Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi

Serpil Çiğdem (Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi, Sapanca Meslek Yüksek Okulu, Pazarlama Ve Reklamcılık Bölümü, Sakarya, Türkiye)
Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi
17 6
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 77 Sayfa Aralığı: 157 - 199 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 18-06-2020

Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Çalışma hayatı, son yıllarda büyük bir değişim sürecine girmiştir. Endüstri 4.0 ile birlikte dijital teknolojilerinçalışma hayatına etkisi giderek daha fazla hissedilmektedir. Bu kapsamda, ILO’nun Ekim 2017’de çalışmalarınabaşlattığı “işin geleceği” girişimi, iş ve çalışma yaşamındaki değişimi ve ihtiyaç duyulan çözümleri ortayakoymayı hedefleyen önemli çalışmalardan biridir. En son Kasım 2018’de gerçekleşen toplantıyla dört kezbir araya gelen İşin Geleceği Küresel Komisyonu, 2019’daki 108. Uluslararası Çalışma Konferansında işingeleceğine ilişkin raporun içeriğini açıklamıştır. Bu kapsamda iş dünyasında gerçekleşen dönüşümlerden biridijital emek platformlarının ya da gig ekonomisinin giderek büyümesi olmuştur. 2015’ten bu yana dijitalplatformlar üzerine çalışmalar yapan ILO’nun Ekim 2018’de yayımladığı “Dijital Emek Platformları ve İşinGeleceği” adlı rapor, İşin Geleceği Küresel Komisyonu’nun girişimlerini desteklemek için hazırlanmış önemliçalışmalardan biridir.Bu çalışma, ILO’nun işin geleceğine ilişkin gerçekleştirdiği tematik tartışmalardan değişen iş organizasyonlarıtemelinde, dijital emek platformları ve yeni kendi hesabına çalışma biçimlerinin yükselişini konuedinmektedir. Aynı zamanda insana yakışır iş kavramının bileşenleri olan istihdam, çalışma yaşamına ilişkintemel haklar, sosyal koruma ve sosyal diyalog çerçevesinde dijital emek platformlarının analizi yapılmayaçalışılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonunda insana yakışır iş açısından en sorunlu alanlardan birinin gig çalışanlarolduğu görülmüştür. Gig ekonomisinde son yıllarda belirgin bir büyüme görülmesine rağmen emek haklarıüzerindeki etkisi büyük ölçüde göz ardı edilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Industry 4.0 and an Evaluation of Digital Labor Platforms in the Context of Decent Work

Öz:
Working life has undergone a major change in recent years. With Industry 4.0, the impact of digital technologies on work is increasingly felt. In this context, ILO’s “Future of Work ” initiative, begun in October 2017, is an important study aimed at revealing these changes in work and working lives and the solutions needed. The Global Commission for the Future of Work, which met four times at the meeting held last November 2018, announced the content of the report on the future of work at the 108th International Labor Conference in 2019. In this context, one of the transformations in the business world has been the growth of digital labor platforms or the gig economy. The ILO has been working on work platforms since 2015, and the report Digital Labor Platforms and the Future of Work, published in October 2018, is one of the most important publications prepared to support the initiatives of the Global Commission for the Future of Work. This study focuses on the rise of digital labor platforms and new forms of self-employment with a view to changing business organizations following the thematic discussions ILO has held on the future of work. At the same time, digital labor platforms were analyzed within the framework of employment, fundamental rights of working life, social protection and social dialogue which are the components of the decent work concept. At the end of the study, gig employees were found to work within one of the most problematic areas in terms of decent work. Although the Gig economy has seen significant growth in recent years, its impact on labor rights is largely underestimated.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
0
0
0
  • Aleksynska, M., Berg, J., Foden, D., Johnston, H., Parent-Thirion, A., & Vanderleyden, J. (2019). Working Conditions in a Global Perspective. ILO–Eurofound. Doi: 10.2806/870542
  • Anker, R., Chernyshev, I., Egger, P., Mehran, F., & Ritter, J. (2002). Measuring Decent Work with Statistical Indicators (No. 2). Geneva.
  • Arkan, Ç. (2016). Thoughts on Global Workforce Transformation in the Industry 4.0 Era. https://news.microsoft.com/uploads/2017/02/Thoughts-on-global-workforcetransformation- in-the-Industry-4.0-era.pdf
  • Athanasou, J. A. (2010). Decent work and its ımplications for careers. Australian Journal of Career Development, 19(1), 36–44. Doi: 10.1177/103841621001900108
  • Bauer, C, & Wee, D. (2015). Manufacturing’s Next Act. McKinsey & Company, https:// www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/manufacturings-nextact. Erişim Tarihi:25/08/2019
  • Berg, J. (2016). Income Security in the On-Demand Economy: Findings and Policy Lessons from a Survey of Crowdworkers. Conditions of work and employment series no. 74 .International Labour Office.Geneva.
  • Berg, J. M., Furrer, M., Harmon, E., Rani, U. & Silberman, M. S. (2018). Digital Labour Platforms and The Future of Work: Towards Decent Work in the Online World. International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/- --dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_645337.pdf
  • Bergvall‐Kåreborn, B. & Howcroft D. (2014). Amazon mechanical Turk and the commodification of labour. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(3), 213–223.
  • Boulin, J. Y., Lallement, M., Messenger, J. C., & Michon, F. (2006). Decent Working Time : New Trends, New İssues. Geneva.
  • Bowles, P., & MacPhail, F. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on pathways from casual work to economic security: Canadian and international perspectives. Social Indicators Research, 88, 1–13
  • Brancati, C. U., & Fernández-Macías, E. (2019). Digital Labour Platforms in Europe : Numbers , Profiles and Employment Status of Platform Workers. Luxembourg.
  • Burtch, G., Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B. N. (2016). Can You Gig It? An Empirical Examination of the Gig-Economy and Entrepreneurial Activity. Papers.ssrn.com, 44.
  • Buschoff, K. S., & Schmidt, C. (2009). Adapting labour law and social security to the needs of the “New self-employed”– comparing the UK , Germany and the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(2), 147–159. Doi: 10.1177/0958928708101867
  • Byrne, A., & Waters, R. (2015). New world of work: Digital marketplace reshapes casual labour. Financial Times, August 5. https://www.ft.com/content/6a23a27c-3500-11e5- b05b-b01debd57852. Erişim Tarihi:08/11/2019.
  • Cappelli, P., & Keller, J. R. (2013). Classifying Work in the New Economy. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 575–596.
  • Castells, M. (2008) Enformasyon çağı: Ekonomi, toplum ve kültür. Ağ toplumunun yükselişi (1 cilt, 2. bs), İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Clinton, M., Totterdell, P., & Wood, S. (2006). A grounded theory of portfolio working experiencing the smallest of small businesses. International Small Business Journal, 24(2), 179–203. Doi: 10.1177/0266242606061843.
  • Cohen, L., & Mallon, M. (1999). The transition from organisational employment to portfolio working: Perceptions of “Boundarylessness.” Work. Employment&Society, 13, 329–352.
  • Cherry, M. (2009). Working for (virtually) minimum wage: Applying the fair labor standards act in cyberspace. Alabama Law Review, 60(5), 1077–1110.
  • Dallı, C. M. (2013). Gereksiz İşler Olgusu Üzerine. http://www.birikimdergisi.com/guncelyazilar/ 918/gereksiz-isler-olgusu-uzerine#.W7DCumgzbIU Erişim Tarihi:02/08/2019.
  • De Groen, W. P., & Maselli, I. (2016). The Impact of the Collaborative Economy on the Labour Market, CEPS Special Report, N. 138.
  • De Groen, W., Maselli, I., & Fabo, B. (2016). The Digital Market for Local Services: A one-Night Stand for Workers? An Example from the On-demand Economy. An Example from the On-Demand Economy. CEPS Special Report, (133).
  • De Silva, L., Millett, A. W., Rotondi, D. M., Sullivan, W. F., Fischer, E., & Sillings, M. (2000). Independent Contractors: Prevalence and Implications for Unemployment Insurance Programs. Planmatics.
  • De Stefano, V. (2016). The Rise Of The « Just-İn-Time Workforce »: On-Demand Work , Crowdwork And Labour Protection İn The « Gig-Economy ». Geneva. Ducharme, L. M., Arslanalp, S., Goksu, B., Kostroch, D., Carlos Moreno-Ramirez, J.,
  • Martins, M., & Jamasali, J. K. (2018). Measuring the digital economy. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
  • Durward, D., Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Crowd work. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(4), 281–286.
  • Eberhard, B., Pérez Alonso, A., Radovica, E., Avotina L., Peiseniece L., Caamaño Sendon M., & Joan Solé-Pla. (2017. Smart work: The transformation of the labour market due to the fourth ındustrial revolution (I4.0). International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 10(3), 47–66.
  • Erdoğan, E. ve Çiğdem, S. (2018) Gig Ekonomisi ve Freelance İşgücünün Yükselişi: Freelancer. Com Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirme. Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Seçme yazılar-II, 229.
  • Eurofound. (2015). New Forms of Employment Eurofound New Forms of Employment. European Foundation For The Improvement Of Living And Working Conditions. Dublin.
  • Fabo, B., Karanovic, J., & Dukova, K. (2017). In search of an adequate policy response to the platform economy. Transfer, 23(2), 163–175.
  • Farrell, L. (2006). Making Knowledge common: Literacy and knowledge at work. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Felstinerf, A. (2011). Working the crowd : Employment and labor law in the crowdsourcing ındustry. Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 32(1), 143–204. Doi: 10.15779/Z38Z92X
  • Freelancers Union&Elance-oDesk . (2017). Freelancing in America: A National Survey of the New Workforce. Frenken, K. (2016). Sustainability Perspectives on the Sharing Economy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23(Kasım), 1–2.
  • Friedman, G. C. (2014). Workers without employers : Shadow corporations and the rise of the Gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171–88. Doi: 10.4337/ roke.2014.02.03
  • Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M., (2013). The Future of Employment: Education, How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerization?, OxfordUniversity, http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/ downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 28/08/2019
  • Fudge, J., Tucker, E., & Vosko, L. (2002). The Legal Concept of Employment: Marginalizing Workers.
  • Garben, S. (2017). Protecting Workers in the Online Platform Economy : An Overview of Regulatory and Policy Developments in the EU. Luxembourg.
  • Ghai, D. (2003). Decent work: Concept and indicators. International Labour Review, 142(2).
  • GMB (2019). A New Year Resolution For Uber, https://www.gmb.org.uk/long-read/newyear- resolution-uber. Erişim Tarihi:05/11/2019.
  • Green, D. D., Walker, C., Alabulththim, A., Smith, D., & Phillips, M. (2018). Fueling the gig economy: A case study evaluation of Upwork.com. Management and Economics Research Journal, 04(Nisan), 104.
  • Hatfield, I. (2015). Self-Employment in Europe.
  • Heeks, R. (2017). Digital Economy and Digital Labour Terminology: Making Sense of the “Gig Economy”, “Online Labour”, “Crowd Work”, “Microwork”, “Platform Labour”, Etc (No. Paper No. 70 Digital).
  • Heinrich, M. (2019). INDUSTRY 4 . 0 : How İt Will Affect Employment And What Skills Will Be Required to Match The Requirements of The Market.
  • Hermann, M., Otto, B., & Pentek, T. (2015). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review (Working Paper: No. 01 / 2015 Design). Dortmund.
  • Huws, U., Spencer, N. H., & Syrdal, D. S. (2017). Work in the European GIG Economy: Research results from the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Italy.
  • ILO (1999). Decent Work, International Labour Conferance 87th Session 1999, Report Of The Director General, Geneva.
  • ILO (2008). Measurement of Decent Work.eneva. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/ public/-dgreports/--integration/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_098027.pdf
  • ILO (2012). Decent Work Indicators-Concepts and Definitions, International Labour Organizations, First Edition, Genava
  • ILO. (2015a). World Employment Social Outlook: The Changing Nature of Jobs. Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/--- publ/documents/publication/wcms_368626.pdf
  • ILO. (2015b). Non-standard forms of employment. Geneva.
  • ILO. (2016). Non-Standard Employment Around The World:Understanding Challenges, Shaping Prospects. Genea.
  • ILO (2018) . Job Quality in the Platform Economy. 2nd Meeting of the Global Commission on the Future of Work.Geneva.
  • ILO. (2019). World Employment Social Outlook: Trends 2019. Geneva.
  • INTERNATIONAL FEREDARION of ROBOTICS (2016), World Robotics Report 2016, https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/world-robotics-report-2016 Erişim Tarihi: 05/11/2019.
  • IPSE. (2017). Exploring the Rise Of Self-Employment in the Modern Economy. London.
  • Işığıçok, Ö. (2005). XXI. yüzyılda istihdam ve insana yakışır İş. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
  • ITU. (2017). ICT Facts and Figures 2017. Geneva. http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/ Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2017.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 02/08/2019.
  • Johnston, H., & Land-Kazlauskas, C. (2018). Organizing on-demand: Representation, voice, and collective bargaining in the Gig economy. International Labour Office, 94, 54. Doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.12235.90400
  • Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 341–365.
  • Kemp, S. (2018). Digital in 2018: World’s Internet Users Pass the 4 Billion Mark. We are Social.
  • Kemp, S. (2019). Digital in 2019: Global Internet Use Accelerates. We are Social.
  • Kuhn, P. J., & Schuetze, H. J. (2001). Self-Employment dynamics and self-employment trends: A study of canadian men and women, 1982-1998. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D’économique, 34(3), 760–784.
  • Kuhn K. M., & Maleki A. (2017). Micro-entrepreneurs, dependent contractors, and ınstaserfs: understanding online labor platform workforces. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3), 183–200.
  • Kuzgun, İ. (2004). Türkiye’de esnek istihdam biçimlerinin düzenlenmesi. H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), 17–31.
  • Lehdonvirta, V., Kässi, O., Hjorth, I., Barnard, H., & Graham, M. (2019). The global platform economy: A new offshoring ınstitution enabling emerging-economy microproviders. Journal of Management, 45(2), 567–599.
  • Moore, A. (2018). Gig ? Sharing ? The Changing Workplace And The New Self-Employed Economy, (May). https://reason.org/wp-. Erişim Tarihi: 3/10/2019.
  • Muntaner, C. (2018). Digital platforms, gig economy, precarious employment, and the invisible hand of social class. International Journal of Health Services, 48(4), 597– 600. Doi: 10.1177/0020731418801413
  • OECD (2017). OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris. Doi: 10.1787/9789264276284-en
  • Öztuna, B. (2017), “Endüstri 4.0: Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi ile Çalışma Yaşamının Geleceği”, Ankara, Gece Kitaplığı.
  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Politicizing contingent work: Countering neoliberal labor market regulation...from the bottom up?, South Atlantic Quarterly 111(4), 741–761.
  • Pesole, A., Urzí Brancati, M. ., Fernández-Macías, E., Biagi, F., & González Vázquez, I. (2018). Platform Workers in Europe. EUR29275 EN, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Doi: 10.2760/742789.
  • Pintaldi, F. (2008). Non-standard and Informal Employment in Italy. Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing, 1–5. http://www.wiego.org/sites/default/ files/publications/files/Pintaldi_Informal_empl_Italy.pdf
  • Rüßmann, M., & ark. (2015). Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity And Growth in Manufacturing Industries. Boston Consulting Group (BCG), pp.1-14.
  • Platman, K. (2004). “Portfolio careers” and the search for flexibility in later life. Work, Employment&Society, 18(3), 573–599. Doi: 10.1177/0950017004045551
  • Ravenelle, A. J. (2017). Sharing economy workers: Selling, not sharing. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(2), 281–295. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsw043
  • Rogers, B. (2016). Employment rights in the platform economy : Getting back to basics. Harv. L. & Pol’y Rev., 10, 479.
  • Said, C. 2015. “Growing Voices Say Gig Workers Need Protections, Benefits”, SFGate, http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Growing-voices-say-gig- workers-needprotections- 6079992.php (02/05/2018).
  • Santos, B. P., Charrua-Santos, F. ve Lima, T. M. (2018). Industry 4.0: An overview. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, 2236(July), 1–7.
  • Schmidt, F. A. (2017). Digital Labour Markets in the Platform Economy. Mapping the Political Challenges of Crowd Work and Gig Work. Freidrich Ebert Stiftung.
  • Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
  • Siberman, M. S. ve Harmon, E. (2017). Rating Working Conditions in Digital Labor Platforms. Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work - Exploratory Papers, Reports of the European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies. http://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2017-to-be-added
  • Smith, R.ve Leberstein, S. 2015. Rights on Demand: Ensuring Workplace Standards and Worker Security in the On-Demand Economy. National Employment Law Project. New York.
  • Stefano, V. D. E. (2016). The Rise of The « Just-in-Time Workforce »: On-Demand Work , Crowdwork And Labour Protection in the « Gig-Economy ». Geneva.
  • Taeihagh, A. (2017). Crowdsourcing, sharing economies and development. Journal of Developing Societies, 33(2), 191–222. Doi: 10.1177/0169796X17710072
  • Tucker, D. (2002). “Precarious” Non-Standard Employment – A Review of the Literature . Wellington. www.lmpg.dol.govt.nz
  • Upwork&Freelancers Union. (2017). Freelancing in America: 2017.
  • Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S. (2018). Industry 4.0 – A Glimpse. Procedia Manufacturing, 20(1), 233–238.
  • Von Broembsen, M. (2012). People want to work, yet most have to labour: Towards decent work in South African supply chains. Law, Democracy & Development, 16(1), 1–28.
  • Vuksanović, D., Ugarak, J., & Korčok, D. (2016). Industry 4.0: The future concepts and new visions of factory of the future development, 293–298. Doi: 10.15308/ sinteza-2016-293-298
  • World Bank. (2006). Doing Business in 2006: Creating Jobs. Washington DC. https:// openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7421. Erişim Tarihi: 02/09/2019.
  • World Bank. (2015). Global Opportunity in Online Outsourcing. http://documents. worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/06/24702763/global-opportunity-online-outsourcing
  • World Economic Forum. (2016). The Future of Jobs - Reports - World Economic Forum. Research Report, (January), 12. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/thefuture- of-jobs-report-2018
  • World Economic Forum. (2018). The Future of Jobs 2018. Executive Summary.
  • Youssra, R., & Sara, R. (2018). Big data and big data analytics: Concepts, types and technologies. Int J Res Eng, 5(9), 524–528.
  • http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ik-yeni-ekonomi/sirketler-z-kusagi-kapinizda-29575932
APA ÇİĞDEM S (2019). Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. , 157 - 199.
Chicago ÇİĞDEM SERPİL Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. (2019): 157 - 199.
MLA ÇİĞDEM SERPİL Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. , 2019, ss.157 - 199.
AMA ÇİĞDEM S Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. . 2019; 157 - 199.
Vancouver ÇİĞDEM S Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. . 2019; 157 - 199.
IEEE ÇİĞDEM S "Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi." , ss.157 - 199, 2019.
ISNAD ÇİĞDEM, SERPİL. "Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi". (2019), 157-199.
APA ÇİĞDEM S (2019). Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 0(77), 157 - 199.
Chicago ÇİĞDEM SERPİL Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi 0, no.77 (2019): 157 - 199.
MLA ÇİĞDEM SERPİL Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, vol.0, no.77, 2019, ss.157 - 199.
AMA ÇİĞDEM S Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi. 2019; 0(77): 157 - 199.
Vancouver ÇİĞDEM S Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi. 2019; 0(77): 157 - 199.
IEEE ÇİĞDEM S "Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi." Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 0, ss.157 - 199, 2019.
ISNAD ÇİĞDEM, SERPİL. "Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijital Emek Platformlarının İnsana Yakışır İş Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi". Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi 77 (2019), 157-199.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 12:16

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları