Freedom of speech in parliament shall enjoy an elevated level of protection because ofthe fundamental role that the parliament plays in a democratic society. Different forms of parliamentary immunities may serve to protect this freedom. But disciplinary powers o of parliaments are not included in the concept ofparliamentary immunity. Each parliament may regulate its own disciplinary measures to function effectively. Thus, the Rule of Procedure of GANT provide for three type of disciplinary penalties against deputies such as call to order/warning, reprimand and temporary exclusion from the assembly. The power to decide and execute the penalty ofcall to order is at the discretion ofthe Speaker. And, the Plenary decides on penalties of reprimand or temporary exclusion from the assembly upon the proposal ofthe Speaker. According to Venice Commission, disciplinary penalties for deputies are appropriate as long as they are legitimately justified and proportionate and not misused by the parliamentary majority to violate the rights and freedoms ofpolitical opponents. Although ECtHR can examine whether there has been a violation, in Turkish law, there is lack of a judicial remedy for these sanctions. The Constitutional Court may examine the dispositions of the Rules of Procedure only in abstracto. This study aims to analyze the regulations on disciplinary penalties since 1877 and their applications since 1982 in order to demonstrate the need for a judicial remedy at national level.