Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 10 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?

Öz:
Dünyadaki dil eğitimi müfredat ve programları yabancı dil öğretiminin, özellikle de İngilizce için, 5-6 kadar küçük yaştaki öğrenciler için önemini vurgulamaya başlamışlardır. Ancak, araştırmalar erken dil öğretiminin faydalarından bahsetseler de, bu eğilimin gerçek başarı açısından sonuçlarının ne olduğu net değildir. Bu sebeple, araştırmacılar, İngilizce'nin yabancı dil olarak öğretiminin ilkokul öncesi ve ilkokul seviyesinde başladığı ülkelerden elde edilen uluslararası İngilizce müfredatlarını ve ilgili ülkelere ait Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce (TOEFL) sınavı sonuçlarını incelemek kaydıyla başarı ile yabancı dil olarak İngilizce eğitimine başlama yaşının ilişkisini ortaya koymak için bu çalışmayı tasarlamışlardır. Bulgular, yabancı dil olarak İngilizce eğitimine erken başlamanın, faydalı olsa da, tek başına başarının garantisi olmadığını: ve sınıftaki öğrenci sayısı, İngilizce eğitimine ayrılmış ders saati ve öğretmen yeterlilikleri gibi diğer unsurların da dikkate alınması gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Eğitim, Özel

-

Öz:
Language education curricula and programs worldwide have begun emphasizing foreign language instruction for learners as young as 5-6 years, particularly in English. Yet, while studies have argued for the benefits of early language instruction, the results of this trend in terms of actual achievement are not clear. For this reason, the researchers designed this study to illustrate the connection between age of onset of English as a foreign language (EFL) instruction and learner achievement, examining international language curricula from countries where English is taught as a foreign language beginning at the pre-primary and primary level alongside the corresponding scores on the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL). The findings indicate that, although early onset of EFL instruction may be beneficial in many respects, it is not, in itself, a guarantee of success, and other elements, such as class size, number of hours dedicated to English instruction, and teacher qualifications, must also be considered.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Eğitim, Özel
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abbas, M.M. (2012). "Iraq opportunitiesz" The new national curriculum and teaching English as foreign language in Iraqi primary schools. IAMURE: International Journal of Education, 2, 219-239. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7718/iamure.ije.v2i1.174
  • Akdoğan, F. (2004). Yeni projeler ışığında erken yaşta yabancı dil öğretimi [Foreign language teaching at an early age in light of new projects]. İstanbul Üniversitesi Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [lstanbul University Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty ofEducation Journal], 1(2), 97-109.
  • Aslan, N. (2008). Dünyada erken yaşta yabancı dil öğretimi uygulamaları ve Türkiye'deki durum [Foreign language teaching practices at an early age around the world and the situation in Turkey]. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal], 3(35), 1- 9.
  • Baldauf, R.B., Jr., Kaplan, R.B. (2005). Language-in-education policy and planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, (pp. 1013-1034). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Barry, D.M. (2009). Curriculum reform in South Africa: Assessment of English in the national qualifications framework (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Bayyurt, Y. (2012). 4+4+4 eğitim sisteminde erken yaşta yabancı dil eğitimi [Foreign language education at an early age in the +4 +4 education system]. Paper presented at the lst Hacettepe University Foreign Language Education Workshop, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Copland, F., Garton, S., Burns, A. (2013). Challenges in teaching English to young learners: Global perspectives and local realities. TESOL Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi: 10. 1002/tesq. 148
  • Council of Europe (CoE). (2004). Language education policy profile: Norway. Strasbourg, France: Author.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research." Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. Crystal, D. (2003). English as Global Language (2nd ed.). London, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Çelik, S. (2013). Plurilingualism, pluriculturalism, and the CEFR: Are Turkey's foreign language objectives reflected in classroom instruction? Procedia Social anal Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1872-1879.
  • Çelik, S., Karaca, B. (2013). Current trends in English as foreign language education." Is earlier instruction really better? Paper presented at the International Symposium on Changes and New Trends in Education, Konya, Turkey.
  • DeKeyser, R. (2013). Age effects in second language learning: Stepping stones toward better understanding. Language Learning, 63(1), 52-67.
  • Duff, PA. (2008). Foreign language policies, research and educational possibilities. Paper presented at the APEC Education Symposium, Xi'an, China.
  • Educational Testing Service (ETS). (2013). Test and score data summary for TOEFL tests: January 2012-December 2012 test data. Princeton, NJ: Author.
  • European Commission. (2012). Foreign language learning statistics. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Foreign_language_learni ng_statistics
  • Eurydice. (2008). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/about/eurydice/documents/KDL2008_EN.pdf
  • Giannikas, C.N. (2011). Ll in English language learning: research study in Greek regional context. International Journal ofApplied Linguistics, 2/(3), 319-339.
  • Gnutzmann, C. (2005). English language teaching in Germany: reflection of the national and universal importance of English. In G. Braine (Ed.), Teaching English to the world: History, curriculum, and practice, (pp. 23-33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Igawa, K., Yagi, S. (2011). Perspectives on English language education in Sweden. Shitennoji University Bulletin, 1], 99-122.
  • Kara, Ş. (2004). Ana dil edinimi ve erken yaşta yabancı dil öğretimi [Native language acquisition and foreign language instruction]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Uludağ University Faculty ofEducation Journal], /7(2), 295-315.
  • Larson-Hall, J. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying foreign language at younger starting age in minimal input situation. Second Language Research, 24(1), 35-63.
  • McCurry, J. (2011, March 8). Japan launches primary push to teach English. The Guardian Weekly. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/20ll/mar/08/japanlaunches-primary-english-push Ministere Education Nationale [Ministry of National Education]. (2008). Bulletin officiel hors-serie no du 19 juin 2008: Programmes d'enseignement de l'ecole primaire [Official bulletin of French national education special edition number of 19, June, 2008: Elementary education programs]. Retrieved from http://www.efv.lt/get.php?f.l155
  • Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2005). Avrupa konseyi dil projesi ve Türkiye uygulaması [Language project of European council and application in Turkey]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi [Journal of National Education], 33(167). Retrieved from http://dhgm.meb. gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/Milli_Egitim_Dergisi/ 67/index3 demirel.htm
  • National Curriculum Information Center (NCIC). (2009). National Curriculum of Korea. Retrieved from http://ncic.kice.re.kr/englishkri.org.inventoryList.do Nielsen, PM. (2003). English in Argentina: sociolinguistic profile. World Englishes, 22(2), 199-209.
  • Pitoniak, M. J., Young, J. W., Martiniello, M., King, T. C., Buteux, A., Ginsburgh, M. (2009). Guidelines for the assessment of English language learners. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
  • Radwanska-Williams, J., Piasecka, L. (2005). English language teaching in Poland: Tradition and reform. In G. Braine (Ed.), Teaching English to the world: History, curriculum, and practice (pp. 115-124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Rajagopalan, K., Rajagopalan, C. (2005). The English language in Brazil-A boon or bane? In G. Braine (Ed.), Teaching English to the world: History, curriculum, and practice, (pp. 1-10). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Republic of Iraq Ministry of Education. (2004). Development of education (National report of Iraq). Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/International/ICE47/English/Natreps/reports/iraq_en.pdf
  • Rokita, J. (2007) Lexical development in early L2 acquisition. Krakow: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Pedagogicznej. Scheffler, P. (2013). Introducing very young children to English as foreign language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Admin/Downloads/ijall2035.pdf
  • Silver, R.E., Hu, G., Masakazu, I. (2002). English language education in China, Japan and Singapore. Singapore: National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
  • T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı [Republic of Turkey, Ministry of National Education, Board of Education] 2013. Ilköğretim kurumları (ilkokullar ve ortaokullar) İngilizce dersi (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Elementary (primary and lower secondary) English language teaching program (Grades 2-8)]. Ankara: T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
  • Wiriyachitra, A. (2002). English language teaching and learning in Thailand in this decade. Thai TESOL Focus, 15(1), 4-9. Retrieved from http://www.apecknowledgebank.org/resources/downloads/english%201anguage%20te aching%20and%20leaming%20in%20thailand.pdf
APA celik s, KARACA B (2014). IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?. , 1 - 10.
Chicago celik servet,KARACA Bilal IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?. (2014): 1 - 10.
MLA celik servet,KARACA Bilal IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?. , 2014, ss.1 - 10.
AMA celik s,KARACA B IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?. . 2014; 1 - 10.
Vancouver celik s,KARACA B IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?. . 2014; 1 - 10.
IEEE celik s,KARACA B "IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?." , ss.1 - 10, 2014.
ISNAD celik, servet - KARACA, Bilal. "IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?". (2014), 1-10.
APA celik s, KARACA B (2014). IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?. Novitas-Royal, 8(1), 1 - 10.
Chicago celik servet,KARACA Bilal IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?. Novitas-Royal 8, no.1 (2014): 1 - 10.
MLA celik servet,KARACA Bilal IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?. Novitas-Royal, vol.8, no.1, 2014, ss.1 - 10.
AMA celik s,KARACA B IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?. Novitas-Royal. 2014; 8(1): 1 - 10.
Vancouver celik s,KARACA B IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?. Novitas-Royal. 2014; 8(1): 1 - 10.
IEEE celik s,KARACA B "IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?." Novitas-Royal, 8, ss.1 - 10, 2014.
ISNAD celik, servet - KARACA, Bilal. "IMPROVING LEARNER OUTCOMES IN EFL: DOES EARLY INSTRUCTION LEAD TO GREATER ACHIEVEMENT?". Novitas-Royal 8/1 (2014), 1-10.