Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 53 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 221 - 225 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014 İndeks Tarihi: 31-10-2019

Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees

Öz:
Objective: The aim of the study was to assess mutual associations of body image perception, compliance with the prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees. Methods: Fourty transfemoral amputee (30 male and 10 female), who had a traumatic and unilateral amputation were included in this study. The mean age of the patients at the time of study was 37 ± 9.9 and the mean age at amputation was 12.6 ± 9.4 years. Patients's body image perception and compliance with the prosthesis paramaters were evaluated with Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS) and Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES). MoCA (The Montreal Cognitive Assessment) has been used to determine the cognitive ability of the participant. All tests has been administered by dual task method during ambulation. Patients who had neurologic orcognitive deficit were excluded from the study. Results: There was a statistically significant relationship between an individual's body image perception and cognitive performance. Body image perception was significantly and negatively correlated with the MoCA score (r ¼0.514, p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between psychosocial adjustment, prosthesis satisfaction and MoCA scores (r ¼ 0.550, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Body image satisfaction, psychosocial adjustment, lack of activity restriction, and satisfaction with prosthesis are positively associated with cognitive performance of transfemoral amputees. Before beginning the amputee rehabilitation programs, we recommend to include not only physical functions, but also consider body image and cognitive functions as assessment parameters.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Ortopedi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Ostler C, Ellis-Hill C, Donovan-Hall M. Expectations of rehabilitation following lower limb amputation: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36: 1169e1175.
  • Esquenazi A. Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:831e836.
  • Breakey JW. Body image: the lower-limb amputee. J Prosthet Orthot. 1997;9: 58e66.
  • Durmus D, Safaz I, Adigüzel E, et al. Psychiatric symptoms in male traumatic lower limb amputees: associations with neuropathic pain, locomotor capabilities, and perception of body image. J Mood Disord. 2015;5:164e172.
  • Zidarov D, Swaine B, Gauthier-Gagnon C. Quality of life of persons with lowerlimb amputation during rehabilitation and at 3-month follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:634e645.
  • Murray CD, Fox J. Body image and prosthesis satisfaction in the lower limb amputee. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:925e931.
  • Senra H, Oliveira RA, Leal I, et al. Beyond the body image: a qualitative study on how adults experience lower limb amputation. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26:180e191.
  • Horgan O, MacLachlan M. Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:837e850.
  • Harness N, Pinzur MS. Health related quality of life in patients with dysvascular transtibial amputation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;383:204e207.
  • Sinha R, van den Heuvel WJ, Arokiasamy P, et al. Influence of adjustments to amputation and artificial limb on quality of life in patients following lower limb amputation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2014;37:74e79.
  • Asano M, Rushton P, Miller WC, et al. Predictors of quality of life among individuals who have a lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008;32: 231e243.
  • Abernethy B, Hanna A, Plooy A. The attentional demands of preferred and nonpreferred gait patterns. Gait Posture. 2002;15:256e265.
  • Knaepen K, Marusic U, Crea S, et al. Psychophysiological response to cognitive workload during symmetrical, asymmetrical and dual-task walking. Hum Move Sci. 2015;40:248e263.
  • Willrich A, Pinzur M, McNeil M, et al. Health related quality of life, cognitive function, and depression in diabetic patients with foot ulcer or amputation. A preliminary study. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:128e134.
  • Rafnsson SB, Deary IJ, Fowkes F. Peripheral arterial disease and cognitive function. Vasc Med. 2009;14:51e61.
  • Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture. 2002;16:1e14.
  • Heller B, Datta D, Howitt J. A pilot study comparing the cognitive demand of walking for transfemoral amputees using the Intelligent Prosthesis with that using conventionally damped knees. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14:518e522.
  • Singh M, Sachdeva S. Cognitive assessment techniques. Int J Inf Technol Knowl Manag. 2014;7:108e118.
  • Williams RM, Turner AP, Green M, et al. Relationship between cognition and functional outcomes after dysvascular lower extremity amputation: a prospective study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;94:707e717.
  • Topuz S, Ülger €O, Yakut Y, Gül S¸ener F. Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the trinity amputation and prosthetic experience scales (TAPES) in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35:201e206.
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:695e699.
  • Davies B, Datta D. Mobility outcome following unilateral lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003;27:186e190.
  • Munin MC, Espejo-De Guzman MC, Boninger ML, et al. Predictive factors for successful early prosthetic ambulation among lower-limb amputees. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38:379e384.
  • O'Neill B, Moran K, Gillespie A. Scaffolding rehabilitation behaviour using a voice-mediated assistive technology for cognition. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010;20:509e527.
  • O'Neill BF, Evans JJ. Memory and executive function predict mobility rehabilitation outcome after lower-limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31: 1083e1091.
  • Pinzur MS, Graham G, Osterman H. Psychologic testing in amputation rehabilitation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;229:236e240.
  • Coffey L, O'Keeffe F, Gallagher P, et al. Cognitive functioning in persons with lower limb amputations: a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1950e1964.
  • Hanspal R, Fisher K. Prediction of achieved mobility in prosthetic rehabilitation of the elderly using cognitive and psychomotor assessment. Int J Rehabil Res. 1997;20:315e318.
  • Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, et al. Physical, mental, and social predictors of functional outcome in unilateral lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:803e811.
  • Saglam Y, Gulenc B, Birisik F, Ersen A, Yilmaz Yalcinkaya E, Yazicioglu O. The quality of lifeanalysis of knee prosthesis with complete microprocessor control in trans-femoral amputees. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017;51:466e469.
APA GÖZAYDINOĞLU Ş, Hosbay Z, Durmaz H (2019). Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees. , 221 - 225. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
Chicago GÖZAYDINOĞLU Şüheda,Hosbay Zeynep,Durmaz Hayati Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees. (2019): 221 - 225. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
MLA GÖZAYDINOĞLU Şüheda,Hosbay Zeynep,Durmaz Hayati Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees. , 2019, ss.221 - 225. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
AMA GÖZAYDINOĞLU Ş,Hosbay Z,Durmaz H Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees. . 2019; 221 - 225. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
Vancouver GÖZAYDINOĞLU Ş,Hosbay Z,Durmaz H Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees. . 2019; 221 - 225. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
IEEE GÖZAYDINOĞLU Ş,Hosbay Z,Durmaz H "Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees." , ss.221 - 225, 2019. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
ISNAD GÖZAYDINOĞLU, Şüheda vd. "Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees". (2019), 221-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
APA GÖZAYDINOĞLU Ş, Hosbay Z, Durmaz H (2019). Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 53(3), 221 - 225. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
Chicago GÖZAYDINOĞLU Şüheda,Hosbay Zeynep,Durmaz Hayati Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 53, no.3 (2019): 221 - 225. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
MLA GÖZAYDINOĞLU Şüheda,Hosbay Zeynep,Durmaz Hayati Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol.53, no.3, 2019, ss.221 - 225. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
AMA GÖZAYDINOĞLU Ş,Hosbay Z,Durmaz H Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2019; 53(3): 221 - 225. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
Vancouver GÖZAYDINOĞLU Ş,Hosbay Z,Durmaz H Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2019; 53(3): 221 - 225. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
IEEE GÖZAYDINOĞLU Ş,Hosbay Z,Durmaz H "Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees." Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 53, ss.221 - 225, 2019. 10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014
ISNAD GÖZAYDINOĞLU, Şüheda vd. "Body image perception, compliance with a prosthesis and cognitive performance in transfemoral amputees". Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 53/3 (2019), 221-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2019.03.014