Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey

YASAR, ASKIN; SINMEZ, ÇAGRI ÇAGLAR; Yiğit, Ali; ÜLGER, İsmail

Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey

Çağrı Çağlar SİNMEZ, (Department of History of Veterinary Medicine and Deontology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri-TURKEY)

Ali YİĞİT, (Department of History of Veterinary Medicine and Deontology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University, Kars-TURKEY)

İsmail ÜLGER, (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Erciyes University, Kayseri-TURKEY)

Aşkın YAŞAR (Department of History of Veterinary Medicine and Deontology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya-TURKEY)

Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi

9 0

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 58 - 69 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey

Öz:

Bu derlemede, sığır ve koyun yetiştiriciliğinde uygulanan kuyruk ve kulak kesme işlemleri nedeniyle oluşan fizyolojik ve davranışsal tepkilerin tanımlanması, hayvanlara yapılan bu işlemlerin bilimsel gerekliliğinin doğrulanması, yasal mevzuat ve hayvan refahı (gönenci) açısından dünyadaki ve Türkiye'deki durumunun değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Bilimsel araştırmalar koyunlarda kuyruk kesme uygulamasının hafif-orta şiddette akut ağrı ve davranışsal tepkilere yol açtığını ve sinek istilasına karşı koruyucu etkisinin tartışmalı olduğunu göstermektedir. Kuyruksuzlaştırma işleminin koyun canlı ağırlık artışı ve karkas kalitesi üzerindeki etkisi ise hala tartışmalıdır. İneklerde kuyruk kesiminin nispeten daha az ağrıya sebep olduğu ve ineklerin arka bölgesinde sinek birikiminin fazla miktarda oluştuğu bildirilmektedir. Türkiye'de, tedavi ve geleneksel amaçlarla koyun ve sığırlarda ampiriklerce uygulanan kulak kesme işlemi ise yetiştiricilerin genellikle analjezi ve anestezi kullanmadan, steril olmayan koşullarda ve uygun olmayan araçlarla uyguladıkları, ağrı, acı ve yaralanmalara yol açan bir uygulamadır. Bu derlemede, ruminantlarda izlenen kuyruk ve kulak kesme işlemleri ana başlıklar altında değerlendirilerek dünyadaki ve Türkiye'deki durumu karşılaştırıldı. Türkiye'de sığır ve koyunlar üzerinde uygulanan kuyruk ve kulak kesimiyle ilgili hayvan refahı ve yasal mevzuat hakkında yetiştiricilerin bilinçlendirilmesi ve hayvan sağlığı ve refahı için alternatif yöntemlerin geliştirilmesi teşvik edilmelidir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Veterinerlik

Ruminantlarda Kulak ve Kuyruk Kesme: Hayvan Refahı (Gönenci) Bakımından Dünyada ve Türkiye'deki Durumun Karşılaştırılması

Öz:

The aim of this paper is to identify the physiological and behavioral responses caused by tail docking and ear cropping in ruminants, to affirm the scientific evidence for the rationale and to evaluate laws, animal welfare and current practices in the world and in Turkey. The scientific research indicates that the practice of tail docking causes acute pain and behavioral responses in sheep, and that its protective effect against fly strike is controversial. The docking process and its effect on carcass quality and live weight gain are still unclear. It is argued that tail docking in cows causes relatively low pain but can result in an excess quantity of fly strike on the back of the animals. The practice of ear cropping for the purpose of tradition and treatment by folk healers in sheep and cows - generally without using anaesthesia and analgesia, in unsterilized conditions leads to distress, pain and injury in animals. In this review, the tail docking and ear cropping were briefly outlined and compared between Turkey and around the world. The development of alternative methods for animal health and welfare, the level of awareness should be increased on welfare and legislative issues regarding ear cropping and tail docking in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Veterinerlik

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Al Jassim RAM, Brown G, Salman ED, Abodabos A. Effect of tail docking in Awassi lambs on metabolizable energy requirements and chemical composition of carcasses. Anim Sci 2002; 75: 359-66.
2. Anonymous. Statistical Yearbook of Turkey. State Institute of Statistics Prime Ministry Republic of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey, 2000.
3. Anonymous. Animal Protection Act, 01.07.2004, Official Gazette, Ankara, Turkey, https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/kanunlar/k5199.html, Accessed: 10.01.2015.
4. Anonymous. Report on the Implication of Castration and Tail Docking for the Welfare of Lambs. Farm Animal Welfare Counsil, London, UK, 2008; pp. 1-36.
5. Anonymous. The Regulation on the Implication of Organic Agriculture, 18.08.2010, Official Gazette, Ankara, Turkey, Accessed: 10.01.2015.
6. Arslan ED. Ege Bölgesi folklorunda veteriner hekimliği ve hayvancılık üzerine araştırmalar, PhD Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey, 1988.
7. AVMA, 2014, Literature Review on the welfare Implications of Tail Docking of Cattle, https://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/ LiteratureReviews/Documents/tail_docking_ cattle_bgnd.pdf, Accessed: 04.01.2015.
8. Barnett JL, Coleman GJ, Hemsworth PH, Newman EA, Fewings-Hall S, Ziini C. Tail docking and beliefs about the practice in the Victorian dairy industry. Aust Vet J 1999; 77 (11): 742-7.
9. Bıyıkoğlu K. Koyunculukta yetiştirme, bakım, yemleme ve idare işleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Zirai Araşt Enst Yay, Erzurum, Turkey, 1967.
10. Bıyıkoğlu K. Yağlı kuyruklu koyunlarda kuyruk kesimi ve sağladığı faydalar. Zoo Araş Enst Derg 1969; 2: 5.
11. Bıyıkoğlu K, Yazgan O, Çakır A. Mor Karamanlarda kuyruk kesmenin ve bazı kuyruk kesme metotlarının büyümeye ve merinos aşımına etkileri. Atatürk Üniv Ziraat Fak Derg 1970; 1(3): 77-100.
12. Bingöl M, Aygün T, Gökdal Ö, Yılmaz A. The effects of docking on fattening performance and carcass characteristics in fat-tailed Norduz male lambs. Small Rum Res 2006; 64 (1-2): 101-6.
13. Cengiz F, Arık IZ. Effects of docking on fattening performance and carcass characteristics in Akkaraman lambs. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of EAAP. 1994; p. 289, Edinburg, UK.
14. Chapman RE, Fell LR, Shutt DA. A comparison of stress in surgically and nonsurgically mulesed sheep. Aust Vet J 1994; 71(8): 243-7.
15. Clark C, Mendl M, Jamieson J, Arnone A, Waterman-Pearson A, Murrell J. Do psychological and physiological stressors alter the acute pain response to castration and tail docking in lambs? Vet Anaesth Anal 2011; 38(2): 134-45.
16. Council of Europe, 1988, Recommendation Concerning Cattle, Article 17, http:// eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?uri=celex:31998L0058, Accessed: 05.01.2015.
17. Council of Europe, 1992, Recommendation Concerning Sheep, Article 30, http:// www.coe.int/t/e/legal_affairs/legal_ cooperation/biological_safety_and_use_ of_animals/farming/Rec%20sheep%20E. asp#TopOfPage, Accessed: 06.01.2015.
18. Dinnis AS, Stafford KJ, Mellor DJ, Bruce RA, Ward RN. Acute cortisol responses of lambs castrated and docked using rubber rings with or without a castration clamp. Aust Vet J 1997; 75(7): 494-6.
19. Eicher SD, Cheng HW, Sorrells AD, Schutz MM. Behavioral and physiological indicators of sensitivity or chronic pain following tail docking. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89(8): 3047-51.
20. Eicher SD, Dailey JW. Indicators of acute pain and fly avoidance behaviors in Holstein calves following tail-docking. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85(11): 2850-8.
21. Eicher SD, Morrow-Tesch JL, Albright JL, Dailey JW, Young CR, Stanker LH. Tail-docking influences on behavioral, immunological, and endocrine responses in dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 2000; 83(7): 1456-62.
22. Eicher SD, Morrow-Tesch JL, Albright JL, Williams RE. Tail docking alters fly numbers, fly-avoidance behaviors, and cleanliness, but not physiological measures. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84(8): 1822-8.
23. Fisher MW, Gregory NG. Reconciling the differences between the length at which lambs' tails are commonly docked and animal welfare recommendations. Proc NZ Soc Anim Prod 2007; 67: 32-8.
24. French NP, Wall R, Morgan KL. Lamb tail docking: A controlled field study of the effects of tail amputation on health and productivity. Vet Rec 1994; 134(18): 463-7.
25. Fulwider WK, Grandin T, Rollin BE, Engle TE, Dalsted NL, Lamm WD. Survey of dairy management practices on one hundred thirteen North Central and Northeastern United States dairies. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91(4): 1686-92.
26. Gökdal Ö, Aygün T, Bingöl M, Karakus F. The effects of docking on performance and carcass characteristics of male Karakaş lambs. S Afr J Anim Sci 2003; 33(3): 185-92.
27. Gökdal Ö, Ülker H, Karakuş F, Cengiz F, Temur C, Handil H. Growth, feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of Karakas and crossbred lambs (F1) under rural farm conditions in Turkey. S Afr J Anim Sci 2004; 34(4): 223-32.
28. Graham J, Kent JE, Molony V. Effects of four analgesic treatments on the behavioural and cortisol responses of 3-week-old lambs to tail docking. Vet J 1997; 153(1): 87-97.
29. Grassi A. A look at bovine welfare-what's good, what's bad, and the lessons within. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 219(10): 1369-73.
30. Grooms D, Schweihofer J, Metz K. Effect of tail docking on health and performance on feedlot calves housed in confined slotted floor facilities. AABP Proceedings 2010; 43: 236.
31. Gürsoy O, Özcan L. Effects of docking and castration on growth performance of Awassi lambs. Yearbook. Çukurova University, Faculty of Agriculture, Turkey, 1982; pp. 49-63.
32. Heath ACG, Bishop DM, Tenquist JD. The effects of artificially induced fly-strike on food intake and live weight gain in sheep. NZ Vet J 1987; 35(4): 50-2.
33. Hemsworth PH, Cronin GM, Barnett JL, Butler KL, Jongman EC, Karlen GA, Coffey A, Arnold NA. Behavioural responses of lambs to plastic clips as an alternative procedure to mulesing. Aust Vet J 2012; 90(10): 373-80.
34. Isani GB, Yaqoob M, Khan BB, Younas M, Hanjra SH. A comparative study of effect of docking fat-tailed sheep and crossbreeding fat-tailed and thin-tailed sheep on growth and carcass characteristics. Pak J Agri Sci 2012; 49(1): 88-92.
35. Kadak R, Akçapınar H, Tekin ME, Akmaz A, Müftüoğlu Ş. Alman Siyah Başlı etçi x Akkaraman, Hampshire Down x Akkaraman, Alman Siyah Başlı Etçi x İvesi, Hampshire Down x İvesi (F1) kuzuların büyüme, besi ve karkas özellikleri. Hay Araş Enst Derg 1993; 3: 1-7.
36. Karakuş F, Cengiz F. Effects of docking on fattening performance and carcass characteristics of fat-tailed sheep. Proceedings of GAP II Agricultural Congress. October 24- 26, 2001; Şanlıurfa, Turkey.
37. Kent JE, Molony V, Graham MJ. The effect of different bloodless castrators and different tail docking methods on the responses of lambs to the combined burdizzo rubber ring method of castration. Vet J 2001; 162(3): 250-4.
38. Kent JE, Molony V, Robertson IS. Changes in plasma cortisol concentration in lambs of three ages after three methods of castration and tail docking. Res Vet Sci 1993; 55(2): 246- 51.
39. Kroll LK, Grooms DL, Siegford JM, Schweihofer JP, Metz K, Rust SR. Effects of tail docking on health and performance of beef cattle in confined, slatted floor feedlots. J Anim Sci 2014; 92(9): 4108-14.
40. Landa L. The effect of milk suckling from the dam or glucose administration on the behavioural responses to tail docking in lambs. Acta Vet Brno 2003; 72: 175-82.
41. Lester SJ, Mellor DJ, Holmes RJ. Behavioural and cortisol responses of lambs to castration and tailing using different methods. NZ Vet J 1996; 44(2): 45-54.
42. Lester SJ, Mellor DJ, Ward RN, Holmes RJ. Cortisol responses of young lambs to castration and tailing using different methods. NZ Vet J 1991; 39(4): 134-8.
43. Lomax S, Dickson H, Sheil M. Topical anaesthesia alleviates short-term pain of castration and tail docking in lambs. Aust Vet J 2010; 88(3): 67-74.
44. Lomax S, Shiel M, Windsor PA. Use of local anaesthesia for pain management during husbandry procedures in Australian sheep flocks. Small Rum Res 2009; 86(1-3): 546-58.
45. Lombard JE, Tucker CB, Von Keyserlingk MAG, Kopral CA, Weary DM. Associations between cow hygiene, hock injuries, and free stall usage on US dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2010; 93(10): 4668-76.
46. Lund V, Coleman G, Gunnarsson S, Appleby MC, Karkinen K. Animal welfare scienceworking at the interface between the natural and social sciences. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006; 97: 37-49.
47. MAF. Animal Welfare (Painful Husbandry Procedures) Code of Welfare 2005. MAF, Wellington, New Zealand, 2005; p. 36.
48. Marai IFM, Nowar MS, Bahgat LB. Effect of docking and shearing on growth and carcass traits of fat-tailed Ossimi sheep. J Agric Sci Camb 1987; 109(3): 513-8.
49. McCracken L, Waran N, Mitchinson S, Johnson CB. Effect of age at castration on behavioural response to subsequent tail docking in lambs. Vet Anaesth Anal 2010; 37(4): 375-81.
50. Mears GJ, Brown FA. Cortisol and beta endorphin responses to physical and physiological stressors in lambs. Can J Anim Sci 1997; 77(4): 689-94.
51. Mellor DJ, Molony V. Castration and/or tail docking of lambs. Vet Rec 1995; 137(9): 227.
52. Mellor DJ, Murray L. Change in the cortisol responses of lambs to tail docking, castration and ACTH injection during the first seven days after birth. Res Vet Sci 1989; 46(3): 392-5.
53. Mellor DJ, Stafford KJ. Acute castration and/or tailing distress and its alleviation in lambs. NZ Vet J 2000; 48(2): 33-43.
54. Miller SR. Survey of Tail Docking Practices of Michigan Livestock Producers. Center for Economic Analysis Report. Michigan State University, USA, 2010; pp. 1-14.
55. Moharrery A. Effect of docking and energy of diet on carcass fat characteristics in fat-tailed Badghisian sheep. Small Rum Res 2007; 69(1): 208-16.
56. Moharrery A. Effect of docking and diet energy on carcass fat characteristics in fat-tailed baluchian sheep. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2009; 33(2): 95-103.
57. Molony V, Kent JE, Robertson IS. Behavioural responses of lambs of three ages in the first three hours after three methods of castration and tail docking. Res Vet Sci 1993; 55(2): 236- 45.
58. Morris MC. Ethical issues associated with sheep fly strike research, prevention, and control. J Agric Environ Ethics 2000; 13(3): 205-17.
59. Njidda AA, Isidahomen CE. Hematological parameters and carcass characteristics of weanling rabbits fed sesame seed meal (Sesamum indicum) in a semi-arid region. Pak Vet J 2011; 31(1): 35-9.
60. Özgür A. Hayvan gönenci açısından Türkiye'de veteriner hekimlik ile ilgili mevzuatın değerlendirilmesi. Vet Hek Dern Derg 2007; 78(1): 45-8.
61. Panopoulou E, Papadimitriou T, Deligeorgis SG, Rogdakis E. Effect of docking on carcass composition, fat cell size and NADPdependent anzyme activity in adipose tissue of female Chois lambs at 40 kg live wight. Epith Zoo Epistem 1991; 13: 93-107.
62. Peers A, Mellor DJ, Wintour EM, Dodic M. Blood pressure, hearth rate, hormonal and other acute responses to rubber-ring castration and tail docking of lambs. NZ Vet J 2002; 50(2): 56-62.
63. Petrie NJ, Mellor DJ, Stafford KJ, Bruce RA, Ward RN. Cortisol responses of calves to two methods of tail docking used with or without local anaesthetic. NZ Vet J 1996; 44(1): 4-8.
64. Petrie N, Stafford KJ, Mellor DJ, Bruce RA, Ward RN. The behaviour of calves tail docked with a rubber ring used with or without local anaesthetic. Proc NZ Soc Anim Prod 1995; 55: 58-60.
65. Phipps AM, Matthews LR, Verkerk GA. Tail docked dairy cattle: fly induced behaviour and adrenal responsiveness to ACTH. Proc NZ Soc Anim Prod 1995; 55: 61-3.
66. Pollard JC, Roos V, Littlejohn RP. Effects of an oral dose of acetyl salicylate at tail docking on the behaviour of lambs aged three to six weeks. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2001; 71(1): 29- 42.
67. Samsar E, Akın F. Kulak Hastalıkları. Özel Cerrahi Kitabı, Ankara, Medipres Yay, Turkey, 2002; pp. 52-3.
68. Sarvar EN, Moeini MM, Poyanmehr M, Mikaeli E. The effects of docking on growth traits, carcass characteristics and blood biochemical parameters of sanjabi fat-tailed lambs. AsianAust J Anim Sci 2009; 22(6): 796-802.
69. Savaş T, Yaman YI, Tölü C. Hayvan hakları ve hayvan refahı: Felsefi bakış-nesnel arayışlar. Hay Üretim Derg 2009; 50(1): 54-61.
70. Schreiner DA, Ruegg PL. Effects of tail docking on milk quality and cow cleanliness. J Dairy Sci 2002a; 85(10): 2503-11.
71. Schreiner DA, Ruegg PL. Responses to tail docking in calves and heifers. J Dairy Sci 2002b; 85(12): 3287-96.
72. Sefidbakht N, Ghorban K. Change arising from docking of fat-tailed sheep in feedlot performance. Iran Agric Res 1972; 1(2): 72-7.
73. Shelton M, Willingham T, Thompson P, Roberts EM. Influence of docking and castration on growth and carcass traits of fat-tail Karakul, Rambouillet and crossbred lambs. Small Rum Res 1991; 4(3): 235-43.
74. Sinmez ÇÇ. Bozlak kültüründe folklorik veteriner hekimliği ve hayvancılık üzerine araştırma,Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya, Türkiye, 2011; p.195.
75. Sinmez ÇÇ. Sivas Yöresinde Folklorik Veteriner Hekimliği ve Hayvancılık Üzerine Araştırma. Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi. No: V-006, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey, 2013; p.190.
76. Small AH, Belson S, Holm M, Colditz IG. Efficacy of a buccal meloxicam formulation for pain relief in Merino lambs undergoing knife castration and tail docking in a randomised field trial. Aust Vet J 2014; 92(10): 381-8.
77. Stull CL, Payne MA, Berry SL, Hullinger PJ. Evaluation of the scientific justification for tail docking in dairy cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220(9): 1298-303.
78. Sutherland MA, Tucker CB. The long and short of it: A review of tail docking in farm animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011; 135(3): 179-91.
79. Tekin ME, Akmaz A, Kadak R, Nazlı M. The fattening and carcass characteristics of Akkaraman, Awassi and Turkish merino male lambs. Hay Araşt Enst Derg 1993; 3: 98-102.
80. Tellioğlu S. Kuzularda kastrasyon, kuyruk kesimi ve mules operasyonu. J Fac Agric 1974; 5(4):135-7.
81. Thomas DL, Waldron DF, Lowe GD, Morrical GD, Meyer HH, High RA, Berger YM, Clevenger DD, Fogle GE, Gottfredson RG. Length of docked tail and the incidence of rectal prolapses in lambs. J Anim Sci 2003;
81(11): 2725-32.
82. Tilki M, Saatci M, Aksoy AR, Kırmızıbayrak T. Effect of tail docking growth performance and carcass traits in Turkish tuj lambs. J Anim Vet Adv 2010; 9(15): 2094-7.
83. Tom EM, Duncan IJH, Widowski TM, Bateman KG, Leslie KE. Effects of tail docking using a rubber ring with or without anesthetic on behavior and production of lactating cows. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85(9): 2257-65.
84. Trentini R, Maitino AG, Fede E, Iannetti L, Dalla Villa P. Taglio della coda degli ovinie benessera animale: Revisione della letterature. Large Anim Rev 2013; 19: 21-31.
85. Tucker CB, Fraser D, Weary DM. Tail docking dairy cattle: effects on cow cleanliness and udder health. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84(1): 84-7.
86. Webb Ware JK, Vizard AL, Lean GR. Effects of tail amputation and treatment with an albendazole controlled-release capsule on the health and productivity of prime lambs. Aust Vet J 2000; 78(12): 838-42.
87. Wilson GDA. Docking cows' tails. Proceedings of Ruakura Farmer Conference. 1972; pp: 158-65, New Zealand.
88. Yaşar A, Sinmez ÇÇ, Aslım G. İç Anadolu Bölgesi Konya Bölümünde (Aksaray, Karaman ve Konya) Folklorik Veteriner Hekimliği ve Hayvancılık Üzerine Araştırma. Araştırma Projesi No: 112O428 TÜBİTAK-TOVAG, Konya, Turkey, 2013; p. 160.
89. Yüksel E. Aşağı Fırat Havzasında veteriner hekimliği folkloru üzerine araştırmalar, Doktora Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ, Türkiye, 2012; p. 191.

APA	SINMEZ Ç, Yiğit A, ÜLGER İ, YASAR A (2016). Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey. , 58 - 69.
Chicago	SINMEZ ÇAGRI ÇAGLAR,Yiğit Ali,ÜLGER İsmail,YASAR ASKIN Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey. (2016): 58 - 69.
MLA	SINMEZ ÇAGRI ÇAGLAR,Yiğit Ali,ÜLGER İsmail,YASAR ASKIN Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey. , 2016, ss.58 - 69.
AMA	SINMEZ Ç,Yiğit A,ÜLGER İ,YASAR A Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey. . 2016; 58 - 69.
Vancouver	SINMEZ Ç,Yiğit A,ÜLGER İ,YASAR A Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey. . 2016; 58 - 69.
IEEE	SINMEZ Ç,Yiğit A,ÜLGER İ,YASAR A "Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey." , ss.58 - 69, 2016.
ISNAD	SINMEZ, ÇAGRI ÇAGLAR vd. "Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey". (2016), 58-69.

APA	SINMEZ Ç, Yiğit A, ÜLGER İ, YASAR A (2016). Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 58 - 69.
Chicago	SINMEZ ÇAGRI ÇAGLAR,Yiğit Ali,ÜLGER İsmail,YASAR ASKIN Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 13, no.1 (2016): 58 - 69.
MLA	SINMEZ ÇAGRI ÇAGLAR,Yiğit Ali,ÜLGER İsmail,YASAR ASKIN Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.13, no.1, 2016, ss.58 - 69.
AMA	SINMEZ Ç,Yiğit A,ÜLGER İ,YASAR A Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 13(1): 58 - 69.
Vancouver	SINMEZ Ç,Yiğit A,ÜLGER İ,YASAR A Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 13(1): 58 - 69.
IEEE	SINMEZ Ç,Yiğit A,ÜLGER İ,YASAR A "Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey." Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, ss.58 - 69, 2016.
ISNAD	SINMEZ, ÇAGRI ÇAGLAR vd. "Tail Docking and Ear Cropping in Ruminants: A Comparison of Welfare Aspects in the World and Turkey". Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 13/1 (2016), 58-69.