A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS

ÖZDEMİR, Nevin

A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS

Nevin ÖZDEMİR (Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Bölümü, Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmenliği Anabilim Dalı, Samsun, Türkiye)

Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

4 0

Yıl: 2015 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 71 - 88 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 30-01-2020

A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS

Öz:

It has been argued that culture has a significant impact on learning styles. Turkey is one of the nonWesterncountries according to studies on the classification of countries based on cultural characteristics.Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to compare the learning styles of geographyundergraduates in Turkey with the findings of a previous international study in which the learning styles ofWestern geography undergraduates were assessed. Kolb’s Learning Styles Inventory was used as ameasurement tool in order to facilitate this comparison, and 1275 Turkish geography undergraduatesstudying at eight universities in different geographical regions of Turkey responded to this inventory. Thedata obtained from the study were analyzed to compare the learning styles with those of Western geographyundergraduates. According to the research findings, the assimilating and converging learning styles werefavored between Turkish geography undergraduates, while the assimilating learning style was favoredbetween Western geography undergraduates. Similar to Western counterparts, there are significantdifferences between demographic variables such as age and class of and predominant learning styles ofTurkish geography undergraduates within 10 departments.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih

Türkiye’deki Coğrafya Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Stillerinin Batılı Emsalleriyle Karşılaştırılması

Öz:

Kültürün öğrenme stilleri üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olduğu ileri sürülmektedir. Kültürel özellikleri esas alarak yapılan ülkelerin sınıflandırmasıyla ilgili çalışmalara göre Türkiye, Batı Kültür Bölgesi içerisindeki ülkelerden biri olarak kabul edilmemektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’deki coğrafya öğrencilerinin öğrenme stillerini Batılı coğrafya öğrencilerinin öğrenme stilleriyle ilgili önceki bir çalışmanın bulgularıyla karşılaştırmaktır. Bu karşılaştırmayı kolaylaştırmak için karşılaştırma yapılan çalışmada da kullanılan Kolb Öğrenme Stilleri Envanteri veri toplama aracı olarak kullanılmıştır. Türkiye’nin farklı coğrafi bölgelerinde yer alan 8 üniversitenin, coğrafya ve coğrafya öğretmenliği bölümlerinde öğrenim gören 1275 öğrenci bu envanteri cevaplamıştır. Bu çalışmadan elde edilen veriler, coğrafyacıların öğrenme stilleri üzerine yapılmış önceki çalışmanın sonuçlarıyla karşılaştırılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre Türk coğrafya öğrencilerinin baskın öğrenme stilleri özümseme ve ayrıştırma olduğu, buna karşılık batılı emsallerinin baskın öğrenme stilinin özümseme olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Batılı emsallerine benzer şekilde coğrafya öğrencilerinin öğrenme stilleri üniversite, yaş ve sınıf düzeyine göre anlamlı farklılıklar göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Apfelthaler,G., Hansen, K., Keuchel, S., Neubauer, M., Ong, S. H., Tapachaı, N., & Mueller, M. (2005). Cross cultural learning styles in higher education. Internatıonal Journal Of Learnıng, 12 (5), 247-257.
Aşkar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb learning style inventory. Education and Science, 87, 37-47.
Auyeung, P., & Sands, J. (1996). A cross-cultural study of the learning style of accounting students. Accounting and Finance, 36 (2), 261–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.1996.tb00310.x.
Barmeyer, C. I. (2004). Learning styles and their impact on cross-cultural training: An international comparison in France, Germany and Quebec. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28, 577–594. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.01.011.
Barron, P., & Arcodia, C. (2002). Linking learning style preferences and ethnicity: International students studying hospitality and tourism management in Australia. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 1(2), 1-13.
Retrieved from http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv.php?pid=UQ:8864&dsID=Accepted_Paper.pdf.
Becher, T., Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. (Adobe Digital Editions version). Retrieved from http://ceps.pef.unilj.si/knjiznica/ izbirni/D.c.%202001%20Becher%20and%20Towler_Academic%20Tribes%20and%20Teritories.pdf.
Bergsteiner, H., Avery, G. C., & Neumann, R. (2010). Kolb's experiential learning model: critique from a modelling perspective. Studies in Continuing Education, 32(1), 29-46.
Boland, G., Sugahara, S., Opdecam, E., & Everaert, P. (2011). The impact of cultural factors on students' learning style preferences: A global comparison between Japan, Australia and Belgium. Asian Review of Accounting, 19 (3), 243 – 265. doi: 10.1108/13217341111185155.
Bradbeer, B. (1999). Barriers to Interdisciplinary: disciplinary discourses and student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 23 (3), 381-396. doi:10.1080/03098269985326.
Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: an overview of theories. Educational Psychology, 24 (4), 419-444. doi: 10.1080/0144341042000228834
Coffield, F. J., Moseley, D.V., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice? (Adobe Digital Editions version).
Retrieved from http://itslifejimbutnotasweknowit.org.uk/files/LSRC_LearningStyles.pdf
Cullen, D. J., Pearson, M., Saha, L. J., & Spear, R. H. (1994). Establishing effective PhD supervisions. Canberra: AGPS.
Çelebi, N. (2003). Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi'ndeki Mülteci Profesörler. (The Refugee Professors at the Faculty of Language, History and Geography). Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih Coğrafya Fakültesi
Dergisi, 43 (1), 259–272. Retrieved from http://dergiler.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/26/1009/12247.pdf
De Bello, T.C. (1990). Comparison of eleven major learning styles models: variables, appropriate populations, validity of instrumentation, and the research behind them. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 6(3), 203–222. doi:10.1080/0748763900060302.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Dunphy, A., & Spellman, G. (2009). Geography fieldwork, fieldwork value and learning styles. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 18 (1), 19-28. doi: 10.1080/ 10382040802591522.
Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Styles of Learning and Teaching: An Integrated Outline of Educational Psychology for Students, Teachers and Lecturers. Wiley: Chichester.
Eaves, M. (2011). The relevance of learning styles for international pedagogy in higher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17 (6), 677-691. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2011.625143.
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engr. Education, 78 (7), 674-681.
Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/LS-1988.pdf
Fridland, G. H. (2002). Adult learning styles and cultural background: A comparison of the learning style preferences of American teachers of English as a second language and Chinese teachers of English as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Memphis, TN. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/pqdtft/docview/305443559/fulltextPDF/13FE40DDA1A2D66A071/1?accountid= 16701
Gencel, I. E. (2007). Kolb’ün Deneyimsel Öğrenme Kuramına Dayalı Öğrenme Stilleri III’ ün Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması. (The Turkısh adoptation study of Kolb’ learning style inventory). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9 (2), 120–140.
Retrieved from http://www.sbe.deu.edu.tr/dergi/cilt9.say%C4%B12/9.2%20gencel.pdf
Given, B. K. (1996). Learning styles: a synthesized model. Journal of Accelerated Learning and Teaching, 21 (1-2), 11-43. Retrieved from http://ialearn.org/files_jalt/jalt_21_1996_1%20%26%202. pdf#page=11
Hadfield, J. (2006). Teacher education and trainee learning style. RELC Journal, 37 (3), 367-386. doi: 10.1177/0033688206071320
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Learning cycles and learning styles: the application of Kolb’s experiential learning model in higher education. Journal of Geography, 99, 185–195. doi:10.1080/ 00221340008978967.
Healey, M., Kneale, P., & Bradbeer, J. (2005). Learning styles among geography undergraduates: an international comparison. AREA. 37 (1), 30-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00600.x.
Holtbrügge, D., & Mohr, A. T. (2010). Cultural determinants of learning style preferences. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9 (4), 622–637.
Retrieved from http://www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/AOM_US/A101222H.pdf
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. SAGE Publication, Tousand Oaks:California.
Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38 (1), 52-88. doi: 10.1177/1069397103259443
Hoppe, M. H. (1990). A comparative study of country elites: International differences in work-related values and learning and their implications for management training and development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Caroline at Chapel Hill, NC.
House, R.J., Hanges, P.M., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
İlhan, A., Gülersoy, A. E., & Gümüş, N. (2013). Coğrafya bölümü ve coğrafya öğretmenliği anabilim dalı mezunlarının mezuniyet sonrası karşılaştıkları istihdam sorunu. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(9). 585- 1602.
Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., Sully de L. M., & House, R. J. (2006). In the Eye of the Beholder: Cross Cultural Lessons in Leadership from Project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20 (1), 67-90. Retrieved from http://www.csus.edu/indiv/s/sablynskic/documents/GLOBEprojecteyeofthebeholder.pdf
Jonassen, H. D., & Grobowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning and Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Joy, S., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Are there cultural differences in learning style? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 69– 85. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.11.002.
Kayes, D. C. (2002). Experiential learning and its critics: preserving the role of experience in management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1 (2), 137–149.
Kazu, İ. Y. (2009). The effect of learning styles on education and the teaching process. Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (2), 85-94. Retrieved from http://perweb.firat.edu.tr/personel/yayinlar/fua_35/35_59283.pdf
Kefee, J. W. (1987). Learning Style Theory and Practice. Restan, Va: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Kent, M., Gilbertson, D., & Hunt, C. (1997). Fieldwork in Geography teaching: a critical review of the literature and approaches. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21(3), 313-332. doi:10.1080/ 03098269708725439.
Koçman, A., & Sütgibi, S. (2004). Geographical Education and Training at Turkish Universities. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 13 (1), 97–102. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10382040408668799
Kolb, D. A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. (Adobe Digital Editions version). Retrieved from http://www.medicine.heacademy.ac.uk/static/uploads/workshop_resources/178/178_ Learning_styles_and_disciplinary_difference.pdf.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Retrieved from http://academic.regis.edu/ed205/Kolb.pdf
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (1999). Experiential learning theory: Previous Research and New Directions. (Adobe Digital Editions version).
Retrieved from http://www.d.umn.edu/~kgilbert/educ5165-731/Readings/experiential-learning-theory. pdf
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). The Kolb learning style inventory: Version 3.1 2005 technical specifications. (Adobe Digital Editions version). Retrieved from http://www.whitewater-rescue.com/support/ pagepics/lsitechmanual.pdf.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Experiential Learning Theory: a dynamic, holistic approach to management learning, education and development. (Adobe Digital Editions version). Retrieved from http://learningfromexperience.com/media/2010/08/ELT-Hbk-MLED-LFE-website-2-10-08.pdf
Leigh, J. (2005). Developing the Wyndham Scheme: A case study of geography education in NSW, Australia. Geography Online, 5 (2). Retrieved from http://www.siue.edu/GEOGRAPHY/ONLINE/Leigh05. pdf.
Lemire, D. (1996). Using learning styles in education: research and problems. Journal of Accelerated Learning and Teaching, 21, 43-57.
Retrieved from http://ialearn.org/files_jalt/jalt_21_1996_1%20%26%202.pdf#page=45
Mainemelis, C., Boyatzis, R. E., & Kolb, D. A. (2002). Learning styles and adaptive flexibility: testing experiential learning theory. Management Learning, 33 (1), 5-33. doi: 10.1177/1350507602331001.
Massey, M. G., Kim, S. H., & Mitchell, C. (2011). A study of the learning styles of undergraduate social work students. Journal of evidence-based social work, 8(3), 294-303. Doi:10.1080/15433714.2011.557977.
Nulty, D. D., & Barrett, M. A. (1996). Transitions in students’ learning styles. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 333–345. doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381251.
ÖSYM, (2011). 2009-2010 öğretim yılı yükseköğretim istatistikleri (Higher education statistics for 2009-2010 academic year) (Adobe Digital Editions version). Retrived from http://osym.gov.tr/belge/1- 12038/2009-2010-ogretim-yili-yuksekogretim-istatistikleri-kit-.html.
ÖSYM, (2013). 2012-2013 öğretim yılı yükseköğretim istatistikleri. (Adobe Digital Editions version). http://www.osym.gov.tr/dosya/1-69412/h/21yabanciogrenciuyruk.pdf.
Özdemir, N., & Kesten, A. (2012). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme stilleri ve bazı demografik değişkenlerle ilişkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16 (1), 361-377.
Reisman, A. (2007). Jewish Refugees from Nazism, Albert Einstein, and the Modernization of Higher Education in Turkey (1933–1945). Aleph, 7, 253-281. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40377865.
Sidaway, J. D., & Johnston, R. J. (2007). Geography in higher education in the UK. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31 (1), 57-80. doi:10.1080/03098260601033027
Smith, J. (2002). Learning styles: fashion fad or lever for change? The application of learning style theory to inclusive curriculum delivery. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, 63–70.
Svinicki, M. D., & Dixon, N. M. (1987). The Kolb model modified for classroom activities. College Teaching, 35 (4), 141-146.
Whalley, W. B., Saunders, A., Lewis, R. A., Buenemann, M., & Sutton, P. C. (2011). Curriculum Development: Producing Geographers for the 21st Century. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35 (3), 379-393. doi:10.1080/03098265.2011.589827
Widmann, H. (2000). Atatürk ve Üniversite Reformu (Atatürk and the University Reform). (Translated from French: Aykut Kazancıgil & Serpil Bozkurt). İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi.
Yamamura, J. H., & Stedham, Y. (2004). National cultural characteristics: a comparison of gender differences in Japan and the U.S. (Adobe Digital Editions version). Retrieved from http://www.sba. muohio.edu/abas/2002/sanjose/Stedham_Stedham-%20Yamamura%20-%20Hofstede-%20Gender.pdf
Yamazaki, Y. (2005). Learning styles and typologies of cultural differences: A theoretical and empirical comparison. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29 (5), 521–548. Retrieved from http://learningfromexperience.com/media/2010/08/yoshi-typologies-of-cultural-differences.pdf
Zualkernan, I.A.; Allert, J., & Qadah, G.Z. (2006). Learning styles of computer programming students: a Middle Eastern and American comparison. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49 (4), 443-450.

APA	ÖZDEMİR N (2015). A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS. , 71 - 88.
Chicago	ÖZDEMİR Nevin A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS. (2015): 71 - 88.
MLA	ÖZDEMİR Nevin A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS. , 2015, ss.71 - 88.
AMA	ÖZDEMİR N A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS. . 2015; 71 - 88.
Vancouver	ÖZDEMİR N A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS. . 2015; 71 - 88.
IEEE	ÖZDEMİR N "A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS." , ss.71 - 88, 2015.
ISNAD	ÖZDEMİR, Nevin. "A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS". (2015), 71-88.

APA	ÖZDEMİR N (2015). A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(1), 71 - 88.
Chicago	ÖZDEMİR Nevin A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 25, no.1 (2015): 71 - 88.
MLA	ÖZDEMİR Nevin A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.25, no.1, 2015, ss.71 - 88.
AMA	ÖZDEMİR N A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015; 25(1): 71 - 88.
Vancouver	ÖZDEMİR N A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015; 25(1): 71 - 88.
IEEE	ÖZDEMİR N "A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS." Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25, ss.71 - 88, 2015.
ISNAD	ÖZDEMİR, Nevin. "A COMPARATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE LEARNING STYLES OF TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE GEOGRAPHY STUDENTS AND THEIR WESTERN COUNTERPARTS". Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 25/1 (2015), 71-88.