LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ

Aykut GÖKSEL, (Gazi Üniversitesi)
Emre Burak EKMEKÇİOĞLU (Gazi Üniversitesi)
Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
4 0
Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 721 - 747 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 26-02-2020

LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ

Öz:
Bu araştırmada öncelikle lider-üye etkileşiminin örgütsel özdeşleşmeye olan etkisindeişe bağlılığın aracı rolü incelenmiştir. Özel bütçeli anonim şirket statüsündeki birkalkınma ve yatırım bankasında çalışan uzman ve uzman yardımcılarından oluşantoplam 152 kişiden elde edilen veriler ile değişkenler arasındaki doğrudan ve dolaylıetkiler yapısal eşitlik modeliyle incelenmiştir. Lider-üye etkileşimi derecesi, örgütselözdeşleşme ve işe bağlılık ölçeklerinin Türkçe formlarının geçerli ve güvenilir birölçme aracı olup olmadığının tespiti çalışmada ikincil bir amaç olarak planlanmış vebulgular çalışmanın ek bölümünde yer aldığı şekliyle bu ölçeklerin geçerli ve güvenilirolduğunu göstermiştir. Bu sonuç belirtilen ölçeklerin uluslararası geçerliliklerinepozitif yönlü bir katkıyı da oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanın ana sorunsalı çözümlemesi içinveriler analiz edilmiştir ve elde edilen bulgulara göre lider-üye etkileşimi çalışanlarınörgütsel özdeşleşmelerini ve işe bağlılıklarını anlamlı ve pozitif yönde etkilediği; işebağlılığın örgütsel özdeşleşmeyi anlamlı ve pozitif yönde etkilediği sonucunaulaşılmıştır. Aynı zamanda lider-üye etkileşimin örgütsel özdeşleşme ile ilişkisinde işebağlılığın tam aracı etkisinin olduğu da tespit edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, lider-üyeetkileşiminin niteliği ile örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki doğrudan ilişkinin işe bağlılıkvasıtasıyla daha iyi açıklanacağını göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat

THE MEDIATING ROLE OF JOB INVOLVEMENT IN THE RELATIONSHİP BETWEEN LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION

Öz:
The current study examines primarily the mediating role of job involvement on the relationship between leader-member exchange and organizational identification. Direct and indirect effects of the variables were investigated by using structural equation modeling with data obtained from 152 employees consisting of experts and assistant exports working the bank is a development and investment bank in status of specialbudged joint stock company. It was investigated whether Turkish version of the scales of leader-member exchange quality, organizational identification and job involvement are valid and reliable instruments as a second objective in the study and the findings indicated that these scales are valid and reliable as shown in appendix. This result leads us to contribute positively to the international validity of these scales. In order to clarifed the main research question, the datas were analyzed and the results reveal that leader-member exchange has a significant and positive effect on employee’s organizational identification and job involvement and job involvement have significant and positive effect on employee’s organizational identification. It was also clarified that the full mediation role of job involvement exists on the relationship between leader-member exchange and organizational identification. Results suggest that the direct relationship between leader-member exchange quality and organizational identification is better explained through the job involvement.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
0
0
0
  • Ahmed, I., Ismail, W.K.W., & Amin, S. M. (2014). Employee’s reciprocation of organizational support and leader–member exchange. Management Research Review, 37(11), 930-943.
  • Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of management, 34(3), 325-374.
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
  • Bauer, T. N., Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Wayne, S. J. (2006). A longitudinal study of the moderating role of extraversion: leader-member exchange, performance, and turnover during new executive development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 298-310.
  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley
  • Brown, S. P. (1996). A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psychological bulletin, 120(2), 235-255.
  • Chen, Z. X., Aryee, S., & Lee, C. (2005). Test of a mediation model of perceived organizational support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(3), 457-470.
  • Chen, G., & Kanfer, R. (2006). Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Research in organizational behavior, 27, 223-267.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. (I. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • DeConinck, J. B. (2011). The effects of leader–member exchange and organizational identification on performance and turnover among salespeople.Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 31(1), 21-34.
  • Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of management review, 11(3), 618-634.
  • Dunegan, K. J., Duchon, D., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1992). Examining the link between leader member exchange and subordinate performance: The role of task analyzability and variety as moderators. Journal of Management, 18(1), 59-76.
  • Edwards, M. R., & Peccei, R. (2010). Perceived organizational support, organizational identification, and employee outcomes. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(1), 17-26.
  • Efraty, D., & Sirgy, M. J. (1990). The effects of quality of working life (QWL) on employee behavioral responses. Social Indicators Research, 22(1), 31-47.
  • Efraty, D., Sirgy, M. J., & Claiborne, C. B. (1991). The effects of personal alienation on organizational identification: a quality-of-work-life model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 6(1), 57-78.
  • Elanain, H. M. A. (2014). Leader-member exchange and intent to turnover: Testing a mediatedeffects model in a high turnover work environment.Management Research Review, 37(2), 110-129
  • Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. Sage Publications:London.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of applied psychology, 82(6), 827-844.
  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multilevel multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
  • Gould, S., & Werbel, J. D. (1983). Work involvement: A comparison of dual wage earner and single wage earner families. Journal of Applied Psychology,68(2), 313-319.
  • Göksel, A., & Aydıntan, B. (2012). Lider-Üye Etkileşimi Düzeyinin Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerine Etkisi: Görgül Bir Araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 247-271.
  • Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: Felsefe-Yöntem-Analiz. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Harris, T. B., Li, N., & Kirkman, B. L. (2014). Leader–member exchange (LMX) in context: How LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX's influence on OCB and turnover intention. The Leadership Quarterly,25(2), 314-328.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Iacobucci, D., & Duhachek, A. (2003). Advancing alpha: Measuring reliability with confidence. Journal of consumer psychology, 13(4), 478-487.
  • Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology,92(1), 269-277.
  • İnce, M., Bedük, A., & Aydoğan, E. (2004). Örgütlerde Takım Çalışmasına Yönelik Etkin Liderlik Nitelikleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (11), 423-446.
  • Joo, B. K. B. (2010). Organizational commitment for knowledge workers: The roles of perceived organizational learning culture, leader–member exchange quality, and turnover intention. Human resource development quarterly, 21(1), 69-85.
  • Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., & Brymer, R. A. (1999). Antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment: A comparison of two scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(6), 976-994.
  • Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of applied psychology, 67(3), 341-349.
  • Katrinli, A., Atabay, G., Gunay, G., & Guneri, B. (2008). Leader–member exchange, organizational identification and the mediating role of job involvement for nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64(4), 354-362.
  • Katrinli, A., Atabay, G., Gunay, G., & Guneri, B. (2009). Exploring the antecedents of organizational identification: the role of job dimensions, individual characteristics and job involvement. Journal of nursing management,17(1), 66-73.
  • Kim, B. P., Lee, G., & Carlson, K. D. (2010). An examination of the nature of the relationship between Leader-Member-Exchange (LMX) and turnover intent at different organizational levels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 591-597.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3 rd ed.). Guilford publications.
  • Laschinger, H. K. S., Purdy, N., & Almost, J. (2007). The impact of leader-member exchange quality, empowerment, and core self-evaluation on nurse manager's job satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Administration, 37(5), 221-229.
  • Laschinger, H. K. S., Finegan, J., & Wilk, P. (2009). Context matters: The impact of unit leadership and empowerment on nurses' organizational commitment. Journal of Nursing Administration, 39(5), 228-235.
  • Lawrence, E. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (2012). Leader-member exchange and stress: The mediating role of job involvement and role conflict. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 14(1), 39-52.
  • Lee, J. (2001). Leader-member exchange, perceived organizational justice, and cooperative communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(4), 574-589.
  • Liao, C., & Lee, C. (2009). An empirical study of employee job involvement and personality traits: The case of Taiwan. International Journal of Economics and Management, 3(1), 22-36.
  • Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionafity of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of management, 24(1), 43-72.
  • Liu, Y., Loi, R., & Lam, L. W. (2011). Linking organizational identification and employee performance in teams: The moderating role of team-member exchange. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(15), 3187-3201.
  • Lodahl, T. M., & Kejnar, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of applied psychology, 49(1), 24-33.
  • Loi, R., Chan, K. W., & Lam, L. W. (2014). Leader–member exchange, organizational identification, and job satisfaction: A social identity perspective.Journal of Occupational and Organizational psychology, 87(1), 42-61.
  • Lu, Y., Shen, Y., & Zhao, L. (2015). Linking Psychological Contract Breach and Employee Outcomes in China: Does Leader-Member Exchange Make a Difference?. The Chinese Economy, 48(4), 297-308.
  • Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
  • Mallinckrodt, B., Abraham, W. T., Wei, M., & Russell, D. W. (2006). Advances in Testing the Statistical Significance of Mediation Effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 372-378.
  • Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological bulletin, 97(3), 562-582.
  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological methods, 7(1), 64-82.
  • Mete, E. S., Sökmen, A., & Biyik, Y. (2016). The Relationship between Organizational Commitment, Organizational Identification, Person-Organization Fit and Job Satisfaction: A Research on IT Employees. International Review of Management and Business Research, 5(3), 870-901.
  • Nunnally J C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill, p.701.
  • Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2009). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pan-Pacific Management Review, 12(2), 131-146.
  • Ouyang, Y., Cheng, C. H., & Hsieh, C. J. (2010). Does LMX enhance the job involvement of financial service personnel by the mediating roles. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 8(1), 174-181.
  • Paullay, I. M., Alliger, G. M., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of applied psychology, 79(2), 224-228.
  • Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2006). Leader–member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2), 264-279.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544.
  • Rabinowitz, S., Hall, D. T., & Goodale, J. G. (1977). Job scope and individual differences as predictors of job involvement: independent or interactive?.Academy of Management Journal, 20(2), 273-281.
  • Reitz, H. J., & Jewell, L. N. (1979). Sex, locus of control, and job involvement: A six-country investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 22(1), 72-80.
  • Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of vocational behavior, 66(2), 358-384.
  • Schneider, B., Hall, D. T., & Nygren, H. T. (1971). Self Image and Job Characteristics as Correlates of Changing Organizational Identification. Human Relations, 24(5), 397-416.
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Sluss, D. M., Klimchak, M., & Holmes, J. J. (2008). Perceived organizational support as a mediator between relational exchange and organizational identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 457-464.
  • Sollitto, M., Martin, M. M., Dusic, S., Gibbons, K. E., & Wagenhouser, A. (2016). Assessing the Supervisor-Subordinate Relationship Involving Part-Time Employees. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(1), 74-96.
  • Sonnentag, S., & Kruel, U. (2006). Psychological detachment from work during off-job time: The role of job stressors, job involvement, and recovery-related self-efficacy. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(2), 197-217.
  • Stephina, L. P., Perrewe, P. L., Hassell, B. L., Harris, J. R., & Mayfield, C. R. (1991). A Comparative Test of the Independant Effects of Interpersonal, Task, and Reward Domains on Personal and Organizational Outcomes. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(1), 93-104.
  • Stinglhamber, F., Marique, G., Caesens, G., Desmette, D., Hansez, I., Hanin, D., & Bertrand, F. (2015). Employees’ organizational identification and affective organizational commitment: An integrative approach. PloS one, 10(4), 1-23.
  • Sugawara, H. M., & MacCallum, R. C. (1993). Effect of estimation method on incremental fit indexes for covariance structure models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17(4), 365-377.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4 th ed.).Pearson Education Company.
  • Tajfel H, Turner JC. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin WG, editors. Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, pp. 7–24.
  • Tangirala, S., Green, S. G., & Ramanujam, R. (2007). In the shadow of the boss's boss: effects of supervisors' upward exchange relationships on employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 309-320.
  • Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Schie, E.C.M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 73(2), 137-147.
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Cropanzano, R., & Hartnell, C. A. (2009). Organizational justice, voluntary learning behavior, and job performance: A test of the mediating effects of identification and leader‐member exchange. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(8), 1103-1126.
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204-213.
APA Göksel A, EKMEKÇİOĞLU E (2016). LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ. , 721 - 747.
Chicago Göksel Aykut,EKMEKÇİOĞLU EMRE BURAK LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ. (2016): 721 - 747.
MLA Göksel Aykut,EKMEKÇİOĞLU EMRE BURAK LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ. , 2016, ss.721 - 747.
AMA Göksel A,EKMEKÇİOĞLU E LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ. . 2016; 721 - 747.
Vancouver Göksel A,EKMEKÇİOĞLU E LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ. . 2016; 721 - 747.
IEEE Göksel A,EKMEKÇİOĞLU E "LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ." , ss.721 - 747, 2016.
ISNAD Göksel, Aykut - EKMEKÇİOĞLU, EMRE BURAK. "LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ". (2016), 721-747.
APA Göksel A, EKMEKÇİOĞLU E (2016). LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3), 721 - 747.
Chicago Göksel Aykut,EKMEKÇİOĞLU EMRE BURAK LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 18, no.3 (2016): 721 - 747.
MLA Göksel Aykut,EKMEKÇİOĞLU EMRE BURAK LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.18, no.3, 2016, ss.721 - 747.
AMA Göksel A,EKMEKÇİOĞLU E LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 18(3): 721 - 747.
Vancouver Göksel A,EKMEKÇİOĞLU E LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016; 18(3): 721 - 747.
IEEE Göksel A,EKMEKÇİOĞLU E "LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ." Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, ss.721 - 747, 2016.
ISNAD Göksel, Aykut - EKMEKÇİOĞLU, EMRE BURAK. "LİDER-ÜYE ETKİLEŞİMİNİN ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME İLE İLİŞKİSİNDE İŞE BAĞLILIĞIN ARACI ROLÜ". Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 18/3 (2016), 721-747.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 10:35

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları