Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler

ŞİMŞEK, Ülkü Gülcihan; ÖZHAN, Nejla; ÖZÇELİK, Mehtap

Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler

Nejla ÖZHAN, (Fırat University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Science Department Elazığ, Turkey.)

Ülkü Gülcihan ŞİMŞEK, (Fırat University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Science Department Elazığ, Turkey.)

Mehtap ÖZÇELİK (Fırat University, Health Services High School, Biochemistry, Elazığ, Turkey.)

Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi

0 0

Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 63 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 317 - 322 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler

Öz:

Bu araştırma, yer ve kafes sistemlerinde yetiştirilen etlik piliçlerin bazı biyokimyasal parametreler, kemik kalitesi ve Musculus pectoralis pH düzeyleri bakımından eş zamanlı olarak karşılaştırılması amacıyla yapıldı. Araştırmanın hayvan materyalini her yetiştirme sisteminden büyüme periyodunun 32. gününde seçilen sabit canlı ağırlıktaki 30 etlik piliç oluşturdu. Her sistemdeki piliçlerin tamamı 25.000 kapasiteli 6 farklı sürüden seçildi. Piliçler boyun uçurma yöntemi ile kesildi; kanları özel tüplere alındı. Kesimi takiben göğüs kasının pH'sı on dakika sonunda ölçüldü. Kemikler etlerinden soyuldu, fiziksel özellikleri ve mineral düzeyleri bakımından incelendi. Kafes sisteminde yetiştirilen etlik piliçlerde serum glukoz, çok düşük yoğunluklu lipoprotein (VLDL kolesterol) ve ürik asit düzeyi önemli ölçüde arttı (P< 0.05). Serum total kolesterol, trigliserit ve protein düzeyleri ile alkalen fosfataz ve kreatin kinaz enzim aktivitelerinde önemli farklılık tespit edilmedi (P> 0.05). Tibio-tarsal ve femur kemiklerinde kül düzeyi, kafes sisteminde yetiştirilen piliçlerde düşük bulundu (P< 0.05). Tibia ve femur ağırlık, boy ve en değerleri gruplar arasında benzerdi (P> 0.05). Kafes sisteminde göğüs kası pH düzeyi yer sisteminden önemli derecede yüksekti (P< 0.01). Sonuç olarak, kafes sisteminin etlik piliçlerde kan parametreleri, kemik kalitesi ve göğüs kası pH'sını olumsuz etkilediği tespit edildi.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Veterinerlik

Yer ve kafes sistemlerinin etlik piliçlerde bazı refah parametreleri bakımından karşılaştırılması

Öz:

This study was conducted to investigate simultaneously compare floor with cage housing systems in terms of some blood parameters, bone quality and pH level of Musculus pectoralis in broilers. The animal material of the study was consisted of a total of 30 broilers per housing system, having stable live weight, were selected on 32nd day of growing period. All broilers per system were choosen at six different flocks having 25.000 capacities. The chickens were slaughtered via beheading method and blood samples were collected into special tubes. The pH level of breast muscle was measured within ten minutes later following the slaughter. Bones were eviscerated from meat and analyzed in terms of physical properties and mineral levels. Serum glucose, verylow-density lipoprotein (VLDL cholesterol) and uric acid levels increased in broilers reared by cage housing systems (P< 0.05). There were not any significant differences at serum total cholesterol, triglyceride, protein level and enzyme activities of alkaline phosphatase and creatine kinase (P> 0.05). Ash ratios of tibio-tarsal and femora bones were lower in cage housing system (P< 0.05). Dimensions and weights of tibia and femora bones were observed to have similar values between groups (P> 0.05). pH levels of breast muscle was significantly higher in cage housing systems than floor system (P< 0.01). Consequently, cage housing system was negatively affected on broiler's blood parameters, bone quality and pH level of breast muscle.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Veterinerlik

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. AOAC (2000): Official Methods of Analysis Association of AOAC International. 17th ed., (AOAC International Maryland).
2. Bizeray D, Leterrier C, Constantin P, et al. (2000): Early locomotor behaviour in genetic stocks of chickens with different growth rates. Appl Anim Behav, 68, 231- 242.
3. Ciftci M, Simsek UG, Azman MA, et al. (2013): The effects of dietary rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) oil supplementation on performance, carcass traits and some blood parameters of Japanese quail under heat stressed condition. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 19, 595-599.
4. Crampton EW, Maynard LA (1983): The relation of cellulose and lignin content to nutritive value of animal feeds. J Nutr, 15, 383-395.
5. Dadgar S, Lee ES, Leer TLV, et al. (2010): Effect of microclimate temperature during transportation of broiler chickens on quality of the pectoralis major muscle. Poult Sci, 89, 1033-1041.
6. Dadgar S, Lee ES, Leer TLV, et al. (2011): Effect of acute cold exposure, age, sex, and lairage on broiler breast meat quality. Poult Sci, 90, 444-457.
7. Daneshyar M, Kermanshahi H, Golian A (2009): Changes of biochemical parameters and enzyme activities in broiler chickens with cold-induced ascites. Poult Sci, 88, 106-110.
8. Duncan IJH (2001): The pros and cons of cages. World Poult Sci J, 57, 381-390.
9. Filaire E, Toumib H (2012): Reactive oxygen species and exercise on bone metabolism: Friend or enemy? Joint Bone Spine, 79, 341-346.
10. Fouad MA, Razek AHA, Badawy SM (2008): Broilers welfare and economics under two management alternatives on commercial scale. Int J Poul Sci, 7, 1167-1173.
11. Hocking PM, Maxwell MH, Robertson GW, et al. (2001): Welfare assessment of modified rearing programmes for broiler breeders. Br Poultry Sci, 42, 424-432.
12. Johnson JS (2014): Heat stress alters animal physiology and post-absorptive metabolism during pre- and postnatal development. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 13982.
13. Kissebah AH (1974): 'Stress' Hormones and Lipid Metabolism. Proc R Soc Med, 67, 665-667.
14. Lacin E, Coban O, Aksu MU, et al. (2013): The effects of different breeding methods on fattening performance and parameters related to slaughter, carcass and some meat quality in broiler chickens. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 19, 283-289.
15. Lin H, Decuyperea E, Buyse J (2004): Oxidative stress induced by corticosterone administration in broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) 1. Chronic exposure. Biochem Physiol B-Biochem Mol Biol, 139, 737-744.
16. Onbasilar EE, Aksoy FT (2005): Stress parameters and immune response of layers under different cage floor and density conditions. Livest Prod Sci, 95, 255-263.
17. Orban JI, Roland DA, Bryant MM, et al. (1993): Factors influencing bone mineral content, density, breaking strength, and ash as response criteria for assessing bone quality in chickens. Poult Sci, 72, 437-446.
18. Ostman B, Michaëlsson K, Byberg L, et al. (2009): Oxidative stress and bone mineral density in elderly men: Antioxidant activity of alpha-tocopherol. Free Radical Bio Med, 47, 668-673.
19. Rajman M, Juráni M, Lamosová D, et al. (2006): The effects of feed restriction on plasma biochemistry in 20. Rath NC, Huff GR, Huff WE, et al. (2000): Factors regulating bone maturity and strength in poultry. Poult Sci, 79, 1024-1032.
21. Ristic M, Klaus D (2010): The meaning of pH-value for the meat quality of broilers - Influence of breed lines. Tehnol Mesa, 51, 120-123.
22. Rizk SW, Stake PE, Simmons RW (1980): Curled toes and perosis-like leg abnormalities in cage reared broilers. Poult Sci, 59, 308-15.
23. Sams AR (1999): Meat quality during processing. Poult Sci, 78, 798-803.
24. Sari M, Cerci IH (1993): Animal feeds and nutritional diseases. Chemical analysis of feeds. Elazığ-Tolga-Ofset, p: 266-279.
25. Sherlock L, Demmers TGM, Goodship AE, et al. (2010): The relationship between physical activity and leg health in the broiler chicken. Br Poult Sci, 51, 22-30.
26. Shields S, Greger M (2013): Animal welfare and food safety aspects of confining broiler chickens to cages. Animals, 3, 386-400.
27. Simsek UG, Ciftci M, Dogan G, et al. (2013): Antioxidant activity of cinnamon bark oil (Cinnamomum zeylanicum L.) in Japanese quails under thermo neutral and heat stressed conditions. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 19, 889-894.
28. Simsek UG, Erisir M, Ciftci M, et al. (2014): Effects of cage and floor housing systems on fattening performance, oxidative stress and carcass defects in broiler chicken. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 20, 727-733 . 29. Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences (SPSS 21) (2012): Licensed materials property of IBM corporation © copyright IBM corporation and other(s). 1989-2012; International.
30. Sundaram M, Yao Z (2010): Recent progress in understanding protein and lipid factors affecting hepatic VLDL assembly and secretion. Nutr Metab, 7, 35.
31. Tang S, Yu J, Zhang M, et al. (2013): Effects of different heat stress periods on various blood and meat quality parameters in young Arbor Acer broiler chickens. Can J Anim Sci, 93, 453-460.
32. Thorp BH, Duff SRI (1988): Effect of exercise on the vascular pattern in the bone extremities of broiler fowl. Res Vet Sci, 45, 72-77.
33. Tolon B, Yalcin S (1997): Bone characteristics and body weight of broilers in different husbandry systems. Br Poult Sci, 38, 132-5.
34. Virden WS, Kidd MT (2009): Physiological stress in broilers: Ramifications on nutrient digestibility and responses. J Appl Poult Res, 18, 338-347. Geliş tarihi: 14.04.2015 / Kabul tarihi: 09.10.2015

APA	ÖZHAN N, ŞİMŞEK Ü, ÖZÇELİK M (2016). Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler. , 317 - 322.
Chicago	ÖZHAN Nejla,ŞİMŞEK Ülkü Gülcihan,ÖZÇELİK Mehtap Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler. (2016): 317 - 322.
MLA	ÖZHAN Nejla,ŞİMŞEK Ülkü Gülcihan,ÖZÇELİK Mehtap Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler. , 2016, ss.317 - 322.
AMA	ÖZHAN N,ŞİMŞEK Ü,ÖZÇELİK M Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler. . 2016; 317 - 322.
Vancouver	ÖZHAN N,ŞİMŞEK Ü,ÖZÇELİK M Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler. . 2016; 317 - 322.
IEEE	ÖZHAN N,ŞİMŞEK Ü,ÖZÇELİK M "Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler." , ss.317 - 322, 2016.
ISNAD	ÖZHAN, Nejla vd. "Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler". (2016), 317-322.

APA	ÖZHAN N, ŞİMŞEK Ü, ÖZÇELİK M (2016). Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 63(3), 317 - 322.
Chicago	ÖZHAN Nejla,ŞİMŞEK Ülkü Gülcihan,ÖZÇELİK Mehtap Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 63, no.3 (2016): 317 - 322.
MLA	ÖZHAN Nejla,ŞİMŞEK Ülkü Gülcihan,ÖZÇELİK Mehtap Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.63, no.3, 2016, ss.317 - 322.
AMA	ÖZHAN N,ŞİMŞEK Ü,ÖZÇELİK M Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 63(3): 317 - 322.
Vancouver	ÖZHAN N,ŞİMŞEK Ü,ÖZÇELİK M Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 63(3): 317 - 322.
IEEE	ÖZHAN N,ŞİMŞEK Ü,ÖZÇELİK M "Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler." Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 63, ss.317 - 322, 2016.
ISNAD	ÖZHAN, Nejla vd. "Comparison of floor and cage housing systems in terms of some welfare assessments in broiler". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 63/3 (2016), 317-322.