (2000). Mathematical proficiency, statistics knowledge, attitudes toward statistics, and measurement course performance. The College Student Journal, 34, 334-347.
Le, D. T. (2013). Applying item response theory modeling in educational research (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/1450045295/DD5A9 4235C534A49PQ/1?accountid=8319.
Matteucci, M., & Stracqualursi, L. (2006). Student assessment via graded response model. STATISTICA, 4, 435-447.
Ozan, C., & Köse, E. (2013). Adaptation of attitudes toward educational measurement inventory (ATEMI) to Turkish. E-İnternational Journal of Educational Research, 4 (2), 29-47.
Özbaşı, D., & Demirtaşlı-Çıkrıkçı N. (2013). Primary school teachers' perceptions of their competencies regarding measurement and evaluation in terms of some variables. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 46(2), 25-46.
Perkins, K. K., Adams, W. K., Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2005). Correlating student beliefs with student learning using the Colorado learning attitudes about science survey. AIP Conference Proceedings, 790(1), 61-64.
Reed, H. C., Drijvers, P., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Effects of attitudes and behaviours on learning mathematics with computer tools. Computers & Education, 55(1), 1-15.
Shih, C. C., & Gamon, J. (2001). Web-based learning: Relationships among student motivation, attitudes, learning styles, and achievement. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 12-20.
Thissen, D. (2001). IRTLRDIF v.2.0b: Software for the computation of the statistics involved in item response theory likelihood-ratio tests for differential item functioning. Chapel Hill: L. L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1993). Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. In P. W. Holland and H. Wainer (Eds.). Differantial item functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ulutaş, S. (2003). Investigating the competency of teachers in high schools in measurement and evaluation and level of application principles of measurement and evaluation (Master thesis, University of Ankara). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/.
Wise, S.L., Lukin, L.E. & Roos, L.L. (1991). Teacher beliefs about training in testing and measurement. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 37-42.
Yıldırım, H. H. (2006). The differential item functionıng (DIF) analysis of mathematics items in the international assessment programs (Doctoral dissertation, METU). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/.

APA	DEMİRTAŞLI N, yalçın s, ayan c (2016). The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course. , 133 - 144.
Chicago	DEMİRTAŞLI Nükhet,yalçın seher,ayan cansu The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course. (2016): 133 - 144.
MLA	DEMİRTAŞLI Nükhet,yalçın seher,ayan cansu The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course. , 2016, ss.133 - 144.
AMA	DEMİRTAŞLI N,yalçın s,ayan c The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course. . 2016; 133 - 144.
Vancouver	DEMİRTAŞLI N,yalçın s,ayan c The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course. . 2016; 133 - 144.
IEEE	DEMİRTAŞLI N,yalçın s,ayan c "The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course." , ss.133 - 144, 2016.
ISNAD	DEMİRTAŞLI, Nükhet vd. "The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course". (2016), 133-144.

APA	DEMİRTAŞLI N, yalçın s, ayan c (2016). The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 7(1), 133 - 144.
Chicago	DEMİRTAŞLI Nükhet,yalçın seher,ayan cansu The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi 7, no.1 (2016): 133 - 144.
MLA	DEMİRTAŞLI Nükhet,yalçın seher,ayan cansu The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, vol.7, no.1, 2016, ss.133 - 144.
AMA	DEMİRTAŞLI N,yalçın s,ayan c The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi. 2016; 7(1): 133 - 144.
Vancouver	DEMİRTAŞLI N,yalçın s,ayan c The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi. 2016; 7(1): 133 - 144.
IEEE	DEMİRTAŞLI N,yalçın s,ayan c "The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course." Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 7, ss.133 - 144, 2016.
ISNAD	DEMİRTAŞLI, Nükhet vd. "The Development of IRT Based Attitude Scale towards Educational Measurement Course". Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi 7/1 (2016), 133-144.