Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi

KOLASİ, Klevis

Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi

Klevis KOLASİ (* Öğr. Gör. Dr., Ankara Üniversitesi, Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü, Cebeci 06590)

İnsan Hakları Yıllığı

17 0

Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 0 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 29 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi

Öz:

Bu çalışma, savaşın niteliği ve uygulanma biçimi ile devletlerarası kuvvet kullanımını düzenleyen Uluslararası Hukuk arasında yakın bir ilişki olduğu varsayımdan hareketle, kuvvete başvurma kurallarını kapsayan jus ad bellum'un ve kuvvet kullanımının fiilen icra edilirken uygulanan kuralları kapsayan jus in bello'nun günümüz savaşın değişen niteliğinden nasıl etkilendiğinin bir incelemesini ortaya koymaya çalışmaktadır. Makale, uluslararası hukukta mevcut bulunan kuvvet kullanmaya ilişkin düzenlemelerinin savaşın siyasi teorisinde ortaya konulan siyasal şiddetin niteliğini esas aldığını ve bu nedenle 'yeni savaşlar' kavramı çerçevesinde dile getirilen günümüz silahlı çatışmaların özelliklerinin mevcut jus ad bellum ve jus in bello'nun kapsamı dışında kaldığını göstermeye çalışmaktadır

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Hukuk

The Changing Character of War and its Impact on the Jus ad bellum and the Jus in bello

Öz:

This article is based on the assumption that there is a close relationship between the nature of war and International Law governing the use of force. This study attempts to elucidate how jus ad bellum, which encompasses the rules of the use of force, and jus in bello, which deals with the rules in war, are affected by the changing character of war today. The article argues that the existing regulation regarding the use of force in international law is based on the nature of the political violence as defined in the political theory of war, and that the features of contemporary armed conflicts expressed within the framework of the concept of ‘new wars’ remain outside the scope of the existing jus ad bellum and jus in bello

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Hukuk

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

Ali, T. (Ed.) (2001). Evrenin Efendileri? NATO'nun Balkan Seferi. İstanbul: OM Yayı- nevi.
Armstrong, D., Farrell T. & Maiguashca B. (Ed.). (2005). Force and Legitimacy in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D., Farrell T. & Maiguashca B. (Ed.). (2012). International Law and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aust, A. (2010). Handbook of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barkawi, T. (2006). Globalisation and War, Lanham: MD Rowman and Littlefield, Bartholomew, A. (Ed.). (2006). Empire’s Law: The American Imperial Project and the ‘War to Remake the World’. London: Pluto.
Başeren, S. H. (2003). Uluslararası Hukukta Devletlerin Münferiden Kuvvet Kullanmalarının Sınırları. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
Bauman, Z. (2001). Wars of the Globalisation Era. European Journal of Social Theory, 4(1), 11-28.
Booth, K. (2001). The Kosovo Tragedy: The Human Rights Dimensions. New York, Frank Class.
Booth, K. (2007). Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brocklehurst, H. (2007). Children and War. Contemporary Security Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, C. & Ainley, K. (2005). Understanding International Relations. New York: Palgrave.
Brown, C. (2007). ‘The Twilight of International Morality’? Hans J. Morgenthau and Carl Schmitt on the end of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brownlie, I  Apperley, C. J. (2000). Kosovo Crisis Inquiry: Memorandum on the International Law Aspects. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 49 (04 ), 878 – 905.
Brownlie, I. (2001). ‘International Law and the Use of Force by States’ Revisited, http://chinesejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/1/1/1.full.pdf (12.05.2012). Buzan, B. & Lawson, G. (2015). The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Byers, M.,  Nolte G. (2003). United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Castells, M. (2010). The Information Age Economy, Society, and Culture: End of Millennium. Wiley-Blackwell.
Chinkin, C.  Kaldor M. (2017). International Law and New Wars. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Clausewitz, C. (1968). On War, with an introduction by Anatol Rapoport. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.
Clausewitz, C. (2007). On War. New York: Oxford.
Collins, R. (2008). Violence: a Micro-Sociological Theory. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Creveld, M. (1991). The Transformation of War. New York: The New Press.
Çelebi, A. (2008). Devlet, Toprak, Egemenlik: Carl Schmitt’in Düşüncesinde Siyasal Kavramı ve Kurucu İktidar Sorunu, Ankara: İmaj Kitabevi.
Dinstein, Y. (2011). War, Aggression and Self-Defences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duffield, M. (2001). Global Governance and the New Wars. New York: Zed.
Eckhardt, W. (1990). Civilizations, Empires and Wars. Journal of Peace Research, 27 (1), 9-24.
Falk, R. (2004). The Declining World Order: America’s İmperial Geopolitics. New York, Routledge.
Fleming, C. M. (2009). New or Old Wars? Debating a Clausewitzian Future, Journal of Strategic Studies, 32 (2), 213-241.
Gazzini, T.  Tsagourias, N. (2012). The Use of Force in International Law. New York: Routledge.
Gellner, E. (2006 [1983]). Nations and Nationalism, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Gill, S. (1995). Globalisation, Market Civilisation, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism. Millennium, 24 (3), 399-423.
Glennon, M. (2001). Limits of Law, Prerogatives of Power: Interventionism After Kosovo. New York: Palgrave.
Glennon, M. (2015). The Limitations of Traditional Rules and Institutions Relating to the Use of Force. The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law. New York: Oxford UP.
Gray, C. (1999). Clausewitz Rules, OK? The Future is the Past-with GPS. Review of International Studies. 25, 161-182.
Greenwood, C. (2008). Historical Development and Legal Basis. The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York, Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2010). Postmodernliğin Durumu: Kültürel Değişimin Kökenleri. İstanbul: Metis.
Held, D. & McGrew, A. G. (Ed.) (2002). The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Herberg-Rothe, A. (2007). Clausewitz’s Puzzle: The Political Theory of War. New York: Oxford UP.
Huntington S. (1957). The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil Military Relations. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.
Jackson, R. (2005). Classical and Modern Thought on International Relations: From Anarchy to Cosmopolis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Johnson, J. T. (2004). From Moral Norm to Criminal Code: The Law of Armed Conflict and the Restraint of Contemporary Warfare. Ethics and the Future of Conflict: Lessons from the 1990s. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Johnson, J. T. (2014). Sovereignty. Georgetown University Press.
Jung, D. (2003). Shadow Globalization, Ethnic Conflicts and New Wars. New York: Routledge.
Kaldor, M. (1999). New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity.
Kaldor, M. (2007). Oil and Conflict: the Case of Nagorno Karabakh. Oil Wars. London: Pluto.
Kaldor, M. (2012). New and Old Wars: Organized violence in a Global Era. London: Polity Press. Kaldor, M. (2013). In Defence of New Wars. Stability. 2 (1), 1-16.
Keen, D. (2006). Endless War? Hidden Functions of the ‘War on Terror’. London: Pluto.
Keskin, F. (1997). Silahlı Çatışmalar Hukukunun B.M. Kuvvetlerine Uygulanması. SBF Dergisi. 52 (1), 447-466.
Keskin, F. (1998). Uluslararasi Hukukta Kuvvet Kullanma: Savaş, Karışma ve Birleşmiş Milletler. Ankara: Mülkiyeliler Birliği Vakfı.
Keskin, F. (2006-2007). İnsancıl Müdahale: 1999 Kosova ve 2003 Irak Sonrası Durum. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 3 (12), 49-70.
Kohen, M. (2003). The use of force by the United States After the end of the Cold War, and its impact on international law. United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kolb, R. & Hyde R. (2008). An Introduction to the International Law of Armed Conflicts. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Leander, A. (2004). Wars and the un-making of states: Taking Tilly seriously in the contemporary world. Contemporary Security Analysis and Copenhagen Peace Research. New York: Routledge.
Malanczuk, P. (1997). Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law. New York: Routledge.
Malesevic, S. (2010). The Sociology of War and Violence. New York, Cambridge University Press.
McDougal, M. S.  Feliciano, F. P. (1961). Law and Minimum World Public Order. Yale University Press.
Mearsheimer, J. (2005). Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq war: Realism Versus NeoConservatism. www.opendemocracy.net (11.08.2017).
Meiertöns, H. (2010). The Doctrines of US Security Policy: An Evaluation Under International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moller, B. (2004). Post-Trinitarian war and the Regulation of Violence. in Steffano Guzzini and Dietrich Jung. Contemporary Security Analyzis and Copenhagen Peace Research. New York: Routledge.
Münkler, H. (2007). Clausewitz and the Privatization of War. Clausewitz in the TwentyFirst Century. New York: Oxford UP.
Newman, E. (2004). The ‘New Wars’ Debate: A Historical Perspective Is Needed. Security Dialogue. 35 (2), 173-189.
Oppenheimer, F. (1922). The State. New York: Vanguard.
Ortiz, C. (2004). Regulating Private Military Companies: States and the Expanding Business of Commercial Security Provision. Global Regulation: Managing Crises After the Imperial Turns. New York: Palgrave.
Özdemir, A. M. (2011). Güç, Buyruk, Düzen. Ankara, İmge.
Özen, Ç. & Bağdadi I. (2010). When Not Losing is Winning: Terrorist Organisations and Asymmetrical War. Use of Force in Countering Terrorism, IOS Press.
Panitch, L. & Gindin, S. (2003). Global Capitalism and American Empire. Socialist Register 2004: The New Imperial Challenge. London: Merlin Press.
Peoples, C. & Vaughan-Williams N. (2010). Critical Security Studies: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Raffo, V., Sriram C. L., Spiro P. & Biersteker T. (2007). Introduction: International law and International Politics old Divides, New Developments. International Law and International Relations: Bridging theory and practice. New York: Routledge.
Reus-Smit, C. (Ed.) (2004). The Politics of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Sassòli, M., Antoine A., Bouvier & Quintin A. (2006). How Does Law Protect in War? Geneva: ICRC.
Schmitt, C. (2006). The Nomos of the Earth: in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. New York: Telos Press Publishing.
Schnabel, A.,  Thakur R. (Ed.) (2000). Kosovo and the challenge of humanitarian intervention: selective indignation, collective action, and international citizenship. New York: United Nations University Press.
Shaw, M. (2000). The New Western Way of War: Risk-Transfer War and its Crisis in Iraq. Cambridge: Polity.
Sheehan, M. (2008). The changing character of war. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Sorensen, G. (2001). Changes in statehood: the transformation of international relations. New York: Palgrave.
Stone, J., (1954). Legal Controls of International Conflict, London: Rinehart.
Tangör, B.  Yalçınkaya, H. (2010). Güvenlik Yönetişimi Çerçevesinde Özel Askeri Şirketler. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 7 (25), 127-154.
Thakur, R. (2006). The United Nations, Peace and Security. New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Independent International Commission on Kosovo. (2000). Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned. Oxford University Press.
Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
Toynbee, A. J. (1950). War and Civilization, Selections from A Study of History. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weller, M. (2010). Iraq and the Use of Force in International Law. New York: Oxford UP.
Weller, M. (Ed.) (2015). Introduction: International Law and the Problem of War. Marc
Weller. The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law. New York: Oxford UP.
Wheeler, N. (2001). Humanitarian Intervention after Kosovo: Emergent Norm, Moral Duty or the Coming Anarchy? International Affairs. 77 (1), 113-128
Williams, P. D. (2008). War. Security Studies: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Yalçınkaya, H. & Türkeş K. T. (2008). Yirmi Birinci Yüzyılda Çatışma Alanlarında Görülen Yeni Unsurlar. Güvenlik Stratejisi Dergisi. 4 (7), 55-89.
Yalçınkaya, H. (2008). Savaş: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Güç Kullanımı. Ankara: İmge.

APA	KOLASİ K (2017). Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi. , 1 - 29.
Chicago	KOLASİ Klevis Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi. (2017): 1 - 29.
MLA	KOLASİ Klevis Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi. , 2017, ss.1 - 29.
AMA	KOLASİ K Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi. . 2017; 1 - 29.
Vancouver	KOLASİ K Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi. . 2017; 1 - 29.
IEEE	KOLASİ K "Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi." , ss.1 - 29, 2017.
ISNAD	KOLASİ, Klevis. "Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi". (2017), 1-29.

APA	KOLASİ K (2017). Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, 35(0), 1 - 29.
Chicago	KOLASİ Klevis Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı 35, no.0 (2017): 1 - 29.
MLA	KOLASİ Klevis Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, vol.35, no.0, 2017, ss.1 - 29.
AMA	KOLASİ K Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı. 2017; 35(0): 1 - 29.
Vancouver	KOLASİ K Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı. 2017; 35(0): 1 - 29.
IEEE	KOLASİ K "Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi." İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, 35, ss.1 - 29, 2017.
ISNAD	KOLASİ, Klevis. "Savaşın Değişen Niteliği ve Jus ad bellum ve Jus in bello’ya Etkisi". İnsan Hakları Yıllığı 35/0 (2017), 1-29.