Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları

H Beyza CANBAZOĞLU, (Çukurova Üniversitesi)
Kamuran TARIM (Çukurova Üniversitesi)
İlköğretim Online (elektronik)
2 1
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1919 - 1937 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365 İndeks Tarihi: 09-04-2020

Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları

Öz:
Çalışmanın amacı; sınıf öğretmenlerinin ve sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematiksel dil becerilerineilişkin farkındalıklarını belirlemektir. Araştırmanın modeli nitel araştırma desenlerinden durumçalışması olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu sınıf öğretmeni ve sınıf öğretmeni adaylarıoluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri “Yapılandırılmış Görüş Alma Formu” ve görüşmeler yoluyla eldeedilmiştir. Araştırmanın verilerinin analizinde betimsel analiz yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Sınıföğretmenlerinin ve sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematiksel dil becerilerine ilişkin farkındalıklarınınbelirlenmesine yönelik yapılan görüşmeler sonucunda, öğretmen ve öğretmen adayları çeşitli görüşlerdebulunmuşlardır. Öğretmenler ve öğretmen adayları matematiğin kendine özgü bir dili olduğunu,matematiği ve matematiksel problemleri anlama sürecinde dilin bir araç olduğunu, matematiği vematematiksel problemleri anlamak ve öğrencilere aktarabilmek için matematik ve dil arasında bir ilişkiolduğunu ifade etmişlerdir. Araştırmanın önemli bulgularından bir diğeri ise öğretmen adaylarınınilkokul matematik öğretim programında yer alan matematiksel yetkinlik ve özel amaçlar konusunda bilgisahibi olmamalarının belirlenmesidir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Matematik

The Awareness of the Language of Mathematical Skills of Primary School Teachers and Pre-Service Primary School Teachers

Öz:
The aim of this study is to determine the awareness of primary school teachers and pre-service primary school teachers about their mathematical language skills. The model of the research was determined as a case study of qualitative research designs. The study group of the research consisted of primary school teachers and pre-service primary school teachers. The data of the study was obtained through the Interview Form and interviews. Descriptive analysis method was used to analyze the data of the study. As a result of the interviews conducted in order to determine the awareness of the teachers about the mathematical language skills, the teachers and pre-service teachers made various opinions. Teachers and pre-service teachers stated that mathematics is a language of its own, that language is a tool in understanding mathematics and mathematical problems, and that there is a relationship between mathematics and language to understand mathematics and mathematical problems. Another important finding of the study is to determine the lack of knowledge of the prospective teachers about the mathematical competence and special aims in the primary school mathematics curriculum.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Matematik
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • An, S., Kulm, G. & Wu, Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school mathematics teachers in China and the US. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 145–172.
  • Andrews, P., Ryve, A., Hemmi, K., & Sayers, J. (2014). PISA, TIMSS and Finnish mathematics teaching: An enigma in search of an explanation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(1), 7-26.
  • Bailey, A. L., Blackstock-Bernstein, A., & Heritage, M. (2015). At the intersection of mathematics and language: Examining mathematical strategies and explanations by grade and English learner status. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 6-28.
  • Baki, A. (2014). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik eğitimi. Ankara: Harf Eğitim Yayıncılığı.
  • Barnas, B., Sumarmo, U., & Syaban, M. (2018). The role of SQ3R strategy on mathematical communication ability and self regulated learning of seventh grade student. JIML-Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 1(3), 248-255.
  • Baroody. A. J. (1993). Problem solving, reasoning and communicating. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.
  • Barwell, R. (2008). Discourse mathematics and mathematics education. New York: Springer.
  • Bray, W. S. (2011). A collective case study of the influence of teachers' beliefs and knowledge on errorhandling practices during class discussion of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(1), 2-38.
  • Brendefur, J., & Frykholm, J. (2000). Promoting mathematical communication in the classroom: Two preservice teachers' conceptions and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(2), 125-153.
  • Brethouwer, J. (2008). Vocabulary instruction as a tool for helping students of diverse backgrounds and ability levels to understand mathematical concepts. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
  • Brodie, K. (1989). Learning mathematics in a second language. Educational review, 41(1), 39-15.
  • Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (2011). Becoming a mathematics teacher: Identity and identifications. London, UK: Springer.
  • Chapin, S. H., O'Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, grades k-6. sausalito. CA: Math Solutions.
  • Chapman, O. (2015). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge for teaching problem solving. LUMAT (2013–2015 Issues), 3(1), 19-36.
  • Chard, D. (2003). Vocabulary strategies for the mathematics classroom. Houghton Mifflin Math.
  • Cobb, P., Wood, T. & Yackel, E. (1994). Discourse, mathematical thinking and classroom practice. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick & C. Addison Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cockburn, A, (2007). Mathematical understanding. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  • Cooke, B. D., & Buchholz, D. (2005). Mathematical communication in the classroom: A teacher makes a difference. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(6), 365-369.
  • Craig, T., & Morgan, C. (2015). Language and Communication in Mathematics Education. In The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 529-533). Springer, Cham.
  • Dahlan, J. A. (2011). Mathematical curriculum analysis. Jakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Terbuka.
  • Dubinsky, E. (2000). Meaning and formalism in mathematics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5, 211–240.
  • Education and Manpower Bureau of the HKSAR. (2005). The New Academic Structure for Senior Secondary Education and Higher Education–Action Plan for Investing in the Future of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
  • Fajriah, N., Hartono, R., & Sari, A. (2016). Lower secondary school student’s written mathematical communication based on gender. Multidisciplinary Studies for Social Science and Humanities, 3, 87-91.
  • Franke, M. L., & Kazemi, E. (2001). Learning to teach mathematics: Focus on student thinking. Theory into practice, 40(2), 102-109.
  • Franke, M.L., Webb, N.W, Chan, A.G., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students' mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60 (4), 380-392.
  • Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1–2), 127–135.
  • Gomez, K., Gomez, L. M., Rodela, K. C., Horton, E. S., Cunningham, J., & Ambrocio, R. (2015). Embedding language support in developmental mathematics lessons: Exploring the value of design as professional development for community college mathematics instructors. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(5), 450-465.
  • Gray, V. D. (2004). The language of mathematics: A functional definition and the development of an instrument to measure teacher perceived self-efficacy. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Oregon State University, Oregon, OR.
  • Hiebert, J., Stigler, J. W., Jacobs, J. K., Givvin, K. B., Garnier, H., Smith, M., & Gallimore, R. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 111-132.
  • Jamison, R. E. (2000). Learning the language of mathematics. Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, 4, 45-54.
  • Kabael, T., & Baran, A. A. (2016). Matematik öğretmenlerinin matematiksel iletişim becerilerinin gelişimine yönelik farkındalıklarının incelenmesi. İlkogretim Online, 15(3), 868-881.
  • Kranda, J. (2008). Precise mathematical language: Exploring the relationship between student vocabulary understanding and student achievement. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
  • Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Martinez, J. G. R. (2001). Thinking and writing mathematically: Achilles and the tortoise as an algebraic word problem. Mathematics Teacher, 94(4), 248-252.
  • Matteson, S. (2006). Mathematical literacy and standardized mathematical assessments. Reading Psychology, 27, 205–233.
  • McVey, M. K. (2000). Mathematics exemplary assessment strategies: Review of the literature. Ottowa: The Network For Educational Leaders.
  • Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507-528.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2016). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. California: Sage Publications.
  • Ministry of Education Singapore. (2019). Retrieved from http://www.moe.edu.sg
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology-Japan. (2019). Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/en/
  • Monroe, P., & Orme, M. (2002). Developing mathematical vocabulary. Preventing School Failure, 46, 139-142.
  • Morgan, C. (2011). Communicating mathematically. In S. Johnston-Wilder, P. Johnston-Wilder, D. Pimm & C. Lee (Eds.), Learning to teach mathematics in the secondary school (pp. 146-161). London: Routledge.
  • Mullen, J. (2009). Enhancing mathematical literacy. Mathematical and Computing Sciences Masters.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  • National Middle School Association (2004). Position paper of the National Middle School Association middle level curriculum: A work in progress. Westerville, OH: NMSA.
  • Ndlovu, M., & Mji, A. (2012). Pedagogical implications of students misconception about deductive geometric proof. Acta Academica. 44(3), 175-205.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development [OECD] (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. PISA: OECD.
  • Özerem, A. (2012). Misconceptions in geometry and suggested solutions for seventh grade students. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 1(4), 23-35.
  • Pape, S. J., Bell, C. V., & Yetkin, İ. E. (2003). Developing mathematical thinking and self-regulated learning: A teaching experiment in a seventh-grade mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53(3), 179-202.
  • Pimm, D. (1991). Communicating mathematically. Language in mathematical education: Research and practice. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Prahmana, R. C. I., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2016). The hypothetical learning trajectory on research in mathematics education using research-based learning. Pedagogika, 123(3), 42-54.
  • Prahmana, R.C.I., Kusumah, Y.S. and Darhim. (2017). Didactic trajectory of research in mathematics education using research-based learning. The Asian Mathematical Conference 2016 (AMC 2016): IOP Publishing.
  • Raiker, A. (2002). Spoken Language and mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32 (1), 45-60.
  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.
  • Riccomini, P. J., Smith, G. W., Hughes, E. M., & Fries, K. M. (2015). The language of mathematics: The importance of teaching and learning mathematical vocabulary. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(3), 235-252.
  • Rickard, A. (2014). Unpacking middle school students’; ideas about perimeter: A case study of mathematical discourse in the classroom. Mathematics Educator, 23(2), 60–87.
  • Sari, D. M. (2017). Analysis of students’ mathematical communication ability by using cooperative learning talking stick type. Infinity Journal, 6(2), 183-194.
  • Schmidt, W., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum. American Education. Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
  • Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), 13-57.
  • Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses and mathematizing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Silver, D. S. (2017). The new language of mathematics. American Scientist, 105(6), 364-371.
  • Simpson, A., & Cole, M. W. (2015). More than words: A literature review of language of mathematics research. Educational Review, 67(3), 369-384.
  • Soemarmo, U. D., & Hendriana, H. (2014). Mathematics education assessment. Bandung, Indonesia: Refika Aditama.
  • Sumarmo, U. (2013). Kumpulan Makalah Berpikir dan Disposisi Matematik serta Pembelajarannya. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.
  • Sundayana, R., Herman, T., Dahlan, J. A., & Prahmana, R. C. (2017). Using ASSURE learning design to develop students’ mathematical communication ability. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(3), 245-249.
  • Suryabrata, S. (2002). Educational Psychology. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
  • Susanto, A. (2015). Primary school learning and teaching theory. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri.
  • Taiwan Ministry of Education (2013). Grade 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines Mathematics. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
  • Tall, D. (2008). The transition to formal thinking in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 5–24.
  • Tinungki, G.M. (2015). The role of cooperative learning type team assisted individualization to improve the students’ mathematics communication ability in the subject of probability theory. Journal of Education and Practice, 6 (32), 27-31.
  • Widodo, S. A., Purnami, A. S., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Team accelerated instruction, initials and problem-solves ability in junior high school. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(2), 193-204.
  • Yang, X. (2013). Investigation of junior secondary students’ perceptions of mathematics classroom learning environments in China. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(3), 273-284.
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Yin, R. K. (2017). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
APA CANBAZOĞLU H, TARIM K (2019). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları. , 1919 - 1937. 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
Chicago CANBAZOĞLU H Beyza,TARIM KAMURAN Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları. (2019): 1919 - 1937. 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
MLA CANBAZOĞLU H Beyza,TARIM KAMURAN Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları. , 2019, ss.1919 - 1937. 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
AMA CANBAZOĞLU H,TARIM K Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları. . 2019; 1919 - 1937. 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
Vancouver CANBAZOĞLU H,TARIM K Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları. . 2019; 1919 - 1937. 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
IEEE CANBAZOĞLU H,TARIM K "Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları." , ss.1919 - 1937, 2019. 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
ISNAD CANBAZOĞLU, H Beyza - TARIM, KAMURAN. "Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları". (2019), 1919-1937. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
APA CANBAZOĞLU H, TARIM K (2019). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 18(4), 1919 - 1937. 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
Chicago CANBAZOĞLU H Beyza,TARIM KAMURAN Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları. İlköğretim Online (elektronik) 18, no.4 (2019): 1919 - 1937. 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
MLA CANBAZOĞLU H Beyza,TARIM KAMURAN Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), vol.18, no.4, 2019, ss.1919 - 1937. 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
AMA CANBAZOĞLU H,TARIM K Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 2019; 18(4): 1919 - 1937. 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
Vancouver CANBAZOĞLU H,TARIM K Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 2019; 18(4): 1919 - 1937. 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
IEEE CANBAZOĞLU H,TARIM K "Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları." İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 18, ss.1919 - 1937, 2019. 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
ISNAD CANBAZOĞLU, H Beyza - TARIM, KAMURAN. "Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin ve Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematiksel Dil Becerilerine İlişkin Farkındalıkları". İlköğretim Online (elektronik) 18/4 (2019), 1919-1937. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.639365
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 11:11

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları