Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi

Can MEŞE, (Bozok Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Temel Eğitim Bölümü, Yozgat, Türkiye)
Özcan Özgür DURSUN (Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü, Eskişehir, Türkiye)
Eğitim ve Bilim
15 3
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 43 Sayı: 196 Sayfa Aralığı: 67 - 95 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.15390/EB.2018.7726 İndeks Tarihi: 13-05-2019

Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi

Öz:
Teknolojinin gelişmesiyle birlikte dijital oyunlar da giderek dahageniş bir kullanıcı kitlesi tarafından tercih edilmeye başlanmıştır.Bu tercihe oyunların ilgi uyandırıcı tasarımları ve oyunlardanedinilen duygusal tatmin oldukça önemli etkide bulunmaktadır.Son yıllarda dijital oyunlara olan bu yönelim, oyuna ilişkin bazıözelliklerin oyun dışı ortamlara aktarılmasını da tetiklemektedir.Oyunlaştırma olarak ifade edilen kavram oyunlara ait özelliklerinoyun dışı bağlamlara uyarlanmasına vurgu yapmaktadır.Oyunlaştırma, son yıllarda birçok alanda yaygın olarakkullanılmaktadır. Bu alanların biri de eğitimdir. Buradan hareketlebu çalışmada, oyunlaştırma bileşenlerinin harmanlanmış öğrenmeortamlarındaki etkililiğinin duygu, ilgi ve çevrimiçi katılımbağlamında incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada, nicel ve nitelverilerin ilişkilendirilerek açıklandığı yakınsayan paralel karmadesen kullanılmıştır. Bu doğrultuda araştırma deney (n=30) vekontrol (n=33) olmak üzere 63 üniversite öğrencisiyle 13 haftalık birsürede gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın her iki grubuna da hemyüz yüze hem de çevrim içi olmak üzere harmanlanmış biröğrenme deneyimi sunulmuştur. Deney grubu yüz yüze ve çevrimiçi ortamda sunulan; yönergelerin verilmesi, ilerleme çubuğu,rozet, seviye, deneyim puanı, liderlik sıralaması, ödül, tamamlamaoranı, etkinlik tamamlama, etkinlik sınırlama ve etkinlikgeribildiriminden oluşan oyunlaştırma bileşenleri ile kontrolgrubundan ayrılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgulara göreharmanlanmış öğrenme ortamlarında kullanılan oyunlaştırmabileşenleri katılımcılarda hem olumlu hem de olumsuz duygularaneden olmuştur. Bunun yanı sıra oyunlaştırmanın ilgi çekiciolduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca grupların çevrimiçi ortamakatılım bağlamında harcadıkları ortalama zamanları arasındadeney grubu lehine anlamlı bir farklılığın oluştuğu görülmüştür.Bu bulguya ek olarak katılımcıların çevrimiçi ortamakatılmalarında ödülün, rekabetin, seviyenin, rozetin vekısıtlamanın etkili olduğu görülmüştür.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Eğitim, Özel Psikoloji
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391-405. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9033-0
  • Abramovich, S., Schunn, C. ve Higashi, R. M. (2013). Are badges useful in education? It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 217- 232.
  • Alomar, N., Wanick, V. ve Wills, G. (2016). The design of a hybrid cultural model for Arabic gamified systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 472-485.
  • Amriani, A., Aji, A. F., Utomo, A. Y. ve Junus, K. M. (2013). An empirical study of gamification impact on e-Learning environment. 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology (ICCSNT) içinde (s. 265-269). Dalian: IEEE.
  • Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J. ve Gonçalves, D. (2013). Improving participation and learning with gamification. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications – Gamification, 13, 10-17. doi:10.1145/2583008.2583010
  • Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J. ve Gonçalves, D. (2015). Gamification for smarter learning: tales from the trenches. Smart Learning Environments, 2(1), 1-23.
  • Becker, E. S., Goetz, T., Morger, V. ve Ranellucci, J. (2014). The importance of teachers’ emotions and instructional behavior for their students’ emotions - An experience sampling analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 15-26. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.05.002.
  • Bergkvist, L. (2014). Appropriate use of single-item measures is here to stay. Mark Lett, 26(3), 245-255. doi:10.1007/s11002-014-9325-y
  • Bergkvist, L. ve Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple item versus single-item technology of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175-184.
  • Billieux, J., Van der Linden, M., Achab, S., Khazaal, Y., Paraskevopoulos, L., Zullino, D. ve Thorens, G. (2013). Why do you play World of Warcraft? An in-depth exploration of self-reported motivations to play online and in-game behaviours in the virtual world of Azeroth. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 103-109.
  • Bowser, A., Hansen, D., He, Y., Boston, C., Reid, M., Gunnell, L. ve Preece, J. (2013). Using gamification to inspire new citizen science volunteers. Proceedings of the first international conference on gameful design, research, and applications içinde (s. 18-25). New York: ACM.
  • Brooks, C. F. (2010). Toward ‘hybridised’faculty development for the twenty‐first century: blending online communities of practice and face‐to‐face meetings in instructional and professional support programmes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 261-270.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S. ve Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Bye, D., Pushkar, D. ve Conway, M. (2007). Motivation, interest, and positive affect in traditional and nontraditional undergraduate students. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(2), 141-158. doi:10.1177/0741713606294235
  • Chang, S. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C. ve Liang, J. C. (2014). An experiment of a mobile competition game for investigating students’ interests in learning local culture. Proceedings - IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2014, 154-156. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2014.53
  • Clark, D. B., Nelson, B. C., Chang, H. Y., Martinez-Garza, M., Slack, K. ve D’Angelo, C. M. (2011). Exploring Newtonian mechanics in a conceptually-integrated digital game: Comparison of learning and affective outcomes for students in Taiwan and the Unite. Computers and Education, 57(3), 2178-2195.
  • Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E. ve Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79-122. doi:10.3102/0034654315582065
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. ve Rathunde, K. (2014). The development of the person: An experiential perspective on the ontogenesis of psychological complexity. M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education içinde (s. 7-79). Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London: Springer.
  • Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 50, 1-17. doi:10.6018/red/50/2
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (4th bs.). Los Angles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington: Sage.
  • Davies, J. ve Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657-663. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00542.x
  • Delgado, M. R., Gillis, M. M. ve Phelps, E. A. (2008). Regulating the expectation of reward via cognitive strategies. Nature Neuroscience, 11(8), 880-881. doi:10.1038/nn.2141
  • de-Marcos, L., Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J. ve Pagés, C. (2014). An empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learning. Computers and Education, 75, 82-91.
  • Denis, G. ve Jouvelot, P. (2005). Motivation-driven educational game design. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology - ACE ’05 içinde (s. 462-465). doi:10.1145/1178477.1178581
  • Denny, P. (2013). The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2013) içinde (s. 763-772). Paris: ACM.
  • Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. ve Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments içinde (s. 9-15). Tampere: ACM.
  • DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Dirkx, J. M. (2001). The power of feelings: Emotion, imagination, and the construction of meaning in adult learning. Spring, 89(89), 63-72. doi:10.1002/ace.9
  • Dormann, C., Whitson, J. R. ve Neuvians, M. (2013). Once more with feeling: Game design patterns for learning in the affective domain. Games and Culture, 8(4), 215-237. doi:10.1177/1555412013496892
  • Durik, A. M., Shechter, O. G., Noh, M., Rozek, C. S. ve Harackiewicz, J. M. (2014). What if I can’t? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 104-118. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9419-0
  • Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P. ve Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434-449. doi:10.1007/s11747- 011-0300-3
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Fitz-Walter, Z., Johnson, D., Wyeth, P., Tjondronegoro, D. ve Scott-Parker, B. (2017). Driven to drive? Investigating the effect of gamification on learner driver behavior, perceived motivation and user experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 586-595. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.050
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. ve Hyun, H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. (8. bs.). New York: McGrawHill.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367-1377. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1512
  • Freitas, A. A. ve Freitas, M. M. (2013). Classroom live: A software-assisted gamification tool. Computer Science Education, 23(2), 186-206.
  • Fung, Y. Y. (2004). Collaborative online learning: Interaction patterns and limiting factors. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 19(2), 135-149.
  • Garrison, D. R. ve Vaughan, N. D. (2007). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines (1st bs.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass- John Wiley & Sons.
  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 20. doi:10.1145/950566.950595
  • Gibson, D., OstasHewski, N., Flintoff, K., Grant, S. ve Knight, E. (2015). Digital badges in education. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 403-410.
  • Gibson, R. K., Lusoli, W. ve Ward, S. (2005). Online participation in the UK: Testing a ‘contextualised’ model of Internet effects. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 7(4), 561-583.
  • Gizir, C. A. (2005). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi son sınıf öğrencilerinin problemleri üzerine bir çalışma. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 1(2), 196-213.
  • Hamari, J. ve Koivisto, J. (2014). Measuring flow in gamification: Dispositional flow scale-2. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 133-143.
  • Hera, T. de la, Loos, E., Simons, M. ve Blom, J. (2017). Benefits and factors influencing the design of intergenerational digital games: A systematic literature review. Societies, 7(3), 18. doi:10.3390/soc7030018
  • Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549-571.
  • Hidi, S. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. C. Sansone ve J. M. Harackiewicz (Ed.), The search for optimal motivation and performance içinde (s. 309-339). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Hidi, S. ve Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st Century. Review of Research in Education, 70(2), 151-179. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170660 adresinden erişildi.
  • Hidi, S. ve Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  • Hoeppner, B. B., Kelly, J. F., Urbanoski, K. A. ve Slaymaker, V. (2011). Comparative utility of a single- item versus multiple-item measure of self-efficacy in predicting relapse among young adults. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 41(3), 305-312.
  • Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers and Education, 52(1), 78-82.
  • Huang, E. Y., Lin, S. W. ve Huang, T. K. (2012). What type of learning style leads to online participation in the mixed-mode e-learning environment? A study of software usage instruction. Computers and Education, 58(1), 338-349. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.003
  • Hung, C. Y., Sun, J. C. Y. ve Yu, P. T. (2015). The benefits of a challenge: student motivation and flow experience in tablet-PC-game-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 172-190. doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.997248
  • Izard, C. E. (2007). Basic emotions, natural ki emotion schemas, and a new paradigm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(3), 260-280. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40212206%5Cnhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/40212206?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents%5Cnhttp://about.jstor.org/terms adresinden erişildi.
  • Izard, C. E. (2010). The Many meanings/aspects of emotion: definitions, functions, activation, and regulation. Emotion Review, 2(4), 363-370. doi:10.1177/1754073910374661
  • Jin, S. H. (2017). Using Visualization to motivate student participation in collaborative online learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 51-62. http://www.jstor.org/stable/90002163 adresinden erişildi.
  • Kang, H., Scharmann, L. C., Kang, S. ve Noh, T. (2010). Cognitive conflict and situational interest as factors influencing conceptual change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(4), 383-405.
  • http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ908938%5Cnhttp://www.eric.ed.gov/PDF S/EJ908938.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  • Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley, & Sons.
  • Karataş, E. (2014). Eğitimde oyunlaştırma: Araştırma eğilimleri. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty (KEFAD), 15(2), 315-333.
  • Kennedy, J. (2014). Characteristics of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A research review, 2009- 2012. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(1), 1-16. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651864883?accountid=14624%5Cnhttp://resolver.rero.ch/uni ge?url_ver=Z39.88- 2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ:ericshell&atitle=Ch aracteristics+of+Massive+Open+Online+Courses+(MOOCs adresinden erişildi.
  • Kintsch, W. (1980). Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway. Poetics, 9, 87-89
  • Knogler, M., Harackiewicz, J. M., Gegenfurtner, A. ve Lewalter, D. (2015). How situational is situational interest? Investigating the longitudinal structure of situational interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 39-50. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.08.004
  • Kopp, K., Mills, C. ve D’Mello, S. (2016). Mind wandering during film comprehension: The role of prior knowledge and situational interest. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(3), 842-848. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0936-y
  • Kuo, M. S. ve Chuang, T. Y. (2016). How gamification motivates visits and engagement for online academic dissemination-An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 16-27.
  • Lazzaro, N. (2004). Why we play games: Four keys to more emotion without story. Game Developer Conference (GDC), 1-8. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04896.x
  • Leutner, D. (2014). Motivation and emotion as mediators in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 174-175. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.004
  • Lewis, Z. H., Swartz, M. C. ve Lyons, E. J. (2016). What's the point?: A review of reward systems implemented in gamification interventions. Games for Health Journal, 5(2), 93-99.
  • Li, C., Dong, Z., Untch, R. H. ve Chasteen, M. (2013). Engaging computer science students through gamification in an online social network based collaborative learning environment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 72-77. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2013.V3.237.
  • Li, W., Grossman, T. ve Fitzmaurice, G. (2012). GamiCAD: A gamified tutorial system for first time AutoCAD users. UIST’12 - Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 103-112. doi:10.1145/2380116.2380131
  • Lieberoth, A. (2015). Shallow gamification testing psychological effects of framing an activity as a game. Games and Culture, 10(3), 229-248.
  • Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J. ve Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 487-509. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00042-7
  • Lister, M. (2015). Gamification: The effect on student motivation and performance at the post-secondary level. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 3(2), 566-577. doi:10.2458/azu_itet_v3i2_Lister
  • Marczewski, A. (2015). Even ninja monkeys like to play: Gamification, game thinking, & motivational design. Gamified UK.
  • Meyer, D. K. ve Turner, J. C. (2006). Re-conceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 377-390. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9032-1
  • Miles, M, B. ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook (2. bs.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
  • Nebel, S., Schneider, S. ve Rey, G. D. (2016). From duels to classroom competition: Social competition and learning in educational videogames within different group sizes. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 384-398.
  • O’Donovan, S., Gain, J. ve Marais, P. (2013). A case study in the gamification of a university-level games development course. The South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference içinde (s. 242-251). East London: ACM.
  • Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers and Education, 52(1), 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd bs.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P. ve Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002 Plass, J. L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E. O., Homer, B. D. ve Um, E. (2014). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 128-140. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.006
  • Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D. ve Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258-283. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533
  • Prensky, M. (2001). The digital game-based learning revolution. Digital Game-Based Learning, 1(1), 1-19. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.001
  • Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. C. S. ve J. M. Harackiewicz (Ed.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance içinde (s. 373-404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Robinson, D. ve Bellotti, V. (2013). A preliminary taxonomy of gamification elements for varying anticipated commitment. CHI 2013 Workshop on Designing Gamification: Creating Gameful and Playful Experiences, Paris: ACM. http://gamification-research.org/wp- content/uploads/2013/03/Robinson_Bellotti.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  • Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(4), 305-335. doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(02)00097-6.
  • Rotgans, J. I. ve Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active- learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58-67. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.001
  • Rotgans, J. I. ve Schmidt, H. G. (2017). How individual interest influences situational interest and how both are related to knowledge acquisition: A microanalytical investigation. Journal of Educational Research, 671(November), 1-11. doi:10.1080/00220671.2017.1310710
  • Rovai, A. P. ve Jordan, H. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2).
  • Sabourin, J. L. ve Lester, J. C. (2014). Affect and engagement in game-based learning environments. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 5(1), 45-56. doi:10.1109/T-AFFC.2013.27
  • Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K. ve Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371-380
  • Sansone, N., Ligorio, M. B. ve Buglass, S. L. (2016). Peer e-tutoring: Effects on students’ participation and interaction style in online courses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 3297(November), 1-10. doi:10.1080/14703297.2016.1190296
  • Schraw, G. ve Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52. doi:10.1023/A:1009004801455
  • Schraw, G., Flowerday, T. ve Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211-224. doi:10.1023/A:1016619705184
  • Seixas, L. d., Gomes, A. S. ve de Melo Filho, I. J. (2016). Effectiveness of gamification in the engagement of students. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 48-63.
  • Shuck, B., Albornoz, C. ve Winberg, M. (2007). Emotions and their effect on adult learning: A constructivist perspective. Adult Education, 108-113. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2014.895305
  • Song, H., Kim, J., Tenzek, K. E. ve Lee, K. M. (2013). The effects of competition and competitiveness upon intrinsic motivation in exergames. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1702-1708.
  • Staus, N. L. ve Falk, J. H. (2017). The role of emotion in informal science learning: Testing an exploratory model. Mind, Brain, and Education, 11(2), 45-53. doi:10.1111/mbe.12139
  • Sung, B., Vanman, E. J., Hartley, N. ve Phau, I. (2016). The emotion of interest and its relevance to consumer psychology and behaviour. Australasian Marketing Journal, 24(4), 337-343. doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2016.11.005
  • Tauber, S. K., Dunlosky, J., Urry, H. L. ve Opitz, P. C. (2017). The effects of emotion on younger and older adults’ monitoring of learning. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 24(5), 555-574. doi:10.1080/13825585.2016.1227423
  • Tang, M. ve Byrne, R. (2007). Regular versus online versus blended: A qualitative description of the advantages of the electronic modes and a quantitative evaluation. International Journal on E- Learning, 6(2), 257.
  • Tenório, T., Bittencourt, I. I., Isotani, S., Pedro, A. ve Ospina, P. (2016). A gamified peer assessment model for on-line learning environments in a competitive context. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 247-263.
  • Tüzün, H. (2007). Blending video games with learning: Issues and challenges with classroom implementations in the Turkish context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 465-477. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00710.x
  • Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M. ve Malik, A. S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(AUG). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454
  • Um, E. R., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O. ve Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485-498. doi:10.1037/a0026609
  • Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S. ve Sinagub, J. M. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Sage.
  • Watanabe, N., Sakagami, M. ve Haruno, M. (2013). Reward prediction error signal enhanced by striatum-amygdala interaction explains the acceleration of probabilistic reward learning by emotion. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(10), 4487-4493. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3400-12.2013
  • Weber, P. (2014). Discussions in the comments section: Factors influencing participation and interactivity in online newspapers’ reader comments. New Media & Society, 16(6), 941-957. doi:10.1177/1461444813495165
  • Werbach, K. ve Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: how game thinking can revolutionize your business. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Digital Press.
  • Wideman, H. H., Owston, R. D., Brown, C., Kushniruk, A., Ho, F. ve Pitts, K. C. (2007). Unpacking the potential of educational gaming: A new tool for gaming research. Simulation & Gaming, 38(1), 10- 30. doi:10.1177/1046878106297650
  • Williams, D., Yee, N. ve Caplan, S. E. (2008). Who plays, how much, and why? Debunking the stereotypical gamer profile. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(4), 993-1018.
  • Yıldırım, İ. ve Demir, S. (2016). Oyunlaştırma temelli “Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri” dersi öğretim programı hakkında öğrenci görüşleri. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 6(11), 85-101.
  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E. ve Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252.
  • Zheng, B. ve Warschauer, M. (2015). Participation, interaction, and academic achievement in an online discussion environment. Computers and Education, 84, 78-89. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.008
  • Zichermann, G. ve Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media Inc.
APA MEŞE C, Dursun Ö (2018). Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi. , 67 - 95. 10.15390/EB.2018.7726
Chicago MEŞE Can,Dursun Özcan Özgür Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi. (2018): 67 - 95. 10.15390/EB.2018.7726
MLA MEŞE Can,Dursun Özcan Özgür Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi. , 2018, ss.67 - 95. 10.15390/EB.2018.7726
AMA MEŞE C,Dursun Ö Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi. . 2018; 67 - 95. 10.15390/EB.2018.7726
Vancouver MEŞE C,Dursun Ö Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi. . 2018; 67 - 95. 10.15390/EB.2018.7726
IEEE MEŞE C,Dursun Ö "Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi." , ss.67 - 95, 2018. 10.15390/EB.2018.7726
ISNAD MEŞE, Can - Dursun, Özcan Özgür. "Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi". (2018), 67-95. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7726
APA MEŞE C, Dursun Ö (2018). Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 43(196), 67 - 95. 10.15390/EB.2018.7726
Chicago MEŞE Can,Dursun Özcan Özgür Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim 43, no.196 (2018): 67 - 95. 10.15390/EB.2018.7726
MLA MEŞE Can,Dursun Özcan Özgür Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.43, no.196, 2018, ss.67 - 95. 10.15390/EB.2018.7726
AMA MEŞE C,Dursun Ö Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2018; 43(196): 67 - 95. 10.15390/EB.2018.7726
Vancouver MEŞE C,Dursun Ö Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2018; 43(196): 67 - 95. 10.15390/EB.2018.7726
IEEE MEŞE C,Dursun Ö "Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi." Eğitim ve Bilim, 43, ss.67 - 95, 2018. 10.15390/EB.2018.7726
ISNAD MEŞE, Can - Dursun, Özcan Özgür. "Oyunlaştırma Bileşenlerinin Duygu, İlgi ve Çevrimiçi Katılıma Etkisi". Eğitim ve Bilim 43/196 (2018), 67-95. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7726
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 7:47

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları