Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme

Gamze DOĞAN (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi)
Türk Psikoloji Yazıları
46 0
Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 37 Sayfa Aralığı: 35 - 47 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme

Öz:
Kadın bedeninin nesneleştirilmesini kültürel açıdan olağan kabul eden bir toplumda yaşamanın birey-beden ilişkisinde yarattığı bozulmaları ve bu bozulmalardan kaynaklanan psikolojik problemleri konu edinen kendini nesneleştirme kuramı son yıllarda daha geniş bir çerçevede ele alınmaktadır. Kendini nesneleştirme durumunun temelini sadece görünüm odaklı endişelerden almadığı, sistemi meşrulaştırma ile ilişkili daha geniş bir ideolojik-eleştirel yaklaşımla ele alınması gerektiği fikrinden yola çıkan çalışmacılar, sistemi meşrulaştırma ile kendini nesneleştirme arasındaki ilişkiyi sınamaya yönelik deneysel ve ilişkisel çalışmalar yapmışlardır. Bu makalede, daha önce Türkiye'de pek çalışılmayan kendini nesneleştirme kuramını özetlemek ve kendini nesneleştirme durumunun kaynağını aldığı düşünülen sistemi meşrulaştırma ile ilişkisine dair çalışmalar hakkında bilgi vermek amaçlanmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Psikoloji

-

Öz:
Self objectification theory conceptualizes the psychological problems that are caused by living in a society that normalizes the sexual objectification of women's bodies. Recently studies have started to focus upon self objectification's enviromental antecedents. System justification theory, as proposed by social psychologists, can be seen as a helpful device to understand and study self objectification from a broader perception. This review aims to summarize self objectification theory and its possible connection to the system justification, in light of the relevant literature.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Psikoloji
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aubrey, J. S., Henson, J. R., Hopper, K. M. ve Smith, S. E. (2009). A picture is worth twenty words (about the self): Testing the priming influence of visual sexual objectification on women's self-objectification. Communication Research Reports, 26(4), 271-284.
  • Berger, J. (1988). Görme biçimleri (7. baskı). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Buss, D. M. (1996). Paternity uncertainity and the complex repertoire of human mating strategies. American Psychologist, 51, 161-162.
  • Calogero, R. M. (2013). Objects don't object: Evidence that self objectification disrupts women's social activism. Psychological Science, 24(3), 312-318.
  • Calogero, R. M. (2009). Objectification process and disordered eating in british women and men. Journal of Health Psychology, 14(3), 394-402.
  • Calogero, R. M., Davis, W. N. ve Thompson, J. K. (2005). The role of self-objectification in the experience of women with eating disorders. Sex Roles, 52(1-2), 43-50.
  • Calogero, R. M. ve Jost, J. T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 211-228.
  • Calogero, R. M. ve Thompson, J. K. (2009). Potential implications of the objectification of women's bodies for women's sexual satisfaction. Body Image, 6(2), 145-148.
  • Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S. ve Thompson, J. K. (2011). Self-objectification in women: causes, consequences, and counteractions. Washington DC: American Psychological Assosiation.
  • Courtney, A. E. ve Lockeretz, S. W. (1971). A woman's place: An analysis of the roles portrayed by women in magazine advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(1), 92- 95.
  • de Beauvoir, S. (1971). Kadın: Genç kızlık çağı (2. baskı). İstanbul. Payel Yayınevi.
  • Doğan, G. (2013). Üniversite öğrencilerinde kendini nesneleş- tirme ve bazı değişkenlerle ilişkisi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. ve Harrison, K. (2005). Throwing like a girl: Self-objectificaton predicts adolescent girls' motor performance. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 29(1), 79-101.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. ve Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173-206.
  • Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T. A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M. ve Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 269-284.
  • Forbes, G. B., Collinsworth, L. L., Jobe, R. L., Braun, K. D. ve Wise, L. M. (2007). Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practises: Are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles, 56, 265-273.
  • Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D. ve LaFrance, M. (2003). Body objectification and 'fat talk': Effects on emotion, motivation, and cognitive performance. Sex Roles, 48(9-10), 377-388.
  • Glick, P. ve Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109-118.
  • Gordon, M. K. (2008). Media contributions to african american girls' focus on beauty and apperance: Exploring the consequences of sexual objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(3), 245-256.
  • Grabe, S., Hyde, J. S. ve Lindberg, S. M. (2007). Body objectification and depression in adolescents: The role of gender, shame, and rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 164-175.
  • Greenleaf, C. (2005). Self-objectification among physically active women. Sex Roles, 52(1-2), 51-62.
  • Haines, M. E., Erchull, M. J., Liss, M., Turner, D. L., Nelson, J. A., Ramsey, L. R. ve Hurt, M. M. (2008). Predictors and effects of self-objectification in lesbians. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(2), 181-187.
  • Harper, B. ve Tiggemann, M. (2008). The effect of thin ideal media images on women's self-objectification, mood, andbody image. Sex Roles, 58(9-10), 649-657.
  • Harrison, K. ve Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). Women's sports media, self-objectification, and mental health in black and white adolescent females. Journal of Communication, 53(2), 216-232.
  • Hebl, M. R., King, E.B. ve Lin, J. (2004). The swimsuit becomes us all: Ethnicity, gender, and vulnerability to selfobjectification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(10), 1322-1331.
  • Hill, M. S. ve Fischer, A. R. (2008). Examining objectification theory: Lesbian and heterosexual women's experiences with sexual- and self- objectification. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(5), 745-776.
  • Huebner, D. M. ve Fredrickson, B. L. (1999). Gender differences in memory perspectives: Evidence for self-objectification in women. Sex Roles, 41(5-6), 459-467.
  • Jost, J. T. ve Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotying in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27.
  • Jost, J. T. ve Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498-509.
  • Knauss, C., Paxton, S. J. ve Alsaker, F. D. (2008). Body dissatisfaction in adolescent boys and girls: Objectified body consciousness, internalization of the media body ideal and perceived pressure from media. Sex Roles, 59(9-10), 633-643.
  • Loya, B. N., Cowan, G. ve Walters, C. (2006). The role of social comparison and body consciousness in women's hostility toward women. Sex Roles, 54, 575-583.
  • Maalouf, A. (2012). Doğu'dan uzakta. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Martins, Y., Tiggemann, M. ve Kirkbride, A. (2007). Those speedos become them: The role of self-objectification in gay and heterosexual men's body image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 634-647.
  • Miner-Rubino, K., Twenge, J. M. ve Fredrickson, B. L. (2002). Trait self-objectification in women: Affective and personality correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(2), 147-172.
  • Monro, F. J. ve Huon, G. F. (2006). Media-portrayed idealized images, self-objectification, and eating behavior. Eating Behaviors, 7(4), 375-383.
  • Moradi, B., Dirks, D. ve Matteson, A. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internatlization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 420.
  • Morry, M. M. ve Staska, S. L. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 33(4), 269.
  • Muehlenkamp, J. J. ve Saris-Baglama, R. N. (2002). Self-objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 371-379.
  • Myers, T. A., Crowther, J. H. (2007). Sociocultural pressures, thin ,ideal internalization, self-objectification, and body dissatisfaction: Could feminist beliefs be a moderating factor? Body Image, 4(3), 296-308.
  • Noll, S. M. ve Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(4), 623-636.
  • Prichard, I. ve Tiggemann, M. (2005). Objectification in fitness centers: Self-objectification, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating in aerobic instructors and aerobic participants. Sex Roles, 53(1-2), 19-28.
  • Pope, H. G., Gruber, A. J., Mangweth, B., Bureau, B., Jouvent, R. ve Hudson, J. I. (2000). Body image perception among men in three countries. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(8), 1297-1301.
  • Prichard, I. ve Tiggemann, M. (2005). Objectification in fitness centers: Self-objectification, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating in aerobic instructors and aerobic participants. Sex Roles, 53(1-2), 19-28.
  • Prichard, I. ve Tiggemann, M. (2008). Relations among exercise type, self-objectification, and body image in the fitness centre enviroment: The role of reasons to exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(6), 855-866.
  • Quinn, D. M., Chaudor, S. R. ve Kallen, R. W. (2011). Performance and flow: A review and integration of self-objectification research. R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn ve J. K. Thompson, (Ed.), Self objectification in women: Causes, consequences and counteractions içinde (119- 138). Washington: American Psychological Association.
  • Quinn, D. M., Kallen, R. W., Twenge, J. M. ve Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). The disruptive effect of self-objectification on performance. Psychology Of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 59-64
  • Roberts, T. A. ve Gettman, J. Y. (2004). Mere exposure: Gender differences in the negative effects of priming a state of self-objectification. Sex Roles, 51(1-2), 17-27.
  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2003). Cinsiyetçilik: Kadınlara ve erkeklere ilişkin tutumlar ve çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik kuramı. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 6(11-12), 1-20.
  • Sanchez, D. T. ve Kiefer, A. K. (2007). Body concerns in and out of the bedroom: Implications for sexual pleasure and problems. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(6), 808-820.
  • Steer, A. ve Tiggemann, M. (2008). The role of self-objectification in women's sexual functioning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(3), 205-225.
  • Strelan, P. ve Hargreaves, D. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification? Sex Roles, 52(9-10), 707-712.
  • Slater, A. ve Tiggemann, M. (2010). Body image and disordered eating in adolescent girls and boys: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 63(1-2), 42-49.
  • Szymanski, D. M. ve Henning, S. L. (2007). The role of selfobjectification in women's depression: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 56(1-2), 45-53.
  • Tiggemann, M. (2011). Mental health Risks of self objectification: A review of the emprical evidence for disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual dysfunction. R. M.
  • Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn ve J. K. Thompson, (Ed.), Self objectification in women: Causes, consequences and counteractions içinde (139-159). Washington: American Psychological Association.
  • Tiggemann, M. ve Kuring, J. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disoredered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(3), 299-311.
  • Tiggemann, M. ve Lynch, J. E. (2001). Body image across the life span in adult women: The role of self-objectification. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 243.
  • Tiggemann, M. ve Slater, A. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25(1), 57- 64.
  • Tylka, T. L. ve Hill, M. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51(11-12), 719- 730.
  • Wiederman, M. W. (2000). Women's body image self consciousness during physical intimacy with a partner. Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 60-68.
  • Wolf, N. (2002). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Wykes, M. ve Gunter, B. (2005). The media & body image. London: Sage Publications.
  • Zimmerman, A. ve Dahlberg, J. (2008). The sexual objectification of women in advertising: A contemporary cultural perspective. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(1), 71- 79.
APA DOĞAN G (2016). Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme. , 35 - 47.
Chicago DOĞAN Gamze Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme. (2016): 35 - 47.
MLA DOĞAN Gamze Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme. , 2016, ss.35 - 47.
AMA DOĞAN G Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme. . 2016; 35 - 47.
Vancouver DOĞAN G Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme. . 2016; 35 - 47.
IEEE DOĞAN G "Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme." , ss.35 - 47, 2016.
ISNAD DOĞAN, Gamze. "Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme". (2016), 35-47.
APA DOĞAN G (2016). Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 19(37), 35 - 47.
Chicago DOĞAN Gamze Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 19, no.37 (2016): 35 - 47.
MLA DOĞAN Gamze Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, vol.19, no.37, 2016, ss.35 - 47.
AMA DOĞAN G Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2016; 19(37): 35 - 47.
Vancouver DOĞAN G Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2016; 19(37): 35 - 47.
IEEE DOĞAN G "Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme." Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 19, ss.35 - 47, 2016.
ISNAD DOĞAN, Gamze. "Bir Sistemi Meşrulaştırma Pratiği Olarak Kendini Nesneleştirme". Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 19/37 (2016), 35-47.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 3:39

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları