ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA
Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 63 - 94 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X İndeks Tarihi: 17-01-2020
ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA
Öz: Çok sayıda araştırma, otantik liderlik davranışının, örgütlerde pozitif psikolojik sermayenin yapı taşlarından biri olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Bu durum aynı zamanda, otantikliderliğin, örgütlerde işe yabancılaşma gibi negatif koşullar ile mücadeleyi kolaylaştırdığını göstermektedir. İşe yabancılaşma, sanayi devriminden bugüne kadar çalışanların iş yaşamında karşıkarşıya kaldıkları negatif koşullar arasında önemli bir paya sahiptir. Çalışmada otantik liderliğin işeyabancılaşma ile ilişkisi ele alınacaktır. Bu bağlamda, otantik liderliğin; ilişkilerde şeffaflık, içselleştirilmiş ahlak anlayışı, bilginin dengeli değerlendirilmesi ve kişisel farkındalık bileşenleriyle yabancılaşma ilişkisinin hangi yön ve şiddette gerçekleştiğinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma için, Bursaili dericilik sektöründe faaliyet gösteren işletmelerden tesadüfü örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilenlerden eldeedilen veriler, istatistiksel yöntemler ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, otantik liderlik ve işeyabancılaşma arasında negatif yönlü, anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOR AND WORK ALIENATION IN ORGANIZATIONS: A STUDY IN BURSA LEATHER INDUSTRY
Öz: The many studies revealed, that authentic leadership behavior is one of the important cornerstones of the development of positive psychological capital. This situation, at the same time, suggests that authentic leaders can be supporting employees to cope with the negative circumstances as work alienation. Work alienation –until today from the industrial revoluation-, has a important share in the work life between these negative conditions. This study focused on the relationship between authentic leadership and work alienation. In this context, the purpose of this paper is to determine the direction an intensity of the relations between authentic leadership components (relational transparency, internalized perspective, balanced processing and self-awareness) and levels of alienation of employess. The research was carried out leather industry businesses in Bursa. Data were analyzed by statistical methods. The research findings revealed tha a significant negative correlation between authentic leadership and work alienation.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
- AIKEN, M. Ve HAGE, J.,(1966), Organizational Alienation: A Comparative Analysis, American Sociological Review, 31 (4), 497-507.
- ALGERA, P.M., ve MARJOLEIN, W., (2012), Radical Authentic Leadership: Co-creating The Conditions Under Which All Members of the Organizations Can Be Authentic, The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 118-131.
- ALLEN, B.B. ve LAFOLLETTE, W.B.,(1977), Perceived Structure and Alienation Among Management Traines, Academy of Management Journal, 20(2), 334-341.
- ARCHIBALD, P. W. (2009) Globalization, Downsizing and Insecurity: Do We Need to Upgrade Marx’s Theory of Alienation?, Critical Sociology, 35 (3), 319-342.
- AVOLIO, B.J., ve Diğerleri (2004) Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which Authentic Leaders Impact Follower Attitudes and Behaviors, Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823.
- BANAI, M. ve REISEL, W.,(2007),The influence of supportive leadership and job characteristics on work alienation: A six-country investigation, Journal of World Business 42, 463–476.
- BOERNER, S, (1998) Work Alienation and Continuous Improvement: The Effects of Leadership Style, Proceeding of the 2nd International Euro CI Net Conference on Continnuous Improvement form idea to reality, Enschede, The Wetherends 14-15 September, 63-75.
- BOSCH, Ralph van den and TARIS, Toon W., (2014), Authenticity at Work: Development and Validation of an Individual Authenticity Measure at Work, Journal of Happiness Studies 15, 1-18. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=19&sid=6278b9fb-8e77-4ce8-9e25-1527c5d2d354%40sessionmgr4004&hid=4114
- CIANCI, M. ve Diğerleri, (2014), The effects of authentic leadership on followers’ ethical decision-making in the face of temptation: An experimental study, The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 581- 594.
- CLARK, S. K., ve Diğerleri (2010),Temporary Worker Alienation and Job Performance: The Impact of Rating Score, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 17(31), 257-297.
- CUNHA, M,P.,KAMOCHE,K.,ve CUNHA, R.C.,(2003), Organizational Improvisation and Leadership, International Studies of Management and Organizations,33 (1), 34-57.
- EVGENY, O.,(2009), Subjective Experience of Alienation: Measurement and Correlates, Empirische Forschung, www.existential-analysis.org/fileadmin/4editors/...
- FLEESON, W., and WILT, Joshua, (2010),The Relevance Of Big Five Traits Content in Behavior to Subjective Authenticity, Journal of Personality, 7(4), 1353-1382.
- FREEMAN, E.R.,ve AUSTER, R.E.,(2011), Values, Authenticity, And Responsible Leadership, Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 15-23.
- GEMMIL, G. ve OAKLEY, J.,(1992), Leadership: An Alienating Social Myth, Human Relations, 45 (2), 113-129.
- HANNAH, J. AVOLIO ,B.J ve WALUMBWA, (2011),Relationship Between Authentic Leadership, Moral Courage and Ethical and Prosocial Behaviors, Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4), 555- 578.
- HAYEK, M. ve Diğerleri (2014), Inextremis leadership of Sartrean authenticity”, Journal of Management History, 20/3. 292 – 310
- HIRSCHFELD, R. S.,FIELD, H.S.,ve BEDEIAN, A.,(2000), Work Alienation as an Individual Difference Construct for Predict in Workplace Adjustment: A test in Two Samples, Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 30:9, 1880-1902.
- HIRSCHFELD, R.S.,ve FIELD, H.S. (2000), Work Centrality and Work Alienation: Distinct Aspects of a General Commitment to Work, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 789-800.
- HORNEY, K.(1998), Ruhsal Çatışmalarımız,(Çeviren: Budak, S.), Öteki Yayınevi, Ankara.
- HOSSEINZADEH, A. NAZEM, F., ELNEI, M.N.,(2014), A Structural Model for Transformational Leadership Style Based on Job Alienation in District, Bulletin of Environment, 3(1), 01-05.
- JACKSON, T.K.,(2005), Towards To Authenticity: A Sartrean Perspectives on Business Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 307-325.
- KAYA, U., ve SERÇEOĞLU, N.,(2013), Duygu İşçilerinde Yabancılaşma: Hizmet Sektöründe Bir Araştırma, Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, S.1., 311- 346.
- KAYRİ, M. (2009), Araştırmalarda Gruplar arası Farkın Belirlenmesine Yönelik Çoklu Karşılaştırma (POST-HOC) Teknikleri, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19 (1), 51-64.
- KELLEY, Robert E.,(1988),“In Praise of Followers”, Harvard Business Review, 66(6), s.142-148
- KERNIS, M.,ve GOLDMAN, B.,(2006), A Multicomponent Conceptualization of Authenticity: Theory and Research Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, http:www.researchgate.net/ publication/222578792
- KIZILTAN, G.S.,(1986), Çağımızda Yabancılaşma Sorunu, Metis Yayınevi, İstanbul.
- KOHN, M.(1976),Occupational Structure and Alienation, American Journal of Sociology, 82 (1), 111-130.
- LASCHINGER, S.H, ve FIDA, Roberta (2014) New nurses burnout and workplace wellbeing: The influence of authentic leadership and psychological capital., Burnout Research, 1(1) 19-28.
- LAWLER, J., ve ASHMAN, I.,(2012), Theorizing Leadership Authenticity: A Sartrean Perspective, Leadership, 8(4), 327-344.
- LEROY, H., PALANSKI, M., ve SIMONS, T.(2012), Authentic Leadership and Behavioral Integrity as Drivers of Follower Commitment and Performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 10 (7), 255-264.
- LYSTAD, M. H., (1972), Social Alienation: A Review of Current Literature, The Sociological Quarterly, 13, 90-113.
- MADDI, R.,(2004), Hardiness: An Operationalization Of Existential Courage, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 44/3, 279-298.
- MADDI, R. S., KOBASA, S. ve HOOVER,(1979), An Alienation Test, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 19/4, 73-76.
- MENARD, J.,ve BRUNET, L.,(2010),Authenticity and Well-Being in the Work Place, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26 (4), 331-346.
- MINER, J.,(2006),Organizational Behavior: Historical Origins, Theoretical Foundations and the Future, M.E.Sharpe, New York.
- MOTTAZ, C., (1981), Some Determinants of Work Alienation The Sociological Quarterly 22, 515- 529.
- NEIDER, L., ve SCHRIESHEIM, C. A.,(2011), The Authentic Leadership Inventory (ALI): Development and Empirical tests, Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1146-1164.
- NICHOLS, T.ve ERAKOVICH, R.,(2013), Authentic leadership and implicit theory: a normative form of leadership?”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34/ 2 182 – 195
- NOVICEVICH, M. ve Diğerleri (2006), Authentic Leadership: A Historical Perspective, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 2006, 13 (1), 64-75.
- NYBERG, D.,. ve BERNIN, P. (2005) The Impact of Leadership on the health of subordinates, Joint Programme for Working Life Research in Euro- pe, Swedish, www.su.se/polopoly-fi/1.../P2456_ AN.pdf
- PALANSKI, M.E., KAHAI, S., ve YAMMARINO, F.,(2011), Team Virtues and Performance: An Examination of Transparency, Behavioral Integrity, And Trust, Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 201-216.
- PALANSKI, M.E.ve YAMMARINO, F.,(2007), Integrity and leadership: Clearing The Conceptual Confusion ,European Management Journal, 25 (3), 171-181.
- PATRICK, B. FORSYTH ve WAYNE, K. H., (1978), Isolation and Alienationin Educational Organizations, Educational Administration Quarterly, 14 (1), 80-96.
- RITZER, G.,ve WALZACK, D.,(1986), Working Conflict an Change, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
- ROUNDY, C. A. (2011),Behavioral Integrity: The Precursor to Ethical Leadership; 65-80; Lentz, C.A. (Editor), Ethics, Leadership and Globalization, Amazon Media. http://ehis.ebscohost.com/ ehost/prfviewer?vid=5&hid
- RYFF, C. D., ve SINGER, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1–28.
- SARROS, J.C., ve Diğerleri,(2002), Work Alienation and Leadership, British Journal of Management, 13, 285-304.
- SCHEIN, E.,(1976), Örgütsel Psikoloji, Kalite Matbaası, Ankara.
- SEEMAN, M.,(1959), On the Meaning of Alienation, American Sociological Review, 24 (6), 783-791.
- SEEMAN, M., (1991), Alienation and Anomie, 291- 367; Robinson, John, Shaver, Philip, ve Wrightsman, Lawrence, (editors), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Atttitudes, V.I, Academic Press Inc.
- SENNETT, R.,(2004), Kamusal İnsanın Çöküşü, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
- SHANTZ, A., ALFESM, K.,ve TRUSS, C.(2014), Alienation From Work: Marxist Ideologies and Twenty-First-Century Pratice, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (18), 2529-2550.
- SIMONS, T. (2002), Behavioral Integrity: The Perceived Alignment Between Managers’ Words and Deeds as a Research Focus, Organization Science, 13(1), 18-35.
- TEKİN, F.,(2014), Peter L.Berger’in Yabancılaşma Anlayışı: Diyalektik Bilinç Kaybı, Beytulhikme An International Journal of Plilosophy, 4(2), 29- 48.
- THOMPSON, L.J.,(2004), Moral Leadership in a Postmodern World, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11(1), 27-37.
- TSURİ, N., BETKOVITZ, N., ve GINZBURG, K., (2015)Body Awareness, Emotional Clarity, and AuthenticBehavior: The Moderating Role of Mindfulness, Journal of Happiness Studies, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10902-015-9652-6
- TÜKEL, İ.,(2012), Modern Örgütlerde Yabancılaşma ve Kafka’nın Dönüşüm Romanının Bu Bağlamda Analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 34-50.
- WOOLLEY, L., CAZA, A., and LEVY, L., (2010),Authentic Leadership and FollowerDevelopment: Psychological Capital,Positive Work Climate, and Gender, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 18/4, 438-448.
- WALUMBWA, F.O., ve Diğerleri (2008),. Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure, Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
- YUILL,C., (2011), Forgetting and Remembering Alienation Theory, History of Human Sciences, 24(2), 103-119.
| APA | ÖCAL H, BARIN n (2016). ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. , 63 - 94. 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| Chicago | ÖCAL HÜLYA,BARIN nurgül emine ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. (2016): 63 - 94. 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| MLA | ÖCAL HÜLYA,BARIN nurgül emine ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. , 2016, ss.63 - 94. 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| AMA | ÖCAL H,BARIN n ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. . 2016; 63 - 94. 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| Vancouver | ÖCAL H,BARIN n ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. . 2016; 63 - 94. 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| IEEE | ÖCAL H,BARIN n "ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA." , ss.63 - 94, 2016. 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| ISNAD | ÖCAL, HÜLYA - BARIN, nurgül emine. "ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA". (2016), 63-94. https://doi.org/10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| APA | ÖCAL H, BARIN n (2016). ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. İş Güç, Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 18(2), 63 - 94. 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| Chicago | ÖCAL HÜLYA,BARIN nurgül emine ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. İş Güç, Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi 18, no.2 (2016): 63 - 94. 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| MLA | ÖCAL HÜLYA,BARIN nurgül emine ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. İş Güç, Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, vol.18, no.2, 2016, ss.63 - 94. 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| AMA | ÖCAL H,BARIN n ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. İş Güç, Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi. 2016; 18(2): 63 - 94. 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| Vancouver | ÖCAL H,BARIN n ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. İş Güç, Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi. 2016; 18(2): 63 - 94. 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| IEEE | ÖCAL H,BARIN n "ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA." İş Güç, Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 18, ss.63 - 94, 2016. 10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
| ISNAD | ÖCAL, HÜLYA - BARIN, nurgül emine. "ÖRGÜTLERDE OTANTİK LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞININ İŞE YABANCILAŞMA İLE İLİŞKİSİ: BURSA İLİ DERİCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA". İş Güç, Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi 18/2 (2016), 63-94. https://doi.org/10.4026/2148-9874.2016.0316.X |
